5.4. SR 11-13-2006
City of Elk River
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Section Meeting Date
Worksession November 13, 2006
Item Description
Health Insurance U date
Administrator
Introduction
This is a discussion item only to inform the Council of the renewal rates for the non-union employee
health and dental insurance contracts and to get direction from the Council on the amount of the city's
contribution to the flexible benefit plan for 2007.
Discussion
Barry Rosenberg and Rick Nelson of Minnesota Insurance Services will be at the meeting to discuss the
renewal rates. Lauren Wipper and I have been working with Mr. Rosenberg for the past several months
on the renewal. In addition to reviewing the renewal rates and plans being offered by BlueCross
BlueShield, other companies and plan options were explored. Based on the group's claims experience, it
was determined that staying with BlueCross BlueShield was the best option at this time. The city
purchases this coverage through Resource Training and Solutions, a cooperative that offers insurance to
cities, counties, and school districts. An Employee Assistance Plan will be added in 2007 through
BlueCross BlueShield at a cost of approximately $1,200. This will be funded through the tobacco
settlement funds.
The original renewal increase for health insurance was approximately 27 percent. By adjusting the plans
slightly, the actual rate increases will be around 23 percent depending upon which plan the employee
chooses. Mr. Rosenberg and Mr. Nelson will go over this information in more detail at the meeting.
The 2007 budget currently includes a $15 increase in the city's flexible benefit plan contribution. Last
year when the city contribution was discussed, the Council directed staff to research this item so the
Council could consider different options for the 2007 contribution. Ms. Wipper has surveyed other cities
and found that there is no consistency in the contribution levels; the contribution in the cities surveyed
varied from $500 to $850 per month. Further, there was no direct correlation between the amount of the
contribution and the premium. The one item we were able to summarize from the data was that the city's
contribution to family coverage is slightly low. However, that may be because we offer a four tiered plan
with employee and spouse and employee and children plans in addition to just family coverage. We have
reviewed different contribution structures for the city's contribution with costs ranging as high as an
additional $70,000. Staff is looking for direction and input from the Council on the total amount the
Council is willing to spend to increase the 2007 contribution and whether the Council wants to adjust the
three contribution levels differently.
Financial Impact
S:\Council\Lori\2006\Health Insurance Update.doc
Attachments
· 2006/2007 Medical Insurance Comparison
· New York Times Article
Action Requested
The Council is asked to provide direction on the 2007 contribution to the flexible benefit plan so it can
be brought back for formal action on November 20.
Council Action
Motion by _
Second by _
Vote
Follow Up
S:\Council\Lori\2006\Health Insurance Update. doc
2006/2007 MEDICAL INSURANCE COMPARISON
2006 CMM w/$15 Copay
single
+spouse
+child(ren)
family 998.00
single
dental life
30.28 5.13
30.28 5.13
30.28 5.13
30.28 5.13
$500 Deductible
single
+spouse
+child(ren)
family
mediCal
256.50
560.50
554.50
845.00
total
premium
291.91
595.91
589.91
880.41
November 2006 City of Elk River Demographics
$15 CO-Day $500 Deductible Total
Single 31 14 45
+Spouse 8 4 12
+Child(ren) 15 8 23
Family 6 8 14
Total 60 34 94
$16,425.00
$ 6,180.00
$ 11,845.00
$ 9,170.00
$ 43,620.00 Monthly cost
for City
2007 Increase co-pay, add another plan choice, change Rx coverage, increase City
contribution by $15.00 per month
CMM w/$25 Copay, Rx Change employee
single total monthly
medical dental life est* premium city contrib deduction
single 368.50 33.08 5.00 406.58 380.00 26.58
+spouse 806.50 33.08 5.00 844.58 530.00 314.58
+child(ren) 799.50 33.08 5.00 837.58 530.00 307.58
family 1,218.00 33.08 5.00 1,256.08 670.00 586.08
CMM w/$25 Copay, $250 Deductible, Rx Change employee
single total monthly
medical dental life est* premium city contrib deduction
single 359.00 33.08 5.00 397.08 380.00 17.08
+spouse 785.50 33.08 5.00 823.58 530.00 293.58
+child(ren) 778.50 33.08 5.00 816.58 530.00 286.58
family 1,186.00 33.08 5.00 1,224.08 670.00 554.08
$500 Deductible, Rx Change employee
single total monthly
medical dental life est* premium city contrib deduction
single 317 .00 33.08 5.00 355.08 380.00 -24.92
+spouse 693.00 33.08 5.00 731.08 530.00 201.08
+child(ren) 685.00 33.08 5.00 723.08 530.00 193.08
family 1,044.00 33.08 5.00 1,082.08 670.00 412.08
Single 45 $ 17,100.00
+Spouse 12 $ 6,360.00
+Child(ren) 23 $12,190.00
Family 14 $ 9,380.00
Total 94 $ 45,030.00 Monthly cost for City
* Life premium increased to $6.25 for 2007. The City's agent is getting rates from other
companies. This $5.00 rate is an estimate.
~
~
a
w
~
=
~
~
~
g
(1)
(.)
. ...-4
o
;..C
.....,
.......c
ca
(1)
:r:
(1)
;..C
.....,
bO
c:
. ...-4
.......c
.......c
~
rn
S
:s
.-
S rn
Q) Q)
Jo..:c
0... . _
Q) 'tJ
U :s
:s."
." Q)
~o
-
rn ca
c: :s
ca c:
- c:
~<
Q) Jo..
.... Q)
U...c:
~ b.O
...... .f1111!14
o::c
~ ~
Q) Jo..
S ca
:su
rn ...
c: :s
8cc
~
Q)
z
~= :R~~ i3 ar
.= QJ .- <<s- "'""' CL> .:.:::
.... '.srn e: 'O.c: g.c 00
.- Cl)a$ s..Q) ~
u.i' ~..c ~ ~ - > =
-;SU.clllaJlll"OO 0
.:. lll.c:ae:....Ill~aJJ:8>>
Q) S+-i"".9f-5Q.8:CL>~
~ SaJ~oe.e:S~~-S-s
u rn;;.5~01ll1ll52:?AQl)
'0 ~'c;~uti"u~8.5
~ s'O'i >>';'0 ::li'O-E-S
>> rna1$~'~ac:laaO.!:<l
.w fIJ _Q.l; =Otl)~$
>> ';2'0 oo.c: Porn Ill.... a Ill'"
=O]....~ 5.2lSc:5! ~-::: ~ 00
lo..I """-'-O~cno_o
Q)~=;~c: ~o.:: ern.=rn..rn
-Sc;_~~~Ill~Q.,iii~iii~
~ ~- 8 8.~ ~ 8E1l1$ ~
tn 0 I Q) I: UJ
III " _-CD ~ ds ~ ~ ~ a ~ <l-I e:; = t-t C
CLla::::..c:>- .... Q) -..... .... -.."" ca
~~~~8~ E~ ~~t~; ~S~~u~~
Ill~~ ~ UOO 0....~1ll1ll O....c:,o
rn'OIll'O... ::l::l .!!le:IllS>> Ill,SUO~1ll
~ ~ ~ ~~.s ] :5! 00 s i Ql) Sma - ~ tl
'0 .- III U Po III '0 .~ ~ tl ~ 5.5 Po 2:.c: gf.c: ~
~~~t.~ .sE aoo....,o~~J~iii!
_ooa~'Oe::l.c1ll ,e: 1ll~1iiiiiU;;o'OoPoolll
Ql) moo rn~rnPoIll....rn ... illS
Poboo-...rn a"'~1$~lllrn-Sa'i.~.sPo::l
~-SaJ~lll~ a~1$~oolllo Q)rn1lIllIllPo~
~e:>5.cSiii QQl)rnrn~.....5.c:5 Ql)Ql)1ll0
I ~ 8 ca III ~ . ~&;2 ~-salll aJSUl.s ~ e~ u,
-"''i",SIll.se:;-Eu'iSi-s~aJ....~~o~
C;~e:~Ill'irn~""::lIll1$llloolllo>::l 8....~
>> 0 .S Ql) -S .u 't'i .... ~ S S III i... III 0 ~ .' .... U
00=c;2>>e;;-S20~00-S~,~S.~OOOiaIllS
PoOIll Illlll - Ql)e: e:rn~O::l'Oe:Ill'
rnlll~005S~~-;Sa-~80a~~~aSS~
2;;orns~a .~u S2S.c_ _ ....
.o_u._ ....
::e
2:iil
0=
",2:
...1~
~Q
c:l;l
<~
Q=:
~""
~E-
=:...1
>>i
='Cl
e:
00
I . I...... I I I
Ql)1ll >>Ql);, rn III be ?AS s= g~ S
.s~ al~~-SJ8 !Ill.s~~~ r~
~u S"'OOOIll~OO >> III 0'"
.~ "'~1$a~~~ ~agf~....c; S)
'+001-.5 ,s~+J= s.c. s.t:: ~5 .~.......
~ 5 ~ 0.5 III e 1$ ~ ~ rn rn'~ ~ 0 t ~~:=
illS orn'O..s._.... e: Poalll 0-.'000 00 0 '
U -e:Ill-........!:<l.c:a_ Po "'aJ-g
a~ ~.S~8.~Ill~ 5olllrn->~....
~ ~ &= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lr~ = -5 i ~ 8 Q) rJJ"
s..,Q) EQ)~Q)~~..c:"""~=Q)~8Q)Q)~
::lei 1$-~~.c:5>'O~u.aJ~rn-S~.!:<l
~~~~oOQ)"""~8~=~ ..c: ~Q)rns
Q)......~efIJ:~a~~g~ e~~c~S~
.......cooe:e:.c-rnO...Ill'OOOe:OOOO....>>
OO~oolll.2l~~~C;~~.carn~S-S-Ea~
-;s>>~ rg Ill'COi ~ e:;; aJ.... rn aJ a.> ,a.>,S Ill';;
ii ~.a~ -S e ~ '0 ~ ~ S ~.;l ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8-
1$,S c;<'ia~~~ ~a<oo a.>
00
~
l;l
Q.,
E::
o
'0
.,
::l
E::
:;::
S
u
15
ai ui
.r:. Co
~~
en_
o c
a:2l
>-(1)
-o~
::J c
..., ,-
(1)!!1
~ (1)
= >
en (1)
35~
>-.0
0=
o.~
E-o
(1). (1)
ai;:
.52 c
o (1)
-5~
1!'6
;:s
~ 0
al-
E~
t2.8
om
c.r:.
+:i"tJ
52
i!5~
(1).r:.
.0(1)
ffi ~
...... ().91
~ C Q5
~ alo.
-- C5.. x
-=-(1)
... al en
'G) 5'<0
a::: :a E
al (1)
.c -= rg
~ ala:
";:- -0 .
c en
al:2;
bJl~~
c o..r:.
= -5.~
.... ai (1)
=J1ti5
c; -oI
(1) ui
(,) u a5
~(1)
... :0 c:
fI) "- (1)
g ~ ~
-; ~:6
5ai
"y () 1!
G) al (1)
Q a5:J
~:2
~ Q)'~
= .o1!
Co) g';
... "00 co
= OE
is B~
Cii
::J
E'
c (1)
o.r:.
(1)-
OJ~
~ (1)
::J.r:.
~~Olcn~
'5, 0 ,s: () rg
~=citi''6()
~~1!o.~~
~Cs~c3~~
CD- C co It.....c:.
C o.al.o 0_
el ::Jo..!!!1!aiil
a;-o(1).r:._.S2(1)
~~:Ct:'=~~"O
III OJ'';:; ::J al.r:. 0
lIl'w ~~{l 0.0
8.. (1) -0 c en -0 LO_
J::IDoCOc:__
NCI)-oen.oal6'7
QjCD
;=.r:.
0-
-0
o
:2;
ai
()
c
(1)
-0
c
(1)
0.
(1)
-0
E
ccCO"5
.9€~
l)l-o;=E
~1!~ ~ .
oB=::--o
()'~~-"ai
~en-oEen
~1!.gj.:21!
wrn.r:.~en
> -Q)\-:::
ll!8:c 0.-0-
..0 >-g gs
:gC\JmC\J.r:.
~E>6'7al
>-
(1) -0"5
f;a:lffi~
'- to -.-
$2~~g'
2 6'7 ?;h:
g ~ c: .5
~;=ro~ '
-0 Eco.o:Q
~.~~E ~
0~.851!
~ a. I E_en
6'7(1) al-.
al.r:. g.o 15
.9::0);-;5
E~.5&7~
~ (1)-0 g,1l,g
<(;='--oal
=-g ~ ~-~
-al(1)~-oc
~-o~""~~
>~, -0-00
S~caffi1!~
.~ ~~.s g:n
ag,~8~8
~;;-cE;=C\J
(1) (1)
c.r:.
o en
o >- --0
O::CIDC:
o_-"-ca .
T"'" C CO (l)
6'7~-;;;~;Q
~~E~g
rgoo.r:.-o
el.r:.roE(1).gj
~~~~.eQ)
r5 ~ .~ ..c .0 :6
l&:C(1)l-en>-
~gJ:OE5~
Dlo=::Jeno
<( a: ~ '-E m -
c\j '-0 (1).r:.-o
ClCJJQ)\..._CO
.~ :2; -0 0. 0 .r:.
I
f
l
r
I
t
r
I
~I
ti,
5'
l:!lL
N
o
o
N
';'
Rolling the Dice ort New Health Plans
ContinuedFrom First Business Page
said Judy Rosenthal, a working
mother in Independence, Mo., who
has experimented with four plans in
five years.
Several years ago, Ms. Rosenthal
chose a $1,000 deductible with a rela-
tively low $126 monthly premium for
herself and her two young sons.
Three months later, one'of her sons
broke his leg. Right off the top, she
had to pay $1,000 before the health
plan picked up the remainder of her
son's bills. ,
"I got scared and went to a $250 de-
ductible for the next year," said Ms.
Rosenthal, who works as a research
coordinator at Discover Vision Cen-
ters, an eye care chain. The pre-
mium was $326 a month that year,
2003. But it kept going up - to $388 in
2004 and $440 for, 2005, when she
switched plans again.
"I couldn't afford that," she said.
So to reduce her monthly outlay, she
gambled on a plan with a $2,500 de-
ductible with a $230 monthly pre-
mium.
"Last year, I came out ahead," Ms.
Rosenthal said. "With kids, you never
know."
During her employer's enrollment
period this year, for coverage be-
ginning July I, Ms. Rosenthal signed
up for a $1,500 deductible plqn with a
$323.81 premium. Over. the Fourth of
July weekend, one son hurt his back
playing baseball. Ms. Rosenthal
quickly burned through her own
$1,500 on a visit to an orthopedic sur-
geon and subsequent physical ther-
apy.
Because consumer-directed health
plans have been around for only a
short time and adopted by relatively
few workers, it is hard to know yet
whether they are meeting the goal of
making people better consumers of
,health care.
The evidence "shows that greater
cost-sharing leads to reduction in
health care use and expenditures,"
said Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin, an
economist who led a study of the
plans that was released last month
by the research center Rand. "But
what we don't know," she said, "is
how this will affect overall health
quality and patients' health."
That is why, despite the prospect
of saving money on their employees'
health benefits, mlmy companies are
also cautious, mindful that their
workers could end up worse off.
"Large employers are not rushing
pell mell into these products," said
Peter V. Lee, the chief executive of
the Pacific Business Group on
Health, a San Francisco-based em-
'ployer group.
During the enrollment season for
2006, only 7 percent of employers
that offer health benefits made con-
sumer-directed plans one 'of the op-
tions, according to a widely respect-
ed annual survey conducted jointly
by the Kaiser Family Foundation
and the Health Research and Educa-
tional Trust, which was released in
late September.
The report estimated that fewer
than three million workers and their
dependents were enrolled in such
plans. Many consultants and insur-
ers say the nm.nbers are actually
much higher - at least twice Kai-
ser's estimate - but that would still
be only a small fraction of the 70 mil-
lion or so American workers covered
by employer health insurance.
Last year, the Kroger supermar-
ket chain, one of the first large com-
panies to offer a consumer-directed
plan linked to an individual health
savings account, managed to con-
vince only'5 percent - or 3,500 of its
70,000 eligible employees - to sign
up. To attract more employees in the
current sign-up period, Kroger is
adding a $500 match to employee
contributions to the health savings
account.
In an individual health savings ac-
Employers have been
slow to adopt the
changes because of
:\,. ,
the high risk.
count the annual contribution cannot
exceed the plan's annual deductible.
But it can grow tax-free until the
money is withdrawn and can be add-
ed to year after year. And it is the
employees' to keep even if they
change jobs. Nationally, employees
have . opened about 1.2 million ac-
counts that contain about $1.5 billion,
according to 'a survey of 60 adminis-
trators of health savings plans by
Steve' Davis, managing editor of In-
side Consumer-Directed Care, a
trade newsletter.
"We think health savings accounts
give our associates a long-term in-
terest in the economics of health
care that wasn't there before," said
Mike Stoll, vice president of corpo-
rate benefits at Kroger.
So that employees do not skimp on
the preventive medicine that can
stave off much more expensive
health conditions, many of the plans
provide 100 percent coverage for
such basics as a yearly physicals or
annual mammograms. The insurer
,UnitedHealth Group is the leading
provider of consumer-directed plans,
with 1.8 million members. By com-
bining financial incentives with the
help people need to' make better
health care decisions, UnitedHealth
said, its patients with chronic dis-
eases who are enrolled have 12 per-
cent fewer emergency room visits
Questions to Ask When Picking a Plan
The calculus will vary, depend-
ing on the person's circumstances
and the details of the health plan
offering. But in trying to choose
between a traditional plan and a
consumer-directed one, here are.
some of the main issues to consid-
er. .
What health care services am I
likely to use? If you have a chron-
ic condition, add up the cost of
drugs you take and doctors you
see. Be sure to include the costs of
any yearly checkups or tests.
How much of my health-care
costs am I responsible for? Care-
fully compare premiums, deduct-
ibles, co-payments and the maxi-
mum out-of-pocket amount you
are liable for in a year. Some con-
sumer-directed plans cap your
personal outlays at lower levels
than traditional plans.
What is covered? A doctor or
hospital out of the plan's network
may cost.much more in a consum-
er-directed plan, but if you stay
in-network these plans may pay
100 percent of preventive care or
even the drugs and doctor visits
for a chronic condition.
Can I save toward future health
care costs? A health savings ac-
count linked to the plan, if that is
an option, may help you build sav-
ings for an early retirement, and
there are tax advant!:lges. The
plans can be even more attractive
if the employer matches part of
the contribution.
How can I learn more? Ask
your. employer or the insurer for
more information or links to Web
sites that may provide further
gUidance ili determining whether
a specific plan is right for you.
than those in traditional plans.
Even Kaiser Permanente, the'
health plan best known for its classic
H.M.O.'s, plans to offer consumer-
directed products in California next
year. And Medicare, the federal in-
surance program, is experimenting
with some form of health savings ac-
counts in 39 states.
"We're getting there,"" said Tracy
L. Bahl, a UnitedHealth Group exec-
utive who manages health benefits
for large employers. While adoption
may be slower than anticipated, he
said, "the trajectory still remains
positive."
The real attraction of the plans for
employers is the potential savings.
UnitedHealth points to its own study
of 50,000 workers in these plans,
which found that the average cost of
care for members decreased 3 to 5
percent, compared with an increase
of 8 to 10 percent in UnitedHealth's
traditional plans.
Some employees are enthusiastic
about consumer-directed coverage.
About half the 5,000 eligible workers
at the Visant Corporation, a printing
and marketing company in Armonk,
N.Y., are enrolled in a plan with ade-
ductible of $1,000 for an individual
and $2,000 for a family.
For Brian Hartman, a 36-year-old
Vis ant finanl(e executive, the compa-
ny this year contributed $600 to a
health reimbursement account - a
savings vehicle similar to a health
. savings account except that the em-
. ployer keeps its contributed money if
the employee leaves the company.
For doctors in the network, the plan
covers 90 percent of fees, and those
fees are discounted for plan mem-
bers.
Mr. Hartman said that his former
health plan, a traditional preferred
provider -P.P.O. - plan, with a
$500 deductible for 'each member,
had covered only 80 percent of doctor
fees. That coverage "was not so
great," Mr. Hartman said. "
Now, "I'm really impressed with
the level of discounts at the different
doctors we go to in the new plan," he
said. "We don't have a co-pay. There
is no paperwork."
Other people in consumer-directed
plans have been disappointed,
though. Don Cohon of Muir Beach,
Calif., has tried the new approach
and gone back to more traditional
coverage.
That was after an expensive bicy-
Cle accident in February 2005 that
sent him to an emergency room.
Even before he was examined Mr.
Cohon incurred a $12,000 "trauma ac-
tivation fee." Although he spent less
than three hours in the hospital, after
X-ray!i. a CT scan and treatment for
some bruises, his total bill came to
$25,000.
Mr. Cohon, whose plan had a $2,500
deductible, was responsible for
$6,200 of the charges.
He eventually managed to con-
vince the hospital to forgive the bulk
of . that amount. But he is now en-
rolled in a traditional plan offered by
his employer, the Edgewood Center
for Children and Families, a non-
profit social services group.
"It's much better coverage," he
said. "It's not a high-deductible."
Even for consumers who try to
make careful use of the health care
system because they are now paying
a larger share of cost, high medical
bills can be inevitable. "It sounds
good to say you need skin in the
game," said Dr. Greg M. Silver, a
family physician in Clearwater, Fla.
In his case, the "skin" was a plan
with a $5,000 deductible. And he was
careful to choose family doctors and
a hospital that were in the plan's net-
work - the hospital where Dr. Silver
was a department chairman. But
when his son had to have an ap-
pendectomy at that hospital, he dis-
covered that none of the specialists
there were in the network.