4.4 ERMUSR 06-03-2025______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 1
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
TO:
ERMU Commission
FROM:
Tony Mauren – Governance & Communications Manager
MEETING DATE:
June 3, 2025
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
4.4
SUBJECT:
Dispute Resolution Committee Appointment
ACTION REQUESTED:
Appoint by motion a member of the Commission to the Dispute Resolution Committee
BACKGROUND:
ERMU Policy G.2g4 – Dispute Resolution Committee Charter establishes the membership of the
body as consisting of, in part, two ERMU Commissioners. With the departure of Commissioner
Bell, a replacement should be appointed.
DISCUSSION:
Current committee appointments are the following:
Wage & Benefits Committee – John Dietz – Chair and Mary Stewart
Financial Reserves & Investment Committee – Matt Westgaard – Chair and Nick Zerwas
Information Security Committee – Mary Stewart – Chair
Dispute Resolution Committee – Matt Westgaard – Chair and Vacant
ATTACHMENTS:
• ERMU Policy - G.2g4 - Dispute Resolution Committee Charter
139
Page 1 of 3
COMMISSION POLICY
Section: Category:
Governance Governance Policies
Policy Reference: Policy Title:
G.2g4 Dispute Resolution Committee Charter
PURPOSE:
The Dispute Resolution Committee exists to provide customers an alternative dispute resolution
option for circumstances which: require action beyond the authority assigned through the
Delegation to Management Policies; require policy creation, revision, or exception; have
exhausted the established utilities procedures and/or protocol; and involves customer protected
data for which the customer prefers addressing the issue through a meeting closed to the public.
For qualifying customer disputes, the Committee will provide: an informal hearing in
accordance with Open Meeting Law allowing the customers to communicate the concern; recess
and reconvene as needed to conduct appropriate research and/or deliberate; make a
determination within parameters established through the Commission Policies and within the
authorities delegated through this policy; and report and/or make recommendations to the
Commission as required.
MEMBERSHIP:
The Committee shall be comprised of five members, three appointed annually and two which vary
with each dispute. The three members appointed annually shall include two Commissioners and
the General Manager. At no time shall there be a quorum of the Commission on the Committee.
The Committee shall also include the director and the manager most directly involved in the
dispute.
The Commission shall appoint Committee members annually following the Commission election
of officers during the March Regular Commission meeting. The Commission shall also appoint
the Committee Chair at that time.
ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR:
The primary role of the Committee Chair is to run the Committee meetings. The Committee will
adhere to the Current edition of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised for all situations to
which they are applicable and are not inconsistent with ERMU’s bylaws, policies, and any
140
Page 2 of 3
ERMU Commission Policy – G.2g4 Dispute Resolution Committee Charter
special rules of order that the Commission may adopt.
AUTHORITY:
Except as established in this Committee Charter, the authority of the Committee is limited to the
purpose of dispute resolution within the authorities delegated to management through the
Commission Policies, research related to customer disputes or complaints, and recommendations to
the Commission. The Committee, at the discretion and through formal action of the Commission,
may be empowered beyond the role as outlined in this policy such that it is consistent with the
Organizational Core Purpose policies and the Commission Committees policy.
SPECIFIC DUTIES:
1. After a formal request is submitted for a qualifying customer dispute, the
Committee will schedule a hearing, either in person or virtual, within a reasonable
amount of time.
2. Through the hearing, the Committee will allow the customer to communicate
relevant information and request dispute resolution which may require policy
creation, revision, or exemption.
3. The Committee is required to verify all information and data; and the Committee will
review the Customer’s account history and other relevant information.
4. And as needed, the Committee shall research industry best practices related to the dispute.
5. The Committee is authorized to engage legal counsel for legal review and
recommendations.
6. The Committee will make a determination whether resolution can be provided within the
authorities assigned through this policy; and if so, the Committee will provide written
summary of the dispute and the authorized resolution for implementation by management.
7. When no action is taken by the Committee toward resolution, the Committee will determine
whether the request warrants further consideration by the Commission, in which case the
Committee will present a summary of the dispute to the Commission and a make
recommendation. In the event that no action is taken by the Committee, and the Committee
has determined that the dispute does not warrant further consideration or advancement to
the Commission, the Committee shall summarize their finding in a report to be provide to
the customer and placed on file.
8. The Committee shall record minutes of all Committee meetings. Committee meeting
minutes shall be subject to applicable data retention law and policies.
SCHEDULE:
The Committee shall meet on an as-needed basis.
141
Page 3 of 3
ERMU Commission Policy – G.2g4 Dispute Resolution Committee Charter
TERMINATION:
The Committee shall exist until at such time formal action of the Commission is taken to
dissolve the Committee.
POLICY HISTORY:
Adopted January 12, 2021
Revised February 14, 2023
Revised February 13, 2024
142