3.7. SR 03-19-2007
Item Description
Consider Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Sherburne
Coun Economic Develo ment Authon
Item Number
3.7.
Prepared by
Catherine Mehelich, Director of
Economic Develo ment
Reviewed by
Scott Clark, COtntnunity Development
Director
City of Elk River
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Section Meeting Date
Consent Agenda March 19, 2007
Introduction
The Elk River EDA recently reviewed information regarding the proposed establishment of a Sherburne
County EDA as outlined in the attached materials from Sherburne County Administrator Brian Benson.
EDA Commissioner Pat Dwyer and HRA Commissioner Stewart Wilson both served on the County
subcommittee which explored and recotntnended the establishment of the County EDA.
Discussion
The attached Resolution states that pursuant to MN Statutes Section 469.1082, Subdivision 5, once the
city adopts the resolution to participate in the County EDA it is unable to withdraw its participation for a
minitnutn period of 5 years. In follow up to Counciltnember Motin's question raised at the EDA
meeting, the attached statute requires notice of the city's withdrawal to be given to the County EDA ''not
less than 90 nor more than 180 days prior to the anniversary date" of participation.
Financial Impact
The County EDA with approval from each of the cities could levy a limited amount upon the city's
property taxpayers as part of the county levy to support its economic development services. It would not
impact the city levy.
Attachments
. Staff report dated March 12,2007 regarding EDA Recotntnendation
. MN Statutes 469.1082 regarding County EDA
. Resolution Authorizing the City of Elk River to Participate in the Sherburne County
Economic Development Authority
Action Requested
At its March 12"' meeting the EDA acted to recotntnend the City Council's approval of the attached
Resolution Authorizing the City of Elk River to Participate in the Sherburne County Economic
Development Authority.
Council Action
Motion by_
Second by _
Vote
Follow Up
S,\EDA \SCEDA \REQUEST COUNCIL ACTION.3.19.07.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO: Economic Development Authority
FROM: Catherine Mehelich, Director of Economic Development
DATE: March 12,2007
SUBJECT: Consider Recommendation to City Council on Resolution
Authorizing Participation in the Sherburne County Economic
Development Authority (EDA)
Attachments
. Memo dated February 2, 2007 from Brian Benson, Sherburne County Administrator
. DRAFT Resolution Authorizing City Participation in the Sherburne County EDA
. Summary Sherburne County Economic Development Strategic Plan Goals
. Sherburne County EDA Enabling Resolution
. Report to Sherburne County Board of Commissioners from the Economic
Development Structure Task Force, August 2006
Issue
Sherburne County Administrator Brian Benson will be presenting information to the EDA
regarding the proposed establishment of a Sherburne County EDA as outlined in the
atrached memo and related materials.
The Elk River EDA is asked to provide a recommendation to the City Council on the
atrached draft resolution authorizing the City of Elk River's participation in the Sherburne
County EDA. It is anticipated that the City Council would consider the EDA's
recommendation regarding the resolution at its March 19, 2007 Council meeting.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the EDA consider recommending the City Council approve a resolution
authorizing the City of Elk River's participation in the Sherburne County Economic
Development Authority.
S:\EDAIAGENDAWear2007\County EDA 3.12.07.doc
Memo
February 2,2007
To: City Economic Development Authorities in Sherburne County
City Council Members
From: Brian Bensen, Sherburne County Administrator
Re: County Board consideration of a County EDA
CC: County Commissioners
Kathleen Heaney, County Attorney
Greetings.
Over the past 2 years Sherburne County has been studying our Economic Development
needs. The result was an Economic Development Strategic Plan that provides a road map
for our continuing efforts. A major thrust of our Economic Development Plan is to
provide assistance to local governments in a way that compliments rather than competes
with local efforts. Coupled with another goal to preserve an available supply of industrial
land for the future, the County Board is studying how to proceed. The County Board,
following the requirements laid out in Minnesota Statutes 469.1082, Sub 2, appointed the
Economic Development Structure Taskforce. The taskforce was defined as a committee
"to recommend a County Economic Development Service Provider" in the County Board
resolution dated April 11, 2006. (A copy is included in the materials.) The Taskforce
members appointed included citizens, local EDA and HRA members, City Council and
City EDA staff members, town board members, County Board and County HRA
members, Sherburne County Economic Development Alliance members, and
business/industry representation.
The Taskforce met over the sununer to review the history of the County's economic
development efforts, study the current County Housing and Redevelopment Authority,
the cities and their governance, and finally different options which the County could
implement.
The Taskforce recommended to the County Board the creation of a County Economic
Development Authority (EDA) to work in cooperation with the cities. I am now meeting
with the cities EDA's and Councils to inform you of the process and the recommendation
which will go to the County Board. I will ask your EDA and City Council for a
resolution of support to be forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners.
Summary of Goals
Sherburne County Economic Development Strategic Plan
1. Preserve land for future industrial and commercial growth in key
locations through planning, zoning, and acquisition in cooperation with
affected communities to ensure:
o a strong and balanced tax base
o a healthy employment base, and
o convenient access for residents to goods and services
2. Advocate for transportation and other infrastructure critical to the
county's economic competitiveness.
3. Integrate consideration of economic development into other county
departments, planning and decision-making.
4. Support local government efforts to plan and implement economic
development initiatives throughout Sherburne County.
5. Market the county for economic development.
6. Create the organizational capacity to effectively implement the 2005-
2007 workplan.
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners
Resolution enabling the creation of an
Economic Development Authority
in the County of Sherbnrne, State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues Section 469.1082 authorizes a County to form a county
economic development authority if the County receives a recommendation to do so from a
committee formed, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.1082, Subdivision 2, to
recommend options for a county economic development service provider;
WHEREAS, it was found and determined by the Sherburne County Board of
Commissioners that the encouragement and financial support of economic development and
redevelopment in Sherburne County (the "County") is vital to the orderly development of the
County, contributes to continued growth and diversification of the tax base, increases
employment opportunities, and is in the best interests of the health, safety, prosperity, and
general welfare of the citizens of Sherburne County;
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2006, the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners passed
Resolution Number 04l106-AD-1089 which created a committee, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 469.1082, Subdivision 2, to explore and recommend the type of entity
appropriate to serve as the Sherburne County economic development service provider;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforementioned Resolution, the Sherburne County
Economic Development Structure Task Force ("Task Force") was created, met on June 21, July
13, July 27, and August 10, 2006; and presented its findings and recommendations to the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners in a written report entitled Report to the Sherburne
County Board of Commissioners From the Economic Development Structure Task Force
("Report") ;
WHEREAS, the Task Force, in its report, concluded that an Economic Development
Authority ("E.D.A." or "Authority") is the most effective and efficient structure to provide the
necessary economic development for Sherburne County;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of a public hearing held on September 12, 2006, the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners accepted the Report of the Task Force, adopted its
recommendation, and directed County Staff to develop the Bylaws and Enabling Resolution for
the Sherburne County Economic Development authority;
Be It Therefore Resolved by the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners as follows:
Section 1. Enabling Resolution.
1.01
The Sherburne County Economic Development Authority (E.D.A.)
is hereby established and created.
1.02
The ED.A. is a Public body corporate and politic, and is a political
subdivision ofthe State of Minnesota.
06 J 218 Sherburne County ED.A. Enabling Resolution
Page I of7
1.03
The Sherburne County Economic Development Authority shall
have all the powers, duties and responsibilities as set forth in
Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.090 to 469.1081, or as may be
amended from time to time, and all other applicable laws, except
as limited by this Resolution. These powers include, without
limitation:
(a). To use all powers granted to it, from any source, to carry
out its purposes.
(b). To create and define the boundaries of an Economic
Development District.
(c). To enter into joint powers agreements to carry out its
purposes.
(d). Acquire, by purchase, lease, gift, devise, or condemnation,
the needed right, title and interest in real property. Property so
acquired shall be owned, leased, controlled, used, or occupied by
the Authority for public governmental purposes and is exempt
from taxation by the State of Minnesota or its political
subdivisions.
( e). Accept land, money, or other assistance, whether by gift,
loan, or otherwise, in any form, from the federal government, the
State government, or any political subdivision of the State, or any
agency thereof.
(f). Sign options to purchase, sell, or lease property
(g). Sell, or otherwise dispose of, property acquired.
(h). Make contracts for the purpose of economic development.
(i). Become a limited partner in a partnership, or become a
member of any other organization, whose purpose is consistent
with and will further the economic development goals ofthe
Authority.
(j). Purchase the supplies and materials it needs.
(k). Contract to retained specialized professional services
needed to perform its duties and exercise its powers, in areas
including, but not limited to, economic development, engineering,
architecture, real estate, marketing, and law.
061218 Sherburne County E.D.A. Enabling Resolution
Page 2 of?
(I). Research, assemble, and disseminate demographic data and
information pertaining to real estate, economic information,
commercial, and industrial activities within Sherburne County.
(m). Undertake outreach and marketing activities in an effort to
encourage and attract commercial and industrial development in
Sherburne County
Section 2.
Limitations on Powers.
2.01
The following limits shall apply to the Sherburne County
Economic Development Authority and its operations:
(a). Bylaws of the E.D.A. must be approved by the Sherburne
County Board of Commissioners.
(b). The E.D.A. shall submit its budget to the Sherburne County
Board aunually, at a time specified by the County Administrator,
and shall follow the budget process for all County Departments.
(c). The E.D.A. budget must include a detailed, written estimate
of the amount of monies the E.D.A. expects to require from the
County to conduct Authority business during the subsequent fiscal
year.
(d). The fiscal year of the E.D.A. shall be the same fiscal year
as the County.
(e). The E.D.A. aunual operating budget and plan must be
approved by the Sherburne County Board.
(t). The E.D.A. may not levy without the approval of the
Sherburne County Board.
(g). The E.D.A. may not issue bonds without the approval of
the Sherburne County Board.
(h). The actions of the E.D.A. must be consistent with the
Sherburne County Comprehensive Plan.
(i). All development plans must be approved by the Sherburne
County Board prior to implementation.
Section 3.
E.n.A. Board Appointments and Terms of Office.
3.01
The E.D.A. governing body shall be a Board consisting of nine
Members.
061218 Sherburne County E.D.A. Enabling Resolution
Page 3 of7
3.02 Two of the members of the E.D.A. Board shall be members of the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners.
3.03 All E.D.A. Board Members shall be appointed by the ED.A.
Board Chair, and all Board Members shall be approved by the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners.
3.04 All E.D.A. Board Members shall either be residents of, or own or
manage a commercial or industrial enterprise at least partially
located within, Sherburne County. The E.D.A. Board shall include
representation from Townships and incorporated municipalities
located within Sherburne County.
3.05 All E.D.A. Board Members shall initially be appointed for terms of
two, three, four, five, and six years, respectively. Thereafter, all
Board Members shall be appointed for six year terms. Any Board
Member who also serves as an elected public official shall be
appointed to a term commensurate with their term in office.
3.06 Any vacancy in the E.D.A. Board created by the resignation or
removal of any Board Member shall be filled, for the balance of
the unexpired term, by appointment from the E.D.A. Board Chair.
This appointment shall also be approved by the Sherburne County
Board of Commissioners.
Section 4. Removal of E.n,A. Board Members.
4.01 An E.D.A. Board Member shall automatically be dismissed and
removed for missing, without justifiable excuse, three consecutive
meetings or the majority of Board meetings in any given calendar
year.
4.02 An E.D.A. Board Member may be removed by the Sherburne
County Board for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or misconduct in
office. A Board Member may only be removed after a public
hearing conducted before the Sherburne County Board. A copy of
the allegations must be presented to the Board Member at least ten
(10) days before the hearing. The Board Member must be given an
opportunity to be heard, and present witnesses and evidence, at the
public hearing. If a Board Member is removed, a record of the
proceedings, along with the charges and written findings, shall be
filed with the Office of the County Administrator.
4.03 Any Board Member may be removed by a majority vote of the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners.
061218 Sherburne Count}' E.D.A. Enabling Resolution
Page 4 of7
Section 5.
5.01
5.02
5.03
Section 6.
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
Section 7.
7.01
Conflict ofInterest.
Except as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 471.88, a
Board Member, officer, or employee of the Sherburne County
E.D.A. shall not possess or acquire any financial interest, direct or
indirect, in any project or in any property, included or planned to
be included, in any project; nor shall the person have any financial
interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or proposed contract for
materials or services to be furnished or used in connection with
any project.
Any Board Member, officer, or employee who has or may have an
actual or perceived conflict of interest in any project or contract for
services in support of any project shall immediately report the
conflict of interest to the full E.D.A. Board. Failure to disclose any
conflict of interest shall constitute misconduct.
Any Board Member with a conflict of interest in any project, or in
any contract for services in support of any project, is required to
abstain from voting on all actions of the E.D.A. in connection with
the project.
Financial Reports.
The E.D.A. Board shall prepare and approve monthly financial
reports, which shall include all income, expenditures, and claims of
the Authority.
The E.D.A. must submit an annual financial statement to the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners, due on or before the
1 st day of the month of June of each and every year.
The financial reports and statements of the E.D.A. must be
prepared, audited, filed, and published or posted, in the manner
required for the financial statements of all other County
departments.
The financial reports and statements of the E.D.A. are subject to
audit by the Sherburne County Auditor and / or the Minnesota
State Auditor.
Staffing.
The Authority may use the County's purchasing resources in
connection with construction work, or to purchase equipment,
supplies and materials.
061218 Sherburne County E.D.A. Enabling Resolution
Page 5 of7
7.02
The County may furnish offices, meeting rooms, structures, space,
supplies; or stenographic, clerical, engineering, or other services or
assistance to the Authority.
7.03
The Authority shall receive staff support from the Office of the
County Administrator, as well as the Office of the Sherburne
County Auditor I Treasurer.
7.04
The Authority may use the servIces of the Sherburne County
Attorney's Office.
Section 8.
Modification and Amendment.
8.01
This Enabling Resolution may be modified by the Sherburne
County Board of Commissioners from time to time as deemed
appropriate or necessary, or to make any changes authorized by
law.
8.02
As part of its annual report, the E.D.A. Board shall report to the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners as to whether any
changes or modifications are requested to either the Authority's
By-Laws or this Enabling Resolution.
Section 9.
Affect Upon Other Obligations.
9.01
It is the intention of the Sherburne County Board of
Commissioners that nothing in this Resolution, nor any activity of
the Sherburne County E.D.A., be construed to impair the
obligations of the County under any of its contracts or to affect in
any detrimental manner the rights and privileges of a holder of any
bond or other obligation heretofore issued by Sherburne County.
The Sherburne County Board of Commissioners shall not modify
any limit in effect at the time any bonds or obligations are issued
or contracts executed to the detriment of the holder of the bonds or
obligations of any contracting party.
Section 10.
Implementation.
10.01
The Sherburne County Board of Commissioners may, from time to
time as necessary, adopt such ordinances and resolutions as are
required and permitted by law to give full effect to this Resolution.
10.02
The County administrator, and County staff, are authorized and
directed to take the actions and execute the delivery of docwnents
necessary to give full effect to this Resolution.
061218 Sherburne County E.D.A, Enabling Resolution
Page 60f7
PurSilllllt to MN Stat. 375B.06, this resolution shall be published in the official county newspaper for three
consecutive weeks and become effective 30 days after initial publication.
On ,2007, Commissioner moved the adoption of the above
resolution; Commissioner seconded the motion to adopt said resolution, and
thereupon the same was put to a vote with the following result:
Commissioner Riebel voted
Commissioner Engstrom voted
Commissioner voted
Commissioner Leonard voted
Commissioner Schmiesing voted
aye_ naye_
aye_ naye_
aye_ naye_
aye_ naye_
aye_ naye_
Attested to:
Brian J. Bensen
Sherburne County Administrator
061218 Sherburne County E.D.A. Enabling Resolution
Page 70f7
Report to Sherburne County Board of Commissioners
From
The Economic Development Structure Task Force
August 2006
1
Creation of Task Force
The Sherburne County Board of Commissioners authorized the creation of an
Economic Development Structure Task Force pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes 469.1082, Subdivision 2 on April 26, 2006.
A copy of the County Board Resolution and other organizational documents,
including the membership and staff/consultant lists as well as minutes from the
June 21,2006, July 13, 2006, July 27,2006, and August 10, 2006 meetings are
included in the Appendix for reader reference.
The Sherburne County Board of Commissioners determined that formation of the
Task Force was necessary as a means to most effectively meet their established
goal of working cooperatively with local governments to build a strong County tax
base and to encourage the development of quality employment opportunities
within Sherburne County.
Task Force Compliance with Statutory Requirements
Membership on the Task Force is consistent with the statutory direction and
included in the appendix.
The statutory directive for the Task Force is to issue its report within 90 days of
its initial meeting has been complied with by the submission of this report to the
Sherbume County Board of Commissioners.
Issues Considered by the Task Force
The statute requires that the Task Force issue a report identifying:
1. existing economic, housing and community development programs
2. economic, housing and community development services provided by
the existing agencies;
3. any gaps in programs and services;
4. the capacity and ability of existing agencies to expand their activities;
5. the recommended organizational option for providing needed
economic development, housing and community development services
throughout the County in the most efficient manner; and
2
6. The distance from the boundary of a city that may be controlled by
each affected city in the county.
Task force findings and recommendations related to the statute are summarized
below in accordance with the six-point structure identified above. Non-statutory
findings and recommendations follow.
STA TUTORY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDA TIONS
1. Existing economic, housing and community
development organizations
Sherburne County HRA
Structure
. Established May 1992
. Initial board - 5 members reflecting an area-wide distribution on a
representative basis
. County board itself has served as the HRA Board since its inception (however
this is not a requirement of the articles or by-laws)
. Rationale for County Board also serving as HRA Board
o Any taxes assessed were controlled through elected persons
o Meetings held at same time as the County Board
Purpose, powers
. Sherburne County Board of Commissioners, acting under its authority of MN
Statute Chapter 469 incorporated the HRA
. Purposes are the lawful business of a county HRA
Budget
No budget at this time; Board composition is the same as the County Board and
meetings are conducted on the same day to avoid additional cost.
Sherburne County Economic Development Alliance (SCEDA)
Structure
. Established 1994
. Fifteen member volunteer committee structured to represent a balance of
interests in the county, membership assigned geographically and terms of
service are two years
Purpose, powers
. Advisory to the County Board
Sherburne County Economic Development Budget
. 2006 budget - $57,000. Primary expenditures are for professional services
and organization memberships/contributions (Initiative Foundation match, The
3
Partnership). Other expenses include: meeting expenses, marketing &
promotion, travel, supplies.
Becker EDA
Structure
. Established 1986
. Have HRA powers (given when HRA was dissolved in mid-1990's)
. 7 members including 2 members of the City Council, appointed by the Mayor
with approval of the City Council
. Staggered terms initially; then 6-year terms
Functions, Powers and Duties
. Hire staff, public accountant and consultants to perform duties and exercise
powers
. Purchase materials and supplies needed to carry out functions
. Use the services of the City Attorney and City's purchasing department
. Create & define the boundaries of an Economic Development District
. Be a limited partner in a partnership, consistent with the purposes of the
Authority
. May study and analyze economic development needs of the City and ways to
meet those needs
. May "carry out the law on economic development districts to develop and
improve the lands in an economic development district to make it suitable and
available for economic development uses and purposes. In general, with
respect to an economic development district, the Authority may use all of the
powers given an economic development authority by law."
. May join trade associations; hold receptions of officials who may contribute to
advancing the City and carry out other appropriate public relations activities to
promote the city and its economic development.
. Must follow the budget process for City departments
. Must be consistent with the comprehensive plan
. Must submit its administrative structure and management practices to the City
Council for approval
Limitations of Power
. May not exercise any specific powers contained in the Act, Minn. Stat. 462
and 472A without the prior approval of the City Council
. Sale of all bonds issued by the Authority, must be approved by the City
Council before issuance
Budget
2006 budget - $175,400. Primary expenditures are staff, taxes and
assessments, tax abatement and EDA subsidies. Other expenses include:
membership dues, professional development & conferences, marketing,
contracted services, legal & contracted services.
4
BiCl Lake EDA
Structure
. Established 1990
. 7 members including 2 members of the City Council, appointed by the Mayor
with approval of the City Council
. Members must be residents of Big Lake or business owners in Big Lake
. 2 members appointed by the township board who are ex-officio at all times,
except when discussing matters related to a joint powers industrial
development project, at which time they become full voting members
. 2 city members become non-voting when township members have voting
rights; at no time are there more than 7 voting members
. Staggered terms initially; then 6-year terms, except city council members and
elected township officials whose term coincides with their existing term as an
elected city or town official
Functions, Powers and Duties
. Hire staff, engineers and consultants to perform duties and exercise powers
. Purchase materials and supplies needed to carry out functions
. Use the services of the City Attorney and City's purchasing department
. Exercise the powers granted to carry out its purpose
. Create & define the boundaries of an Economic Development District
. Related to Joint Powers agreement with township
. Acquire property by lease, purchase, gift, devise or condemnation
proceedings, the needed right, title and interest in the property to create
Economic Development Districts
. May sign options to purchase, sell or lease property; make contracts; be a
limited partner in project consistent with Authority's purpose
· May acquire rights and easements for a term of years
. May receive property from other units of government
. May operate and maintain a public parking facility or other public facilities to
promote development in an Economic Development District
Limitations of power
. Sale of bonds or obligations shall be issued and approved by the City Council
. Must be consistent with the comprehensive plan
. Obligations
o Must submit budget annually to the City Council
. _ City of Big Lake sets the levy annually for the purpose of the BLEDA,
separate from the City's general fund. .
Budget
The Big Lake EDA has total assets of $762,058. Operating revenues for 2006
total $143,500; operating expenses for 2006 total $18,500. Sources of income
include grant proceeds, net lease revenue after debt service, and interest.
Expenses include legal and professional services, engineering, advertising and
property related expenses.
5
Elk River EDA
Structure
. Established 1987; bylaws adopted 1988
. 7 members including the Mayor, 3 City Council members, 3 residents who are
not members of the City Council
. Terms of City Council members coincide with terms on the council. Non-
council members begin with staggered terms and thereafter serve 6 year
terms.
Functions, Powers and Duties
. The powers of an HRA under MN Stat ~ MN Stat ~469.001 et seq;
. The powers of a City under MN Stat ~ 469.124 et seq.;
. The powers and duties of a redevelopment agency under MN Stat ~ 469.152
et seq.;
. The power to create and define the boundaries of economic development
districts as provided by law;
. The power to acquire by lease, purchase, gift, devise, or condemnation
proceedings property required to create economic development districts; and
to dispose of property acquired, as provided by the Statute;
. The power to sign options to purchase, sell or lease property;
. The right of eminent domain, as provided by the Statute;
. The authority to be a limited partner in a partnership whose purposes are
consistent with the Authority's purpose;
. The power to acquire rights or an easement for a term of years, or
perpetually, for development of an economic development district;
. The power to buy supplies and materials to carry out the purposes of the
Statute;
. The right to receive public property;
. The power to sell or lease land held by it for economic development in
economic development districts;
. The power to operate and maintain a public parking facility or other public
facility to promote development in an economic development district;
. The right to cooperate with or act as agent for the federal or state government
or other public body to carry out the Statute;
. The power to study and analyze economic development needs in the City and
ways to meet the needs; to study the desirable patterns for land use for
economic development and community growth, and other factors affecting
local economic development in the City; to make the result of the studies
available to the public and to industry in general; to engage in research and to
disseminate information on economic development in the City;
. The power to utilize public relations activities to promote the City;
. The right to accept conveyances of land from all other public agencies,
commissions or other units of government, if the land can be used to carry out
the purposes of the Statute;
. The power to develop and improve the lands in an economic development
district to make it suitable and available for economic development uses and
purposes; to fill, grade and protect the property;
6
. The power to borrow money in anticipation of bonds, after bonds have been
authorized;
. The power to issue general obligation bonds, pursuant to the procedures set
forth in and as provided by the Statute and when authorized by 2/3 majority of
the City Council;
. The power to issue revenue bonds;
. The power to sell or convey property;
. The power to advance its general fund money or its credit or both without
interest for the objects and purposes of the Statute;
. The right to request that the City levy a tax for the benefit of the Authority;
. Must name a national or state bank within the state as its depository every 2
years;
. Financial statements shall be prepared, audited, filed and published in
accordance with the Statute;
. Shall prepare an annual report and annual budget;
Budget
2006 budgeted revenue is $345,800; including $307,200 general levy and
$32,100 from the business incubator. 2006 budgeted expenses total $297,850.
Primary expenditure is for staff related expenses, advertising/marketing,
professional, legal and engineering services, and incubator related expenses.
Other expenses include professional development and conferences, dues and
subscriptions, insurance, supplies, postage, and phone.
.
Elk River HRA
Structure
. Established July 1980;
Functions, Powers and Duties
. Created by resolution referencing MN Stat ~ 462.411-462.712;
. Bylaws dated November 25, 1996 and signed by 5 commissioners
Limitations
. Unknown at this time
Budget
2006 budgeted revenues are $264,950, including a general levy of $221,950.
Other revenue is from tax increment financing. 2006 budgeted expense total
$123,750. Primary expenditures are for staff related costs, legal and
professional services, and publishing. Other expenses include dues and
subscriptions, insurance, and postage.
Princeton EDA
Structure
. Established 1994
. 7 commissioners; 3 shall be members of the City Council and 2 may be
residents of area townships
. Appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council
7
o Staggered terms initially; then 6-year terms, except city council members
whose term coincides with service as a city council member
Functions, Powers and Duties
o Resolution establishing an EDA references City authority under MN Stats
469.
o Authorized to coordinate and administer economic development and
redevelopment plans and programs of the City.
Limitations
o Sale of bonds or other obligations must be approved by the City Council.
o Must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and official controls
implementing the comprehensive plan.
o Must submit its plans for development and redevelopment to the City Council
for approval in accordance with City planning procedures and law.
o EDA administrative structure, management practices and policies must be
approved by the City Council.
o Must get City Council approval for the acquisition or disposition of property.
Budget
No information received from the City as of the publication of this report.
Sf. Cloud HRA
Structure
o Established 1966
o 5 commissioners, appointed by the Mayor; two must be members of the City
Council; all must be residents of the City of St. Cloud
o Staggered terms initially; then 5-year terms, except city council members
whose term coincides with service as a city council member
Functions, Powers and Duties
o Resolution establishing the HRA references City authority under MN Statutes,
Chapter 462.425, the municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act of 1947.
Restated By-Laws, September 2004 reference exercising its powers, duties,
and functions as "prescribed by MN Statutes Chapter 469 and all other law of
the State of Minnesota applicable thereto."
o In 1966, determined a need to establish the HRA based on sub,standard or
blighted areas that cannot be redeveloped without the assistance of
government; the need for housing for servicemen, veterans and their families;
the need for safe, sanitary dwellings for persons of low income and their
families.
o May employ personnel as it deems necessary to exercise its powers, duties
and functions.
o Staff of 25.
o Section 8 Authority in Sherburne County.
Limitations
o Sale of general obligations bonds or other general obligations must be
approved by the City Council.
8
o Sale of revenue bonds does not require City Council approval.
o Must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and official controls
implementing the comprehensive plan.
o JOBZ must be approved by the City Council after recommendation by the
HRA.
o Must submit its plans for development and redevelopment to the City Council
for approval; the purchase or disposition of property is included in these
plans; therefore, the City Council does have authority over the purchase or
disposition of property.
Budget
2006 annual revenue (budget) - $11 ,829,297
2006 annual expense (budget) - $11,626,497
The primary source of revenue is intergovernmental ($8.2M) including MHRA,
HUD CDBG, HUD Section 8. Developer fees total $691,653. Levy is $420,556.
Other sources of revenue include interest on investments, property management
fees, and real estate sales. The most significant expenses are housing
assistance payments, debt service, salaries and benefits, maintenance services
and supplies and utilities.
St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership "The
Partnership II
Structure
o Organized in 1985 as a non-profit corporation with powers under MN Statutes
S 317
o IRS classification as a 501 (c)4 non-profit corporation (civic organization)
o Organizational memberships for cities, counties, utilities, educational
institutions, and business organizations (e.g. Chamber of Commerce, St.
Cloud Opportunities)
o Associate members for businesses
o Annual dues for basic membership with Board representation - $7,500
o Board representation based on level of financial support
Purpose
o "The general purpose and nature for which this corporation is organized
shall be for promoting the social welfare and common good of the
citizens of the St. Cloud area by coordinating and facilitating a
private/public partnership to aid and assist investment decisions that will
further the economic development of the St. Cloud area as measured by
increased employment, payroll, business volume, tax base and
corresponding factors..."
o "The corporation shall: assist existing businesses and industries in
maintaining, expanding, and upgrading their facilities within the St. Cloud
area; seek out, encourage and assist new businesses and industries to
locate within the St. Cloud area; and provide technical, research and
9
financial assistance in support of area economic development as deemed
appropriate by the Board of Directors."
Budget
2006 budgeted revenue - $323,700
2006 budgeted expense - $318,737
Major expenditures are salaries and benefits, program related expense
(marketing, job fair, quarterly economic profile), office expense. Other expenses
include travel, professional education, board and committee expenses, and
prospect related expenses.
2. Programs and services provided by existing agencies
Sherburne County HRA
Major accomplishments
. 1992 approved Housing Plan for Sherburne County.
. Joined with the St. Cloud Area Planning Organization for a bonding pool for
first time homebuyers.
. Establishment and creation of a TIF district for the expansion of Appert's
(Appert's did not want to be annexed by the City of St. Cloud.) TIF district was
decertified early.
. Contemplated potential bond issuance for a combined pool between
Guardian Angels and Wilder Foundation for elderly housing. The County
Board chose not to participate; perhaps because the majority of the issuance
would have benefited persons who were not residents of Sherburne County.
. $19 million bond for jail facility.
Focus/goals
. The HRA does not currently have separate goals from those established by
the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners.
. The HRA may need to stay in existence until its obligations (bonds) are
repaid.
Sherburne County Economic Development Alliance
Major accomplishments
. Started the "Money Breakfasts" to support entrepreneurs.
. Provided guidance to the 2005 economic development strategy.
. Advisory on TIF requests including Appert's.
. Participated in developing the tax abatement policy.
Focus/goals
. Responsive to tax abatement requests.
Becker EDA
Major accomplishments
10
. Industrial projects - Liberty Paper, Inc. (issued bonds) and a number of
smaller industrial projects.
. Industrial Park - development of various phases, design standards.
. Work with planning commission to review commercial development proposals
and redevelopment projects. Conducted planning studies for redevelopment
. Member of 'The Partnership"
Focus/goals
. Continued work with prospects
. Industrial park expansion, additional 30 acres
. Ordered railroad study (engineering)
. Other engineering studies for water and sewer for future expansion of
industrial park
Big Lake EDA
Major accomplishments
. Developed and filled a 68-acre industrial park Oointly with Big Lake Township)
. Redeveloped blighted residential area (9 homes on 10 lots); redeveloped as
town home and single family residential project
. Awarded funding from DEED/MHFA for scattered site residential properties
(approximately 10 properties)
. Rehab of 25-35 housing units
. Administer fa9ade loan program ($10,000 maximum)
. Administer revolving loan fund for industrial and commercial projects
. Participate in MN Community Capital Fund
. Acquired numerous properties on a key commercial block (anticipate
redevelopment); under discussions with developer
. Bonded for public facilities (city hall, police and fire, public works facility and
liquor store)
Focus/goals
. Possible industrial park expansion (negotiating with property owners)
. Downtown redevelopment
. Possible involvement in Transit Oriented Development
Elk River EDA
Major accomplishments
. Developed Northstar Business Park
. Cooperation with 3 privately initiated industrial parks (TIF)
Focus/goals
. Industrial development
. I ncu bator
. Marketing
. Commercial development
. Transportation advocacy (Highways 169 & 10)
11
Elk River HRA
Major accomplishments
. $30 million downtown redevelopment
. King and Main S1. - First National Financial Services project
Focus/goals
. Downtown
. East Highway 10
. Monitor housing needs; limited involvement due to results of needs
assessments
Princeton EDA
Major accomplishments
. Been involved with 3-4 incentive financing packages for manufacturers
(UDAG revolving loan funds)
. Developed Arrow Commercial Park - 11 acres, Mille Lacs County
. Sold several tax forfeiture parcels in industrial park east of the airport
Focus/goals
. 40 acre industrial park expansion in Sherburne County (working on EDA
grant)
. Downtown revitalization
. Working on brochure for City of Princeton & Arrow Commercial Park
St. Cloud HRA
Major accomplishments
. 1-94 industrial park in partnership with S1. Cloud Opportunities and Stearns
Electric
. Airport Business Park in partnership with S1. Cloud Opportunities and East
Central Energy
. Secured Business Development Infrastructure Grant from the State of
Minnesota for the extension of sewer and water in the Airport Industrial Park
(2004)
. Work closely with the City of S1. Cloud and the East Side Boosters on a
redevelopment initiative for the East Side
. Assisted with redevelopment of the Federal Building for a technology
business.
. Numerous financing packages for expanding businesses - including funds
from the Minnesota Community Capital Fund, Minnesota Investment Fund
and tax abatement from JOBZ.
. Comprehensive array of affordable housing programs - senior, single family,
multi-family and mixed use housing projects, including both rental and
ownership programs. Oversees and manages 720 apartment units (16
complexes and 40 homes), 830 Housing Choice vouchers, and 5 special
programs.
12
. Administration of CDBG funds
Focus/goals
. Airport Business Park in Benton County
. Expansion of 1-94 industrial park
. Downtown redevelopment
. Comprehensive array of affordable housing programs - senior, single family,
multi-family and mixed use housing projects, including both rental and
ownership programs.
St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership
Focus/goals
. Retention and expansion of existing industries
. Timely & professional response to prospect inquiries for the Greater St. Cloud
Area - including portions of Benton, Sherburne and Stearns Counties
. Community and workforce development to support economic growth
. Attraction of new industry with quality employment opportunities
3. Identification of gaps in programs and services
Sherburne County HRA
The county economic development strategy indicates a need to focus on the
development of business and industrial parks; many potential sites will not qualify
under redevelopment statutes and the EDA would provide greater flexibility in the
achievement of the economic goals of the County Board.
Sherburne County Economic Development Alliance
SCEDA does not have the statutory power to address all the goals identified in
the 2005 economic development strategic plan.
Becker EDA
. Becker identified the following challenges and gaps in service. Challenges in
working with MnDOT re: reorientation of Co Rd 8 outside the boundaries of
the city
. Does not utilize existing HRA powers
. Challenges in g!3tting utility services to new industrial areas
. Doesn't do extensive marketing to attract businesses to Becker
. Only offer serviced industrial land with design standards
. Challenge in attracting retail businesses to Becker
BiCl Lake EDA
Big Lake identified the following challenges and gaps in programs and services.
. Extending utilities to land identified in comp plan for industrial use
13
. Acquiring land at reasonable prices for industrial park development
. Preserving land identified in the comp plan for industrial use
. Do moderate amount of marketing to attract businesses to Big Lake
. Only offer serviced industrial land with design standards
. Need additional support for entrepreneurs
Elk River EDA
Elk River identified the following challenges and gaps in programs and services.
. Regional marketing
. Commercial development (resource limitations)
. Limited funds to acquire and hold properties
Elk River HRA
Elk River identified the following challenges and gaps in programs and services.
. Limited funds to acquire and hold properties for redevelopment
Princeton EDA
Princeton identified the following challenges and gaps in programs and services.
. Determining how to best invest in infrastructure to stimulate commercial and
industrial development
. Extending utilities to new industrial park
. Limited marketing materials/capacity
. Only offer serviced industrial land
Sf. Cloud HRA
The St. Cloud HRA identified the following challenges and gaps in programs and
services.
. Challenges on public housing and Section 8 housing due to reduction in
federal funds.
. Can only levy .0144% in property taxes (about 3% of the HRA budget)
. Attempt to maximize fee income by charging administrative fees, developers'
fees, etc.
St. Cloud Area Economic Deve/ooment Partnershio
The St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership is seeking to expand its
membership to secure sufficient funding to support area wide marketing - a gap
identified by its members. Members also feel that marketing is appropriately
handled at the regional level - to reach and work with prospects in the most cost
effective manner.
Other Gaps in Service
The task force identified additional gaps in service as follows:
. Staff, resources and authority available to townships for economic
development;
. A centralized source for county economic and demographic data.
14
4. Capacity and ability of existing entities to expand
Sherburne County HRA
No legal limitations to expanding the HRA to include EDA powers.
Sherburne County Economic Development Alliance/Sherburne
County Board
8CEDA is limited to advisory capacity to the County Board.
The County Board focus on economic development would be more clearly
emphasized with the use of the EDA and the EDA structure can ensure the
accountability of the County Commissioners to the voters.
Becker EDA
The Becker EDA expects to continue to focus on commercial and industrial
development in the City of Becker.
Bia Lake EDA
The Big Lake EDA expects to continue to focus on commercial and industrial
development in Big Lake and in areas immediately adjacent to the City.
Elk River EDA
The Elk River EDA expects to continue to focus on economic development
issues in the City of Elk River. The EDA is limited by resources and currently
levies to the maximum.
Elk River HRA
The Elk River HRA expects to focus on redevelopment issues in Elk River and
will continue to monitor housing issues. The HRA is limited by resources and
currently levies to the maximum level.
Princeton EDA
The Princeton EDA expects to continue to focus on commercial and industrial
development in Princeton.
St. Cloud HRA
The 81. Cloud HRA manages housing programs in other counties at the request
of HUD, due to the lack of active HRAs in some adjacent counties. However it
operates economic development and redevelopment programs only within the
city limits of 81. Cloud.
15
St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership
The Partnership is a regional organization works with companies and
communities throughout the greater SI. Cloud area, including portions of Benton,
Stearns and Sherburne Counties. It may be an appropriate partner for Sherburne
County economic development efforts, but does not have the capacity to address
the land and tax base development goals of the county or provide the type and
depth of services envisioned in the county's economic development strategy.
5. The recommended organizational option for providing
needed economic development, housing and
community development services in the most efficient
manner.
In accordance with the statute, the Economic Development Structure Task Force
considered four options when evaluating the appropriate economic development
structure for Sherburne County.
1. Existing situation - Sherburne County Economic Development Alliance,
Sherburne County HRA, and County Board
2. HRA with EDA Powers .
3. EDA
4. Special legislation
The Committee has identified that the existing structure is inadequate to obtain
the goals set forth in the strategic plan as well as the specific goals of the County
Board. It is clear from the Committee that additional efforts and structure will
facilitate economic development in the community. The Committee is cognizant
of the need to supplement the existing structure both in the County as well as the
cities. However, the existing structure is reactive and not progressive in nature.
The Committee has identified that the HRA with EDA powers is not a viable
alternative to recommend to the County Board for consideration.
The Committee identified the creation of an EDA for the County as the preferred
alternative and set forth its rationale below.
The Committee recognizes that the use of special legislation in the past was
used as a means for other County Boards to gain the powers that are now
inherent in the structure of the HRNEDA or an EDA as a stand alone. For this
reason, the Committee is not recommending this option to the County Board.
Further, any future changes necessary to respond to the needs of the community
would require legislative action. This may result in lost opportunities for the
County and the citizens that they serve.
16
6. The distance from the boundary of the city, that may
be controlled by each affected city.
The control of each city should extend only to its geographic boundaries. Some
cities and townships have chosen to work together in efforts for economic
development, which have proven very successful and should be emulated again.
However, that is a choice that is not one the County may direct.
Task Force Recommendation to Sherburne Board of
County Commissioners
Statutory Findings
The Task Force detennined that an Economic Development Authority is the
most effective and efficient structure to provide the necessary economic
development for Sherburne County.
After extensive discussion the Task Force members determined that the benefits
of a nine member EDA, appointed by the County Commissioners include:
. The statutory authority needed to accomplish the County's proactive
economic development goals
. Clear economic development focus which will be less confusing to the
public and to businesses
. The best opportunity to address the economic development needs and
opportunities of the townships
. The County Commissioners, by statute, have clear oversight and decision-
making responsibility and adequate controls over the activity of the EDA
. Flexibility and reduced controversy because cities may opt in or opt out
. Creation can direct the entity to supplement the existing initiatives of the
cities (as a goal is to clearly avoid any overlaps in service)
. The larger, nine member Committee allows;
a. Greater citizen involvement
b. Broader access to expertise
c. More opportunities for leadership development
17
Non-Statutory Findings
The Task Force discussed characteristics of the EDA and recommends for
further deliberation by the Board of County Commissioners the following:
Membership
. Nine members on the Economic Development Authority
. Geographic representation from across the county
. City and township representation
. At-large representation
County Duties
. Responsibility for economic development will remain in the County
Administrator's office at this time; no changes in county staffing are
anticipated.
According to the statute, if there are 9 members on an Economic Development
Authority, at least 2 must be County commissioners. The committee noted that if
3 of the 9 are county commissioners, then additional meeting notice
requirements may apply.
Although the Task Force prefers a nine member EDA, the group considered that
the County Commissioners may be wary of establishing such body. The task
force therefore further recommends that the EDA be subject to the following
requirements and explicit limitations:
. Bylaws of the new EDA must be approved by the County Board
. Annual operating Budget and plan must be approved by the County
Board
. Any levy must be approved by the County Board
. No bonds may be issued without the approval of the County Board
. EDA actions must be consistent with the Sherburne County
Comprehensive Plan
. All development plans must be approved by the County Board prior to
implementation
. EDA must submit an annual report to the County Board of
Commissioners
18
. The Board of Commissioners may wish to also consider the provisions
of MN Stat Sec 469.090 to 469.1081, as they develop the charge to
the EDA, should they adopt the recommendations of the Taskforce.
Conclusion
In conclusion, after significant consideration, the task force recommends that the
Sherburne County Board of Commissioners establish an Economic Development
Authority for the purpose of fostering county wide economic development, which
is critical to the long-term well-being of Sherburne County. The structure should
be cooperative, complimentary, supportive and collaborative.
The structure will support effective implementation of the Economic Development
Strategy and Workplan approved by the County Board of Commissioners on May
17,2005.
It is our belief that an economic development authority will provide a valuable
framework enabling the county to complement and support townships and cities,
and establish a cooperative county-wide approach to economic development.
Stewart Wilson, Chair
Economic Development Structure Task Force
G:\DeptlAdministration\admndata\commillees\econ dvlp Task Force\ecDev Task Force Rpt 8-1 0-06
19
469.1082, Minnesota Statutes 2006
Page 1 of2
'Mmnes.ota
(\)m"UJf~ ~r,d"~ltes
legislature Home 1 Links. to the World I Help I Advanced Sea~ch
House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Lawsl and Rules
Minnesota Statutes Table of Chapters ~haptElr 469 Table of Contents
469.1082, Minnesota Statutes 2006
Copyright @ 2006 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.
469.1082 COUNTY EDA OR HRA WITH EDA POWERS IN NONMETRO COUNTY.
Subdivision 1. Anthority to create. A county may form a county economic development
authority or grant a housing and redevelopment authority the powers specified in subdivision 4,
clause (2), if it receives a recommendation to do so from a committee formed under subdivision 2.
An economic development authority established under this section has all the powers and rights
of an authority under sections 469.090 to 469.1081, except the authority granted under section
469.094 if so limited under subdivision 4. This section is in addition to any other authority to
create a county economic development authority or service provider.
Nothing in this section shall alter or impair any grant of powers, or any other authority
granted to a community development agency, a county housing and redevelopment authority,
or any county as provided in section 383DA1; Laws 1974, chapter 473, as amended; or Laws
1980, chapter 482, as amended. Any county that has granted economic development powers to a
community development agency or a county housing and redevelopment authority under any of
these provisions may not form a county economic development authority or grant a housing and
redevelopment authority the powers specified in subdivision 4, clause (2).
Subd. 2. Local committees. Upon notice to all local government units and development
agencies within the county, a county may adopt a resolution to create a committee to recommend
options for a county economic development service provider.
The committee shall consist of no fewer than 11 and no more than 15 members appointed
by the county board. At least one city official, at least one housing and redevelopment official,
and at least one township official from the county to be served by the county econ~mic service
provider shall be included on the committee. Members may also represent school districts,
political subdivisions that currently provide services under sections 469.001 to 469.047 and
469.090 to 469.1081, nonprofit or for-profit housing and economic development organizations,
business, and labor organizations located within the county. Political subdivision representatives
must be selected by their local governments and must constitute at least 50 percent of the total
committee membership. The county may appoint no more than two county commissioners. The
committee shall select a chair at its initial meeting.
Subd. 3. Committee report. The committee shall issue its report within 90 days of its initial
meeting. The committee may request one 60-day extension from the county board. The report
must contain the committee's recommendation for the preferred organizational option for a county
economic development service provider, including the distance from the boundary ofthe city
that may be controlled by each affected city in subdivision 5. The distance may not exceed two
miles from the city boundary. The report must contain written findings on issues considered by
the committee including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) identification of the current level of economic development, housing, and community
development programs and services provided by existing agencies, any existing gaps in programs
and services, and the capacity and ability of those agencies to expand their activities; and
(2) the recommended organizational option for providing needed economic development,
housing, and community development services in the most efficient, effective manner.
Subd. 4. Organizational options. The committee may only recommend:
(1) establishment ofa county economic development authority to operate under sections
469.090 to 469.1081. except that the county shall not have the powers of section 46'LQ94 without
http://ros.1eg.mn/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=STAT_CHAP _ SEC&year=current§ion=46... 3/1312007
469.1082, Minnesota Statutes 2006
Page 2 of2
the consent of an existing county housing and redevelopment authority operating within that
county. For the purposes ofa county economic development authority's operation, the county is
considered to be the city and the county board is considered to be the city council;
(2) requiring an existing county housing and redevelopment authority or multicounty housing
and redevelopment authority to operate under sections 469.090 to 469. 1081;
(3) that the county pursue special legislation; or
(4 no nge in the existing structure.
Subd. 5. Ar a of operation. The area of operation of a county economic development
service provider created under this section shall include all cities within a county that have
adopted resolutions electing to participate. A city may adopt a resolution electing to withdraw
participation. The withdrawal election may be made every fifth year following adoption of the
resolution electing participation. The withdrawal election is effective on the anniversary date of
the original ~esolution provided notice is given to the county economic development authority not
less than 90 nor more than 180 days prior to that anniversary date. The city electing to withdraw
retains any rights, obligations, and liabilities it obtained or incurred during its participation. Any
city within the county shall have the option to adopt a resolution to prohibit the county economic
development service provider created under this section from operating within its boundaries and
(1) within an agreed upon urban service area, or (2) within the distance approved in the committee
report referenced in subdivision 3. If a city prohibits a county economic development service
provider created under this section from operating within its boundaries, the city's property
taxpayers shall not be subject to the property tax levied for the county economic development
service provider.
Subd. 6. City economic development authorities. If a county economic development
service provider has been established under this section, existing city economic development
authorities shall continue to function and operate under sections 469.090 to 469.1Q.Sl. Additional
city economic development authorities may be created within the area of operation of the
county economic development service provider created under this section without the explicit
concurrence of the county economic development service provider.
Subd. 7. Continuation of existing county and multicounty housing and redevelopment
authorities. Existing county and multicounty housing and redevelopment authorities shall
continue to function and operate under the provisions of sections 469.001 to 469.047.
Subd. 8. Nine-member boards authorized. In addition to the board options under section
469~Q25, a county economic development authority may have a nine.member board. lfthe
authority has a nine-member board, at least two members must be county commissioners
appointed by the county board. Of the county economic development authority board members
initially appointed, two each shall be appointed for terms of one, two, or three years, respectively,
and one each for terms offoUT, five, or six years, respectively. Thereafter, all authority members
shall be appointed for six.year terms.
History: 2000 c 484 art 1 s 4; ISp2005 c 1 art 4 s 106; ISp2005 c 3 art 7 s 10
Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation
to your House Member or State Senator.
For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact. Us page.
General auestions or comments.
http://ros.1eg.mn/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=STAT_CHAP _ SEC&year=current§ion=46... 3/1312007
RESOLUTION 07 -
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA
HELD: March 19, 2007
Pursuant to due call and notice therefore, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Elk River,
County of Sherburne, State of Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in said City on Monday,
the 19'" day of March, 2007, at _.p.m.
The following members were present:
And the following were absent:
Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ELK RIVER TO PARTICIPATE IN
THE SHERBURNE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Elk River, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
1. Finding.s for Participating: The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
(a) Minnesota Statues Section 469.1082 authorizes a County to form a county economic
development authority if the County receives a recommendation to do so from a committee formed,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.1082, Subdivision 2, to recommend options for a county
economic development service provider.
(b) It was found and determined by the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners that its
commitment to economic development and redevelopment in Sherburne County (the "County'') is vital to
the orderly development of the County, contributes to continued growth and diversification of the tax base,
increases employment opportunities, and is in the best interests of the health, safety, prosperity, and general
welfare of the citizens of Sherburne County.
(c) On April 11, 2006, the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners passed Resolution
Number 041106-AD-1089 which created a committee, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.1082,
Subdivision 2, to explore and recommend the type of entity appropriate to serve as the Sherburne County
economic development service provider.
(d) Pursuant to the aforementioned Resolution, the Sherburne County Economic Development
Structure Task Force ("Task Force'') was created, met on June 21, July 13, July 27, and August 10, 2006; and
presented its findings and recommendations to the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners in a written
- 1-
report entided Report to the Sherburne County Board uf Commissioners From the Economic Development Structure Task
Force ("Report'').
(e) The Task Force, in its Report, concluded that an Economic Development Authority
("E.D.A." or "Authority'') is the most effective and efficient structute to provide the necessary economic
development for Sherburne County. The report further concludes that it is not the County of Sherburne's
role to act in a manner to duplicate the efforts of its member Cities and Townships but to utilize tools that
will assist the local governing authority to continue their efforts;
(f) At the conclusion of a public hearing held on September 12, 2006, the Sherburne County
Board of Commissioners accepted the Report of the Task Force, adopted its recommendation, and directed
County Staff to develop the Bylaws and Enabling Resolution for the Sherburne County Economic
Development Authority.
(g) As stated in the proposed Bylaws of the Sherburne County Economic Development
Authority, the stated intent is for the Sherburne County E.D.A. to complement the economic development
activities of municipalities and townships located within Sherburne County by collaborating, coordinating,
expanding, and enhancing those efforts; as opposed to regulating, duplicating or interfering with the
economic development activities undertaken by the townships and municipalities. Specifically, the need
identified by the Cities and the Townships was assistance in the development of necessary infrastructute to
support business within our community and the need to retain lands for futute economic growth. These
objectives are consistent with the past identified goals of the County of Sherburne.
(h) Pursuant to the proposed Enabling Resolution of the Sherburne County ED.A., the
Sherburne County Board will control the major activities of the Sherburne County E.D.A. by approving the
ED.A.'s annual operating budget, approving any proposed levy, approving any proposed bond issue,
approving all development plans.
(i) Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 4Q9.101, Subdivision 2, one of the powers of the
Sherburne County E.D.A. is to acquire and hold land for such purposes as to create opportunities for futute
economic development activities or for transportation or other necessary infrastructute.
G) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 4Q9.1082, Subdivision 5, the area of operation of the
Sherburne County ED.A. will include all land within the City limits when the City adopts a resolution
electing to participate in the Sherburne County ED.A.
(k) The City's existing economic development authorities shall continue its function and operate
when the City participates in the Sherburne County ED.A. The objective of both parties is to collaborate on
proj ects and not compete.
(I) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.1082, Subdivision 5, once the City adopts a
resolution to participate in the Sherburne County ED.A., it is unable to withdraw its participation for a
minimum period of five (5) years.
(m) The creation of a County E.D.A. will serve as an enhancement of, and a catalyst for,
necessary economic development in the City and will serve to complement the present and futute economic
development activities of the City; and
THEREFORE, electing to participate in the Sherburne County Economic Development Authority
will serve the best interest of the City by encouraging and facilitating necessary economic development
opportunities within the City.
.2.
2. Approval of Participatin~ in the Sherburne County Economic Development Authority.
(a) The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City of Elk River to participate in the
Sherburne County Economic Development Authority, subject to all benefits thereof.
(b) The approval hereby given unto itself to participate in the Sherburne County Economic
Development Authority includes approval of incidental and necessary actions as to effectuate this
The Motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was made by member
and duly seconded by member and, upon a vote being taken thereon after full
discussion thereof, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted agains t the same:
Whereupon said Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Passed and adopted this 19th day of March, 2007.
Stephanie A. Klinzing, Mayor
ATTEST:
Tina Allard, City Clerk
-3-
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( 55
COUNTY OF SHERBURNE )
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Elk River, Minnesota, by
reason of my Office as Clerk, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true, and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City of Elk River, duly called and held on the
date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to participating in the Sherburne County Economic
Development Authority.
WITNESS my hand this _ day of
.2007.
Tina Allard, City Clerk
-4-