The URL can be used to link to this page

6. SR 12-05-1994 rei ~'\) ( )j ~Iil ITEM 6. MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1~ DECEMBER 1, 1994 SUBJECT: 1995 BUDGET MEMO DATE: INTRODUCTION The City of Elk River General Fund Budget public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, December 5,1994, at the Elk River City Hall. This public hearing is required by the Truth in Taxation law. The purpose of the public hearing is to receive citizen input on the proposed 1995 City of Elk River budget and tax levy. e Notice of this public hearing has been sent out by the County to each property owner within the City. Along with this notice for the public hearing was information on the property owners' proposed taxes. A public hearing notice for this meeting was published in the 11/30/94 Elk River Star News. Information on the 1995 proposed budget, the tax rate, and this public hearing was also published in the December 1994 City Newsletter. In September 1994, the City Council adopted the proposed maximum budget and levy. Since September, the City Council has reviewed various components of the budget at a number of meetings. For this December public hearing, a balanced budget in the amount of $3,732,250 is proposed. This 1995 budget proposal reflects a 9.94% or $337,500 increase over the adopted 1994 budget. . The proposed City net tax levy for 1995 is $2,223,347. Of this total, approximately 80% or $1,791,125 is for General Fund activities. The balance (20% of the total tax levy) is used for special assessments, equipment certificates, previous bond issues, the dam loan, the library, and the new surface water management program. The proposed net levy increase for 1995 is $478,499. Almost all of this increase is for the General Fund ($294,237) and for the new Surface Water Management Fee program ($164,533). 13065 Orono Parkway. P.O. Box 490. Elk River, MN 55330. (612) 441-7420. Fax: (612) 441-7425 1995 Budget Memo December 1, 1994 Page 2 e THE ISSUE While the State law requires a Truth in Taxation public hearing on the City budget and levy, what people really want to do is come to this meeting and express their concerns over taxes. People may not necessarily want to discuss various components and sections of the City budget at this 12/5 public hearing. There is no doubt that the increases in City expenditures in 1995 are causing the taxes to go up. Unlike the last few years, in 1995 the City is one of the reasons why the taxes are increasing. e The other factor for why taxes will be increasing in 1995 is because of changes in the property valuation. The valuations are determined for the City by the County Assessor. If your property valuation did not change in 1995, and you lived in the urban service district, your City taxes would have gone up less than 10 %, and you would have had no increase in your overall taxes. However, if your property value increased, you will see an increase in your total tax bill. The impact on your tax bill due to an increase in your taxable market value has been discussed many times over the past few years by the City Council, and everyone should be aware of this significant impact. The attached 11/30/94 Elk River Star News article further explains these taxes and valuation issues. Regardless of the increase in a property's taxable market value, the City is increasing revenues and this is causing the taxes to go up. The City can raise about $250,000 in tax revenue without any tax rate change based on the growth in our net tax capacity. The City is increasing its taxes more than this amount in 1995 for the General Fund, debt services and surface water management program. The City needs additional revenues in 1995 for ongoing and special programs in order to keep pace with inflationary factors and growth and development issues. e While the City cannot dispute the fact that its proposed tax levy is going to go up faster than the growth in its net tax capacity, it is appropriate to offer some past history of the City's urban tax rate and the City's share the total tax rate. It should be noted that the 1994 City tax rate of 21.9 was less that the City tax rate of 22.62 in 1990. During this same time that the City tax rate decreased, the total tax rate in the community increased from 97 to 108. Even after the proposed City increases in 1995, the City share of the total tax bill is less in 1995 than it was in 1990. The attachment on the City tax rate information offers this data for your review. This information clearly shows that the City has made a strong effort in the past few years to keep its tax rate stable. 1995 Budget Memo December 1, 1994 Page 3 e Some additional information to help everyone understand the status of taxes in Elk River is included in the attachment from the Economic Development Coordinator, Bill Rubin. This attachment discusses homeowner taxes on a hypothetical $90,000 home. This memo and attached information from the 8/16/94 Minnesota Journal indicates that on a hypothetical $90,000 home, the City of Elk River has the lowest tax rate of the 27 largest non-metro cities and of all of the 95 metropolitan cities and towns. While our number one ranking may not last forever, it certainly is indicative of how reasonable the tax rates on single family homes are in the City of Elk River, as compared to other communities in Minnesota. THE BUDGET As previously noted, the budget is proposed in the amount of $3,732,250. This is a $337,500 or 9.94% increase over the adopted 1994 budget. Of this increase in the budget about 85% or approximately $310,000 of this increase is in personal services. If the City Council wants to reduce the budget, it really needs to look at personnel issues. e There are three main reasons for personnel increases in the proposed 1995 budget. Approximately $130,000 of the increase is for employees hired in 1994 that were scheduled to begin at mid-year and now must be budgeted for the entire year, or which were completely non-budgeted personnel additions. Also, it is estimated that approximately $73,000 will be needed for increases in wages and benefits for existing employees. Finally, approximately $68,000 are anticipated to be needed for the hiring of new employees. The balance of the personnel increases in 1995, which is approximately $39,000, is for additional overtime in the Police and Street Departments, wage increases for the City Council, step increases for police officers and increases in part-time pay for the Fire Department members. Once again, we can discuss all the "ins and outs" of the proposed budget as much as the City Council desires, but if reductions are to be made, we really need to look at the personnel area. THE TAX LEVY As previously noted, the City tax levy can go up without any change in the tax rate if the City's net tax capacity increases. Taxes are scheduled to go up in 1995 for two reasons. One is an increase in government spending which includes the City, County, School District and special taxing districts. The e second reason is an increase in the taxable market value of property. 1995 Budget Memo December 1,1994 Page 4 e The City net tax levy is scheduled to go up $478,500 in 1995. This increase is needed to finance General Fund activities and special projects. The "reasonableness" of the City's tax rate over the past few years and the fact that the City is only about 20% of the total tax bill is noted in the tax levy attachment. Staff will be prepared to discuss this issue at the public hearing per direction by the City Council. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Before concluding this budget memo, two items must be mentioned. The first item is the fact that the urban and rural taxing districts are still changing. In 1994 the rural rate was approximately 90% of the urban rate and in 1995, this percentage is changing to approximately 95% of the urban rate. In 1996 the urban and rural rates will be the same. e The second item that needs mentioning is the fact that the Utilities Commission increased is contribution to the City in 1995. This contribution allows the City to eliminate one-half of the street loader expense from the budget and tax levy. Without this contribution from the Utilities, the loader may not have been able to have been purchased in 1995 or our taxes may have had to increase in 1996 to finance this expenditure. This financial assistance from the Utilities Commission is greatly appreciated. CONCLUSION At the 12/5/94 Truth in Taxation budget public hearing, City staff will be prepared to discuss the proposed 1995 budget and tax levy. This packet contains a lot of budget information and tax levy information for the City Council to review and understand. However, the City Council has seen most of this material in the past few months and should know all of the big issues that affect the budget and tax levy. e The City Council cannot adopt the tax levy or budget at this 12/5/94 meeting. The City Council must announce continued consideration of the budget and tax levy until 8:00 p.m. on Monday, 12/12/94. This will provide the Council with an opportunity to evaluate the public input it receives on 12/5 and to receive additional public input if necessary. This special meeting of the City Council on 12/12 has already been called. Adoption of the tax levy and budget may take place at this special 8:00 p.m. 12/12/94 meeting if a continuation hearing is not needed. 1995 Budget Memo December 1, 1994 Page 5 e ATTACHMENTS 1. City of Elk River tax rate information - This information shows the City tax rate remaining stable over the past few years, while the total tax rate has increased. 2. Citizens League/Minnesota Tax Payer's Association Property Tax Survey (from Bill Rubin) - This information shows the City of Elk River with the lowest taxes of 95 metro cities and towns and 27 non- metro cities on a hypothetical $90,000 home for taxes paid in 1994. 3. Supplemental Truth in Taxation information - Answers to a number of general questions that the City Council may receive at the Truth in Taxation meeting are offered from the Finance Director, Lori Johnson. 4. League of Minnesota Cities Tax Base and Levy Data - Pages from the October League of Minnesota Cities magazine have been reproduced. This information shows how all the communities in the State compare for an average tax rate, plus other tax related information. The Council should be able to identify some comparable cities to Elk River and see where we stand as far as our City tax rate, total tax rate, total tax capacity, the amount of local government aid received, and the amount of HACA received. e 5. Newspaper articles - Attached is a 11/21/94 article from the Star Tribune that discusses tax increases in the metropolitan area. Double digit tax increases are common throughout the metropolitan area as is a 7 - 9% market value increase. Clearly the City of Elk River is not alone in its scheduled increase in market value..... The second attachment is a 11/20/94 St. Paul Pioneer Press article that reviews taxes in Minnesota. The middle part of this article reviews rising property values and legislative action that affects Minnesota taxes..... The last article is from the 11/30/94 Elk River Star News and this article states that if no changes took place in your property valuations, your taxes would be decreasing. 6. The Current - The December 1994 City Newsletter that reviews the preliminary budget and tax levies is offered as an example of the City's effort to provide the public with information on local revenues and expenditures. 7. The budget document or the budget appropriations, source of funds summary statements and the proposed tax levy resolution for the calendar year 1995 are included for your consideration. e * * -I -II :!! * Q) Q) CD ::::J * * ("') c ("') -I C("') x x < III . * ~ ;::t" c ,,< ::::J -I CD< .., -I .., 0 .., - ::0 n 0- 0- 0--1 Q) Q) -< e~ ~ CD .., Q) -< Q) -I Q) -< .-+ < CD CD ~ Q) ::l * ::l )> ::l * CD Q) Q) ("') .-+ I C/) 0- .., '0 Q) CD U> :* ;::t' ::l a. I CD < a. 0 )> -< "0 ~ CD ::0 CD CD CD C/) m Q) .., CD ::l .., ("') 0 CD U1 0 ::l -I .-+ " .-+ -I Q) 0 ::l CO .-+ ("') 0 Q) CD c: -I ...... -I a. )> 0 Q) CD I .., X ~ I -I CD ::0 ::0 )> CD Q) )> >< .-+ ~ CD Q) ::0 Q) C/) ::l )> ::l a. a. -I a. 0 m m ~ ::l 0 ~ CD 0 )> I\.) 0 I\.) " CD .-+ I\.) ~ U) :D ~ ~ m U1 ::l U> CD U) CD CD CD C ("')"0 CD CD CD CD ~ ~" -CD CO c: ("') cfi """ ~ U1 ~ z a. -" )> a. CD Q) * * :D CD U> -I * * -< ("') ("') Q) * ... n .., ~ ~, c.o=i CD Q) 0 ::l c.o-< C/) 0 CO 0'10 CD ~ -I" ~ mO I\.) 0 I\.) )>m X C/) 0 CO ~ ~ ~ X, e ~ ("') .-+ I\.) CD :D^ CD CD ~, I\.) CD CD ::l C/) ("') ~ ~ 0 CD CD )>:D C/) .-+ ~ """ I\.) ~ U) -1- CD 0 m< X I I m ("') CD CD * * Z:D CD < :5, * * " C/) < CD 0 C/) ::0 C/) :D U> CD ~ ("') ...... )> CD ~ ~ .., ~ 0 I\.) ::! 0 CD CD 0 0 ::l U) 0 ~ ~ z a. CD 0 U1 CD CD I c: en I\.) en CD CD CD 3 ~ 0 U) I\.) < 0 U1 < .-+ Q) C/) X Q) .., ~ a. Q) ~ 0 ~ a. .-+ CO CD ~ CD ~ ~ CD a. en en ~ CD CD . ~ ~ """ CD CD cfi I\.) I\.) I\.) ~ I\.) CD I\.) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ CO CO en CD CD ~ ~ CD CD CD cfi U1 0 ~ 0 I\.) CD U) """ I\.) ~ ~ e I\.) I\.) CD CD ~ CO ~ en CD CO cfi U1 I\.) 0 CD A.! ~( ( II. !I11l TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM PATRICK D. KLAERS, CITY ADMINISTRATOR WILLIAM RUBIN, ECONOMIC ~ 1\11- DEVELOPMENT COORDINAT 1"J NOVEMBER 9, 1994 CITIZENS LEAGUE/MINNESOT A TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION PROPERTY TAX SURVEY I am at long last in receipt of the annual property tax survey that is conducted jointly by the Citizens League and the Minnesota Taxpayers Association. This survey analyzes taxes for non-agricultural homes in the 95 cities and towns with a population of 2,500 or more in the metropolitan area and the 27 cities of 9,000 or more in non-metro Minnesota. This survey is based on 1994 taxes on a hypothetical $90,000 home. e I am pleased to report that Elk River has the lowest tax of the 27 "non-metro" cities based on the hypothetical $90,000 home. The five non-metro cities with the lowest tax are : Elk River Marshall Red Wing Owatonna Brainerd $931.00 938.00 956.00 1,033.00 1,038.00 The five non-metro cities with the highest tax (based on a $90,000 home comparison) are: Duluth Cloquet 81. Peter Hutchinson Hibbing $1,320.00 1,299,00 1,287.00 1,248,00 1,243.00 With respect to "metro communities", the five cities with the lowest tax on a hypothetical $90,000 home are: e P.O. Box 490 · 13065 Orono Parkway · Elk River, MN 55330 · (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425 e Afton Ham Lake Ramsey Corcoran Andover $956.00 968.00 982.00 990.00 1,000.00 The five metro cities with the highest tax are: Waconia 81. Paul Osseo Minneapolis Little Canada 1,451.00 1,391.00 1,378.00 1,368.00 1,363.00 As you can see, if you include Elk River with the "metro" communities, it has the lowest tax on a hypothetical $90,000 home. Elk River's property tax of $931 is $25 lower than Afton's $956. This is particularly good news and should be passed along to the appropriate individuals and parties. To supplement the information in this memo, I have included the salient points from the Minnesota Journal, a publication of the Citizens League. e e s:eda:proptax MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARY AND INFORM~TION CERTtR REFERENCE ONLY HISTORY DEPT. Median tax hike nine percent on average metro homes Property tax bills for owners of average-value homes went up by over 10 percent in 1994 in over one- third (36) of the 95 largest commu- nities in the metropolitan area and in less than half (12) of the 27 largest nonmetropolitan cities. Fewer com- rAies saw double-digit increases uWproperty taxes on their aver- age-value homes this year than in 1993, when 56 of the 95 largest metro area communities and 21 of the 27 largest nonmetro cities had increases of 10 percent or more. The median tax increase on average- value homes was 8.9 percent for the by Lynn Reed and Dana Schroeder metro communities and 9.7 percent for the nonmetro communities. And 1994 taxes on hypothetical $90,000 homes in these metro com- munities are highest in Waconia, which ranked second highest last year. Little Canada-last year's leader-dropped to fifth place. Duluth captures the distinction of highest tax on a 590,000 home among the 27 largest nonmetro communities. Those are findings of the 28th annual homestead property-tax sur- vey, conducted jointly this year by the Citizens League and the Min- nesota Taxpayers Association, The survey analyzes taxes for nonagri- cultural homes in the 95 cities and towns with a population of 2,500 or more in the metropolitan area and the 27 cities of 9,000 or more in nonmetropolitan Minnesota. (A primer on calculating property taxes appears on page 5.) A word of caution: This analysis is not intended to estimate taxes for a specific property. It reports the net taxes after certain property tax relief measures are applied. (See the primer on page 5 for further explanation.) The survey includes only owner-occupied homes, not rental properties, businesses, or other types of property. Taxes on these types of properties will differ from taxes on homes; the results of the survey should not be used to gauge taxes on other properties. Continued on page 6 Congestion tolls could cut some roads' traffic to 250/0 Urban auto travel grow' x- orably. Between 1949 andl e population of the Twin Cities met- ropolitan area increased 2.3-fold; person-trips by all travel modes increased over five-fold. Society appears less and less willing to respond to traffic growth by increasing road capacity. Increased ratios of traffic volume to road capacity and, with them, increased road congestion are inevitable unless something is done. by Herbert Mohring and David Anderson "Congestion pricing" is the "som tia' many economists fa 0 ~urban traffic pr ms. Our knowledge of the ects of conges- tion tolls on travel is imperfect at best. But we roughly estimate that such tolls would reduce traffic 15 August 16, 1994 to 25 percent on the Twin Cities' heavily congested roads and, hence, reciably reduce present pressures to and road capacity. . posed congestion cost in the metro area is 20.7 cents per vehi- cle-mile. Currently, fuel excises-two to three cents per vehicle-mile-are the major taxes that are approxi- mately proportional to road use. Charging anything approaching 49 cents per vehicle-mile for 1- 35W trips would, therefore, dra- We est! e these imposed con- matically increase travel costs. gestion costs he five most Car pools and buses would heavily congested ents of the become more popular. Many trips metra-area Interstate sy range not requiring peak-period depar- between 41 and 49 cents per . tures or anivals would shift out of cle-mile. At the other extreme, the e peak. Pressures would build to , imposed cost on 80 percent of the shl siness and school sched- metro area's road ne~work ~.~~~~;;t". ~~a~a .,. ~Il\~ pe*. _ than two cents a vehlcle- rrlik.l. ,; ._~.", ..1,,$ ~..~I'.;;;rg;g may 6e The average moming-peak?(';~:.';~i,'+ji ~?-~~~fr i~gJr rrl'*'~~ r;: r, ~nft f{'.,,,..;.',, -. 0; t" ...- - If ~""'...... !tJ~";z.t- MINNESOTA JOURNAL 1 , Properly tax Continued from page 1 a Average-value homes _ analysis of taxes on the aver- age-value homestead in each city shows that taxes increased by a median amount of $131.50 in the metro area cities, compared to $68 in the nonmetro cities. The tax increases in the metro cities ranged from $3 in Blaine to $421 in Min- netrista. (A verage- value home taxes decreased in seven metro cities: Andover, Anoka, Brooklyn Center, Coon Rapids, Maplewood, South St. Paul, Wayzata.) Tax increases in the nonmetro cities ranged from $10 in Albert Lea to $136 in Northfield. (Average-value home taxes remained the same in Austin and decreased in Hibbing.) On a percentage basis, the tax increases in the metro cities ranged from less than one percent in Blaine to 18 percent in Spring Lake Township in Scott County, with a median increase of 8.9 percent. In the nonmetro cities the increases ranged from 1.8 percent in Albert Lea to 27 percent in Virginia, with a median increase of9.7 percent. Part of the tax increases can be explained by increases in the value of property. In all but six of the metro communities, the value of the average homes on the tax rolls increased. The median increase among the 95 communities was 2.2 percent. The large percentage increase in Spring Lake Township was due to several factors, The tax capacity rate increased by nearly 11 percent, and voters in School District 719 approved an additional school levy that added another 4.5 percent to the tax bill. In addition to those increases, the average market value of homes in the township increased by 3.5 percent. As a percentage of the homes' average selling price, taxes ranged from one percent to just under two percent in the metro cities and from 0.9 percent to 1.35 percent in the nonmetro cities. Cities in the metro area with the highest taxes in 1994 on their average-value homes are (school district is listed in parentheses): North Oaks(621) $5,397; Orono(278) $4,805; Deep- haven(276) $4,802; Wayzata(284) $4,649; Shorewood(276) $4,130. Metro area communities with the lowest taxes in 1994 on average- value homes are: Linwood Township(831) $794; East Bethel(l5) $809; South St. PauJ(6) $882; Columbia Heights(l3) $897; and St. Paul Park(833) $902; Cities in the nonmetro area with the highest 1994 taxes on their aver- age-value homes are: Northfield(659) $1,306; Rochester (535) $1,108; Elk River(728) $1,093; North Mankato(77) $1,026; and Hutchinson(423) $979. Nonmetro communities with the lowest 1994 taxes on their average- value homes are: Hibbing(70 1) $411; Virginia(706) $511; Brainerd( 181) $515; Albert Lea(241) $552; and Bemidji(31) $553. These comparisons reflect both dif- ferences in home values and tax rates among communities. $90,000 homes A different analysis allows a com- parison of the tax bills of homes selling for the same price- $90,OOO-in different communities. The $90,000 selling price is adjust- ed to reflect how assessors in each community would likely value the home for taxation purposes, A dan- ger in using such a hypothetical home is that its value might be quite different from the actual value of Continued on page 6 How to figure 1994 homestead property taxes Calculating homestead taxes takes four basic steps. Estimated Market Value. First, one must know the market value of the home esti- mated by local assessors-their judgment of what the home would sell for in an arm's- length sale. The estimated market value for the aver- age-value home in the Citizens League/Min- nesota Taxpayers Association survey is the average of all homestead property in each community. For the hypothetical $90,000 home, market value is estimated USing a "sales ratio" -a number calculated by the state Department of Revenue to show the difference between the assessors' judg- ment of the value of property and the price for which homes are actually selling. In Andover, for example, the 1993 sales ratio-the most current availabl&-is 90.4 percent. In other words, studies show that homes that have sold recently in Andover were valued for tax purposes at 90.4 per- cent of their actual sales price. We apply t sales ratio to our hypothetical home es price of $90,000 to arrive at what we call the "assessor's market value": $90,000 x .904 = $81,360. That is the value at which the hypothetical home would likely be val- ued for tax purposes in Andover, based on Au ust 16 1994 recent assessment practices there. Tax Capacity. Second, one must know the home's tax capacity, or how much of the property's value is subject to taxation. The Legislature has determined that less of a home's value should be taxed than of a business or apartment building, for example. For taxes paid in 1994, one percent of the first $72,000 of a home's estimated market value is taxable. For home values over $72,000, two percent is taxable value. As an example, the tax capacity of a home with an estimated market value of $87,650 is determined as follows: Step 1: Multiply the first $72,000 by 1 per- cent = $720. Step 2: Multiply the difference between $87.650 and 872,000 ($15,650) by 2 per- cent = $313. Step 3: Add $720 + $313 = $1,033 = Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Rates. Third, one must know the tax rates, which indicate how much the local units of govemment have decided to tax property. The tax capacity rates, formerly known as mill rates, are the result of dividing the amount of money local units need to raise by the value of their tax base. For every $100 of tax capacity, a 50 percent tax rate would raise $50, a 100 percent tax rate would raise $100, and so on. The total of the tax rates of each taxing jurisdiction-school, city, county, and mis- cellaneous jurisdictions like watershed dis- tricts-is applied to the home's tax capacity to determine the tax. In the example of a home with a tax capacity of $1,033, assume the total tax rate for its community is 107.22 percent. Multiplying the rate against the tax capacity gives the home- owner's tax of $1,108. If the homeowner qualifies for any of the property tax relief described below. the tax bill will be lowered. State-Paid Property Tax Relief. Fourth, . one must know how much property-tax relief, if arPf. one is eligible for. The state of Min- nesota provides this tax relief with revenues it collects from income and saJes taxes. Homeowners might qualify for either of two tax refunds. They must apply for the refunds; the refunds are not automatically included on tax statements. One is known as the "circuit breaker." It is available to homeowners whose property tax bills are MINNESOTA JOURNAL high relative to their income. Renters are also eligible to receive a renters' credit to relieve the tax burden they pay through rent. The Citizens League/Minnesota Tax. payers Association survey of home taxes does not include a calculation for a circuit- breaker refund, since it is dependent on income level. The second is called the special targeted property-tax refund. It is available to all homeowners, regardless of income, whose tax bills increased by more than 12 percent over 1993. The tax increase had to be at least $100. The refund pays 75 percent of the increase over $100 or 12 percent, whichever is greater, up to a maximum refund of $1,500. However, the refund is not available to homeowners whose tax bills increased due to physical improvements to their property. The Citizens League/Minnesota Taxpayers Association study assumes that all home- owners applied for the targeted refund and that none of the valuation increases resulted from improvements to the property. The state provides a variety of other forms of tax relief. A taconite homestead credit is available to homeowners on the Iron Range. The analysis included this credit for the tax estimates in Hibbing and Virginia. ,Properly tax the $90,000 home comparison are: $968;~y(II)$982;Co~ tinction of ranking fIrst this year, ran(877) $990; and Andover( 11) the real change in its tax status Continued from page 5 Waconia(1lO) $1,451; St. $1,000. occurred between 1992 and 1993 Paul(625) $1,391; 0sse0(279) when it moved from 34th in the ~ajority of homes in any given $1,378; Minneapolis(l), $1,368; Waconia, with the highest tax, $90,000 home tax rankings to This is especially true in the and Little Canada(623) $1,363. has the highest 1994 total tax rate second. etro communities, some of among the 95 metro communities which have few homes selling for The fIve Lowest tax metro cities in (167.558). Its school district tax Between 1992 and 1993 taxes in $90,000. the $90,000 home comparison are: rate (83.447) also ranks fIrst and Waconiajumped dramatically as its city tax rate (38.310) third. The fIve highest tax metro cities in Afton(834) $956; Ham Lake(ll) Although Waconia gains the dis- Continued on page 7 TABLE 1: TAX ON HOME SEWNG FOR $90,000* IN 95** METROPOLITAN COMMUNmES, 1994 Assessors Percent Assessors Percent Community Market 1994 Tax Change in Community Market 1994 Tax Change in (School DistrictJ Value- Tax Rook Taxes '93-94 (School Disbict) Value- Tax Rank Taxes '93-94 Afton (834) $ 76,950 $ 956 95 -4.1% Medina (278) $ 78,750 $1,041 83 -42% Andover (11) 81,360 1,000 91 -6.9 Mendota Heights (197) 80,730 1,056 80 11.5 Anoka (11) 83,610 1,103 70 -5.7 Minneapolis (1) 84,330 1,368 4 2.7 Apple Valley (196) 81,450 1,073 75 3.8 Minnetonka (276) 80,190 1 ,255 30 0.9 Arden Hills (621) 82,260 1,223 40 -2.6 Minnetrista (277) 81,900 1,186 49 8.0 Bayport (834) 81,090 1 ,268 24 -2.6 Mound (277) 80,460 1,183 51 4.4 Belle Plaine (716) 79,200 1,291 19 -2.6 Mounds V!fffl (621) 83,880 1,354 6 1.6 Blaine (16) 83,970 1,068 77 -6.1 New Brighton (621) 83,340 1,256 27 -4.3 Bloomington (271) 82,080 1,172 54 9.0 Nfffl Hope (281) 82,350 1,226 39 -02 Brooklyn Center (286) 84,780 1,256 29 -2.4 New Scandia Twp. (831) 76,500 1,008 89 -5.1 Brooklyn Pari< (279) 84,240 1,317 11 3.0 Nffflport (833) 86,310 1,311 14 1.3 Bumsville (191) 81,090 1,159 57 5.8 North Oaks (621) 78,930 1,052 81 -9.6 Champlin (11) 81,810 1,130 64 -4.7 North St. Paul (622) 82,800 1,183 52 -1.8 Chanhassen (112) 81,270 1,248 33 32 Oak Grove Twp. (15) 80,190 1,233 38 1.1 Chaska (112) 85,230 1,254 31 4.0 Oak Pari< Heights (834) 82,890 1,141 i' -2.3 Circle Pines (12) 84,150 1,241 35 6.2 Oakdale (622) 79,470 1,007 -62 lumbia Heights (13) 85,230 1,281 20 7.2 Orono (278) 79,380 1,094 72 1.4 umbus Twp. (831) 79,020 1,017 88 5.5 Osseo (279) 84,240 1,378 3 1.2 n Rapids (11) 82,620 1,031 85 -6.8 Plymouth (284) 80,820 1,076 73 -5.8 Corcoran (877) 77,310 990 92 -6.4 Prior Lake (719) 77,220 1,299 17 122 Cottage Grove (833) 82,620 1,260 26 4.8 Ramsey (11) 80,820 982 93 -3.4 Crystal (281) 82,890 1 ,265 25 1.8 Richfield (280) 83,520 1,304 15 9.3 Dayton (11) 81 ,450 1,170 55 -2.8 Robbinsdale (281) 83,970 1,297 18 3.0 Deephaven (276) 78,570 1,155 58 -0.0 Rosemount (196) 81,000 1,131 63 1.1 Eagan (196) 80,730 1,038 84 2.2 Roseville (623) 83,070 1,321 10 -2.7 East Bethel (15) 81,180 1,043 82 1.5 St. Anthony (282) 82,800 1,279 21 5.9 Eden Prairie (272) 81,000 1,196 47 -5.7 St. Louis Park (283) 80,640 1,190 48 -0.9 Edina (273) 81,360 1,215 42 9.7 St. Paul (625) 83,160 1,391 2 9.5 Excelsior (276) 79,110 1 ,256 28 11.4 St. Paul Park (833) 81,000 1,152 59 3.6 Falcon Heights (623) 84,600 1,234 37 15.5 Savage (191) 76,680 1,301 16 2.4 Farmington (193) 80,370 1 ,200 45 4.9 Shakopee (720) 79,380 1,271 23 0.4 Forest Lake (831) 80,460 1,064 79 8.6 Shorevifffl (621) 82,170 1,237 36 -3.2 Forest Lake Twp. (831) 83,340 1,005 90 13 Shorewood (276) 78,120 1,185 50 -2.9 Fridley (14) 82,980 1,167 56 -3.8 South St. Paul (6) 82,800 1,105 69 -8.1 Golden Valley (270) 81,450 1,253 32 12 Spring Lake Pari< (16) 82,530 1,071 76 -8.2 Grant Twp. (832) 80,730 1,028 86 3.2 Spring Lake Twp. (719) 79,380 1,073 74 12.3 Ham Lake (11) 82,350 968 94 -6.5 Stillwater (834) 79,560 1,110 67 -4.7 Hastings (200) 81,990 1,116 65 -0.3 Vadnais Heights (624) 85,410 1,340 7 112 Hopkins (270) 81,540 1,273 22 0.8 Waconia (110) 79,290 1,451 1 6.5 Hugo (624) 81,720 1,172 53 5.4 Waymta (284) 80,370 1,114 66 -7.2 Independence (278) 83,340 1,314 13 5.0 West St. Paul (197) 81,810 1,096 71 8.9 Inver Grove Hts (199) 80,190 1,203 46 2.0 White Bear L Twp. (624) 81,270 1,218 41 7.1 Jordan (717) 79,740 1,338 8 14.1 White Bear Lake (624) 83,430 1,333 9 5.7 Lake Bmo (834) 83,520 1,141 61 12.8 Woodbury (833) 81,630 1,212 44 0.8 Lakeville (194) 80,820 1,131 62 3.0 'The $90.000 selling price is adjusted for differences in assessment practices among communities, as Lakes (12) 81,900' 1,212 43 2.0 shown in the "Assessors Mar1<et Value" column. cod Twp. (831) 78,750 1,022 87 -0.8 ""The 95 communities in the seven-county metropolitan area with populations of 2,500 or above. e Canada (623) 82,620 1,363 5 -1.4 Mahtomedi (832) 79,740 1,105 68 -4.0 -Reflects the amount at which a home that actually sold for $90,000 would likely be valued for tax Maple Grove (279) 81,720 1,242 34 0.9 purposes by the assessor in each community, based on studies of assessment practices, Maplewood (622) 85,050 1,314 12 -2.1 SOURCES: Citizens League and Minnesota Taxpayers Association 6 MINNESOTA JOURNAL August 16, 1994 . . . Property Tax Duluth(709) $1,320; Cloquet(94) the nonmetro cities, Counties' share other tax calculations in the sur- $1.299; St. Peter(508) $1,287; of the 1994 tax rate averages 28 vey,) Continued from page 6 Hutchinson(423) $1,248; and Hib- percent in the metro cities and 32 bing(701) $1,243. percent nonmetro. The city share Many communities have voter- .e school tax rate increased by 57 averages 18 percent metro and 23 approved levies to provide addi- rcent. According to School Dis- The five lowest tax nonmetro cities percent nonmetro. Miscellaneous tional income for their school dis- trict 110 business manager Larry in the $90,000 home comparison taxing jurisdictions average four tricts. St. Paul is the only one of the Sharratt, the increase is due partly are: percent metro and less than one 95 metro communities whose to a new debt levy to pay for con- percent nonmetro. school district does not have a ref- struction of a $16 million high Elk River(728) $931; Mar- erendum levy affecting 1994 taxes, school set to open this fall and part- shaU(413) $938; Red Wing(256) (These tax-rate share figures do not Only five of the 27 nonmetro com- ly to health and safety work on the $956; Owatonna(761) $1,033; and include school levy referenda munities are in school districts district's buildings and increases in Brainerd(181) $1,038. passed after Nov. 1, 1992, which without referendum levies. the general education levy. At the are based on market value, rather same time, the city tax rate Changes in property tax levels than tax capacity, or other levy ref- Lynn Reed is a research associate increased as the city decided to cut Taxes vary from year to year for a erenda based on market value. ofthe Minnesota Taxpayers Associ- back its reliance on state aid for number of reasons, including Among the 95 largest metro com- ation (MJA) and Dana Schroeder general purpose spending. changes in the value of the proper- munities, two school districts- is editor of the Minnesota Journal. Although the school tax rate ty. In all but eight of the communi- affecting five of the 95 communi- The MJA did the data preparation declined slightly in 1994, increases ties in the survey, the average value ties-and two cities have such and arullysis for the property tax in the city and county tax rates of a home increased from 1992 to market-value referenda in place. survey, The complete study, Min- resulted in an increase in the total 1993. (There is a one-year lag in Among the 27 largest nonmetro nesota Homestead Property Tax tax rate that moved Waconia's the home values used for tax pur- communities, eight school dis- Review 1994, is available for pur- taxes to highest in the ranking. poses.) Six cities showing a decline tricts-affecting nine of the 27 chase from the Citizens League at were in the metro area and two communities-and one city have 338-0791 or the MJA at 224-7477. Neither St. Paul nor Minneapolis were nonmetro communities. In the market-value referenda These ref- ranked in the top five last year; metro area cities the median erenda levies are included in the Minneapolis ranked seventh last increase in average-home value year and St. Paul 16th. The reason was 2.2 percent, compared to 9.7 TABLE 2: TAXON HOME SEWNG FOR $90,(0)* for the change in the two cities' rel- percent in the nonmetro cities, ative rankings? St. Paul's total tax IN 2r* NONMETROPOUTAN COMMUNmes, 1994 rate increase from 1993 to 1994-- Increases in the tax rates set by Assessors Percent at 8.6 percent-was among the local units of government also help Community MaItet 1994 Tax Change in .est in the metro cities. Only account for increases in estimated (School District) Value- Tax Rank Taxes '93-94 e other cities of the 95 had per- taxes. Homeowners in more than centage increases as high or higher. two-thirds (65) of the metro cities Albert Lea (241) $ 79,470 $1,077 21 -5.0% Most of the increase in St. Paul was and over three-fourths (20) of the Austin (493) 78,570 1 ,200 7 -82 due to a nearly 14 percent increase nonmetro cities saw increases in the 8emidji (31) 80,01 0 1,217 6 1.5 in the school tax rate. The county cumulative tax rates in 1994. The Brainerd (181) 79,560 1,038 23 -3.9 tax rate also increased, while the cumulative rate is the sum of tax Cloquet (94) 78,660 1 ,299 2 5.0 city rate declined, rates of the city, the school district, Duluth (709) 81,540 1,320 1 13.5 the county and other taxing juris- Elk River (728) 77,130 931 27 -1.0 Part of the rate increase in St. Paul dictions (such as hospital or water- Fairmont (454) 87,480 1,140 14 14.4 was due to an overall decline in the shed districts), Tax rates increase if Faribautt (656) 78,300 1,129 15 -42 city's tax base, due almost entirely taxes grow at a faster rate than Fergus Falls (544) 80,910 1,105 18 122 to a drop in the city's commercial- property value, or if taxes remain Hibbing (701) 82,800 1,243 5 15.4 industrial tax base. The total tax constant and property value Hutchinson (423) 78,390 1,248 4 3.8 levy also increased, mainly due to declines. Property taxes can Mankato rrn 78,840 1,076 22 -3.1 an increase in school spending, increase if spending increases or if Marshall (413) 78,300 938 26 0.4 there is a loss of revenue from Moorhead (152) 79,650 1,147 11 2.0 While the total tax rate increase for another source, such as state aid. New Ulm (88) 80,370 1,108 17 4.7 Minneapolis-at 2.7 percent-was North Mankatorrn 75,690 1,092 20 -8.1 not large, it was high enough rela- Interestingly, nine of the 30 metro NorthfieId (659) 78,480 1,145 12 42 tive to other cities to push the city cities with tax rate decreases in Owatonna (761) 81,540 1,033 24 102 up three places to fourth highest in 1994 were located in Anoka Coun- Red Wing (256) 81,540 956 25 12 the rankings. The school, city, and ty. The tax rates decreased in three Rochester (535) 81,270 1,167 8 9.8 county tax rates all increased in school districts in which eight of St. CIoud(742) 81,000 1,143 13 2.5 Minneapolis. those nine communities are located, St. Peter (508) 79,380 1,287 3 8.5 Also, Anoka County's tax rate Vrrginia (700) 82,800 1,157 9 14,3 Three of the five lowest metro cities declined slightly (by less than one Willmar (347) 81,180 1,155 10 -3.3 -Ham Lake, Ramsey and Andover percent}-the only one of the seven Winona (861) 81,450 1,110 16 12.4 -are located in School District 11, metro counties showing a tax rate Worthington (518) 83,340 1,104 19 4,8 e has the third lowest tax rate of decrease. 'A ntrnber of nonmetrcpotitan communities have few homes selling for S90,lXXl, but the table is hool districts in which the 95 included for comparative puposes. The S90,lXXl selling price is adjusted for differences n assess- metro cities are located. School districts typically account men! p-actices arrong communities, as shown in the "Assessor's Mar1<et VU. c:okm1. for the largest share of the property -rhe 27 cities outside the metropolitan area with populations of 9,lXXl IX' above. The five highest tax nonmetro cities tax rates-an average of 50 percent -see footnote on Table 1. in the $90,000 home comparison of the total 1994 tax rate in the are: metro area cities and 45 percent in SOURCES: Citizens league and Minnesota Taxpayers Association . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. . 7. - 1995 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING Supplemental Information: Answers to questions posed in UNDERSTANDING YOUR PROPERTY TAXES 1994 printed by the Minnesota Taxpayers Association. What is the dollar amount of proposed total spending for 1995? $3,372,250 for the General Fund. How does that compare to last year? That is an increase of $337,500 or 9.94%. How does this compare to the rate of inflation? It is higher. What are the major spending categories? Police - 35.33% of total; Streets 11.53% oftotal. What are the major revenue sources? Property Tax - 47.99% of total; Intergovernmental Revenues - 24.18%. What is the projected growth rate in total market value for property taxes to be paid in 1995? 12.5% What is the projected growth rate in total net tax capacity for property taxes to be paid in 1995? 15.5% J Special report: 1994 property tax data e GARY CARLSON he payable 1994 property tax data for all cities has been expanded to provide additional information related to the property tax system and local tax base. The data for all cities is again provided in a single, expanded table and the information has been standardized for all cities. The League of Minnesota Cities would like to thank the Property Tax Division of the Minnesota Department of Revenue for their assistance in collecting this information and preparing this report. e Format The property tax data is divided into five broad categories of information-tax base data, average tax capacity tax rate data, average market value tax rate data, city aid and levy data and tax base composi- tion data. This information has been collected from various sources but is largely based on data collected and compiled by the Department of Revenue in the Abstract of Assessment of Real and Personal Property and the Abstract of Tax Usts. The information provided in the table is described in the column descrip- tion that follows. Statewide overview of 1994 property tax data Sluggish growth in real estate market values was one of the most significant highlights for property taxes in 1994. Much of this problem can be attributed to actual declines in the market values for apartments and commercial and industrial properties (see bar chart). These declines were coupled with growing residential homestead values, and as a result, many communities experienced significant shifting of the property tax burdens to their homeowners. For example, in St. Paul, residential homesteads increased from 59.1 percent to 61.3 percent of the total market value. In contrast, apartments decreased from 15.1 percent to 14.4 percent and commercial/ industrial property decreased from 20.0 percent to 18.9 percent of the total market value. City property taxes, including fiscal disparities distribution levies, increased by a modest 3.7 percent over the 1993 levels. Two other major city revenue sources, local govemment aid (LGA) and homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA), increased by 2.5 percent and 3.4 percent respectively. Overall, city revenues from these three primary sources increased by only 3.3 percent froml993 to 1994. Change in Total City Market Values Taxes Payable 1993 to 1994 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% -2.0% -4.0% e ~.O% Res Homestead Farm Other Comm/lnd Apartments Cities continue to comprise only approximately 20 percent of the average local property tax bill. For a $72,000 home, this translates to an average annual city tax bill of $190, up from $184 in 1993. For this amount, the homeowner receives services ranging from police and fire protection to snow plowing and commu- nity parks. On average, the property tax bill for other local units of govemment are paid to the county (29 percent of the total bill), school district (48 percent of the total bill) and other local taxing authorities (three percent of the total). The total tax bill for this $72,000 home was $941 in 1994, up from $915 in 1993. Statewide highlights The 1993 city population estimates reflect a 1.3 percent increase over the 1992 estimates. Tax base highlights Total tax capacity was down by ,8 percent from the 1993 level. Tax increment financing(TIF) captured tax capacity was down by 6.5 percent from the 1993 level, reflecting state imposed property class rate reductions, the decline in commercial and industrial property market values, and the decertification ofTIF districts. Fiscal disparities contribution tax capacity for cities in the seven-county metro area declined by 4.2 percent from 1993, also reflecting state imposed property class rate reductions and the decline in commercial and industrial property values. Taxable tax capacity grew by .3 percent, which partially reflects increases in residential homestead property values. Tax rate highlights The average tax burden imposed by Minnesota cities remained stable at approximately 20 percent of the average total property tax bill (see pie chart), Although the 1994 school district share of the average tax bill declined to 47.9 percent from 48.3 percent in 1993, school district market value referen- dum levies increased by 124 percent to more than $17.6 million for taxes payable in 1994. The average tax burden imposed by counties and special taxing authorities increased slightly frolll1993to 1994. Aid and levy highlights Local govemment aid increased by 2.5 percent over the 1993 certified level. .- Note that beginning in 1994, the equalization aid and the city portion of disparity reduction aid programs were eliminated. The 1993 amounts for these programs were folded in with each city's LGA. City homestead and agricultural credit aid increased by 3.4 percent due to class rate reductions for commercial and industrial properties, non- homestead residential (one to three unit apartments) and several agricul- tural class rate reductions. 1994 city net levies, including fiscal disparities distribution levies, increased by 3.7 percent over the 1993 level. Tax base composition highlights Residential homestead properties increased as a percentage of the tax base market value in cities to nearly 64 percent from 61.8 percent in the previous year. Apartment as well as commercial and industrial market values both declined as a percentage of the market value within cities. Note: These highlights are based on statewide trends. Substantial local variation is possible. Please refer to the 1993 property tax data provided in the November 1993 Minnesota Cities magazine. Column descriptions 1993 Population-The 1993 population estimate for each city prepared by the Metropolitan Council and the State Demographer. Total Tax Capacity-The total tax capacity for taxes payable in 1994, Source: 1994 Abstract of Tax lists. Power Line Tax Capacity-The net tax capacity of 10 percent oCthe 200 KV power line for taxes payable in 1994. Source: 1994 Abstrdct of Tax lists. Captured TIFTax Capacity-The captured tax capacity within tax increment financing districts for taxes payable in 1994, Source: 1994 Abstract of Tax Lists. Fiscal Disparities Contribution Tax Capacity-The tax capacity contributed to the fiscal disparities program for taxes payable in 1994. Cities outside of Anoka, CalVer, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington counties are not affected by this program. Source: 1994 Abstract of Tax Lists. Taxable Tax Capacity-The taxable tax capacity for taxes payable in 1994. The taxable tax capacity is computed by subtracting the power line tax capacity, captured TIF tax capacity and the fiscal disparities contribution capacity from the total tax capacity of each city. This is the tax base used to compute the local tax rate. Sour~e: 1994 Abstract of Tax lists. Fiscal Disparities Distribution Tax Capacity-The tax capacity received from the fiscal disparities program for taxes payable in 1994. Only cities located within Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington counties are affected by this program. Source: 1994 Abstract of Tax Lists. Average Tax Rates-These columns provide the average 1994 tax rates for county, city, school and special districts within each city. Average tax rates are provided be<:ause a city may be overlapped by several school districts, counties or special taxing districts. For example, portions of the city ofSt. Cloud are located in Steams, Sherburne and Benton counties and within the Sauk Rapids (ISD 47) and the St. Cloud (ISD 742) school districts. Source: Computed from data on the 1994 Abstract of Tax Lists. Please note that the -average total rate does not include market value-based referenda levies. Market Value Tax Rates-These columns provide the average 1994 market value tax rates for cities and schools within each city. Beginning in 1993, newly-approved city and school referenda levies were applied to the market value rather than the tax capacity of parcels, For taxes payable in 1994, nine cities and 80 school districts imposed market value referenda levies. This is up from five cities and 34 school districts in 1993, Source: Computed from data on the 1994 Abstract of Tax Lists. 1994 LGA-The 1994 certified local government aid, These amounts are the net of any tax increment penalties that may have been applied in 1994. Source: Department of Revenue spreadsheet, 1994 HACA- The certified 1994 homestead and agricultural credit aid. These amounts are the net of any tax increment penalties that may have been applied in 1994, Source: Department of Revenue HACA calculation spreadsheet. 1994 City Certified Levy-The 1994 certified levy reported by each city to the Department of Revenue in their sUlVcy, Source: Department of Revenue levy sUlVey spreadsheet. 1994 Fiscal Disparities Distribution Levy-The amount of 1994 city levy raised through the fiscal disparities program. Source: House Research Department spreadsheet. 1994 City Net Levy-The city levy actually used to compute the local tax rate. The net levy is computed by subtracting the fiscal disparities distribution levy from each city's certified levy. Source: 1994 Abstract of Tax Lists. Tax Base Composition Columns-These columns provide percentages of the local market value of real and personal property within various broad property classifica- tions, Source: 1993 Abstract of Assessment of Real and Personal Property (Note: the 1993 property assessments are used for taxes payable in 1994). Residential Homestead-all non- agricultural homestead property. Apartment-one to three unit apart- ments, four plus unit apartments, government housing land, Fanners Home Administration buildings, Title II, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and Section 8 buildings. Farm-all agricultural homestead property, non-homestead agricultural property, and timberlands. Commercial and Industrial-all commercial and industrial property, commercial and industrial enterprise zone property Other-public utility, railroad, mineral, cabins, seasonal resorts, mobile home property, and personal property. .. Average Property Tax Bill Where the Tax Dollars Go School District 48% Special 3% I--.--..--.---m.----....--.----.-.---..------------- T AX BASE DA T A________._._-____________mmm________ I......-m----- NETT AX CAPACITY TAX RATES _m__mm"1 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average e Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Conlrib Tax Tax DiSlrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate ADA 1.705 440,648 0 16.414 0 424,234 0 38.1% 45.3% 54.6% 3.3% 141.3% ADAMS 767 176.312 0 0 0 176,312 0 46.1% 42.3% 57.9% 0.7% 147.1% ADRIAN 1.152 244,807 0 12.935 Q 231,872 0 28.5% 58.2% 53.8% 1.4% 141.8% AFTON 2,829 2,781.493 0 0 155.125 2,626.368 170,923 30.7% 20.1% 64.4% 3.2% 118.4% AITKIN 1,709 702,421 0 20,941 0 681.480 0 57.0% 17.4% 53.7% .0.2% 128.4% AKElEY 396 102.782 0 0 0 102,782 0 37.9% 33.4% 69.2'10 0.4% 141.0% ALBANY 1,583 641,637 0 90,685 0 550,952 0 39.5% 43.5% 52.5% 3.6% 139.1% ALBERT LEA 18.360 7.292,692 0 493.018 0 6,799,674 0 42.5% 22.1% 55.4% 0.0% 120.1% ALBERTA 135 52.039 0 0 0 52,039 0 45.1% 33.6% 72.7% 0.0% 151.4% ALBERTVILLE 1.547 870.137 0 101,572 0 768.565 0 31.9% 38.0% 55.7% 0.0% 125.5% ALDEN 620 172.132 0 0 0 172,132 0 38.0% 34.7% 39.1% 0.0% 111.8% ALDRICH 65 19.58B 0 0 0 19.588 0 80.4% 12.6% 61.4% 0.2% 154.6% ALEXANDRIA 8,183 5.691,848 0 156.679 0 5.535.169 0 40.4% 24.1% 61.9% 0.6% 127.1% ALPHA 162 22,798 0 0 0 22.798 0 38.0% 41.4% 51.0% 0.2% 130.7% ALTURA 373 165,765 0 0 0 165.765 0 41.4% 14.9% 50.1% 1.0% 107.5% ALVARADO 353 74,265 0 0 0 74.265 0 23.8% 17.1% 71.2'1.. 2.B% 115.0% AMBOY 559 111,968 0 866 0 111.102 0 34.9% 72.6% 49.9% 0.2% 157.6% ANDOVER IO,~u", 9,114.223 0 642,164 596,955 7.875,104 2,073,495 32.7% 18.4% 57.6% 1.6% 110.3% ANNANDALE 2.262 958.735 0 263.411 0 695,324 0 31.6% 31.6% 62.4% 1.1% 126.8% ANOKA 17,481 9.943.846 0 820,876 1.170.164 7.952,806 2,735.316 29.9% 24.2% 57.2% 4.6% 115.8% APPLE V ALLEY 38,261 24.034,209 0 1,960.503 2,298,138 19,775.568 4,136,929 27.5% 24.6% 61.1% 5.0% 118.2% APPLCTON 1,641 409,385 0 75,376 0 334.009 0 49.2% 70.1% 38.1% 0.4% 157.B% ARCO 106 15,224 0 0 0 15,224 0 40.3% 34.9% 43.4% 0.7% 119.4% ARDEN HILLS 9.493 11.675.187 0 60.354 2,632,708 8.982,125 863.255 44.5% 17.1% 65.6% 5.2% 132.4% ARGYLE 628 182,340 0 0 0 182,340 0 23.4% 22.4% 54.8% 2.8% 103.3% ARLINGTON 1.897 467,532 0 36,226 0 431.306 0 50.B% 72.1% 63.3% 1.8% 187.9% ASHBY 471 95.536 0 0 0 95.536 0 44.8% 46.3% 53.4% 0.0% 144.4% ASKOV 344 90.842 0 0 0 90,842 0 51.2% 23.5% 72.1% 6.0% 152.8% ATWATER 1.049 304.519 0 0 0 304,519 0 38.8% 69.2% 47.2% 0.2% 155.4% AUDUBON 418 137.775 0 0 0 137,775 0 58.0% 56.2% 49.3% 1.7% 165.3% AURORA 1.964 .402.848 0 17.633 0 385,215 0 59.9% 60.2% 39.6% 1.0% 160.7% AUSTIN 21.923 8,634.509 0 504.676 0 8,129,833 0 46.9% 26.8% 66.0% 0.8% 140.4% AVOf:A 145 26.641 0 0 0 26,641 0 37.3% 15.4% 52.3% 0.2% 105.2% AVON 1.000 553.670 0 108.515 0 445,155 0 39.3% 39.3% 52.2% 0.2% 131.0% 8ABEITT 1.585 400,049 0 0 0 400,049 0 80.2% 28.5% 53.3% 1.1% 163.0% BACt.US 278 79.730 0 0 0 79.730 0 39.3% 38.6% 55.5% 0.2% 133.5% BADGER 382 86.139 0 0 0 86,139 0 31.0% 28.5% 99.0% 1.7% 160.1% 8AGLEY 1.431 344.971 0 21,319 0 323,652 0 61.9% 36.7% 59.4% 1.7% 159.6% 8ALATON 727 120.819 0 0 0 120,819 0 37.6% 148.8% 58.1% 0.2% 244.8% BARNESVILLE 2.102 349.595 0 0 0 349.595 0 49.0% 40.6% 64.3% 1.7% 155.6% e 8ARNUM 492 101,934 0 8.609 0 93,325 0 51.5% 74.7% 57.9'1( 2.7% 186.8% BARRETT 350 71.788 0 0 0 71,788 0 44.0% 74.6% 53.4'1( 0.0% 172.1 % BARRY 37 17.087 0 0 0 17.087 0 53.0% 16.8% 48.3% 3.0% 12'.1% BASS BROOK 2,090 12.679,297 2.816 0 0 12,676.481 0 46.8% 6.7% 56.1% 0.2% 10!l.7% BATTLE LAKE 718 282.273 0 .0 0 282,273 0 40.3% 36.4% 49.4% 0.0% 126.1% BAUDETTE 1.146 466,326 0 0 0 466,326 0 58.7% 14.2% 61.9% 0.4% 135.2% BAXTER 4.101 3.346.390 0 304.876 0 3.041.514 0 31.8% 25.1% 59.6% 0.1% 116.6% 8AYPORT .3,195 3.253,821 0 8.180 823.484 2,422.157 405,054 28.2% 42.8% 64.1% 5.5% 140.6% BEARDSLEY 290 48.411 0 0 0 48.411 0 41.8% 66.4% 51.1% 2.8% 162.0% BEAVER BAY 149 67.018 0 0 0 67,018 0 77.4% 61.2% 50.7% 3.0% 192.3% BEAVER CREEK 249 37,756 0 0 0 37.756 0 26.0% 78.6% 59.2% 0.2% 164.0% 8ECKER 1.106 30.492,839 3,535 87.773 0 30.401.531 0 21.8% 14.5% 31.6% 0.4% 68.3% 8EJOU 106 12,517 0 0 0 12,517 0 98.3% 13.7% 42.7% 3.0% 157.7% BELGRADE 698 171,482 0 0 0 171.482 0 38.9% 67.2% 64.9% 0.2% 171.2% BELLE PLAINE 3,190 1,061,534 0 0 65.064 996.470 530,922 48.5% 30.8% 67.7% 2.4% 149.4% BElLECHESTER 154 36.326 0 0 0 36,326 0 32.0% 22.1% 62.8'1( 1.3% 118.2% BELLINGHAM 236 45,857 0 0 0 45.857 0 35.6% 25.9% 80.4% 1.4% 143.3% 8El TRAM I 135 43.562 0 0 0 43.562 0 46.1% 20.4% 58.2% 2.6% 127.2% BELVIEW 383 59.717 0 0 0 59.717 0 29.5% 48.4% 77.5% 0.2% 155.7% 8EMIDJI 11.162 4,848.111 0 146.176 0 4,701,935 0 59.6% 18.6% 59.6% 0.4% 138.2% BENA 144 15.692 0 0 0 15,692 0 40.8% 25.4% '76.9% 0.1% 143.3% BENSON 3,228 732,834 0 159,815 0 573.019 0 55.4% 32.5% 54.1% 0.4% 142.4% BERTHA 512 97,660 0 0 0 97,660 0 70.0% 101% 56.2% 0.2% 136.5% 8ETHEL 430 223.462 0 0 65.564 157.898 76,112 32.7% 41.0% 61.5% 1.1% 136.3% BIG FALLS 332 52.860 0 0 0 52.860 0 41.3% 78.0% 47.4% 25.1% 191.7% BIG LAKE 3.331 1,707.313 0 210,632 0 1,496,681 0 21.6% 26.6% 61.7% 2.7% 112.7% BIGELOW 225 51.999 0 0 0 51,999 0 31.7% 16.9% 55.7% 1.5% 105.9% 81GFDRK 385 118.172 0 0 0 118.172 0 42.5% 28.8% 52.3% 24.9% 148.5% BINGHAM LAKE 149 46.261 0 0 0 46.261 0 44.4% 39.9% 66.9% 0.2% 151.4% BIRCHWDOD VILLAGE 1,024 816.618 0 0 2.322 814,296 77 ,096 30.7% 17.5% 71.9% 5.2% 125.2% 81RD ISLAND 1.324 341,082 0 42,132 0 298.950 0 23.9% 40.3% 41.1% 0.2% 105.6% BISCAY 124 18.368 0 0 0 18,368 0 46.9% 32.4% 55.2% 0.2% 134.7% BIWABIK 1.082 193,624 0 0 0 193,624 0 53.6% 102.2% 31.3% 1.0% 188.2% BLACKDUCK 730 249.642 0 31,738 0 217,904 0 59.6% 29.8% 63.7% 1.9% 154.9% 8LAINE 40.814 23,460,286 0 2.295.345 4.309,161 16,855,780 6.052.625 32.9% 18.6% 57.2% 5.9% 114.5% BLOMKEST 179 43.990 0 0 0 43.990 0 42.2% 46.3% 61.9% 0.2% 150.6% BLOOMING PRAIRIE 2.054 556,832 0 12,620 0 544.212 0 33.1% 38.4% 60.4% 0.0% 131.9% 8LOOMINGTON 86.918 125.051,087 0 15.175.249 24,343.188 B5,532,650 7.286.048 37.8% 23.9% 58.6% 6.8% 127.1% BLUE EARTH 3.727 1,338,983 0 129.586 0 1,209.397 0 30.2% 48.0% 55.4% 0.2% 133.8% 8LUFFTON 188 43,359 0 0 0 43.359 0 40.5% 23.8% 67.3% 0.0% 131.6% BOCK 117 20,55B 0 0 0 20.558 0 81.7% 4.2% 64.1% 0.2% 150.1% BORUP 112 18.439 0 0 0 18.439 0 40.5% 19.5% 55.7% 3.5% 119.2% BOVEY 654 96.486 0 0 0 96.486 0 28.9% 81.0% 44.0% 0.1% 154.0% BOWLUS 260 54,489 0 0 0 54.489 0 58.9% 23.7% 53.7% 0.4% 136.7% e BOY RIVER 41 6,7B4 0 0 0 6,784 0 41.1% 20.4% 58.0% 0.1% 119.6% BOYD 237 36.678 0 0 0 36,67B 0 22.0% 127.4% 28.9% 1.2% 179.5% BRAHAM 1,156 374,712 0 56.877 0 317.835 0 60.2% 54.1% 65.3% 0.2% 179.8% I-m-MV TAX RA TES----- Im--mm.m______m_m__.AID AND LEVY DA TA.m___"__.__._."m___m.____._ I--...-.-m-----.m-..._ T AX BASE COMPOSITION-.....-.m..-...--_.._I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV City MV School MV LGA City Certified FDDist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes ADA. 0% 0% 390,047 123.959 192,203 0 192,203 71.70% 9.65% 0.67% 13.82% 4.16% ADAMS 0% 0% . 115,206 32.605 74,666 0 74.666 75.03% 6.28% 3.89% 12.39% 2.41% ADRIAN 0% 0% 195.099 65,782 134,919 0 134.919 81.10% 7.12% 0.69% 10.75% 0.34% AFTON 0% 0% 0 115,519 557,045 28,744 528.301 75.31 % 6.12% 11.11% 3.59% 3.87% AITKIN 0.03244% 0% . 260.795 48.730 118,768 0 118,768 50.89% 17.56% 0.30% 28.64% 2.61% AKELEY 0% 0% 53.650 5,656 34,345 0 34,345 53.37% 7.34% 4.50% 11.46% 23.32% ALBANY 0% 0% 197.299 82.876 239,901 0 239.901 64.83% 8.81% 0.32% 15.44% 10.60% ALBERT LEA 0% 0.04059% 3,815,896 775,639 1.504,971 0 1,504,971 66.42% 9.24% 0.29% 21.81% 2.25% ALBERTA 0% 0% 9,780 6.824 17,500 0 17,500 37.23% 8.45% 1.22% 44.17% 8.93% ALBERTVILLE 0% 0,04953% 53,772 138,223 291.701 0 291,701 66.B6% 12.21% 4.11% 14.4B% 2.35% ALDEN 0% 0% 114,704 48,110 59.657 0 59,657 72.82% 6.95% 4.07% 13.78% 2.38% ALDRICH 0% 0.05368% 575 541 2,459 0 2,459 52.71 % 2.54% 8.83% 14.40% 21.51% ALEXANDRIA 0.06801 % 0% 1,139,233 384,587 1,335.717 0 1.335.717 41.64% 15.38% 0.42% 38.36% 4.21% ALPHA 0% 0% 23,062 8.438 9.427 0 9.427 56.22% 5.52% 3.B6% 32.85% 1.55% AL TURA 0% 0% 41,212 15.768 24,732 0 24,732 53.91% 6.82% 20.12% 16.45% 2.70% ALVARADO 0% 0% 17.115 2,330 12.722 0 12,722 68.23% 13.67% 0.38% 6.38% 11.34% AMBOY 0% 0% B2,247 42,980 80,619 0 80,619 73.07% 9.06% 2.50% 11.76% 3.61% ANDOVER 0% 0.00551% 100,319 475,910 1.805,846 353.614 1.452.232 87.25% 4.79% 2.09% 2.89% 2.98% ANNANDALE 0% 0.04964% 217,562 128.848 220,015 0 220.015 59.39% 11.55% 1.46% 22.47% 5.14% ANOKA 0% 0% 1,106,872 705.245 2.561,121 638,581 1,922,540 61.61 % 17.91% 0.10% 19.00% 1.37% APPLE VALLEY 0% 0% 362,346 2.539.872 5.919,576 1,045.095 4.874.481 83.17% 5.41% 0.80% 8.40% 2.21% APPLETON 0% 0.04719% 380,469 133.457 234,300 0 234,300 62.15% 11.26% 1.08% 18.23% 7.27% ARCO 0% 0% 15,917 7.671 5,316 0 5.316 59.08% 3.76% 14.01% 19.49% 3.66% ARDEN HILLS 0% 0% 0 97,544 1,661.180 126.853 1.534,327 62.42% 2.86% 0.00% 32.07% 2.65% ARGYLE 0% 0% 133,180 30,068 40,762 0 40,762 59.12% 9.95% 5.93% 13.BO% 11.20% ARLINGTON 0% 0.03252% 267,241 146,911 310,815 0 310,815 75.99% 8.79% 0.3B% 12.64% 2.19% ASH8Y 0% 0% 55.993 23,743 44,214 0 44.214 58.61% 10.25% 1.72% 22.61% 6.82% ASKOV 0% 0% 32,570 8,293 21,339 0 21.339 61.89% 12.18% 4.25% 13.79% 7.90% ATWATER 0% 0% 172.278 78,887 210,739 0 210.739 71.01% 9.24% 0.49% 14.93% 4.33% AUDU80N 0% 0% 27.337 25,571 77.474 0 77.474 49.30% 9.63% 0.83% 27.59% 12.64% AURORA 0% 0% 441,215 188.983 231.880 0 231,880 74.35% 10.64% 0.67% 8.26% 6.07% AUSTIN 0% 0% 4,233.175 1,342,762 2,175,931 0 2,175.931 70.88% 6.67% 0.22% 21.32% 0.92% AVOCA 0% 0% 19,886 3.443 4,099 0 4,099 51.91% 4.61% 25.10% 15.12% 3.26% AVON 0% 0% 77,190 59.743 174.777 0 174,777 66.86% 5.19% 1.05% 23.65% 3.25% BAB81TT 0% 0% 79.766 33,802 114.100 0 114,100 68.00% 5.87% 8.60% 8.98% 8.55% BACKUS 0% 0% 34.476 13,173 30,773 0 30,773 49.02% 10.00% 0.97% B.8B% 31.13% BADGER 0% 0% 64,566 16,350 24,537 0 24,537 63.94% 6.71% 1.64% 19.67% B.03% BAGLEY 0% 0% 258,157 44.499 118,638 0 118,638 48.02% 20.01% 0.24% 27.75% 3.98% 8ALATON 0% 0% 109.588 62,785 179,812 0 179,812 65.94% 16.85% 6.03% 7.89% 3.29% BARNESVILLE 0% 0% 189.530 95,044 142,065 0 142.065 83.18% 6.78% 1.16% 7.66% 1.21% BARNUM 0% 0.05596% 70.B86 28,547 69,670 0 69.670 58.82% 14.00% 1.19% 12.75% 13.24% BARRETT 0% 0% 36,688 18.245 53,55B 0 53,55B 50.23% 6.99% 16.17% 15.32% 11.29% BARRY 0% 0% 1,149 1,584 2.873 0 2.873 19.13% 5.96% 18.00% 2.64% 54.27% BASS BROOK 0% 0% .0 54,848 845,267 0 845,267 14.53% 0.58% 0.64% 0.93% 83.32% BA mE LAKE 0% 0.04411% 95,021 37,668 102,716 0 102,716 65.00% 7.46% 0.64% 8.74% . 18.16% BAUDETTE 0% 0% 209,531 58.044 66.344 0 66,344 51.64% 7.08% 1.22% 32.89% 7.17% 8AXTER 0% 0% 122.852 203,452 764,490 0 764,490 58.86% 3.96% 1.13% 33.16% 2.89% BAYPORT 0% 0% 29,511 165.608 1,182.432 146,374 1,036.058 47.65% 4.96% 0.00% 45.24% 2.14% BEARDSLEY 0% 0% 49,426 16,086 32.139 0 32,139 58.34% 12.31% 2.66% 4.64% 22.06% BEAVER BAY 0% 0.06419% 36.255 9,834 41,004 0 41,004 42.70% 6.95% 0.12% 13.07% 37.17% "'." BEAVER CREEK 0% 0% 43,310 14.978 29,672 0 29.672 70.13% 6.50% 4.35% 16.70% 2.32% BECKER 0% 0% 0 235,246 4.403.661 0 4,403,661 2.24% 0.82% 0.11% 0.81% 96.02% BEJOU 0% 0% 16,352 904 1,721 0 1,721 48.87% 12.77% 7.17% 19.60% 11.59% BELGRADE 0% 0% 96.720 46,608 115,178 0 115.178 64.63% 10.60% 2.67% 17.01% 5.10% BELLE PLAINE 0% 0% 274,833 154,632 458,791 151.858 306,933 78.85% 8.39% 2.55% 8.30% 1.91% BELLECHESTER 0% 0% 11,560 4,222 8,028 0 8,028 73.67% 4.31% 8.37% 11.94% 1.70% BELLINGHAM 0% 0% 59.472 7,108 11.893 0 11,893 53.85% 11.38% 2.95% 12.59% 19.24% Bel TRAMI 0% 0% 10.190 5,320 8,870 0 8,870 29.66% 3.15% 37.11% 19.64% 10.43% BElVIEW 0% 0% 81,376 29,854 28.903 0 28,903 64.63% 6.73% 12.76% 9.87% 6.01% BEMIDJI 0% 0% 2,163,136 240,294 876.864 0 876,864 42.55% 16.98% 0.05% 34.37% 6.05% BENA 0% 0% 15.691 2,508 3,992 0 3,992 41.67% 11.87% 0.00% 6.73% 39.73% BENSON 0.03265% 0.00382% 783.002 107,917 186,059 0 186.059 71.68% 9.32% 0.50% 15.85 % 2.65% 8ERTHA 0% 0.02040% 131,051 15,002 9.885 0 9,885 58.76% 13.40% 4.59% 15.70% 7.54% BETHEL 0% 0.05161% 15,827 5,761 92,823 28,039 . 64,784 61.55% 5.48% 2.20% 5.15% 25.62% BIG FALLS 0% 0% 50,651 7,927 41.218 0 41,218 63.73% 18.62% 3.00% 3.18% 11.47% BIG LAKE 0% 0.05239% 254.317 180,940 398,236 0 398,236 65.54% 10.84% 0.81% 15.96% 6.85% BIGELOW 0% 0% lB,710 3,633 8,790 0 8,790 59.69% 6.01% 6.21% 27.13% 0.96% 81GFORK 0% 0% 79,399 18,781 33.999 0 33,999 53.91% 13.80% 1.72% 20.32% 10.25% 81NGHAM LAKE 0% 0% 17.371 9,014 18.436 0 18,436 47.89% 2.03% 15.61% 29.64% 4.83% BIRCHWOOD VILLAGE 0% 0% 699 53,203 155,625 13.276 142,349 93.48% 3.57% 0.00% 0.00% 2.95% BIRD ISLAND 0% 0% 209.885 102.651 120.530 0 120,530 68.92% 6.80% 3.17% 16.03% 5.08% BISCAY 0% 0% 2.609 4.455 5,945 0 5,945 93.92% 3.45% 0.00% 0.56% 2.07% 8/WABIK 0% 0.00055% 306,763 108.733 197.927 0 197.927 75.97% 8.60% 3.00% 7.17% 5.26% BLACKDUCK 0% 0% 100,089 39.161 64.940 0 64,940 45.97% 12.57% 1.21% 35.09% 5.16% BLAINE 0% 0% 1.166,857 1,620,677 4,277,818 1.149,191 3.128.627 68;96% 5.33% 0.78% 20.96% 3.97% BLOMKEST 0% 0% 18.542 6.512 20.349 0 20.349 55.55% 5.33% 24.04% 13.47% 1.61% BLOOMING PRAIRIE 0% 0% 266,803 153,391 209,103 0 209,103 75.33% 6.77% 1.53% 15.66% 0.70% BLOOMINGTON 0% 0.00081% 0 3,706,271 22.141.946 1.696,222 20.445.724 55.71% 7.88% 0.01% 35.24% 1.15% BLUE EARTH 0% 0% 634,559 337.901 579,942 0 579,942 65.41% 8.19% 0.72% 24.77% 0.90% BLUFFTON 0% 0% 2,096 2.540 10.330 0 10.330 46.39% 8.69% 27.23% 10.33% 7.36% BOCK 0% 0% 4,129 520 859 0 859 64.34% 12.45% 0.56% 20.39% 2.26% BORUP 0% 0% 6.850 1,203 3.599 0 3,599 46.46% 18.87% 15.43% 11.92% 7.31% BOVEY 0% 0.05877% 276.231 68,479 78,127 0 78,127 73.71% 11.01% 0.33% 9.75% 5.21% BOWLUS 0% 0% 12,816 7,538 12,899 0 12.899 69.07% 4.58% 14.13% 6.91% 5.31% BOY RIVER 0% 0% 1,884 915 1,385 0 1,385 6B.60% 2.22% 0.63% 7.56% 20.99% BOYD 0% 0.02615% 65,151 21,401 46;746 0 46,746 46.92% 5.B5% 9.75% 29.54% 7.94% BRAHAM 0% 0.04136% I B8.900 41,764 172,025 0 172,025 61.51 % 11. 72% 1.47% 16.26% 9.04% I--.----.m--------____.__.____________n_____ooo._ T AX BASE OAT A__ooo___moooooo__._____.oo___oo____m__ 1--------------- NETT AX CAPACITY TAX RATES .---.-------001 e 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Dlstrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate BRAINERD 12.515 5,128,596 0 213,101 0 4.915,495 0 30.7% 28.6% 59.1% 0.7% 119.1% BRANCH 2,607 1,270,569 4,904 196,713 0 1.068,952 0 53.5% 24.0% 53.4% 0.2% 131.1% BRANDON 445 93.978 0 1.641 0 92,337 0 41.2% 40.3% 43.7% 0.3% 125.5% BRECKENRIDGE 3.707 848.358 0 26.346 0 822,012 0 42.6% 28.9% 48.2% 0.2% 119.9% BREEZY POINT 457 1,605,769 0 0 0 1.605,769 0 31.8% 25.1% 51.5% 0.7% 109.2% BREWSTER 533 129.302 0 0 0 129.302 0 29.1% 52.9% 50.6% 1.2% 133.7% BRICEL YN 423 107,603 0 14.569 0 93.034 0 29.8% 48.1% 52.3% 0.2% 130.4% 8RODK PARK 132 24.992 0 0 0 24.992 0 51.0% 20.3% 48.2% 0.2% 119.8% BROOKLYN CENTER 28.533 24.281.112 0 1.184.328 5.276,806 17.819,978 3.743.029 37.8% 27.0% 62.4% 6.4% 133.7% BROOKLYN PARK 58.125 36.048.130 7.113 3.658.529 5.639.617 26.742.871 8.185.390 37.8% 24.9% 65.5% 6.2% 134.4% BROOKS 154 37.039 0 0 0 37.039 0 53.8% 29.0% 55.5% 1.9% 140.2% BROOKSTON 102 20,205 0 0 0 20.205 0 76.8% 18.9% 46.9% 1.1% 143.6% BROOTEN 609 148,104 0 5,810 0 142.294 0 38.2% 34.7% 71.0% 4.9% 148.8% BROWERVILLE 775 189,111 0 11,174 0 177.937 0 73.3% 58.5% 56.7% 0.2% 188.6% BROWNS V ALLEY 793 116,891 0 12,785 0 104,106 0 36.3% 96.1% 47.7% 2.3% 182.4% BROWNSDALE 696 153.700 0 0 0 153.700 0 48.9% 17.4% 51.9% 0.7% 118.9% BROWNSVILLE 433 85,179 0 0 0 85,179 0 51.8% 33.5% 59.9% 0.0% 145.2% BROWNTON 787 127.108 0 0 0 127.108 0 41.7% 99.3% 51.5% 0.7% 193.2% BRUNO 90 22.779 0 0 0 22,779 0 51.1% 7.3% 72.0% 6.0% 136.4% BUCKMAN 203 52.805 0 0 0 52.805 0 59.0% 22.2% 61.8% 0.4% 143.3% BUFFALO 7.578 3,841,288 0 1.105.534 0 2,735,754 0 33.7% 22.1% 58.7% 0.0% 114.5% BUFFALO LAKE 735 225,981 0 .0 0 225,981 0 27.3% 83.3% 52.1% 0.8% 163.5% BUHL 903 123.349 0 0 0 123.349 0 43.9% 73.8% 8.6% 1.0% 127.4% BURNSVILLE 53.363 56.911,355 0 1,743.524 10.550.500 44,617,331 5,450,730 27.5% 20.4% 71.2% 5.0% 124.1% BURTRUM 169 16,731 0 0 0 16,731 0 69.1% 28.8% 60.5% 0.2% 158.6% BUTTERFIELD 573 114.871 0 0 0 114.871 0 49.2% 53.4% 48.5% 0.2% 151.3% BYRON 2,854 974.725 0 97.857 0 876.868 0 41.2% 50.5% 70.0% 0.0% 161.7% CALEDONIA 2.907 795.733 0 10.713 0 785.020 0 50.5% 30.0% 59.4% 1.0% 141.0% CALLAWAY 208 51.079 0 0 0 51.079 0 57.7% 27.6% 56.1% 1.7% 143.2% CALUMET 377 48.730 0 0 0 48.730 0 25.8% 75.9% 41.9% 0.1% 143.7% CAMBRIDGE 5,182 2.864.409 0 203,412 0 2.650.997 0 59.3% 41.4% 49.6% 0.2% 160.5% CAMPBELL 227 50.578 0 0 0 50.578 0 44.6% 30.7% 62.7% 0.3% 138.3% CANBY 1,819 413.008 0 5.039 0 407,969 0 43.1% 51.6% 47.9% 1.3% 143.9% CANNON FALLS 3,435 2,020,692 0 266,358 0 1,754.334 0 22.4% 40.7% 61.5% 1.8% 126.5% CANTON 364 69.994 0 0 0 69.994 0 43.5% 34.3% 64.1% 0.0% 141.8% CARLOS 365 65,585 0 0 0 65.585 0 41.7% 27.0% 61.9% 0.3% 130.8% CARLTON 960 236.943 0 0 0 236,943 0 52.8% 43.1% 43.7% 0.2% 139.8% CARVER 773 299,576 0 13.594 15,562 270,420 101,701 44.3% 37.8% 62.6% 1.9% 146.6% CASS LAKE 909 167.518 0 10.656 0 156,862 0 36.7% 53.5% 72.5% 0~2% 162.8% CEDAR MILLS 81 19.742 0 0 0 19.742 0 43.0% 3.1% 61.5% 0.2% 107.9% e CENTER CITY 502 253.667 0 0 0 253,667 0 53.9% 13.5% 56.8% 0.2% 124.4% CENTERVILLE 2.095 842,423 0 158,283 52,172 631,968 270.874 32.7% 35.7% 64.0% 5.5% 137.8% CEYLON 446 53.293 0 0 0 53,293 0 16.2% 119.7% 34.4% 0.1% 170.4% CHAMPliN 18.565 7.564.193 0 494.839 255.858 6,813,496 2,576,859 37.8% 22.2% 57.2% 6.1% 123.3% CHANDLER 308 123,156 0 0 0 123.156 0 37.3% 29.6% 48.2% 0.2% 115.3% CHANHASSEN 13.388 15.355,847 0 4.166.216 963,804 10.225,827 945,161 44.1% 25.5% 69.1% 4.9% 143.6% CHASKA 13.012 11.520.962 0 3,965,273 2.251,041 5,304,648 1.483.301 44.5% 15.5% 62.9% 4.3% 127.2% CHATFIELD 2.341 739,518 0 11,885 0 727.633 0 43.5% 53.7% 62.2% 0.0% 159.4% CHICKAMAW BEACH 137 74,151 0 0 0 74.151 0 40.9% 12.2% 57.1% 0.2% 110.3% CHISAGO CITY 2.041 1.161,328 0 242.535 0 918.793 0 53.8% 30.0% 56.8% 0.2% 140.7% CHISHOLM 5.256 1.011.417 0 0 0 1,011.417 0 56.1% 77.2% 29.4% 0.5% 163.2% CHOKIO 522 100.835 0 2,904 0 97,931 0 43.8% 29.8% 71.3% 0.0% 144.9% CIRCLE PINES 4.779 2.079.262 0 71,925 117,674 1,889,663 636,888 32.7% 27.7% 64.0% 4.5% 128.9% CLARA CITY 1,304 357.241 0 0 0 357,241 0 42.6% 42.7% 58.3% 0.4% 144.1% CLAREMONT 536 110,916 0 0 0 110,916. 0 29.5% 44.3% 42.9% 0.0% 116.8% CLARISSA 634 98.212 0 0 0 98,212 0 59.2% 37.9% 40.0% 0.1% 137.3% CLARKFIELD 1.000 198,084 0 4.346 0 193,738 0 41.3% 79.9% 70.5% 0.4% 192.2% CLARKS GROVE 689 150.709 0 0 0 150.709 0 43.0% 24.2% 54.9% 0.1% 122.2% CLEAR LAKE 318 114,433 0 0 0 114,433 0 21.8% 16.4% 56.5% 0.0% 94.7% CLEARBROOK 565 106,782 0 0 0 106.782 0 65.9% 37.5% 52.1% 1.9% 157.4% CLEARWATER 656 407,740 0 0 0 407,740 0 31.9% 38.2% 56.3% 0.6% 127.0% CLEMENTS 184 36.405 0 0 0 36,405 0 34.6% 50.6% 58.1% 0.2% 143.5% CLEVELAND 715 149.335 0 0 0 149,335 0 41.2% 27.7% 61.4% 0.2% 130.5% CLIMAX 260 61,811 0 0 0 61,811 0 41.0% 57.4% 72.9% 4.0% 175.3% CLINTON 562 82,058 0 0 0 82,058 0 38.7% 30.5% 36.7% 2.7% 108.5% ClITHERALL 101 12.786 0 0 0 12.786 0 40.6% 10.0% 49.8% 0.0% 100.4% CLONTARF 168 35.894 0 0 0 35.894 0 57.4% 0.8% 55.5% 0.4% 114.1% CLOQUET 11.055 6.026.724 0 368.000 0 5,658,724 0 57.6% .32.2% 54.7% 0.2% 144.7% COATES 184 117,842 0 0 17,579 100.263 22,746 27.5% 15.0% 60.9% 1.8% 105.2% COBDEN 65 20.817 0 0 0 20.817 0 36.1% 5.5% 59.8% 0.2% 101.6% COKATO 2,269 886.721 0 140.567 0 746.154 0 32.0% 27.7% 64.9% 0.0% 124.5% COLD SPRING 2,558 1.005.528 0 66.618 0 938.910 0 39.2% 33.2% 60.6% 0.5% 133.5% COLERAINE 1.041 251,768 0 0 0 251,768 0 32.0% 62.0% 46.0% 0.1% 140.2% COLOGNE 567 254,851 0 0 30,179 224.672 82,455 44.5% 45.1% 73.9% 1.4% 164.7% COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 18.999 9.228,787 0 1.034,989 608,086 7,585.712 2,701,198 29.9% 25.7% 69.2% 5.4% 130.2% COMFREY 427 70,116 0 0 0 70.116 0 29.6% 92.1% 61.3% 0.2% 183.2% COMSTOCK 124 35.895 0 0 0 35.895 0 49.6% 11.2% 64.8% 1.7% 127.3% CONGER 136 45,356 0 0 0 45.356 0 43.8% 17.4% 46.2% 0.0% 107.5% COOK 668 181,875 0 0 0 181.875 0 68.8% 68.4% 43.0% 3.1% 183.4% COON RAPIDS 58.833 31,076,727 0 2,523.753 3.699.040 24,853.934 8.131.150 32.7% 15.9% 57.2% 4.7% 110.4% CORCORAN 5.498 2.910.434 8,381 101.666 193,255 2.607,132 549,950 37.8% 20.8% 62.6% 2.5% 123.7% CORRELL 71 11,137 0 0 0 11,137 0 53.0% 32.1% 52.2% 3.0% 140.2% COSMOS 616 133.888 0 0 0 133,888 0 37.3% 25.3% 45.3% 0.2% 108.1 % COTTAGf GROVE 25,752 12,212.412 0 437,253 1.292,196 10,482,963 3,367,721 30.7% 27.1% 71.8% 5.0% 134.5% e COTTONWOOD 1.027 359.086 0 15,885 0 343.201 0 38.8% 38.7% 50.1% 1.1% 128.7% COURTlAND 419 133.583 0 0 0 133.583 0 52.1% 52.4% 52.2% 0.2% 156.8% CROMWELL 222 58.692 0 0 0 58.692 0 56.3% 54.5% 66.7% 0.2% 177.8% l.u..MV TAX RA TES.m. !---um----u..-----..__..m_AIDAND LEVY OAT A____..u.m_uu_._._.__...m. I....-mm.._______....__ T AX BASE CDMPOSmON.-..-----~m___.._1 Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV CityMV School MV LGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes BRAINERD 0% 0% 1,976,857 569,682 1,408,134 0 1,408,134 51.49% 16.92% 0.05% 28.04% 3.50% BRANCH 0% 0.05190% 24,605 123,604 256,827 0 256.827 57.87% 4.44% 20.75% 9.83% 7.11% BRANDON 0% 0% 51,160 19,554 37.247 0 37,247 63.74% 10.78% 1.30% 15.14% 9.03% BRECKENRIDGE 0% 0% 981,449 131,828 237,719 0 237,719 76.81% 8.83% 0.84% 11.49% 2.04% BREEZY POINT 0% 0% 0 lB,642 403,373 0 403,373 20.79% 1.91% 1.53% 2.13% 73.63% BREWSTER 0% 0% 34,406 17.392 68,401 0 68,401 61.67% 6.36% 9.70% 20.16% 2.10% BRICR YN 0% 0% 70,156 37,370 44,754 0 44,754 44.33% 10.62% 0.49% 40.85% 3.71% BROOK PARK 0% 0% 16,485 2,944 5,085 0 5.085 62.71% 8.44% 13.18% 6.54% 9.13% BROOKLYN CENTER 0% 0% 1,757,227 1.317.086 5.733,414 916,674 4,816.740 56.53% 10.11% 0.02% 31.85% 1.48% BROOKLYN PARK 0% 0% 1,551.318 2,769,531 8,523,922 1,866.284 6.657.638 68.09% 11.71% 0.89% 17.64% 1.67% BROOKS 0% 0.13114% 8.500 3.829 10.756 0 10,756 41.26% 8.60% 26.79% 12.63% 10.71% BROOKSTON 0% 0% 4.205 2,189 3.811 0 3.811 66.51% 12.79% 1.24% 4.26% 15.21% BROOTEN 0% 0% 105.360 26.739 49.343 0 49.343 55.34% 10.21% 11.37% 16.33% 6.75% 8ROWERVILLE 0% 0% 77,268 17.035 104.059 0 104.059 62.88% 11.22% 0.79% 20.26% 4.85% BROWNS VALLEY 0% 0% 222.402 55.380 100.016 0 100,016 52.79% 21.57% 1.87% 15.90% 7.86% BROWNSDALE 0% 0% 69,765 25,889 26.811 0 26.811 78.23% 4.65% 1.15% 12.26% 3.72% BROWNSVILLE 0% 0.00055% 31,538 21,623 28,525 0 28.525 81.06% 5.59% 4.25% 2.95% 6.14% BROWNTON 0% 0% 120.106 73.311 126.260 0 126.260 83.08% 9.36% 1.07% 6.29% 0.20% BRUNO 0% 0% 20.759 1,643 1,671 0 1.671 55.19% 8.27% 10.02% 3.76% 22.75% BUCKMAN 0% 0% 5.050 8.442 11.716 0 11.716 71.62% 5.10% 7.26% 13.67% 2.34% BUFFALO 0% 0% 545,523 240,282 604,027 0 604,027 62.94% 13.87% 0.87% 19.56% 2.76% BUFFALO LAKE 0% 0% 101,052 72,932 188,222 0 188,222 59.17% 9.51% 1.99% 25.88% 3.44% BUHL 0% 0.16559% 377,679 103.629 91.060 0 91,000 78.48% 10.19% 1.11% 3.50% 6.71% BURNSVILLE 0% 0.00356% 326,631 2,923.090 10,210,808 1,119,139 9.091,669 57.83% 11.19% 0.03% 24.13% 6.82% BURTRUM 0% 0.03180% 12,927 4,055 4.818 0 4.818 61.07% 12.08% 15.74% 2.65% 8.46% BUTTERFIELD 0% 0.19166% 80.188 38,439 61,324 0 61.324 60.82% 7.72% 1.87% 20.15% 9.43% BYRON 0% 0% 142,769 190.082 442,948 0 442.948 85.17% 4.85% 0.26% 7.87% 1.86% CALEDONIA 0% 0% 440,369 122,240 235.530 0 235.530 73.46% 7.88% 2.47% 14.90% 1.29% CALLAWAY 0% 0.03747% 30.676 5.038 14.096 0 14,096 46.59% 6.39% 7.60% 15.20% 24.22% CALUMET 0% 0.05877% 136,133 44,721 36,988 0 36.988 67.25% 6.16% 0.79% 9.95% 15.86% CAMBRIDGE 0% 0% 327,276 231.148 1.096.188 0 1.096,188 56.16% 14.22% 0.49% 25.89% 3.24% CAMPBELL 0% 0% 36,182 6,235 15.505 0 15.505 50.02% 8.45% 5.05% 5.23% 31.26% CANBY 0% 0.04628% 428,589 146,503 210,545 0 210,545 68.72% 10.74% 0.85% 12.36% 7.33% CANNON FALLS 0% 0.04492% 361,609 274,758 714.856 0 714,856 60.07% 12.30% 1.08% 23.75% 2.80% CANTON 0% 0% 63,170 18.558 23.987 0 23,987 59.37% 12.61% 13.51% 10.10% 4.40% CARLOS 0% 0% 29.820 10.345 17.700 0 17,700 77.36% B.37% 1.62% 9.71% 2.94% CARL TON 0% 0.07115% 121.356 54,464 102.222 0 102,222 66.97% 6.02% 1.05% 10.22% 15.74% CARVER 0% 0% 21,031 62,403 148,962 46,657 102,305 80.97% 6.63% 5.14% 4.21% 3.04% CASS LAKE 0% 0% 285,472 27,824 83.858 0 83.858 46.53% 14.63% 0.00% 24.78% 14.00% CEDAR MILLS 0% 0% 534 427 612 0 612 55.00% 4.19% 17.90% 22.55% 0.36% CENTER CITY 0% 0% 40,877 16,041 34.121 0 34.121 78.26% 6.23% 0.00% 9.72% 5.78% CENTERVILLE 0% 0% 14,272 104,469 309.142 83.605 225,537 B7.84% 3.45% 2.01% 5.13% 1.57% CEYLON 0% 0% 88,876 45.267 63.790 0 63.790 58.83% 9.47% 12.88% 18.81% 0.00% CHAMPLIN 0% 0% 456.018 908.190 2,089,249 575,154 1.514.095 89.50% 6.69% 0.43% 2.36% 1.01% CHANDLER 0% 0% 33.806 10,468 36,479 0 36,479 58.85% 5.23% 4.28% 28.16% 3.48% CHANHASSEN 0% 0% 0 963.016 2.852.429 245.392 2.607,037 73.37% 5.17% 2.34% 17.32% 1.80% CHASKA 0% 0% 293,069 273.473 1,054,802 230,745 824.057 56.69% 11.46% 2.61% 27.35% 1.89% CHATFIELD 0.02409% 0% 283.197 150.583 390,877 0 390,877 78.91% 8.38% 1.11% 9.99% 1.61% CHICKAMAW BEACH 0% 0% 0 2.795 9.049 0 9.049 58.70% 1.48% 4.78% 0.00% 35.04% ,....... CHISAGO CITY 0% 0% 232.223 121.087 275.289 0 275,289 61.63% 20.56% 1.15% 10.94% 5.72% CHISHOLM 0% 0.03025% 1,446,257 536,449 781,251 0 781,251 80.77% 8.89% 0.11% 6.21% 4.03% CHOKIO 0% 0% 94,427 24.004 29,150 0 29,150 65.18% 14.02% 1.77% 9.55% 9.47% CIRCLE PINES 0% 0% 249.411 206.924 696,252 172.191 524.061 91.98% 2.45% 0.00% 4.80% 0.76% CLARA CITY 0% 0% 200,845 98,576 152,584 0 152.584 68.92% 5.68% 4.27% 15.77% 5.35% CLAREMONT 0% 0% 86,093 46.540 49,159 0 49.159 74.19% 5.35% 7.96% 8.82% 3.68% CLARISSA 0% 0% 149.076 36,873 37,240 0 37,240 60.22% 14.53% 1.43% 17.58% 6.24% CLARK FIELD 0% 0% 237.437 131,711 154,788 0 154.788 64.33% 6.49% 3.96% 22.01% 3.20% CLARKS GROVE 0% 0.04058% 66.432 18.601 36.399 0 36.399 70.92% 6.71% 0.77% 16.15% 5.45% CLEAR LAKE 0% 0% 43.635 13,443 18.750 0 18.750 56.52% 9.97% 11.09% 14.46% 7.96% CLEARBROOK 0% 0% 91,974 14.922 40.077 0 40.077 53.71% 19.21% 2.87% 20.15% 4.06% CLEARWATER 0% 0% 19,759 26,659 155.638 0 155,638 43.34% 14.88% 0.91% 36.44% 4.44% CLEMENTS 0% 0% 27,262 10,536 18,429 0 18,429 50.01% 2.81% 16.51% 17.11% 13.56% CLEVELAND 0% 0% 61.157 55.753 41,331 0 41,331 86.65% 5.04% 1.95 % 4.51% 1.84% CLIMAX 0% 0% 36.398 21.596 35,451 0 35.451 50.53% 9.75% 8.46% 15.89% 15.37% CLINTON 0% 0% 139.953 41.665 25,068 0 25.008 72.49% 10.25% 4.11% 9.84% 3.31% CLlTHERALL 0% 0.04411% 11,662 982 1.277 0 1.277 70.34% 14.86% 0.72% 6.49% 7.59% CLONTARF 0% 0.00383% 2,449 6.338 283 0 283 57.74% 3.60% 24.08% 7.34% 7.24% CLOQUET 0% 0.00010% 2,153.345 718,909 1,820,530 0 1.820.530 58.61% 6.43% 0.74% 28.80% 5.42% COATES 0% 0% 72 2,942 17.059 2.023 15,036 52.51% 6.27% 17.26% 20.74% 3.23% COBDEN 0% 0% 810 882 1.143 0 1,143 10.08% 1.58% 63.48% 20.75% 4.11% COKATO 0% 0% 277,204 98,789 206,521 0 206,521 62.42% 14.31% 0.68% 19.60% 2.99% COLD SPRING 0% 0.04177% 249,107 190,839 311,634 0 311.634 70.04% 9.53% 0.21% 17.15% 3.06% COLERAINE 0% 0.05877% 322,158 132,478 156.201 0 156,201 74.15% 7.81% 0.99% 8.40% 8.64% COLOGNE 0% 0% 30,614 39.582 129.621 28,339 101.282 76.48% 6.12% 0.51% 15.15% 1.75% COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 0% 0% 2.025.418 964,991 2,583,778 635.312 1,948.466 75.42% 11.17% 0.00% 12.35% 1.07% COMFREY 0% 0% 113.973 50.669 64,583 0 64.583 66.80% 12.20% 2.22% 15.73% 3.05% COMSTOCK 0% 0% 10,450 1,457 4,023 0 4.023 55.13% 6.96% 9.65% 5.75% 22.51% CONGER 0% 0% 25,169 6,172 7,904 0 7.904 66.19% 2.49% 3.35% 24.87% 3.10% COOK 0% 0% 44.346 40,997 124,437 0 124,437 55.89% 5.65% 0.17% 32.91% 5.38% COON RAPIDS 0% 0% 2,315,876 2,395,315 5.317,686 1,376.449 3,941.237 75.47% 9.25% 0.11% 12.63% 2.53% CORCORAN 0% 0% 25,472 213,273 642,546 99,924 542,622 73.54% 2.49% 16.75% 4.31% 2.91% CORRELL 0% 0.04720% 3.799 771 3.571 0 3.571 49.74% 5.05% 8.95% 11.97% 24.29% COSMOS 0% 0% 102.303 42,203 33,929 0 33,929 62.76% 13.25% 5.15% 15.17% 3.67% COTTAGE GROVE 0% 0% 946,901 1,379.231 3,740,141 902,223 2,837.918 80.30% 4.91% 2.57% 9.29% 2.94% COTTONWOOD 0% 0% 146,322 62,158 132,860 0 132,860 71. 79% 4.17% 0.62% 15.05% 8.37% COURTLAND 0% 0.05822% 25.188 24.599 70.000 0 70,000 70.11% 2.76% 18.69% 6.91% 1.53% CROMWELL 0% 0% 11,149 12,005 32.011 0 32.011 39.25% 9.22% 12.81% 18.92% 19.80% . I-.............--...............--..---.......---.---.T AX BASE OAT A....---..---..------...---...........---.- 1.....---..---.. NETT AX CAPACITY TAX RATES .......---....1 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Conlrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate CROOKSTON 8,175 2,136,604 0 114,009 0 2,022.595 0 42.0% 41.6% 43.9% 3.9% 131.4% CROSBY 2.107 5B8,302 0 78 0 588.224 0 30.3% 66.0% 5B.9% 2.4% 157.6% CROSSLAKE 1.179 3,956,173 0 34.459 0 3.921,714 0 31.8% 11.6% 51.9% 0.1% 95.5% CRYSTAL 23,807 11 ,6B2,84 7 0 986,258 1.117,552 9,579.037 3,367.940 37.8% 25.2% 65.2% 6.6% 134.9% CURRIE 296 49,468 0 0 0 49.468 0 35.0% 39.0% 46.9% 0.2% 121.1% CUYUNA 189 62,251 0 0 0 62.251 0 31.8% 32.9% 60.0% 2.5% 127.2% CYRUS 326 59,573 0 0 0 59,573 0 43.2% 39.6% 48.0% 5.5% 136.3% DAKOTA 357 71,356 .0 0 0 71,356 0 41.4% 61.5% 52.1% 0.9% 156.0% DALTON 236 49,565 0 0 0 49,565 0 40.2% 29.0% 55.2% 0.0% 124.5% DANUBE 562 119,869 0 0 0 119.869 0 25.3% 72.2% 42.1% 0.2% 139.8% DANVERS 103 53.601 0 0 0 53.601 0 57.0% 22.B% 55.1% 0.4% 135,4% DARFUR 138 29,600 0 0 0 29,600 0 46.7% 55.9% 67.3% 0.2% 170.1% DARWIN 245 69.200 0 0 0 69,200 0 43.0% 3.0% 61.2% 0.2% 107.4% DASSEL 1,099 381,452 0 34,137 0 347,315 0 42.1% 52.7% 63.5% 0.2% 158.6% DAWSON 1.630 617,460 0 24,343 0 593.117 0 28.9% 51.1% 42.4% 3.0% 125.5% DAYTON 4.791 2,256,085 0 113.902 199.381 1.942.802 578.710 37.8% 31.2% 59.2% 2.5% 130.6% DE GRAFF 144 32.870 0 0 0 32,870 0 57.4% 35.4% 55.5% 0.4% 148.7% DEEPHAVEN 3.646 5,426,450 0 117,602 130.203 5,178,645 170,157 37.8% 14.B% 77.3% 5.7% 135.7% DEER CREEK 300 59,999 0 0 0 59.999 0 40.0% 48.9% 63.0% 0.0% 152.0% DEER RIVER 834 207,168 0 0 0 207.168 0 42.2% 68.9% 37.8% 0.1% 149.1% DEERWOOD 526 349.240 0 32.7B8 0 316,452 0 31.6% 53.7% 59.7% 2.5% 147.5% DELANO 2,B33 1,753,724 0 166.306 0 1,587,418 0 32.0% 10.6% 65.8% 0.0% 108.4% DELAVAN 238 73,683 0 0 0 73.683 0 28.4% 68.7% 62.8% 0.2% 160.1% DELHI 6B 19,879 0 0 0 19.879 0 35.3% 27.0% 82.6% 0.2% 145.2% DElLWOOD 896 1,980.889 0 0 74,107 1,906,782 30,291 30.7% 13.5% 69.7% 5.4% 119.2% DENHAM 35 25,735 1,306 0 0 24.429 0 51.1% 17.3% 66.4% 0.2% 135.0% DENNISON 151 53,970 0 0 0 53.970 0 25.1% 15.8% 56.3% 0.6% 97.9% DENT 189 34.081 0 0 0 34,081 0 40.6% 14.7% 67.6% 2.9% 125.7% DETROIT LAKES 7.258 4,432,746 0 330,293 0 4,102.453 0 57.0% 21.0% 56.4% 0.9% 135.3% DEXTER 308 68,014 0 11,509 0 56,505 0 35.4% 45.1% 44,7% 0.6% 125.8% DILWORTH 2.709 816,358 0 190.730 0 625.628 0 48.7% 34.3% 53.2% 1.7% 137.9% DODGE CENTER 2,074 821,972 0 147,777 0 674,195 0 36.2% 59.4% 49.6% 0.0% 145.3% DONALDSON 50 39,800 0 0 0 39,800 0 26.3% 15.1% 77.2% 1.7% 120.3% DONNELLY 227 51,843 0 0 0 51.843 0 44.0% 30.5% 60.9% 0.6% 136.0% DORAN 72 8,962 0 0 0 8,962 0 44.5% 35.2% 50.5% 0.6% 130.8% DOVER 434 101.515 0 0 0 101.515 0 41.5% 30.1% 59.2% 0.0% 130.8% DOVRAY 56 39.050 0 0 0 39.050 0 37.3% 11.2% 60.7% 0.2% 109.5% DULUTH 85,388 37.566.843 0 6.879,059 0 30.687.784 0 65.6% 22.0% 54.5% 1.3% 143.4% DUMONT 120 32,969 0 0 0 32,969 0 44.1% 73.8% 56.1% 0.7% 174.7% -- DUNDAS 478 321.720 0 130.845 0 190,875 0 37.6% 30.5% 56.7% 0.0% 124.7% DUNDEE 105 9,861 0 0 0 9,861 0 32.2% 40.7% 60.6% 0.2% 133.7% DUNNELL 215 40,397 0 3.602 0 36,795 0 23.0% 92.0% 45.9% 0.2% 161.2% EAGAN 53.004 56,762.183 0 645,008 11.048.015 45,069,160 . 4.807,280 27.5% 22.2% 63.6% 5.5% 118.8% EAGLE BEND 528 108.280 0 0 0 108,280 0 62.8% 37.4% 47.9% 0.1% 148.2% EAGLE LAKE 1,759 349,399 0 0 0 349,399 0 39.4% 23.5% 54.7% 0.2% 117.8% EAST BETHEL 8,471 3,438.645 0 0 233,585 3,205.060 1,194.165 32.7% 15.6% 60.6% 1.1% 110.0% EAST GRANO FORKS 8.884 3.217,378 0 108,064 0 3,109.314 0 44.0% 37.7% 49.0% 2.9% 133.7% EAST GULL LAKE 725 1,962.992 0 0 0 1,962,992 0 40.9% 10.1% 59.9% 0.2% 111.0% EASTON 220 71,177 0 0 0 71,177 0 30.0% 57.7% 52.9% 0.2% 140.8% ECHO 301 57,380 0 .0 0 57,380 0 45.5% 24.0% 48.4% 0.5% 118.3% EDEN PRAIRIE 42.442 62,185,718 0 138.972 11,744.216 50,302,530 3,111,501 37.8% 24.9% 63.2% 6.5% 132.4% EDEN V ALLEY 726 214,754 0 21,309 0 193.445 0 41.5% 32.1% 63.7% 0.5% 137.8% EDGERTON 1.103 316,608 0 16.266 0 300,342 0 56.9% 42.2% 42.8% 0.2% 142.1% EDINA 46.984 82.244,215 0 6,207.276 10.289,662 65,747,277 2,511,902 37.8% 16.0% 63.2% 6.3% 123.4% EFFIE 128 18,942 0 0 0 18,942 0 46.9% 0.0% 56.1% 25.5% 128.5% EITZEN 221 54.854 0 0 0 54,854 0 44.7% 33.2% 53.1% 0.0% 131.0% ELBA 227 34.054 0 0 0 34.054 0 41.5% 12.6% 53.6% 0.9% 108.6% ELBOW LAKE 1,189 274,915 0 0 0 274,915 0 44.9% 87.5% 61.4% 0.7% 194.6% ELGIN 747 210,310 0 0 0 210,310 0 57.7% 50.9% 48.8% 0.7% 158.1% ELIZABETH 163 19,408 0 0 0 19,408 0 40.2% 42.1% 55.2% 0.0% 137.5% ELK RIVER 12,405 8,673.154 0 621.742 0 8,051,412 0 21.8% 21.7% 63.1% 1.4% 108.0% ELKO 246 107,402 0 .0 7.002 100.400 27,668 47.6% 42.6% 69.7% 2.4% 162.4% ELKTON 141 38.257 0 0 0 38,257 0 46.1% 21.7% 56.0% 0.7% 124.5% ELLENDALE 555 157.237 0 0 0 157,237 0 35.0% 11.1% 74.7% 0.0% 120.8% ELLSWORTH 579 81.214 0 0 0 81,214 0 30.2% 60.2% 65.2% 1.5% 157.1% ELMDALE 136 26,774 0 0 0 26,774 0 59.0% 28.0% 52.3% 0.4% 139.7% ELMORE 700 110.994 0 0 0 110,994 0 21.1% 72.8% 43.8% 0.2% 137.8% ELROSA 208 73,360 0 0 0 73.360 0 39.1% 35.9% 65.3% 1.0% 141.3% ELY 3,941 682.821 0 15 0 682.806 0 55.6% 67.1% 36.3% 0.5% 159.4% ELYSIAN 447 112.336 0 994 0 111.342 0 37.9% 117.3% 42.9% 0.2% 198.4% EMILY 647 649.589 0 0 0 649,589 0 31.8% 18.6% 60.0% 2.5% 112.8% EMMONS 434 95,204 0 0 0 95,204 0 43.9% 9.9% 51.0% 0.0% 104.8% ERHARD 181 24,434 0 0 0 24.434 0 40.5% 29.4% 55.6% 6.2% 131.7% ERSKINE 420 94.736 0 0 0 94,736 0 43.6% 101.1 % 64.1% 4.9% 213.8% EVAN 82 15.996 0 0 0 15.996 0 35.7% 25.3% 47.9% 0.2% 109.1% EVANSVILLE 567 135.266 0 11,183 0 124,083 0 41.7% 33.4% 46.2% 0.3% 121.5% EVELETH 4.012 934,997 0 33,549 0 901.448 0 57.1% 58.2% 28.9% 1.3% 145.4% EXCELSIOR 2,377 2,165,455 0 0 190,208 1,975,247 247,800 37.8% 24.8% 77.3% 5.7% 145.7% EYOTA 1 ,495 377.349 0 0 0 377.349 0 41.1% 28.1% 58.6% 0.0% 127.8% FAIRFAX 1.340 298,388 0 1.173 0 297.215 0 26.2% 43.9% 40.5% 0.2% 110.8% FAIRMONT 11,352 4.649.334 0 196.448 0 4.452,886 0 27.8% 29.1% 60.4% 0.2% 117.5% FALCON HEIGHTS 5,348 3,109,380 0 182.555 190,189 2,736,636 660.946 44.5% 15.4% 73.7% 4.8% 138.3% FARIBAULT 18,421 7,049,580 . 0 607,682 0 6,441,898 0 35.4% 25.8% 71.1% 1.2% 133.5% e FARMINGTON 6.574 3.278,393 0 265,940 214,388 2.798,065 898,029 27.4% 34.5% 70.3% 1.8% 134.0% FARWELL 73 8,091 0 0 0 8.091 0 45.7% 36.8% 67.5% 0.0% 150.0% FEDERAL DAM 117 29,236 0 0 0 29,236 0 40.9% 14.2% 58.0% 0.2% 113.2% FELTON 208 48.240 0 0 0 48,240 0 49.3% 17.0% 51.2% 3.2% 120.7% I...--MV TAX RA TES--... I...............................AID AND LEVY DATA................................. 1..__...................... T AX BASE COMPOSITION............--.........I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV City MV School MV LGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy levy levy Homestead Industrial Classes CROOKSTON 0% 0% 1,829.439 533,839 841,743 0 841.743 67.38% 10.58% 0.29% 15.96% 5.79% CROS8Y 0% 0% 329.428 121,966 388.301 0 388.301 68.08% 7.74% 0.31% 14.30% 9.57% CROSSLAKE 0% 0% 0 13,390 455.709 0 455,709 31.33% 1.61% 0.68% 2.64% 63.74% CRYSTAL 0% 0% -1.782,789 1.052.417 3,219,353 803.616 2.415.737 78.46% 9.12% 0.00% 11.05% 1.37% CURRIE 0% 0% 40.087 13,285 19,300 0 19,300 66.15% 9.27% 4.49% 15.59% 4.50% CUYUNA 0% 0% 19.876 6,105 20,501 0 20.501 59.09% 5.83% 5.65% 1.10% 28.33% CYRUS 0% 0.12509% 42,928 11.422 23,578 0 23,578 66.18% 12.07% 0.09% 16.79% 4.87% DAKOTA 0% 0% 5,522 16,127 43.863 0 43,863 90.57% 2.42% 0.69% 2.65% 3.67% DALTON 0% 0% 27.853 7,808 14,391 0 14.391 70.88% 9.19% 2.00% 9.61% 8.32% DANUBE 0% 0% 91,980 54.487 86,515 0 86.515 73.01% 4.55% 4.81% 12.49% 5.14% DANVERS 0% 0.00382% 10,675 5,784 12,241 0 12,241 48.69% 0.91% 7.15% 25.01% 18.25% DARFUR 0% 0% 13,628 8.467 16,533 0 16,533 47.55% 4.70% 13.11% 31.78% 2.86% DARWIN 0% 0% 3,443 3.202 2.043 0 2.043 58.28% 11.92% 17.18% 6.95% 5.67% DASSEL 0% 0% 152.321 99;869 183.048 0 183,048 61.81 % 10.81% 1.07% 22.00% 4.31% DAWSON 0% 0.02614% 326,466 145,600 303,266 0 303,266 56.33% 8.16% 0.96% 29.45% 5.10% DA YTON 0% 0.00965% 17.892 193.969 751.746 146,369 605,377 75.31% 3.31% 11.64% 7.12% 2.62% DE GRAFF 0% 0.00382% 2,644 1.029 11.651 0 11,651 48.57% 4.36% 23.06% 9.07% 14.94% DEEPHAVEN 0% 0% 0 220,989 790,686 24.298 766,388 90.54% 3.47% 0.00% 2.29% 3.70% DEER CREEK 0% 0% 26.941 15.970 29,363 0 29.363 47.85% 11.41% 25.14% 11.72% 3.88% DEER RIVER 0% 0% 150.467 67.481 142,744 0 142,744 60.55% 11.34% 0.00% 19.45% 8.65% DEERWOOD 0% 0% 58.491 30,875. 170,006 0 170,006 51.13% 13.01% 0.13% 22.14% 13.60% DELANO 0% 0% 355,201 122,327 . 168,679 0 168.679 65.62% 11.48% 0.45% 21.26% 1.19% DELAVAN 0% 0% 42.052 27,407 50.600 0 50,600 42.86% 5.04% 19.30% 29.63% 3.17% DELHI 0% 0% 12.724 2,994 5.369 0 5,369 21.30% 2.45% 47.20% 25.93% 3.12% DELL WOOD 0% 0% 0 41.975 260,455 3.419 257,036 82.84% 3.90% 2.26% 3.99% 7.00% DENHAM 0% 0% 9 264 4,236 0 4.236 34.30% 6.53% 17.55% 1.15% 40.47% DENNISON 0% 0.08916% 16.803 5,056 8.521 0 8,521 53.74% 7.08% 23.93% 14.29% 0.97% DENT 0% 0% 11,285 2,948 5,000 0 5.000 71.85% 6.94% 1.13% 14.68% 5.40% DETROIT LAKES 0% 0.03749% 1,104,492 309,998 861,392 0 861.392 49.79% 12.54% 0.29% 28.89% 8.49% DEXTER 0% 0% 56,814 31.190 25.500 0 25,500 48.47% 3.46% 20.92% 24.40% 2.75% DILWORTH 0% 0% 435.052 81.456 214.534 0 214,534 67.66% 6.25% 0.76% 15.63% 9.68% DODGE CENTER 0%' 0% 309,096 114.404 400,613 0 400,613 60.20% 8.27% 0.91% 26.29% 4.34% DONALDSON 0% 0% 1,597 1.991 5,999 0 5,999 21.28% 4.72% 18.94% 1.84% 53.21% DONNELLY 0% 0.03646% 21.615 12,352 15.800 0 15,800 52.86% 4.92% 26.33% 6.26% 9.64% DORAN 0% 0% 5.539 1,653 3.157 0 3.157 63.51% 4.99% 14.89% 0.67% 15.94% DOVER 0% 0% 49,791 12.779 30,523 0 30,523 77.50% 8.86% 5.57% 5.75% 2.33% DDVRAY 0% 0% 7.085 1,931 4.369 0 4.369 36.80% 4.99% 7.23% 48.55% 2.43% DULUTH 0.02395% 0.05762% 17.062,048 5.451,217 6,754,228 0 6.754.228 67.84% 10.77% 0.02% 16.54% 4.83% DUMONT 0% 0% 17,388 3,979 24.321 0 24.321 40.93% 4.86% 20.71% 30.28% 3.22% DUNDAS 0% 0.10290% 29.100 21.824 58.242 0 58,242 53.58% 2.11% 6.40% 35.19% 2.72% DUNDEE 0% 0% 6,971 2,107 4.013 0 4.013 65.71% 3.03% 21.47% 9.68% 0.11% DUNNELL 0% 0% 32,052 10,476 33,860 0 33.860 51.08% 5.49% 8.77% 32.67% 1.99% EAGAN 0% 0% '0 1,676.376 10,985,967 1,003,138 9,982.829 62.55% 9.72% 0.43% 25.61% 1.69% EAGLE BEND 0% 0% 128,581 38.836 40.487 0 40.487 68.36% 10.86% 2.00% 13.55% 5.23% EAGLE LAKE 0% 0.04770% 115.136 71,096 82,199 0 82,199 86.73% 4.44% 1.54% 4.63% 2.66% EAST BETHEL 0% 0.05373% 91.252 164,481 710,608 211,131 499,477 79.00% 4.74% 6.30% 4.33% 5.63% EAST GRAND FORKS 0% 0% 1.474.355 470.323 1.172,025 0 1.172,025 66.48% 10.20% 0.32% 20.92% 2.08% EAST GULL LAKE 0% 0% 0 6.658 197.417 0 197.417 31.29% 0.74% 0.46% 2.21% 65.30% EASTON 0% 0% 35,056 22,247 41.061 0 41.061 35.68% 6.36% 20.80% 33.45% 3.72% ",. ECHO 0% 0% 73.659 26.001 13.763 0 13.763 45.26% 7.35% 20.13% 23.16% 4.10% EDEN PRAIRIE 0.01204% 0% 0 674.568 13,334,565 821.811 12,512.754 62.86% 10.09% 0.77% 24.54% 1.74% EDEN VALLEY 0% 0% 133,854 42,878 62,048 0 62,048 62.03% 9.85% 2.57% 20.32% 5.24% EDGERTON 0% 0% 134,267 72.063 126.768 0 126.768 74.72% 5.63% 2.60% 15.45% 1.60% EDINA 0% 0.10122% 0 994.020 10.927,943 387,339 10,540,604 71.73% 7.97% 0.00% 19.50% 0.80% EFFIE 0% 0% 981 0 0 0 0 67.77% 9.44% 6.31% 9.25% 7.24% EITZEN 0% 0% 13,289 32.103 18,230 0 18.230 76.60% 3.78% 4.95% 14.26% 0.41% ELBA 0% 0% 1.922 2.418 4.297 0 4.297 78.79% 5.04% 8.46% 5.89% 1.83% EL80W LAKE 0% 0% 245,020 63,380 240,526 0 240,526 68.10% 9.23% 1.13% 18.24% 3.30% ELGIN 0% 0% 68,227 49,590 107.115 0 107,115 77.19% 9.59% 1.50% 9.79% 1.93% ElIZA8ETH 0% 0% 18.740 5.368 8,180 0 8.180 83.05% 6.66% 1.98% 6.13% 2.19% ELK RIVER 0% 0.05252% 242.240 614,397 1,745.173 0 1,745,173 58.21% 9.63% 8.17% 16.14% 7.85% ELKO 0% 0.06290% 2.048 21,196 53,241 10,280 42,961 75.32% 4.86% 11.94% 6.94% 1.94% ELKTON 0% 0% 12,413 8,497 8,289 0 8.289 48.23% 3.22% 34.81% 11.00% 2.74% ELLENDALE 0% 0% 71.618 25,030 17,381 0 17.381 78.09% 8.18% 5.02% 6.45% 2.25% ELLSWORTH 0% 0% 89,270 31,092 48.893 0 48.893 76.53% 4.80% 3.94% 11.45% 3.27% ELMDALE 0% 0.03210% 1,519 5.613 7.498 0 7,498 26.77% 3.12% 61.18% 4.49% 4.44% ELMORE 0% 0% 145,779 68,736 80,799 0 80,799 60.73% 6.24% 7.66% 21.12% 4.24% ELROSA 0% 0% 6.700 12.455 26,307 0 26,307 68.76% 2.48% 0.01% 22.13% 6.62% ELY 0% 0% 889.828 318,596 458,043 0 458,043 75.91% 8.69% 0.14% 12.68% 2.58% ELYSIAN 0% 0% 103.208 36.240 130,617 0 130.617 70.03% 7.96% 0.32% 7.09% 14.60% EMILY 0% 0% 5.041 44,472 120.809 .0 120,809 37.28% 1.15% 3.39% 2.47% 55.70% EMMONS 0% 0% 69,550 15.332 9,456 0 9.456 73.73% 8.89% 5.43% 9.94% 2.01% ERHARD 0% 0% 10,819 3,001 7.178 0 7.178 74.88%. 7.57% 3.16% 11.31 % 3.08% ERSKINE 0% 0% 51,967 24,654 95.819 0 95,819 53.44% 13.78% 0.13% 24.10% 8.54% EVAN 0% 0% 3,185 3.915 4,039 0 4,039 22.26% 5.34% 63.22% 6.19% 3.00% EVANSVILLE 0% 0% 86.356 16.434 41,416 0 41.416 62.91% 20.34% 0.60% 10.53% 5.61% EVELETH 0% 0.04928% 1,085.803 354,304 524,525 0 524,525 67.87% 12.35% 0.00% 13.14% 6.65% EXCELSIOR 0% 0% 127,499 147.674 559,984 69,333 490,651 56.74% 22.47% 0.00% 18.71% 2.09% EYOT A 0% 0% 86,526 94,015 105.847 0 105.847 83.61% 7.91% 1. 74% 5.01% 1.72% FAIRFAX 0% 0% 215,381 108,591 130,388 0 130,388 67.43% 12.87% 4.80% 14.28% 0.61% FAIRMONT 0% 0% 2,075.532 534,470 1,293,850 0 1,293,850 66.19% 8.43% 3.21% 20.91% 1.26% FALCON HEIGHTS 0% 0% 182.902 165.793 527,867 106,261 421.606 80.66% 7.98% 0.17% 10.13% 1.07% FARIBAUL T 0% 0% 3.311.684 747,360 1,663,749 0 1,663.749 70.58% 8.70% 0.91% 17.14% 2.67% FARMINGTON 0% 0.02037% 351,050 384,721 1.260,511 295,627 964.884 75.46% 7.90% 3.66% 8.80% 4.18% FARWELL 0% 0% 15.715 2.120 2.980 0 2.980 60.81 % 8.85% 11.91% 3.47% 14.95% FEDERAL DAM 0% 0% 2,814 897 4,154 0 4,154 45.39% 12.18% 4.97% 8.49% 28.97% FELTON 0% 0% 28,210 8,215 8,187 0 8,187 53.07% 6.62% 18.31% 6.89% 15.11% e J-------------------------------------------------- T AX BASE OAT A-----------------------------------------. 1...__._....____ NETT AX CAPACITY TAX RATES .--------.---1 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate FERGUS FALLS 12,468 6,131,575 0 379,890 0 5,751,685 0 39.7% 28.1% 55.5% 0.5% 123.8% FERTILE 864 162,772 0 0 0 162.772 0 44.4% 60.1% 56.0% 2.4% 162.9% FIFTY LAKES 313 519.298 0 0 0 519.298 0 31.8% 18.9% 57.1% 2.5% 110.3% FINLAYSON 247 92.991 0 0 0 92,991 0 51.2% 18.0% 62.5% 6.0% 137.6% FISHER 409 73,792 0 0 0 73,792 0 46.1% 36.1% 74.1% 4.6% 160.9% FlENSBURG 207 46.688 0 0 0 46,588 0 59.0% 11.9% 60.3% 0.4% 131.6% FlOODWOOD 564 101,526 0 0 0 101,526 0 55.6% 102.8% 41.2% 2.1% 201.7% FLORENCE 51 7,586 0 0 0 7,586 0 38.7% 39.3% 74.3% 0.2% 152.6% FOLEY 1.941 614,630 131 69,589 0 544.910 0 45.3% 47.4% 58.5% 0.0% 151.2% FORADA 172 84,063 0 0 0 84,063 0 41.7% 9.1% 61.9% 0.3% 112.9% FOREST LAKE 6,242 4.915,112 0 720,236 969.865 3,225,011 788,237 28.2% 25.9% 56.2% 3.2% 113.5% FORESTON 370 125,295 482 0 0 124,813 0 81.6% 19.6% 64.1% 0.2% 165.5% FORT RiPlEY 91 22.825 0 0 0 22,825 0 31.8% 15.1% 59.6% 0.1% 106.6% FOSSTON 1.522 345.658 0 44.376 0 301,282 0 45.3% 32.8% 56.4% 6.3% 140.8% FOUNTAIN 327 92,572 0 0 0 92.572 0 38.9% 61.3% 58.6% 0.0% 158.7% FOXHOME 157 16.323 0 0 0 16,323 0 44.9% 33.3% 50.5% 0.0% 128.7% FRANKLIN IRENVILLEI 503 70.071 0 0 0 70,071 0 19.6% 77.7% 44.9% 0.2% 142.5% FRANKLIN 1ST. LOUIS) 19 24,221 0 0 0 24.221 0 72.8% 27.4% 38.6% 1.1% 139.9% FRAZEE 1.164 242,612 0 0 0 242.612 0 58.0% 38.6% 57.7% 0.0% 154.2% FREEBORN 299 69,415 0 0 0 69.415 0 38.3% 43.1% 50.0% 0.0% 131.4% FREEPORT 565 178.152 0 0 0 178.152 0 35.4% 46.0% 61.5% 0.4% 143.4% FRIDLEY 28,287 27.329.921 0 2.581.487 5,000,886 19.747,548 3,278.487 32.7% 16.0% 60.8% 5.2% 114.7% FROST 227 53,.536 0 0 0 53,536 0 28.0% 103.5% 52.0% 0.2% 183.8% FULDA 1.263 208.309 0 0 0 208.309 0 32.9% 60.2% 54.0% 0.5% 147.6% FUNKLEY 15 2,906 0 0 0 2,906 0 60.5% 0.0% 67.2% 2.1% 129.7% GARFIELD 268 65.049 0 0 0 65.049 0 41.7% 27.7% 61.9% 0.3% 131.5% GARRISON 137 146.438 0 0 0 146,438 0 31.8% 17.0% 59.6% 0.1% 108.5% GARVIN 142 16,017 0 0 0 16.017 0 24.8% 100.4% 31.4% 0.2% 156.8% GARY 199 35,704 0 0 0 35,704 0 34.9% 70.0% 69.4% 3.0% 177.4% GAYLORD 1,999 708.709 0 189,949 0 518.760 0 51.2% 42.2% 56.5% 0.2% 150.1% GEM LAKE 446 626,796 0 0 108,299 51B,497 30,291 44.5% 15.4% 71.9% 4.2% 136.0% GENEVA 452 97,321 0 0 0 97,321 0 43.3% 36.9% 74.3% 0.2% 154.6% GENOLA 85 49,766 0 0 0 49,766 0 59.0% 14.2% 61.8% 0.4% 135.3% GEORGETOWN 111 30,346 0 0 0 30.346 0 48.6% 28.5% 59.9% 1.7% 138.7% GHENT 314 73.727 0 0 0 73,727 0 39.1% 27.3% 50.0% 0.2% 116.6% GI8BON 711 146,795 0 0 0 146.795 0 43.8% 81.7% 32.8% 0.2% 158.4% GIL8ERT 1.913 342.726 0 0 0 342,726 0 57.9% 70.3% 27.8% 0.5% 156.5% GILMAN 201 46,335 0 0 0 46.335 0 45.4% 6.6% 58.6% 0.0% 110.5% GLENCOE 4,758 1.895.460 0 220,716 0 1.674,744 0 44.8% 42.1% 53.9% 0.8% 141.5% e GLENVILLE 782 158.070 0 0 0 158.070 0 42.0% 54.8% 52.3% 0.0% 149.1% GLENWOOD 2,583 803,784 0 35,659 0 768. I 25 0 42.7% 65.2% 64.3% 3.7% 175.9% GLYNDON 884 175,824 0 0 0 175,824 0 48.5% 59.1% 50.4% 1.7% 159.7% GOLDEN VALLEY 21.029 28.204,972 0 3,071,336 4,029,778 21,103,858 1.575,051 37.8% 26.0% 66.7% 5.9% 136.4% GONVICK 295 50,337 0 0 0 50.337 0 54.2% 70.9% 37.5% 1.3% 164.0% GOOD THUNDER 566 99.044 0 6,275 0 92.769 0 30.2% 104.4% 44.1% 0.2% 178.8% GOODHUE 675 236.858 0 0 0 236,858 0 24.4% 56.0% 62.2% 0.6% 143.2% GOODRIDGE 106 15.110 0 0 0 15.110 0 63.9% 22.7% 71.6% 1.8% 160.0% GOODVIEW 3,022 1,493,967 0 246,589 0 1,247,378 0 41.0% 36.2% 51.5% 0.9% 129.7% GRACEVILLE 665 104,082 0 0 0 104,082 0 43.7% 62.1% 41.9% 1.1% 148.9% GRANADA 375 44.465 0 0 0 44.465 0 27.8% 47.6% 53.4% 0.2% 129.0% GRAND MARAIS 1,217 663,360 0 0 0 663.360 0 48.3% 54.8% 39.4% 6.9% 149.4% GRAND MEADOW 982 177.309 0 428 0 176.881 0 41.8% 16.1% 59.7% 0.6% 118.3% GRAND RAPIDS 8.117 5.859.462 0 696,905 0 5,162,557 0 44.8% 30.7% 55.1% 0.2% 130.8% GRANITE FALLS 3.053 1.324.757 0 95.512 0 1,229,145 0 47.4% 23.2% 54.4% 0.5% 125.4% GRASSTON 116 22,425 0 0 0 22,425 0 70.5% 23.0% 64.0% 0.3% 157.8% GREEN ISLE 299 82.957 0 0 0 82.957 0 47.9% 102.5% 59.8% 0.2% 210.4% GREEN8USH 608 166,272 0 0 0 166,272 0 31.6% 50.6% 55.3% 1.7% 139.1% GREENFIELD 1.564 1.014.203 3.846 0 80,324 930.033 121.932 37.8% 26.3% 64.8% 2.5% 131.5% GREENWALD 208 66,814 0 0 0 66.814 0 39.7% 16.2% 67.7% 0.5% 124.0% GREENWOOD 643 1.097,980 0 0 32.123 1,065,857 27,448 37.8% 18.7% 77.3% 5.7% 139.5% GREY EAGLE 359 72.688 0 0 0 72.688 0 71.0% 51.1% 62.3% 0.3% 184.8% GROVE CITY 578 88.407 0 0 0 88.407 0 38.7% 45.7% 63.2% 0.2% 147.8% GRYGLA 222 47.678 0 0 0 47,678 0 22.7% 46.3% 56.3% 1.8% 127.1% GULLY 125 20.478 0 3.434 0 17,044 0 46.2% 12.6% 57.5% 7.6% 123.9% HACKENSACK 240 169,638 0 0 0 169,638 0 40.9% 29.7% 54.2% 0.2% 124.9% HADLEY 89 29,329 0 0 0 29,329 0 37.3% 17.0% 52.3% 0.2% 106.8% HALLOCK 1,307 356,722 0 0 0 356,722 0 25.9% 22.9% 64.8% 1.7% 115.3% HALMA 70 8.559 0 0 0 8.559 0 25.2% 53.1% 65.7% 1.7% 145.7% HALSTAD 605 128,130 0 5.037 0 123,093 0 39.3% 67.9% 58.3% 3.4% 168.9% HAM LAKE 9.462 4,795.698 0 0 503,631 4,292,067 1,219.425 32.7% 12.5% 57.1% 2.0% 104.3% HAM8URG 503 146.444 0 0 8.681 137,763 94.921 43.7% 51.8% 72.9% 1.4% 169.8% HAMMOND 206 22,963 0 0 0 22,963, 0 58.5% 38.0% 66.5% 0.7% 163.7% HAMPTON 383 153,586 0 0 12,042 141,544 63.426 27.5% 8.8% 60.3% 1.8% 98.3% HANCOCK 713 117,619 0 0 O. 117,619 0 37.6% 83.6% 50.5% 0.0% 171.7% HANLEY FALLS 243 48,176 0 0 0 48,176 0 41.4% 104.5% 42.0% 1.1% 188.9% HANOVER 1,033 574.058 0 14.607 2.850 556.601 32,261 33.9% 18.8% 58.6% 0.5% 111.8% HANSKA 444 89,216 0 3,850 0 85.366 0 30.5% 48.7% 43.0% 0.2% 122.4% HARDING 75 22.956 0 0 0 22.956 0 59.0% 8.4% 61.8% 0.4% 129.5% HARDWICK 226 35.759 0 0 0 35.759 0 34.1% 27.5% 52.0% 0.2% 113.9% HARMONY 1,073 304.311 0 46.437 0 257,874 0 37.3% 77.0% 53.2% 0.0% 167.5% HARRIS 905 303.289 0 0 0 303.289 0 53.5% 31.3% 58.5% 0.2% 143.5% HARTLAND 299 76.058 0 0 0 76.058 0 43.7% 3.4% 62.2% 0.0% 109.3% HASTINGS 16.143 8.794,473 0 238.418 991,776 7.564.279 2.257.432 27.5% 31.4% 60.4% 2.1% 121.3% - HATFIELD 60 17,504 0 0 0 17,504 0 62.8% 37.6% 53.4% 0.2% 154.0% HAWLEY 1.659 .417,540 0 0 0 417,540 . 0 49.5% 21.5% 50.2% 1.7% 122.9% HAYFIELD 1.301 368.590 0 11.173 0 357.417 0 35.7% 79.8% 44.1% 0.0% 159.5% HAYWARD 238 93.550 0 0 0 93.550 0 41.0% 23.4% 52.5% 0.0% 116.9% I----.MV TAX RA TES-.--- Imm---m-------------------AID AND LEVY OAT A_m_________._._________________ 1-.---------------------- TAX BASE COMPOSITION-----------------------I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV City MV School MV LGA City Certified FO Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes FERGUS FALLS 0% 0% 2,484.269 459,726 1,615,141 0 1,615,141 56.16% 10.04% 0.39% 18.84% 14.57% FERTILE 0% 0% 98,469 59,972 97.786 0 97,786 74.54% 8.29% 2.26% 10.86% 4.05% FIFTY LAKES 0% 0% 0 6,377 98.273 0 98,273 29.18% 1.04% 5.39% 0.07% 64.32% FINLAYSON 0% 0% 17.009 6,108 16.700 0 16.700 47.85% 9.02% 11.48% 23.19% 8.46% FISHER 0% 0% 22,503 16,388 26,627 0 26,627 80.51% 6.39% 1.82% 4.57% 6.71% FLENSBURG 0% 0.00487% 16,503 7,626 5,538 0 5,538 33.99% 2.00% 58.63% 1.53% 3.85% FLOODWOOD 0% 0.05981% 132,385 57.040 104,363 0 104,363 65.23% 15.88% 0.00% 14.26% 4.63% FLORENCE 0% 0% 8,176 2,018 2,982 0 2,9B2 38.04% 10.40% 21.10% 4.31% 26.15% FOLEY 0% 0% 263,553 67.868 258,135 0 258,135 66.09% 12.99% 0.45% 17.41% 3.06% FORADA 0% 0% 913 3.587 7,651 0 7.651 53.66% 2.42% 3.91% 3.02% 36.99% FOREST LAKE 0% 0.06441 % 314.977 237,857 1,036.207 202.048 834.159 52.45% 15.13% 0.14% 29.38% 2.90% FORESTON 0% 0% 25.906 5.283 24.500 0 24,500 53.38% 2.98% 10.08% 29.38% 4.17% FORT RIPLEY 0% 0% 161 1,246 3,450 0 3,450 54.07% 6.58% 22.56% 8.65% 8,15% FOSSTON 0% 0.08371 % 270,007 104.267 98,926 0 98,926 67.28% 10,57% 0.14% 18.18% 3.83% FOUNTAIN 0% 0% 28,820 35.900 56.716 0 56.716 68.74% 3.54% 7.07% 17.13% 3.52% FOXHOME 0% 0% 10,643 2.984 5,438 0 5,438 69.43% 7.46% 10.73% 4.28% 8.10% FRANKLIN IRENVILLE) 0% 0% 119,981 37,642 54,477 0 54.477 61.52% 17.03% 10.43% 6.83% 4.19% FRANKLIN 1ST. LOUISI 0% 0.05866% 5.511 1.990 6.641 0 6,641 10.67% 4.01% 21.77% 47.41% 16.14% FRAZEE 0% 0% 126,695 34.307 93.568 0 93,568 63.91% 15.20% 1.17% 12.90% 6.83% FREEBORN 0% 0% 32.037 14.870 29.900 0 29.900 67.83% 9.83% 0.00% 16.04% 6.30% FREEPORT 0% 0% 59,988 54,818 81,991 0 81,991 69.92% 4.56% 4.85% 16.02% 4.66% FRIDLEY 0% 0.05128% 1.558.917 1.072,800 3,678.816 515.914 3.162,902 54.25% 10.24% 0.00% 31.63% 3.88% FROST 0% 0% 42.798 22,200 55,416 0 55,416 43.97% 1.78% 12.05% 32.43% 9.77% FULDA 0% 0% 237,005 91.168 125.393 0 125.393 80.39% 8.36% 1.61% 9.52% 0.13% FUNKLEY 0% 0% 50 0 0 0 0 32.38% 14.27% 38.70% 11.90% 2.75% GARFIELD 0% 0% 6,810 6.094 18,006 0 18.006 56.67% 9.56% 7.91% 13.26% 12.60% GARRISON 0% 0% 5.670 3.670 24.849 0 24.849 20.93% 8.47% 0.10% 32.27% 38.24% GARVIN 0% 0% 37.880 13.864 16.081 0 16,081 63.21% 6.84% 4.85% 19.28% 5.83% GARY 0% 0% 49.322 12,118 25.005 0 25.005 59.63% 4.20% 2.03% 27.75% 6.39% GAYLORD 0% 0% 341,122 175,117 219.103 0 219.103 64.84% 10.22% 2.06% 19.69% 3.20% GEM LAKE 0% 0% 0 8.923 84,003 4.099 79.904 64.82% 4.95% 2.20% 25.74% 2.29% GENEVA 0% 0% 38,880 24,680 35,871 0 35.871 78.76% 7.46% 0.83% 10.36% 2.59% GENOLA 0% 0% 154 971 7,070 0 7.070 39.29% 5.48% 5.45% 36.27% 13.51% GEORGETOWN 0% 0% 8,305 6,787 8.646 0 8.646 56.03% 5.59% 20.70% 2.17% 15.51% GHENT 0% 0% 38,050 14.584 20.118 0 20,118 69.41% 7.56% 3.06% 18.20% 1.77% GIBBON 0% 0% 136,310 93.994 119.999 0 119,999 79.47% 5.88% 1.14% 11.22% 2.29% GILBERT 0% 0.04928% 572,780 179,178 240.879 0 240.879 80.64% 6.23% 3.29% 6.42% 3.41% GILMAN 0% 0% 877 1,712 3,038 0 3.038 74.38% 6.73% 5.32% 13.33% 0.24% GLENCOE 0% 0% 661.754 296,180 704,766 0 704,766 72.69% 7.07% 0.16% 18.68% 1.40% GLENVILLE 0% 0% 57.424 36,564 86,657 0 86.657 73.96% 7.13% 4.77% 11.38% 2.77% GLENWOOO 0% 0% 466.944 234.366 500,517 0 500,517 61.18% 13.65% 0.32% 15.30% 9.55% GL YNDON 0% 0% 85,528 59.642 103,944 0 103.944 73.42% 5.73% 6.00% 8.03% 6.81% GOLDEN VALLEY 0% 0% 27,333 1,747,879 5.905,036 417.822 5,487.214 64.99% 5.18% 0.00% 28.35% 1.49% GONVICK 0% 0% 60,201 21.752 35,701 0 35,701 52.96% 14.70% 6.85% 17.29% 8.20% GOOD THUNDER 0% 0% 72.882 60.601 96,862 0 96,862 75.51% 10.03% 3.97% 8.26% 2.24% GOODHUE 0% 0% 76,496 46,885 132.669 0 132,669 71.72% 4.93% 4.55% 16.07% 2.73% GOODFlIOGE 0% 0% 21.913 2,095 3,435 0 3,435 54.77% 24.21% 0.54% 16.30% 4.18% GOODVIEW 0% 0% 178.413 225,505 451,850 0 451.850 66.67% 6.04% 0.05% 21.95% 5.30% GRACEVILLE 0% 0% 134.595 35.965 64,629 0 64,629 68.13% 13.29% 2.12% 9.10% 7.36% GRANADA 0% 0% 47,244 12.893 21.173 0 21.173 73.57% 8.18% 8.34% 4.88% 5.03% ". GRAND MARAIS 0% 0% 219,742 107,164 363,441 0 363,441 60.01% 9.12% 0.00% 25.10% 5.77% GRAND MEADOW 0% 0% 135,400 57,321 28.476 0 28,476 83.09% 5.64% 0,47% 8.84% 1.96% I GRAND RAPIDS 0% 0.00019% 1,278.407 505,737 1,587.331 0 1,587,331 44.68% 11.67% 0.00% 41.39% 2.26% GRANITE FALLS 0% 0% 529,265 78,079 285,221 0 285,221 57.42% 9.52% 0.95% 14.31 % 17.81% GRASSTON 0% 0.04140% 14,372 4,278 5.162 O. 5.162 58.27% 9.80% 19.00% 4.28% 8.66% GREEN ISLE 0% 0.03252% 45,122 32.678 85,066 0 85,066 75.75% 4.45% 0.00% 17.83% 1.97% GREENBUSH 0% 0.13609% 137,550 36,086 84.114 0 84,114 69.19% 7.43% 0.78% 13.84% 8.76% GREENFIELD 0% 0% 2,555 80,878 276.421 31,877 244,544 61.97% 4.07% 25.55% 4.61% 3.80% GREENWALD 0% 0% 7.753 9,204 10,796 0 10,796 65.26% 6.16% 7.B5% 13.71% 7.01% GREENWOOD 0% 0% 0 38,584 20.5.121 5,561 199,560 84.30% 6.83% 0.00% 3.50% 5.37% GREY EAGLE 0% 0.03183% 58.726 14,930 37,164 0 37,164 62.71% 14.14% 1.66% 18.10% 3.40% GROVE CITY 0% 0% 114,715 38,613 40,368 0 40,368 72.74% 12.17% 1.74% 10.80% 2.54% GRYGLA 0% 0% 34,582 5.780 22.055 0 22,055 44.48% 19.17% 1.41% 28.30% 6.64% GULLY 0% 0.08368% 6.492 1.673 2.150 0 2,150 30.01 % 22.20% 6.85% 16.83% 24.11% HACKENSACK 0% 0% 13,949 12,151 50.348 0 50,348 39.90% 11.16% 0.00% 26.99% 21.95% HADLEY 0% 0% 2.588 768 5,000 0 5,000 54.32% 2.97% 3.85% 35.91% 2.94% HALLOCK 0% 0% 255,439 68.317 81.675 0 81,675 65.35% 8.19% 1.88% 15.03% 9.54% HALMA 0% 0% 5.475 2.786 4.542 0 4.542 58.23% 4.59% 17.14% 3_08% 16.96% HALSTAD 0% 0% 90,822 43,211 83.538 0 83.538 65.90% 12.91% 0.59% 13.55% 7.05% HAM LAKE 0% 0.00479% 168,588 203,774 692,043 155.020 537,023 77.82% 4.26% 4.76% 8.59% 4.58% HAM8URG 0% 0% 32,899 43,043 107,924 36.570 71,354 84.79% 7.74% 1.10% 4.02% 2.35% HAMMOND 0% 0% 9.581 3,880 8,720 0 8.720 82.50% 12.25% 0.00% 4.14% 1.12% HAMPTON 0% 0.00339% 14,025 19,078 23.368 10.966 12,402 66.70% 10.90% 7.42% 13.80% 1.18% HANCOCK 0% 0% 96.331 41,688 98.352 0 98.352 67.66% 10.51% 3.69% 9.90% 8.24% HANLEY FALLS 0% 0% 50.303 20.892 50,334 0 50.334 57.40% 10.37% 1.47% 5.39% 25.37% HANOVER 0% 0.00141% 15,989 38,989 110.533 5,802 104,731 75.16% 5.20% 12.55% 5.01% 2.08% HANSKA 0% 0.05771 % 63,309 32.608 41,586 0 41,586 68.83% 6.57% 1.29% 21.34% 1.97% HARDING 0% 0% 741 568 1.932 0 1,932 46.91% 4.78% 37.23% 7.39% 3.70% HARDWICK 0% 0% 28.000 6.756 9.847 0 9.847 50.60% 7.27% 29.79% 10.21% 2.15% HARMONY 0% 0% 221.971 81.560 198.561 0 198.561 68.96% 7.43% 1.82% 19.69% 2.10% HARRIS 0% 0.03761% 24.557 27,!l96 94,984 0 94.984 47.76% 6.72% 37.45% 2.95% 5.13% HARTLAND 0% 0% 46,929 13.356 2,602 0 2,602 67.09% 4.67% 2.07% 20.29% 5.88% HASTINGS 0% 0% 1,212,348 988,386 3.042.956 668,984 2.373,972 72.09% 9.88% 0.50% 15.08% 2.46% HATFIELD 0% 0% 864 1,715 6,585 0 6,585 10.70% 1.21% 81.09% 5_20% 1.80% HAWLEY 0% 0.33028% 152.349 53.577 89.767 0 89.767 74.46% 9.03% 0.38% 12.56% 3.57% HAYFIELD 0% 0% 170.491 144.745 285.133 0 285.133 73.03% 7.82% 2.28% 14.73% 2.13% HAYWARD 0% 0.04058% 35.561 10.513 21.936 0 21.936 58.10% 6.56% 6.33% 25.60% 3.41% I----------------------n-----____.___.___n.._.n____ T AX BASE DA T A._n_n_____...____...____________________ '...._.n_______ NETT AX CAPACITY TAX RATES n____.______.1 1993 Total Tax PowerJine Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average e Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate HAZEL RUN BO 14.016 0 0 0 14,016 0 51.2% 16.1% Bl.2% 1.4% 150.0% HECTOR 1.145 . 361.2Bl 0 4.360 0 356,921 0 24.8% 91.7% 48.4% 0.7% 165.6% HEIDELBERG 75 16.546 0 0 0 16,546 0 47.0% 9.7% 60.0% 0.2% 116.8% HENDERSON 755 143.355 0 4.709 0 138,646 0 49.5% 62.7% 56.6% 0.2% 169,1% HENDRICKS 681 152.716 0 0 0 152,716 0 57.2% 31.1% 83.2% 1.4% 173.0% HENDRUM 300 53.802 0 0 0 53,802 0 39.6% 67.7% 58.6% 3.4% 169.3% HENNING 732 172,597 0 20,623 0 151.974 0 39.7% 69.1% 73.9% 0.0% 182.7% HENRIETTE 83 12,616 0 0 0 12,616 0 51.1% 16.2% 57.3% 0.2% 124.8% HERMAN 474 102.758 0 0 0 102.758 0 43.8% 33.0% 50.4% 0.7% 127.8% HERMANTOWN 7.078 4.589.350 0 12 0 4.589,338 0 75.1% 17.8% 62.8% 1.1% 156.6% HERON LAKE 770 139.819 0 0 0 139.819 0 36.7% 54.6% 54.3% 1.2% 146.8% HEWITT 261 37.205 0 0 0 37.205 0 62.2% 23.3% 49.0% 0.2% 134.6% HIBBING 18.025 5.812.538 13.189 179.561 0 5,619.788 0 63.6% 37.8% 39.7% 0.5% 141.5% HILL CITY 466 179,894 0 0 0 179.894 0 52.7% 81.6% 54.6% 0.2% 189.2% HILLMAN 44 6.349 0 0 0 6.349 0 59.0% 51.2% 78.1% 0.4% 188.7% HILLS 605 138,288 0 3,378 0 134.910 0 28.6% 20.9% 62.3% 0.2% 112.0% HILLTOP 749 328,704 0 44.091 54,801 229,812 197.825 32.6% 63.7% 69.1% 5.0% 170.4% HINCKLEY 1.004 762.691 0 151,747 0 610,944 0 51.0% 31.9% 48.2% 6.0% 137.1% HITTERDAL 238 31,129 0 0 0 31,129 0 48.3% 38.5% 72.2% 3.2% 162.2% HOFFMAN 640 120.956 0 0 0 120,956 0 45.8% 29.3% 72.7% 0.0% 147.8% HOKAH 706 133.544 0 0 0 133.544 0 46.0% 72.3% 53.4% 0.0% 171.6% HOLDINGFORD 562 127.517 0 0 0 127.517 0 35.8% 116.4% 44.0% 3.5% 199.7% HOLLAND 212 30.629 0 0 0 30,629 0 54.6% 58.2% 45.2% 0.2% 158.1% HOLLANDALE 291 98.082 0 4.264 0 93,818 0 43.8% 27.5% 55.9% 0.3% 127.5% HOLLOWAY 122 46.962 0 0 0 46,962 0 57.1% 84.6% 46.2% 0.4% 18B.4% HOLT 99 11,201 0 0 0 11.201 0 23.9% 27.8% 51.0% 2.6% 105.3% HOPKINS 16.406 15.341,893 0 1,004.834 1.780.303 12.556,756 1,982.729 37.8% 27.5% 68.2% 6.3% 139.7% HOUSTON 1.016 241.486 0 8,422 0 233.064 0 51.3% 34.3% 63.9% 0.0% 149.6% HOWARD LAKE 1,523 668.447 0 93.160 0 575.287 0 31.9% 38.8% 42.6% 0.0% 113.4% HOYT LAKES 2.327 1.380,513 0 2,756 0 1,377.757 0 78.5% 39.4% 45.5% 1.1% 164.5% HUGO 5.030 3,191,807 6,676 0 317,992 2,867.139 484.448 30.7% 21.2% 66.9% 3.5% 122.3% HUMBOLDT 68 27.740 0 0 0 27,740 0 26.4% 14.1% 65.4% 1.3% 107.3% HUTCHINSON 11.960 5,394.303 0 203.405 0 5,190,898 0 45.2% 40.8% 60.9% 0.2% 147.2% IHLEN .92 13,091 0 0 0 13.091 0 58.8% 32.0% 49.5% 0.2% 140.4% INDEPENDENCE 2.951 2.229.736 0 0 98.574 2,131.162 212.805 37.8% 32.6% 66.0% 2.6% 138.9% INTERNATIONAL FALLS 7,808 6.065.009 0 2.448.435 0 3,616.574 0 37.5% 34.8% 62.4% 0.2% 134.8% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 24,332 16.813,590 0 608,738 2.553,655 13.651.197 2.961.245 27.5% 25.2% 58.8% 5.4% 117.0% 10NA 149 41,666 0 0 0 41.666 0 35.4% 43.8% 49.2% 0.2% 128.6% IRON JUNCTION 135 23,891 0 0 0 23,891 0 81.4% 10.4% 40.5% 1.1% 133.4% IRONTON 562 115,573 0 0 0 115,573 0 29.4% 77.4% 57.7% 2.3% 166.8% e ISANTI 1.857 662,866 0 33.371 0 629,495 0 58.6% 35.4% 49.0% 0.2% 143.1% ISLE 589 325,297 0 6.860 O. 318.437 0 81.6% 40.3% 73.3% 0.2% 195.4% IVANHOE 755 136.308 0 0 0 136.308 0 53.6% 34.9% 56.1% 1.2% 145.8% JACKSON 3,553 911,925 0 95.885 0 816,040 0 35.8% 46.8% 49.1% 0.2% 131.9% JANESVILLE 1.987 387,647 0 0 0 387,647 0 51.4% 37.2% 54.3% 0.2% 143.2% JASPER 586 154.784 0 0 0 154.784 0 49.1% 29.7% 61.5% 0.2% 140.5% JEFFERS 449 73.060 0 0 0 73.060 0 44.3% 40.0% 52.0% 0.2% 136.6% JENKINS 273 69.081 0 0 0 69.081 0 31.8% 32.8% 51.5% 0.1% 116.3% JOHNSON 42 9,931 0 0 0 9,931 0 51.1% 21.7% 46.9% 1.1% 120.9% JORDAN 3,003 950,003 0 38,800 109,637 801.566 610,205 47.9% 41,3% 69.6% 2.4% 161,2% KANDIYOHI 517 124.861 0 0 0 124.861 0 42.2% 34.1% 62.0% 0.2% 138.5% KARLST AD 880 . 212,889 0 0 0 212.889 0 25.7% 82.0% 66.1% 0.3% 174.1% KASOTA 662 129.327 0 0 0 129.327 0 48.9% 22.9% 66.0% 0.2% 136.0% KASSON 3.807 1.065,645 0 48.986 0 1,018,659 0 37.9% 34.2% 43.1% 0,0% 115.1% KEEWATIN 1,105 153,944 0 0 0 153.944 0 30.7% 66.9% 17.4% 0.1% 115.2% KELLIHER 365 58.997 0 0 0 58.997 0 60.8% 19.9% 42.9% 2,1% 125.7% KELLOGG 427 79.158 0 0 0 79.158 0 57.9% 25.0% 57.1% 0.7% 140.7% KENNEDY 330 80.070 0 0 0 80.070 0 24.7% 55.8% 75.2% 1.6% 157.2% KENNETH 77 18.458 0 0 0 18.458 0 34.0% 18.0% 57.3% 0.2% 109.5% KENSINGTON 288 43,575 0 0 0 43,575 0 40.4% 59.0% 57.7% 0.3% 157.4% KENT 132 16.649 0 0 0 16,649 0 44.4% 20.4% 49.9% 0.0% 114.6% KENYON 1,563 554.169 0 48.912 0 505.257 0 22.1% Bl.3% 52.6% 0.6% 156.7% KERKHOVEN 735 165.662 0 0 0 165,662 0 56.5% 24.2% 78.7% 0.4% 159.8% KERRICK 54 21.537 0 0 0 21.537 0 51.2% 30.2% 72.1% 0.2% 153.7% KETTLE RIVER 191 49.298 0 0 0 49.298 0 52.8% 46.7% 49.1% 2.9% 151.5% KIESTER 596 90.102 0 0 0 90.102 0 28.4% 53.2% 50.3% 0.2% 132.1% KILKENNY 164 17,525 0 0 0 17.525 0 41.4% 21.3% 53.2% 0.2% 116.1% KIMBALL PRAIRIE 703 205,632 0 7.764 0 197.868 0 37,9% 66.7% 59.6% 1.3% 165.5% KINBRAE 18 11.423 0 0 0 11,423 0 31.6% 26.8% 60.6% 1.0% 120.0% KINGSTON 127 19.588 0 0 0 19,588 0 43.0% 27.0% 61.2% 0.2% 131.4% KINNEY 246 42,659 0 0 0 42,659 0 22.2% 96.0% 0.7% 0.9% 119.9% LA CRESCENT 4.451 1.490.001 0 17,177 0 1.472,824 0 51.6% 34.0% 59.7% 0.0% 145.2%. LA PRAIRIE 458 231.943 0 2~,597 0 204.346 0 46.4% 26.2% 55.4% 0.2% 128.2% LA SALLE 96 37.745 0 0 0 37.745 0 50.3% 20.9% 52.8% 0.2% 124.3% LAFAYETTE 457 117.714 0 15,417 0 102,297 0 51.3% 76.7% 51.1% 0.2% 179.4% LAKE BENTON 689 141,404 0 0 0 141.404 0 47.8% 30.0% 46.0% 0.2% 124.0% LAKE BRONSON 265 43,034 0 0 0 43,034 0 22.9% 30.7% 61.6% 1.5% 116.7% LAKE CITY 4.430 1.999,693 0 177.126 0 1.822,567 0 51.4% 25.5% 56.0% 0.7% 133.6% LAKE CRYSTAL 2.125 524.327 0 25,813 0 498,514 0 38.9% 41.8% 64.2% 0.2% 145,1% LAKE ELMO 6.057 4.345.315 642 0 269.490 4,075.183 540.982 30.7% 19.9% 63.7% 7.9% 122.2% LAKE HENRY 91 13,321 0 0 0 13.321 0 39.7% 28.9% 65.9% 0.5% 135.0% LAKE LILLIAN 224 77,595 0 0 0 77.595 0 41.4% 23.2% 49.5% 0.2% 114.4% LAKE PARK 640 157.076 0 13.105 0 143,971 0 55.1% 31.1% 47.9% 1.6% 135.1% LAKE SHORE 731 1,652,182 0 0 0 1.652.182 0 40.9% 17.4% 58.8% 0.2% 117.2% e LAKE ST CROIX BEACH 1.127 459,479 0 0 11.940 447.539 138.116 30.7% 24.0% 64.1% 1.8% 120.6% LAKE WILSON 321 55,529 0 0 0 55.529 0 30.7% 23.0% 36.2% 0.2% 90.0% LAKEFIELD 1.673 308.230 0 0 0 308,230 0 30.1% 64.7% 52.5% 1.0% 148.4% I--...MV TAX RA TES...-- I.mm.--._._--------m----._AID AND LEVY OAT Am._._..__.__.___..._______..... I-.---.....--m.-m_m-- T AX BASE CDMPOSITION----m---_-__..._..---l Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV City MV School MV LGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes HAZEL RUN 0% 0% 8,249 1,746 2.254 0 2,254 26.71% 2.45% 48.89% 18.75% 3.20% HECTOR 0% 0% 198,305 118,889 327,347 0 327,347 65.89% 6.27% 4.08% 19..13% 4.63% HEIDelBERG 0% 0% 596 1,585 1,597 0 1,597 73.90% 4.11% 21.06% 0.79% 0.14% HENDERSON 0% 0% 145,544 56,163 86,999 0 86,999 83.61% 5.51% 0.92% 8.14% 1.82% HENDRICKS 0% 0% 128,261 31,658 47,563 0 47,563 69.54% 8.89% 1.97% 14.90% 4.70% HENDRUM 0% 0% 40,136 12,354 36.411 0 36.411 65.62% 9.21% 0.00% 14.03% 11.15% HENNING 0% 0.04165% 133,679 36,474 104.996 0 104.996 59.48% 15.64% 4.98% 17.84% 2.05% HENRIETTE 0% 0% 1,135 764 2,041 0 2,041 57.77% 6.33% 4.72% 21.40% 9.78% HERMAN 0% 0.26459% 117.664 31,922 33,897 0 33.897 53.21% 10.37% 6.17% 13.98% 16.26% HERMANTOWN 0% 0.00036% 465,985 246.241 815,089 0 815,089 62.79% 4.03% 0.92% 15.85% 16.41% HERON LAKE 0% 0% 132.682 43.640 76.389 0 76.389 62.11% 12.48% 5.50% .16.69% 3.21% HEWITT 0% 0.02041% 28,415 13,542 8,653 0 8,653 51.4!l% 13.77% 14.97% 6.41% 13.36% HIBBING 0% 0.05373% 3,942.048 1,228.890 2,124,139 0 2,124,139 71.08% 6.78% 2.12% 14.44% 5.57% HILL CITY 0% 0% 46,846 34,772 146.867 0 146,867 29.32% 5.54% 0.00% 9.32% 55.82% HILLMAN 0% 0% 1.594 249 3.251 0 3,251 41.34% 9.16% 38.71% 7.56% 3.22% HILLS 0% 0% 89,410 17.061 28,130 0 28,130 71.57% 6.90% 2.50% 14.30% 4.73% HILLTOP 0% 0% 53,545 22,670 228,446 82,037 146,409 14.30% 21.61% 0.00% 43.54% 20.56% HINCKLEY 0% 0% 130.211 53.923 194,745 0 194,745 42.46% 11.86% 0.00% 39.98% 5.70% HITTERDAL 0% 0% 40,193 10,927 12,000 0 12,000 56.88% 6.10% 14.36% 7.13% 15.53% HOFFMAN 0% 0% 76,785 23,020 35,434 0 35,434 62.24% 9.22% 10.28% 11.24% 7.03% HOKAH 0% 0.03740% 141,131 45,425 96,524 0 96.524 80.39% 11.35% 0.53% 5.54% 2.18% HOLDING FORD 0% 0.01716% 106,737 55,918 148,385 0 148.385 80.42% 5.91% 0.08% 11.43% 2.16% HOLLAND 0% 0% 35.480 8,674 17.818 0 17.818 57.85% 4.71% 18.36% 5.15% 13.94% HOLLANDALE 0% 0.04060% 33,390 13,501 25.786 0 25,786 60.94% 6.84% 1.60% 27.30% 3.32% HOLLOWAY 0% 0.04720% 13,321 6,270 39,730 0 39.730 26.79% 7.01% 18.61% 23.33% 24.26% HOLT 0% 0% 7,203 1.171 3.113 0 3,113 63.56% 4.26% 17.32% 4.39% 10.47% HOPKINS 0% 0% 794,284 966,384 3,987,289 533.930 3.453,359 44.91% 26.06% 0.05% 27.79% 1.20% HOUSTON 0% 0% 171,865 44,556 80,002 0 80.002 73.28% 8.60% 1.67% 13.93% 2.52% HOWARO LAKE 0% 0.08752% 152,129 72,212 223,488 0 223,488 60.24% 12.24% 0.61% 20.90% 6.00% HOYT LAKES 0% 0% 240.907 133,536 542,959 0 542,959 44.48% 1.94% 2.38% 6.98% 44.21% HUGO 0% 0.01746% 26,028 223,392 709,064 99.827 609,237 68.40% 4.34% 14.52% 7.31% 5.43% HUMBOLDT 0% 0% 5.745 1,719 3.922 0 3.922 24.33% 8.35% 14.69% 3.63% 49.01 % HUTCHINSON 0% 0% 1,325,264 953.521 2,119.859 0 2.119.859 70.29% 9.13% 0.15% 20.10% 0.33% IHLEN 0% 0% 12,077 3.463 4,189 0 4,189 73.42% 3.32% 9.29% 5.18% 8.78% INDEPENDENCE 0% 0% 0 179.612 752,084 58,092 693,992 67.60% 4.96% 22.04% 2.22% 3.18% INTERNATIONAL FALLS 0% 0% 2,105.264 539,666 1,257,222 0 1,257,222 41.90% 5.69% 0.07% 49.14% 3.19% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 0% 0.19443% 427,332 954,495 4.199.057 753,292 3,445.765 65.84% 11.07% 2.01% 12.35% 8.73% 10NA 0% 0% 29.314 9,059 18,270 0 18,270 53.20% 7.51% 18.22% 18.78% 2.29% IRON JUNCTION 0% 0.04925% 3,543 1.508 2,479 0 2,479 80.83% 2.48% 1.33% 1.17% 14.20% IRONTON 0% 0% 98,544 48,674 89,437 0 89,437 67.83% 15.52% 1.06% 9.29% 6.30% ISANTI 0% 0% 212,502 82,536 222,980 0 222,980 67.16% 14.46% 1.16% 11.92% 5.30% ISLE 0% 0% 56,616 22.802 128,451 0 128,451 47.09% 9.56% 0.58% 18.06% 24.71 % IVANHOE 0% 0% 129.834 37,715 47,510 0 47,510 73.93% 6.83% 1.79% 12.76% 4.68% JACKSON 0% 0% 830,573 287,836 381,727 0 381,727 70.12% 11.30% 1.52% 15.87% 1.18% JANESVILLE 0% 0.00319% 237,706 136.633 144,178 0 144,178 82.47% 7.22% 1.38% 7.56% 1.37% JASPER 0% 0% 108.63B 16.310 46,001 0 46,001 63.42% 6.22% 3.11% 20.61% 6.63% JEFFERS 0% 0% 70,917 18,593 29,242 0 29,242 58.63% 7.17% 2.87% 27.97% 3.36% JENKINS 0% 0% 10,510 5,210 22,690 0 22,690 61.95% 5.25% 9.40% 12.47% 10.92% JOHNSON 0% 0% 2.638 1.190 2.159 0 2,159 27.57% 5.72% 39.25% 6.07% 21.40% JORDAN 0% 0% 251,881 150,019 522,188 191.013 331,175 72.74% 8.88% 1.66% 13.00% 3.72% r~ KANDIYOHI 0% 0% 41,755 16,657 42,520 0 42,520 77.75% 12.39% 0.64% 6.70% 2.51% KARLST AD 0% 0% 124,588 43,463 174,509 0 174,509 58.49% 14.57% 1.54% 14.68% 10.73% I KASOTA 0% 0% 51,251 11,285 29.593 0 29,593 81.94% 8.00% 0.41% 7.98% 1.66% i KASSON 0% 0% 392,621 280,059 347,943 0 347,943 81.98% 7..05% 0.45% 8.82% 1.70% I KEEWATIN 0% 0.01811% 353.625 99.806 103.013 0 103.013 80.61% 12.50% 0.00% 4.22% 2.67% KElliHER 0% 0% 22.540 6.094 11,761 0 11,761 48.95% 24.56% 9.40% 13.40% 3.69% KELLOGG 0% 0% 41.192 24,430 19,758 0 19,758 80.55% 4.66% 2.19% 9.81% 2.78% KENNEDY 0% 0% 35,317 35,746 44,656 0 44,656 56.87% 7.52% 8.52% 8.97% 18.12% KENNETH 0% 0% 9,924 2,380 3.320 0 3,320 23.15% 3.55% 50.52% 19.92% 2.86% KENSfNGTON 0% 0% 34,579 13,861 25,709 0 25,709 63.51% 15.80% 3.04% 7.50% 10.15% KENT 0% 0% 14,984 3,809 3,391 0 3,391 61.16% 5.72% 9.50% 7.44% 16.19% KENYON 0% 0% 200,250 155,267 410,850 0 410,850 67.84% 8.14% 4.30% 17.87% 1.85% KERKHOVEN 0% 0% 109.822 27.592 40,057 0 40,057 72.24% 10.24% 2.65% 6.44% 8.43% KERRICK 0% 0% 3.125 815 6.502 0 6.502 54.87% 5.23% 14.12% 6.31% 19.47% KETTLE RIVER 0% 0% 26.559 9,683 23.014 0 23,014 54.22% 12.12% 1.67% 10.63% 21.36% KIESTER 0% 0% 120.689 49,470 47,898 0 47,898 68.68% 5.01% 1.65 % 21.66% 3.01% KILKENNY 0% 0% 26,070 7.090 3,734 0 3.734 79.79% 7.34% 3.77% 5.91% 3.19% KIMBALL PRAIRIE 0% 0% 39.912 46,001 132,000 0 132.000 49.59% 18.18% 6.40% 20.49% 5.34% KINBRAE 0% 0% 907 936 3,064 0 3.064 16.99% 6.05% 65.44% 9.61% 1.91% KINGSTON 0% 0% 1,853 2,171 5,280 0 5,280 72.79% 11.11% 10.59% 4.09% 1.42% KINNEY 0% 0.16559% 71,213 31,284 40,972 0 40,972 46.84% 6.11% 12.07% 3.88% 31.10% LA CRESCENT 0% 0.03739% 273,343 242.114 500.038 0 500,038 82.35% 7.59% 0.14% 6.85% 3.07% LA PRAIRIE 0% 0.04808% 37.770 33,543 53,636 0 53,636 65.11% 5.88% 0.00% 26.79% 2.22% LA SALLE 0% 0% 6.120 2,109 7,891 0 7,891 39.74% 1.44% 0.37% 55.47% 2.98% LAFAYETTE 0% 0.05770% 77.983 31,284 78.482 0 78.482 62.81% 6.01% 11.71% 15.43% 4.04% LAKE 8ENTON 0% 0% 173,444 60,725 42.476 0 42,476 65.35% 10.96% 6.61% 12.67% 4.42% LAKE BRONSON 0% 0% 47.221 14,792 13.226 0 13,226 64.05% 7.57% 4.91% 8.22% 15.25% LAKE CITY 0% 0.01572% 686,980 233,664 464,189 0 464.189 67.32% 8.12% 1.04% 17.70% 5.82% LAKE CRYSTAL 0% 0% 242,840 132,775 208,487 0 208.487 78.27% 9.31% 1.43% 9.70% 1.29% LAKE ELMO 0% 0% 4,487 182,820 914,643 101.877 812,766 78.39% 3.32% 7.08% 6.11% 5.11% LAKE HENRY 0% 0.03685% 3,675 3.790 3,854 0 3,854 74.48% 3.13% 14.35% 4.05% 3.99% LAKE LILLIAN 0% 0% 42.131 17.732 18,001 0 18.001 67.55% 7.66% 2.33% 19.75% 2.70% LAKE PARK 0% 0.12023% 95.684 35.202 44.736 0 44.736 59.99% 15.07% 1.49% 18.20% 5.24% LAKE SHORE 0% 0% 0 11.387 287.991 0 287.991 35.90% 0.95% 1.32% 1.51% 60.31% LAKE ST CROIX BEACH 0% 0% 10,082 35.226 139.960 32.556 107,404 89.00% 6.43% 0.30% 2.30% 1.98% LAKE WILSON 0% 0% 46,856 28.434 12,795 0 12,795 79.59% 3.78% 1.26% 13.01% 2.36% LAKEFIELD 0% 0% 442,262 194.121 199.523 0 199,523 77.07% 7.41% 1.02% 13.00% 1.50% 1-----------u-u------------u---_u.______________uTAX BASE DATA___.___.____._.....__uu___________U____IU".___u...... NET TAX CAPACITY TAX RATES _.._____._____1 e 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrlb Tax Tax Distflb Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate LAKELAND 2,006 1,144,829 0 0 59,983 1.084,846 209.307 30.7% 16.7% 64.1% 1.8% 113.2% LAKELAND SHORES 321 250,437 0 0 10.488 239,949 21,871 30.7% 17.7% 64.1% 1.8% 114.3% LAKEVILLE 30.149 19,880.824 0 1.273.796 2.434,330 16,172.698 3,185,315 27.5% 20.0% 69.8% 1.8% 119.1% LAMBERTON 974 223,762 0 0 0 223,762 0 32.8% 42.8% 50.5% 0.2% 126.3% LANCASTER 335 57.450 0 0 0 57,450 0 26.1% 33.3% 93.0% 1.7% 154.1% LANDFALL 624 59,280 0 D 13.591 45,689 554.872 31.5% 23.8% 60.3% 7.3% 122.9% LANESBDRD 850 208,766 0 0 0 208,766 0 40.5% 57.0% 55.6% 0.0% 153.0% LAPORTE 97 28.614 0 0 0 28,614 0 37.9% 18.7% 70.5% 0.4% 127.6% LASTRUP 111 23.581 0 0 0 23,581 0 59.0% 27.5% 61.8% 0.4% 148.6% LAUDERDALE 2,710 1.300.461 0 149,882 40,318 1,110,261 444,640 44.5% 24.8% 73.7% 5.1% 148.1% LE CENTER 2.074 547,301 0 23.129 0 524,172 0 44.9% 31.7% 63.4% 0.2% 140.3% LE ROY 903 225,579 0 0 0 225,579 0 45.5% 40.3% 77.1% 0.7% 163.6% LE SUEUR 3.818 1.527.362 0 105,597 0 1.421.765 0 45.9% 27.7% 77.6% 0.2% 151.4% LENGBY 111 12,134 0 0 0 12,134 0 39.1% 34.5% 48.2% 7.7% 129.5% LEONARD 24 7.365 0 0 0 7,365 0 67.7% 13.8% 53.8% 1.9% 137.2% LEONIDAS 67 13.357 0 0 0 13,357 0 52.0% 17.7% 26.1% 1.1% 96.8% LESTER PRAIRIE 1,208 374,681 0 0 O. 374,681 0 46.0% 68.1% 63.8% 0.2% 178.1% LEWISTON 1,338 488,843 0 33,793 0 455,050 0 41.4% 49.9% 50.1% 0.9% 142.4% LEWISVILLE 249 58,009 0 0 0 58,009 0 49.7% 59.5% 62.3% 0.2% 171.7% LEXINGTON 2.198 916,528 0 39,117 126,541 750,870 414.458 32.7% 22.0% 64.0% 4.5% 123.1% L1L YDALE 542 993,612 0 0 85,192 908,420 22.199 27.5% 16.7% 64.6% 4.8% 113.6% LINDSTROM 2,554 1,304,704 0 12.238 0 1,292,466 0 53.9% 30.2% 56.8% 0.2% 141.2% L1NO LAKES 11,193 5,506.951 0 256,841 251,291 4,998,819 1.195.695 32.7% 29.7% 63.0% 5.7% 131.1% L1SMORE 242 39.482 0 0 0 39.482 0 25.1% 37.1% 48.9% 1.3% 112.4% LITCHFIELD 6,073 2,207,133 0 23,140 0 2.183,993 0 42.0% 25.9% 61.2% 0.2% 129.4% LITTLE CANADA 9,134 7,346.808 0 300,065 1,275,963 5.770,780 1,174.590 45.3% 20.7% 73.5% 6.6% 146.1% LITTLE FALLS 7.481 2.791.328 0 297,988 0 2,493,340 0 57.5% 31.7% 58.9% 1.0% 149.2% L1TTLEFORK 847 120,875 0 0 0 120,875 0 44.6% 73.3% 46.8% 0.2% 164.9% LONG BEACH 219 121.906 0 0 0 121,906 0 46.5% 0.7% 68.7% 4.1% 120.0% LONG LAKE 1,980 2,031.494 0 222,324 355.088 1.454,082 191.591 37.8% 29.9% 65.8% 5.7% 139.2% LONG PRAIRIE 2.826 1.042,081 0 17B,854 0 863,227 0 73.2% 16.6% 67.2% 0.2% 157.2% LONGVILLE 233 170,753 0 0 0 170,753 0 40.1% 20.7% 5B.0% 0.2% 119.0% LONSDALE 1,298 392,668 0 0 0 392,668 0 36.1% 20.4% 57.9% 0.0% 114.4% LORETTO 477 323,542 0 0 47.965 275,577 55,881 37.8% 24.2% 65.8% 2.5% 130.3% LOUIS8URG 36 22.102 0 0 0 22.102 0 35.9% 32.4% 80.8% 1.4% 150.5% LOWRY 225 57.166 0 0 0 57,166 0 42.5% 57.4% 63.0% 5.4% 168.4% LUCAN 229 43.325 0 0 0 43,325 0 32.9% 57.7% 50.5% 0.2% 141.3% LUVERNE 4.425 1,301,759 0 90,230 0 1.211,529 0 32.7% 27.7% 51.9% 0.2% 112.5% LYLE 501 79,433 0 0 0 79.433 0 42.1% 104.2% 36.4% 0.6% 183.3% LYND 312 50.088 0 0 0 50,088 0 35.8% 52.4% 53.4% 0.2% 141.8% e MABEL 749 148.058 0 0 0 148,058 0 39.2% 50.4% 60.5% 0.0% 150.1% MADEllA 2,234 626,605 0 61,268 0 565,337 0 50.1% 57.8% 68.3% 0.2% 176.4% MADISON 1.925 413,496 0 2,443 0 411.053 0 28.6% 59.8% 48.7% 1.3% 138.4% MADISON LAKE 672 167,475 0 10.433 0 157.042 0 36.8% 41.4% 51.2% 0.2% 129.5% MAGNOLIA 148 58,462 0 0 0 58,462 0 34.4% 21.4% 58.5% 0.2% 114.6% MAHNOMEN 1.203 632,333 0 13,246 0 619,087 0 94.5% 26.1% 40.0% 2.7% 163.2% MAHTOMEDI 5,966 3,718.409 0 81,624 93,998 3,542,787 582,647 30.7% 20.6% 69.7% 5.6% 126.5% MANCHESTER 76 22.143 0 0 0 22,143 0 43.9% 6.9% 56.0% 0.0% 106.8% MANHATTAN BEACH 61 97.664 0 2,937 0 94,727 0 31.8% 3.2% 57.1% 0.1% 92.2% MANKATO 31,434 18.501.177 0 1,691,858 0 16,809,319 0 37.6% 28.8% 54.6% 0.2% 121.3% MANTORVILLE 928 265.830 0 0 0 265,830 0 40.6% 32.1% 45.1% 0.0% 117.8% MAPLE GROVE 42,682 29,857,803 8,381 1,811,705 3,786,106 24,251,611 4,542.858 37.8% 25.4% 67.4% 5.1% 135.7% MAPLE LAKE 1.418 698,229 0 62.726 0 635,503 0 32.0% 38.0% 60.8% 0.0% 130.7% MAPlE PLAIN 2.117 1,477,023 0 155,114 214.466 1,107.443 285,310 37.8% 33.4% 65.8% 2.7% 139.7% MAPlETON 1,562 317,072 0 6,965 0 310,107 0 33.8% 36.4% 48.0% 0.2% 118.3% MAPLEVIEW 204 21,369 0 0 0 21,369 0 43.2% 53.8% 60.0% 0.7% 157.7% MAPlEWOOD 32,394 34,070.202 0 950,918 6.674,580 26.444,704 3.448.753 45.0% 21.8% 61.9% 6.0% 134.7% MAR8LE 615 87.782 0 0 0 87,782 0 25.4% 77.8% 41.7% 0.1% 145.0% MARIETTA 205 24.005 0 0 0 24.005 0 28.0% 30.7% 46.1% 1.3% 106.1% MARINE ON ST CROIX 608 680.790 0 0 18,247 662,543 32.588 30.7% 32.2% 64.1% 1.8% 128.8% MARSHALL 12.229 7.195,052 0 1.256.489 0 5,938.563 0 37.7% 24.3% 48.6% 0.2% 110.8% MAYER 513 167.873 0 0 10,702 157.171 79,721 44.0% 25.8% 66.7% 1.4% 137.8% MAYNARD 423 81.120 . 0 18.374 0 62,746 0 40.0% 53.8% 44.9% 0.4% 139.2% MAZEPPA 742 151,990 0 0 0 151,990 0 55.4% 21.1% 59.1% 0.7% 136.3% MCGRATH 60 9.647 0 0 0 9,647 0 57.0% 3.6% 60.6% 0.2% 121.4% MCGREGOR 370 87.439 0 0 0 87.439 0 49.1% 51.9% 51.4% 0.2% 152.6% MCINTOSH 676 114,310 0 0 0 114,310 0 44.1% 46.0% 64.6% 6.0% 160.7% MCKINLEY 115 16,894 0 0 0 16,894 0 50.1% 15.5% 23.3% 1.1% 90.0% MEADOWLANDS 86 18.497 0 0 0 18,497 0 59.9% 92.2% 38.1% 1.1% 191.3% MEDFORD 752 211,459 0 0 0 211.459 0 34.4% 49.6% 40.9% 0.0% 124.9% MEDICINE LAKE 388 434,964 0 0 4,731 430.233 23,730 37.8% 27.2% 60.5% 5.1% 130.6% MEDINA 3,534 5,658,950 0 477,315 630,982 4.550,653 179,562 37.8% 15.3% 63.9% 2.6% 119.6% MEIRE GROVE 122 26,648 0 0 0 26.648 0 39.4% 27.2% 67.3% 0.5% 134.4% MELROSE 2,635 995,665 0 25,930 0 969.735 0 39.7% 21.2% 67.7% 0.5% 129.0% MENAHGA 1.075 251,122 0 6.697 0 244.425 0 75.3% 62.7% 59.7% 0.2% 197.8% MENDOTA 166 121,065 0 0 18,092 102,973 17.716 27.2% 42.0% 64.2% 5.0% 138.5% MENDOTA HEIGHTS 10.466 13.354.239 0 1.085.703 1,820.483 10.448,053 640.387 27.5% 21.1% 64.6% 5.0% 118.1% MENTOR 186 36.972 0 0 0 36,972 0 46.1% 35.7% 53.9% 1.9% 137.5% MIDDLE RIVER 286 49.584 0 0 0 49.584 0 23.8% 29.8% 96.8% 2.8% 153.3% MIESVILLE 135 93,347 0 0 12.752 80.595 13.778 27.5% 13.3% 60.4% 1.8% 103.0% MILACA 2,273 889.910 398 96,060 0 793.452 0 81.6% 31.9% 64.1% 0.2% 177.8% MILAN 341 55.177 0 0 0 55,177 0 34.7% 102.9% 53.7% 0.4% 191.7% MILLERVILLE 101 21.982 0 0 0 21.982 0 41.7% 1.3% 44.3% 0.3% 87.5% e MILL VILLE 157 41.618 0 0 0 41.618 0 58.5% 9.4% 49.9% 0.7% 118.5% MILROY 302 45,904 0 0 0 45.904 0 29.6% 114.8% 41.6% 0.2% 186.2% MIL TONA 217 53.469 0 0 0 53.469 0 40.8% 37.2% 60.8% 0.3% 139.1% MINNEAPOLIS 367,924 324.404,360 0 41,431,555 50,142,007 232,830,798 46.722,802 33.8% 34.6% 68.4% 4.8% 141.7% 1---nMV TAX RA TESn.n I..-.---nm-n..---....-----..AID AND LEVY DA T Ann~.__.n.n..nn...m.______ I"---'---'---"'.---.---..T AX BASE COMPOSITION-..---....n---..---...I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV City MV School MV LGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes LAKELAND 0% 0% 5.432 31,083 215,638 34,942 180,696 88.57% 3.04% 0.90% 4.65% 2.84% LAKELAND SHORES 0% 0% 0 4,002 46.051 3.668 42,383 88.00% 3.99% 0.00% 3.67% 4.34% LA KEVILLE 0% 0.04987% 455,233 1,732,485 3.888,375 646,716 3.241.659 75.64% 6.33% 2.87% 12.20% 2.96% LAMBERTON 0% 0% 166,011 73,007 95,732 0 95,732 65.27% 12.72% 0.83% 16.09% 5.09% LANCASTER 0% 0% 54,516 17.098 19,106 0 19,106 57.17% 14.48% 8.99% 8.21% 11.16% LANDFALL 0% 0% 1,166 14.361 160.156 149.291 10.865 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 87.50% 12.50% LANES80RO 0% 0% 181,648 54,750 118,907 0 118.907 70.00% 13.78% 2.26% 12.28% 1.68% LAPORTE 0% 0% 4.790 1,640 5,360 0 5,360 54.98% 10.74% 2.85% 13.86% 17.57% LASTRUP 0% 0% 3,973 2.886 6,489 0 6.489 78.07% 0.21% 11.66% 6.40% 3.65% LAUDERDALE 0% 0% 37,018 81.668 385,740 110,174 275,566 64.44% 19.80% 0.00% 6.22% 9.54% LE CENTER 0% 0% 256.254 112,866 166,414 0 166,414 74.87% 9.40% 0.48% 13.23% 2.01% LE ROY 0% 0% 105,394 45,322 91,019 0 91.019 71.45% 5.97% 1.07% 18.63% 2.89% LE SUEUR 0% 0% 593,755 159.170 394.526 0 394,526 71.11% 8.31% 0.69% 19.02% 0.88% LENGBY 0% 0.08371% 20.759 7,510 4,191 0 4,191 70.16% 13.86% 0.00% 10.35% 5.63% LEONARD 0% 0% 1.536 381 1,019 0 1,019 59.47% 0.94% 7.32% 18.68% 13.59% LEONIDAS 0% 0.04927% 43,159 9,1110 2,363 0 2,363 81.00% 0.00% 4.17% 2.54% 12.29% LESTER PRAIRIE 0% 0% 133.617 106,261 255.000 0 255,000 80.27% 5.62% 0.50% 11.38% 2.23% LEWISTON 0% 0% 104.041 59.493 226,883 0 226.883 67.76% 11.34% 1.67% 16.47% 2.77% LEWISVILLE 0% 0% 30.938 10.508 34,500 0 34.500 57.45% 4.00% 5.37% 29.72% 3.46% LEXINGTON 0% 0% 130.418 76,553 262.400 97,449 164.951 65.59% 13.10% 0.00% 16.86% 4.44% L1L YDALE 0% 0% 0 7.275 155,480 3,610 151,870 61.28% 24.40% 0.00% 12.83% 1.48% LINDSTROM 0% 0% 139,217 119.476 390,905 0 390,905 73.65% 7.56% 0.05% 12.82% 5.92% L1NO LAKES 0% 0.01534% 145.445 427,284 1.841,706 359,007 1.482,699 85.92% 4.61% 3.93% 3.14% 2.40% LISMORE 0% 0% 51,260 15,439 14,646 0 14,646 62.35% 6.02% 4.53% 23.02% 4.08% LITCHFIELD 0% 0% 915,952 328,832 566,309 0 566,309 66.47% 9.04% 0.38% 21.10% 3.02% LITTLE CANADA 0% 0% 69.476 406.978 1.434,003 241,874 1,192.129 58.30% 14.77% 0.10% 23.46% 3.37% LITTLE FALLS 0% 0% 1.499,667 269,119 791.212 0 791.212 57.22% 13.41% 0.08% 22.71% 6.58% L1TTLEFORK 0% 0% 89.481 21.400 88.600 0 88,600 68.81% 12.85% 2.09% 5.81% 10.44% LONG BEACH 0% 0% 126 1,113 902 0 902 60.95% 5,31% 0.00% 8.44% 25.29% LONG LAKE 0% 0% 55,087 163,263 . 497.768 63,390 434,378 65.63% 9.55% 0.00% 23.63% 1.19% LONG PRAIRIE 0% 0% 511.423 63,824 143,089 0 143,089 59.68% 11.50% 0.00% 26.35% 2.47% LONGVILLE 0% 0% 6,657 9,591 35,409 0 35,409 42.52% 7.32% 0.00% 29.31% 20.85% LONSDALE . 0% 0% 75,581 103.484 79,940 0 79,940 82.70% 6.23% 0.75% 8.72% 1.60% LORETTO 0% 0% 17.412 17,801 81,338 14,756 66.582 70.36% 10.21% 0.54% 16.76% 2.13% LOUIS BURG 0% 0% 3,070 1.509 7,157 0 7,157 19.03% 5.12% 12.88% 6.48% 56.49% LOWRY 0% 0% 44,359 17.570 32,830 0 32,830 62.93% 9.78% 4.12% 11.55% 11.62% LUCAN 0% 0% 47,537 17,534 25,001 0 25,001 65.99% 9.60% 7.68% 15.95% 0.78% LUVERNE 0% 0% 910,095 177.782 335,143 0 335,143 76.62% 7.85% 0.92% 13.77% 0.85% LYLE 0% 0.19506% 80,627 39,273 82.751 0 82,751 75.68% 2.82% 6.51% 10.59% 4.39% LYND 0% 0.04399% 41,515 19,233 26,267 0 26,267 72.65% 16.27% 0.00% 7.36% 3.72% MABEL 0% 0% 164,778 59,578 74,561 0 74,561 77.68% 6.43% 1.14% 13.84% 0.91% MADEllA 0% 0% 310,588 103,260 326.590 0 326,590 62.83% 12.66% 0.34% 23.09% 1.08% MADISON 0% 0% 439,202 173,195 245.945 0 245,945 73.32% 7.33% 0.2B% 18.14% 0.93% MADISON LAKE 0% 0.04769% 67,lB3 53,850 65,022 0 65,022 81.12% 7.03% 0.94% 6.34% 4.57% MAGNOLIA 0% 0% 10.096 6.778 12.509 0 12.509 37.31% 2.85% 33.71% 24.19% 1.94% MAHNOMEN 0% 0% 257,202 70,572 161,291 0 161.291 46.01% 8.41% 0.87% 36.72% 7.98% MAHTOMEDI 0% 0% 141.284 283,347 857,941 127,934 730,007 90.03% 6.13% 0.38% 1.75% 1.71% MANCHESTER 0% 0.04056% 5,523 639 1.524 0 1.524 46.47% 5.63% 0.65% 44.70% 2.55% MANHATTAN 8EACH 0% 0% 0 61 3,000 0 3,000 31.98% 0.28% 4.26% 5.10% 58.38% r' MANKATO 0% 0.04770% 4.761.414 1,885,216 4.842,223 0 4.842.223 48.24% 15.48% 0.16% 30.12% 6.01% , MANTORVILLE 0% 0% 119,564 70.134 85,403 0 85,403 85.25% 5.47% 1.99% 4.33% 2.95% MAPLE GROVE 0% 0% 143.391 2,111,887 7.288.336 1,140,310 6,148,026 80.26% 4.69% 1.13% 12.14% 1.79% ! MAPLE LAKE 0% 0.05011 % 132,824 79,738 241,453 0 241,453 58.59% 8.78% 2.36% 15.94% 14.34% I MAPLE PLAIN 0% 0% 48,179 ' 146.182 470.713 100.473 370,240 64.10% 13.60% 0.06% 20.76% 1.48% : MAPlETON 0% 0% 174,063 110.531 112.734 0 112.734 76.52% 6.71% 3.98% 10.97% 1.81% MAPLEVIEW 0% 0% 55.898 9,746 11.500 0 11,500 76.84% 9.95% 3.06% 10.15% 0.00% MAPLE WOOD 0% 0% 691,365 1,578,740 6,442,646 689,596 5.753,050 56.47% 7.11% 0.12% 33.80% 2.49% MARBLE 0% 0.05878% 234,677 63.119 68.279 0 68.279 73.83% 11.55% 0.63% 4.02% 9.98% MARIETTA 0% 0% 57.805 12,225 7.371 0 7,371 66.00% 4.11% 4.42% 16.25% 9.21% MARINE ON ST CROIX 0% 0% 0 43.568 223.443 9,916 213,527 70.11 % 15.22% 4.56% 2.35% 7.77% MARSHALL 0% 0% 1.375.053 545,926 1,440,530 0 1,440,530 54.09% 14.14% 0.40% 30.05% 1.32% MAYER 0% 0% 25.063 16,246 61,554 21,063 40.491 85.22% 5.99% 1.46% 5.36% 1.97% MAYNARD 0% 0% 95,792 19.140 33.735 0 33.735 56.57% 9.94% 5.33% 17.99% 10.17% MAZEPPA 0% 0% 69.078 57,829 32.030 0 32,030 78.80% 7.67% 1.07% 8.08% 4.39% MCGRATH 0% 0% 961 988 344 0 344 65.84% 5.33% 5.46% 1.08% 22.29% MCGREGOR 0% 0% 65,713 21.162 45,396 0 45.396 57.20% 5.18% 1.66% 32.23% 3.73% MCINTOSH 0% 0% 103,288 34,957 52,576 0 52,576 59.72% 20.53% 2.87% 9.69% 7.19% MCKINLEY 0% 0.04928% 69.162 17.350 2,625 0 2.625 70.99% 15.30% 6.03% 0.00% 7.68% MEADOWLANDS 0% 0% 14,564 6,522 17,051 0 17.051 54.50% 12.30% 1.53% 13.89% 17.78% MEDFORD 0% 0% 94,022 54,907 104,894 0 104,894 89.53% 3.90% 0.33% 3.78% 2.47% MEDICINE LAKE 0% 0% 0 15.562 123,839 6,669 117.170 87.74% 9.67% 0.00% 1.74% 0.85% MEDINA 0% 0% 0 223.394 722.966 27,991 694.975 69.99% 5.87% 9.21% 13.00% 1.93% MEIRE GROVE 0% 0% 5,885 7,167 7.260 0 7,260 75.59% 2.57% 9.79% 5.68% 6.36% MELROSE 0% 0% 474.129 112,119 205,506 0 205,506 65.89% 4.49% 0.70% 25.70% 3.23% MENAHGA 0% 0% 166,957 57,733 153,147 0 153,147 67.68% 9.88% 1.40% 13.27% 7.77% MENDOTA 0% 0% 5,694 24.226 50.106 6,835 43,271 65.50% 10.26% 0.00% 18.67% 5.56% MENDOTA HEIGHTS 0% 0% 0 465,160 2,337,332 136,110 2,201,222 78.34% 4.63% 0.03% 14.84% 2.15% MENTOR 0% 0% 6.495 4,002 13,192 0 13,192 39.51% 13.66% 14.40% 13.94% 18.48% MIDDLE RIVER 0% 0% 25,791 2,212 14,788 0 14.788 59.93% 8.69% 1.21% 15.24% 14.93% MIESVILLE 0% 0% 24 1,829 12,347 1,593 10,754 46.65% 5.02% 26.16% 14.90% 7.27% MILACA 0% 0% 330,897 93.388 253.317 0 253,317 54.80% 14.50% 1.49% 22.30% 6.91% MILAN 0% 0% 76,538 31.199' 56.796 0 56,796 64.74% 15.33% 3.59% 7.04% 9.30% MILLERVILLE 0% 0% 588 220 280 0 280 56.88% 10.59% 20.06% 9.45% 3.02% MILL VILLE 0% 0% 5,167 2.071 3.921 0 3,921 75.78% 7.46% 0.00% 15.87% 0.90% MILROY 0% 0.12304% 34,826 30,574 52,711 0 52,711 74.09% 7.49% 1.35% 15.01% 2.06% MILTONA 0% 0% 12,499 16,291 19.900 0 19.900 77.36% 7.57% 1.09% 11.96% 2.02% MINNEAPOLIS 0% 0% 63,268,061 29.664,653 96,262.85215,761,603 80.501.249 50.08% 17.78% 0.00% 29.35% 2.79% e Jm___m....._m__..___m___m____.__....__mmT AX BASE OAT A___.mm._m_____...._.____________.... 1-------...----- NET TAX CAPACITY TAX RATES mm__.___.., 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Averaga Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate MINNEISKA 137 37.919 0 0 0 37,919 0 49.5% 19.1% 52.1% 0.8% 121.5% MINNEDTA 1.426 352,155 0 0 0 352,155 0 36.9% 38.4% 50.8% 1.1% 127.2% MINNESOTA CITY 259 49.149 0 0 0 49,149 0 40.7% 43.0% 51.1% 1.3% 136.2% MINNESOTA LAKE 678 139.404 0 0 0 139,404 0 21.8% 67.0% 39.8% 0.2% 128.8% MINNETONKA 49,285 68,181.902 0 872,645 12,896.533 54,412,724 3,724,549 37.B% 20.3% 68.1% 6.3% 132.5% MINNETONKA BEACH 575 1,307,439 0 0 27,369 1,280,070 20,996 37.8% 18.1% 6!;.8% 6.2% 128.0% MINNETRISTA 3,574 4,660.136 0 0 83.428 4,576,708 176,720 37.8% 20.7% 611.5% 2.8% 129.8% MIZPAH 93 9,617 0 0 0 9,617 0 44.8% 10.4% 74.0% 0.2% 129.4% MONTEVIDEO 5,526 1.764,367 0 57.030 0 1,707.337 0 42.0% 50.7% 6:1.5% 0.4% 156.7% MONTGOMERY 2.428 764,417 0 0 0 764,417 0 41.8% 70.6% 54.9% 0.2% 167.5% MONTICELLO 5,293 15.583,604 0 449,460 0 15,134,144 0 32.0% 17.5% 60.6% 2.7% 112.9% MONTROSE 1.028 276.016 0 10,903 0 265,113 0 31.4% 37.9% 5'1.6% 0.0% 126.9% MOORHEAD 32.937 11,782,861 0 1,235,263 0 10,547,598 0 48.0% 20.4% 6'1.0% 1.7% 131.2% MOOSE LAKE 1,614 408,597 0 18,739 0 389,858 0 54.7% 27.5% 5'1.0% 15.0% 148.1% MORA 2,971 1,446,151 0 112,194 0 1,333,957 0 72.6% 14.7% 64.0% 0.3% 151.6% MORGAN 974 224,710 0 3,828 0 220,882 0 27.3% 60.3% 59.8% 0.2% 147.6% MORRIS 5.596 1,491,998 0 67,828 0 1,424.170 0 42.3% 33.4% 59.7% 0.0% 135.3% MORRISTOWN 817 167,070 0 2,720 0 164,350 0 37.1% 37.1% 61.2% 0.8% 136.2% MORTON 440 118.151 0 16,325 0 101,826 0 27.4% 98.3% 50.4% 0.3% 176.4% MOTLEY 459 232,836 0 0 0 232,836 0 58.7% 25.1% 60.0% 0.4% 144.1% MOUND 9,643 5,517.498 0 187.641 238,071 5,091.786 1,083,715 37.8% 21.0% 6'7.8% 6.4% 133.1% MOUNDS VIEW 12,611 7,112,354 0 1.573,060 1,118,123 4.421,171 1,905,525 44.5% 25.8% 65.4% 5.7% 141.4% MOUNTAIN IRON 3,358 1.385,952 0 91,686 0 1,294,266 0 75.7% 36.6% 20.3% 1.0% 133.6% MOUNTAIN LAKE 1,902 405,046 0 0 0 405,046 0 40.4% 61.7% 68.6% 0.2% 170.9% MURDOCK 279 112,269 0 0 0 112.269 0 57.0% 27.2% 78.5% 0.4% 163.1% MYRTLE 67 22,754 0 0 0 22,754 0 43.9% 18.1% 54.8% 0.0% 116.7% NASHUA 56 33,103 0 0 0 33,103 0 44.8% 11.7% 63.0% 0.7% 120.2% NASHWAUK 1,003 152.787 0 372 0 152.415 0 26.4% 50.4% 1:3.1% 0.1% 90.0% NASSAU 79 28.054 0 0 0 28.054 0 35.9% 24.8% 5iB.7% 1.4% 120.9% NELSON 177 43,399 0 0 0 43,399 0 41.7% 13.4% 61.9% 0.5% 117.4% NERSTRAND 215 81,519 0 0 0 81,519 0 37.4% 29.1% 71.3% 0.8% 138.6% NEVIS 391 114.556 0 0 0 1)4,556 0 37.9% 24.2% 61.5% 0.4% 124.0% NEW AUBURN 365 42,385 0 0 0 42.385 0 54.0% 51.6% 54.6% 1.9% 162.1% NEW 8RIGHTON 22.355 15.534.565 0 1,508.267 1,759.874 12,266.424 2.751.611 44.5% 17.5% 65.5% 5.2% 132.B% NEW GERMANY 367 122.088 0 28.785 16.724 76.579 68,894 44.5% 24.2% 83.5% 1.4% 153.5% NEW HOPE 21.758 16.187.255 0 1,326,623 2.777.761 12.082.871 2.966.167 37.8% 23.4% 65.2% 5.9% 132.2% NEW LONDON 1,007 315.983 0 52.244 0 263,739 0 42.0% 34.1% 71.4% 0.2% 147.8% NEW MARKET 227 89.444 0 0 5,921 83.523 26.683 48.5% 41.5% 55.3% 2.4% 147.7% NEW MUNICH 320 59.717 0 0 0 59.717 0 39.7% 15.6% 67.7% 0.5% 123.5% e NEW PRAGUE 3,746 1,580.144 0 54,386 0 1.525.758 0 45.5% 50.2% 53.3% 1.2% 150.2% NEW RICHLAND 1.196 250.731 0 0 0 250.731 0 50.3% 50.9% 60.4% 0.2% 161.8% NEW TRIER 99 27,016 0 0 2,104 24,912 18.590 27.5% 9.9% 60.4% 1.8% 99.5% NEW ULM 13.458 5,236.761 0 422,595 0 4,814,166 0 35.7% 31.7% 51.5% 0.7% 119.6% NEW YORK MILLS 963 256,308 0 11,185 0 245,123 0 36.3% 22.8% 80.2% 0.0% 139.4% NEWFOLDEN 343 64,766 0 0 0 64,766 0 23.0% 33.1% 49.4% 2.7% 108.2% NEWPORT 3.756 3.374.238 0 441.477 561.687 2.371.074 442.672 30.7% 22.5% 72.1% 5.0% 130.3% NICOLLET 817 233.865 0 7.861 0 226,004 0 51.9% 20.7% 61.3% 0.2% 134.2% NIELSVILLE 94 13,848 0 0 0 13.848 0 43.7% 58.1% 75.9% 6.3% 184.1% NIMROD 78 17,659 0 0 0 17,659 0 80.4% 33.8% 53.7% 0.2% 168.1% NISSWA 1.439 2.348.297 0 62,592 0 2,285.705 0 31.8% 18.1% 59.5% '0.3% 109.7% NORCROSS 76 21,176 0 0 0 21,176 0 41.9% 70.0% 48.0% 0.7% 160.6% NORTH BRANCH 2,209 936.905 0 133.923 0 B02,982 0 52.9% 36.8% 52.7% 0.2% 142.6% NORTH MANKATO 11,059 5,172.439 0 359,378 0 4.813,061 0 50.0% 28.0% 54.8% 0.2% 133.0% NORTH OAKS 3.602 5.892,530 0 0 142,573 5,749,957 144.459 44.5% 8.3% 66.1% 4.3% 123.1% NORTH REDWOOD 214 45,763 0 0 0 45,763 0 34.7% 39.2% 68.3% 0.2% 142.5% NORTH ST PAUL 12,730 5.691,353 0 125,718 456.933 5,108.702 1.968.623 45.4% 14.2% 60.3% 6.5% 126.4% NORTH FIELD 15.143 6.486.582 0 47!l,080 0 6,007.502 0 35.1% 32.9% 56.1% 0.7% 124.8% NORTHOME 292 44.436 0 0 0 44.436 0 34.5% 45.0% 65.5% 1.2% 146.2% NORTHROP 279 58,702 0 0 0 58,702 0 27.2% 49.5% 59.1% 0.2% 135.9% NORWOOD 1.377 676.149 0 35.335 118.229 522,585 234.677 44.5% 29.3% 73.9% 1.4% 149.0% OAK GROVE 5,924 2,265,159 0 0 69.202 2.195,957 756,961 32.7% 39.6% 61.3% 1.1% 134.6% OAK PARK HEIGHTS 3.701 6.465,897 0 179,570 760.642 5,525.685 288.153 30.7% 21.8% 64.1% 5.5% 122.1% OAKDALE 22.192 10.887.901 0 1.209.260 1,193.963 8.484,678 2,759,702 31.1% 23.6% 60.3% 7.8% 122.7% ODESSA 151 22.406 0 0 0 22.406 0 38.4% 23.0% 31.5% 2.7% 95.7% ODIN 95 26,063 0 0 0 26,063 0 49.2% 31.8% 48.6% 0.2% 129.8% OGEMA 155 19.668 0 0 0 19.668 0 53.8% 37.6% 51.8% 3.0% 146.2% OGILVIE. 525 92.762 0 6,166 0 86,596 0 66.8% 25.1% 56.6.% 0.3% 148.8% OKABENA 218 33.449 0 0 0 33.449 0 2B.9% 98.8% 42.7% 1.0% 171.4% OKLEE 430 99.866 0 0 0 99,866 0 46.2% 31.9% 51.9% 1.4% 131.4% OLIVIA 2.633 932,619 0 161.337 0 771,282 0 28.7% 37.3% 52.9% 0.3% 119.1% ONAMIA 766 151,936 0 0 0 151.936 0 79.9% 31.8% 76.5% 0.2% 188.4% ORMSBY 152 38.884 0 0 0 38,884 0 41.3% 52.6% 52.8% 0.2% 147.0% ORONO 7.323 12.191.471 0 0 329,095 11,862.376 306,524 37.8% 16.3% 66.1% 6.2% 126.4% ORONOCO 797 342,737 0 0 0 342.737 0 41.5% 10.4% 65.7% 0.0% 117.7% ORR 261 81.912 0 0 0 81,912 0 71.1 % 37.5% 44.3% 1.1% 154.0% ORTONVILLE 2,128 467,593 0 0 0 467,593 0 34.3% 69.4% 27.7% 2.6% 133.9% OSAKIS 1.254 355,128 0 16,898 0 338,230 0 42.4% 36.3% 63.0% 0.5% 142.1% OSLO 363 102.714 0 0 0 102,714 0 20.3% 56.4% 50.9% 2.4% 130.1% OSSEO 2.638 2,070,518 0 108.706 297,555 1.664.257 362.625 37.8% 26.0% 67.6% 5.1% 136.5% OSTRANDER 278 73.303 0 0 0 73.303 0 46.8% 82.9% 79.8% 0.0% 209.6% OTSEGO 5.689 1,628,873 0 0 0 1,628.873 0 32.0% 28.2% 62.1% 2.7% 124.9% OTTERTAIL 333 248,025 0 0 0 248,025 0 40.5% 19.4% 68.5% 0.0% 128.4% e OWATONNA 20.103 10.563,050 0 1,142,184 0 9.420,866 0 33.0% 24.1% 55.9% 0.4% 113.4% PALISADE 142 23,085 0 0 0 23.085 0 57.1% 26.1% 53.6% 0.2% 137.0% PARK RAPIDS 2,966 1.423.128 0 14,456 0 1,408,672 0 37.1% 19.9% 55.8% 0.4% 113.2% PARKERS PRAIRIE 954 175,683 0 0 0 175,683 0 39.9% 46.4% 52.9% 0.0% 139.2% PAYNESVILLE 2,281 753.071 0 46,278 0 706.793 0 39.3% 69.4% 65.4% 1.0% 175.1% I m--MV TAX RATES--... I-m....mm....--...'...____AID AND lEVY OAT A...__mm...m.m.......mh Im....m.m__.....__m T AX BASE COMPOSITION-...--.--.............., Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV CityMV School MV lGA City Certified FD Dist City.Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City levy Levy levy Homestead Industrial Classes MINNEISKA 0% 0% 6,007 3.815 7.255 0 7,255 B2.25% 3.97% 0.27% 4.45% 9.06% MINNEOTA 0% 0% 214.873 84.105 135.221 0 135,221 71.57% 13.91% 1.96% 9.68% 2.88% MINNESOTA CITY 0% 0% 12,940 14,222 21,128 0 21,128 80.89% 8.92% 0.00% 6.87% 3.32% MINNESOTA LAKE 0% 0% 142,929 77,940 93,399 0 93.399 68.91% 5.68% 11.06% 12.09% 2.26% MINNETONKA 0% 0% 0 2,096,079 11.811.047 768.536 11,042.511 67.67% 8.32% 0.01% 22.99% 1.00% MINNETONKA BEACH 0% 0% 0 68.899 236.545 4.289 232.256 89.31 % 4.42% 0.00% 2.99% 3.28% MINNETRIST A 0% 0% 0 273.032 983,416 36,129 947,287 74.56% 10.09% 10.16% 1.29% 3.89% MIZPAH 0% 0% 2.276 1.190 999 0 999 34.72% 8.16% 48.19% 4.56% 4.37% MONTEVIDEO 0% 0% 1.017.034 324,718 866,473 0 866.473 67.60% 8.57% 0.51% 19.53% 3.79% MONTGOMERY 0% 0% 402,808 217,282 539,793 0 539.793 77.09% 6.11% 0.39% 10.63% 5.77% MONTICEllO 0% 0.06864% 0 313.99B 2.653.016 0 2,653,016 18.85% 5..98% 0.34% 10.38% 64.44% MONTROSE 0% 0% 70.351 56,682 100,441 0 100.441 64.18% '16.24% 1.65% 8.76% 9.17% MOORHEAD 0% 0% 4,176,784 931,081 2,150.893 0 2,150,893 67.15% 12.96% 0.37% 18.13% 1.40% MOOSE lAKE 0% 0% 167.361 68.748 107.051 0 107.051 58.59% 14.6B% 0.10% 23.96% 2.66% MORA 0% 0% 398,027 73.602. 195,772 0 195,772 50.24% 13.51 % 1.27% 32.16% 2.82% MORGAN 0% 0% 225,777 110.283 133.179 0 133.179 73.84% 6.62% 0.48% 17.06% 2.00% MORRIS 0% 0.03648% 1,004.103 290.989 476,058 0 476.058 60.38% 13.06% 0.47% 21.05% 5.03% MORRISTOWN 0% 0% 89.127 45.217 61.000 0 61.000 78.31% 8.91% 2.76% 6.70% 3.31% MORTON 0% 0% 76.468 31,643 100.099 0 100.099 60.94% 6.36% 2.B7% 26.96% 2.86% MOTLEY 0% 0.06242% 61.094 18,349 58.460 0 58,460 42.95% 9.79% 1.25% 37.63% 8.38% MOUND 0% 0% 294,954 494,822 1,288,881 218.078 1,070,803 81.13% 11.67% 0.03% 5.24% 1.93% MOUNDS VIEW 0% 0% 596,874 366,747 1,551.874 409,971 1.141.903 69.94% 9.89% 0.00% 17.41% 2.76% MOUNTAIN IRON 0% 0.16499% 198,703 187,550 474,31 B 0 474.318 59.22% 8.97% 2.97% 14.83% 1,4.01% MOUNTAIN lAKE 0% 0% 386,546 151,209 249,942 0 249,942 68.90% 7.79% 1.43% 20.52% 1.36% MURDOCK 0% 0% 47,739 14,809 30,554 0 30.554 46.80% 3.53% 4.07% 16.46% 29.14% MYRTLE 0% 0% 4,819 1.636 4.114 0 4.114 49.85% 6.22% 1.61% 38.07% 4.26% NASHUA 0% 0% 495 1,852 3,866 0 3,866 8.02% 1.74% 77.01% 9.14% 4.09% NASHWAUK 0% 0.01811% 432.733 129,892 76.776 0 76,776 72.98% 12.81% 0.30% 10.76% 3.14% NASSAU 0% 0% 5.676 2.032 6.956 0 6,956 35.33% 4.62% 2.93% 6.51% 50.62% NELSON 0% 0% 5.190 2.697 5.803 0 5.803 51.45% 1'1.03% 13.78% 21.42% 2.32% NERSTRAND 0% 0% 22.163 12.931' 23.720 0 23,720 57.91% 3.61% 20.90% 15.97% 1.62% NEVIS 0% 0% 50,309 9,349 27,683 0 27,683 58.46% 13.34% 0.26% 14.85% 13.08% NEW AUBURN 0% 0% 28,394 13.064 21.872 0 21.872 80.47% 6.72% 4.05% 5.05% 3.70% NEW BRIGHTON 0% 0% 698,046 822.981 2,606,181 454.400 2,151,781 72.92% 10.80% 0.05% 14.76% 1.48% NEW GERMANY 0% 0% 15,668 16,948 . 32,354 13,853 18,501 75.33% 6.08% 2.70% 13.45% 2.44% NEW HOPE 0% 0% 985,786 925.747 3.502,943 680.767 2,822.176 59.89% 15.78% 0.00% 23.46% 0.87% NEW LONDON 0% 0% 122,381 38,403 89.905 0 89.905 63.21% 17.71% 0.08% 16.42% 2.59% NEW MARKET 0% 0% 6.792 21,999 47.499 12.813 34.686 79.13% 4.81% 5.38% 7.99% 2.69% NEW MUNICH . 0% 0% 29.885 9,442 9,343 0 9,343 77.23% 6.14% 3.31% 11.63% 1.69% NEW PRAGUE 0% 0% 465.136 313,599 769.534 0 769.534 76.15% 11.02% 0.56% 11.36% 0.91% NEW RICH lAND 0% 0% 132,206 90.259 127.557 0 127.557 77.15% 7.03% 0.15% 12.41% 3.27% NEW TRIER 0% 0% 1,831 1,428 4.072 1,612 2,460 80.57% 9.67% 3.06% 6.51% 0.18% NEW UlM 0% 0.05771 % 2,466.919 687,151 1,526.765 0 1,526.765 71.34% 6.45% 0.32% 21.38% 0.52% NEW YORK MillS 0% 0% 230.713 61,790 56.001 0 56,001 57.58% 16.76% 0.56% 19.36% 5.75% NEWFOLDEN 0% 0% 56,560 13,196 21,432 0 21,432 55.19%' 13.68% 6.21% 13.35% 11.56% NEWPORT 0% 0% 170,169 255.146 665,647 132.053 533,594 54.94% 10.21% 3.12% 22.07% 9.66% NICOllET 0% 0.15981 % 82.203 42.295 46,814 0 46,814 78.15% 6.49% 1.52% 12.06% 1.79% NIElSVlllE 0% 0% 15,989 7,835 8.049 0 8.049 40.97% 15.22% 28.70% 4.68% 10.43% NIMROD 0% 0.04447% 1,075 1.538 5,962 0 5.962 66.93% 4.65% 4.77% 5.72% 17.93% r' NISSWA 0% 0% 0 10,290 414,849 0 414.849 41.28% 2.94% 0.68% 7.81% 47.30% NORCROSS 0% 0.26453% . 19.676 5.133 14.824 0 14.824 16.25% 2.80% 52.30% 6.70% 21.96% NORTH BRANCH 0% 0.05189% 188.936 97.206 295.599 0 295,599 62.86% 12.42% 0.35% 20.13% 4.24% NORTH MANKATO 0% 0.04770% 1,508,744 617,205 1,345,603 0 1.345,603 74.30% 9.21% 0.09% 14.73% 1.66% NORTH OAKS 0% 0% 0 96,431 486.748 12,032 474,716 91.52% 4.78% 0.38% 2.09% 1.24% NORTH REDWOOD 0% 0% 5,889 13,079 17,922 0 17,922 65.60% 3.38% 11.25% 17.02% 2.76% NORTH ST PAUL 0% 0% 700.420 267,942 994,936 270,316 724.620 80.20% 9.43% 0.00% 9.75% 0.62% NORTHFIELD 0% 0.10290% 1,414.747 728.936 1.978.691 0 1,978.691 69.05% 10.86% 0.33% 18.04% 1.72% NORTHOME 0% 0% 43,352 10,838 19.999 0 19.999 53.30% 19.23% 0.00% 20.43% 7.04% NORTHROP 0% 0% 18,733 13,160 29.050 0 29.050 76.87% 5.27% 0.52% 14.94% 2.39% NORWOOD 0.02554% 0% 75,276 65,398 220.940 67,587 153.353 63.49% 10.29% 0.70% 23.50% 2.02% OAK GROVE 0% 0.05016% 2 117,663 1,175,547 306,738 868.809 85.37% 2.98% 8.26% 0.79% 2.61% OAK PARK HEIGHTS 0% 0% 0 76,640 1.268,109 62.974 1,205.135 37.41% 6.78% 0.15% 16.48% 39.17% OAKDAlE 0% 0% 603.897 962,661 2.576,399 575,078 2,001.321 80.34% 7.81% 0.68% 9.20% 1.97% ODESSA 0% 0% 41,993 8,462 5,162 0 5,162 63.07% 4.65% 5.64% 9.36% 17.27% ODIN 0% 0.19165% 12.218 6.909 8.289 0 8,289 55.40% 4.86% 17.54% 18.95'" "',3.24% OGEMA 0% 0% 23,740 7,979 7,400 0 7.400 61.67% 8.74% 11.07 % 12.04% 6.48% OGilVIE 0% 0% 92.214 14.304 21,727 0 21,727 52.99% 14.73% 3.28% 13.15% 15.84% OKA8ENA 0% 0% 32,646 21,964 33,056 0 33.056 68.99% 5.67% 10.14% 11.87% 3.33% OKLEE 0% 0% 86,762 28.445 31.871 0 31,871 55.89% 12.91% 4.72% 12.70% 13.79% OLIVIA 0% 0% 543,136 109.835 287.611 0 287.611 66.27% 9.46% 1.03% 21.72% 1.51% ONAMIA 0% 0% 68.955 19,759 48,241 0 48,241 53.49% 21.23% 0.80% 17.51% 6.98% ORMSBY 0% 0% 10.301 5.963 20,437 0 20,437 63.08% 4.58% 7.06% 23.30% 1.98% ORONO 0% 0% 0 304.934 1.976.806 48,933 1,927.873 84.29% 9.07% 0.79% 3.24% 2.61% ORONOCO 0% 0% 53,864 32,995 35.704 0 35.704 89.01%. 3.24% 4.48% 1.52% 1.75% ORR 0% 0% 54.610 12.524 30,720 0 . 30.720 65.69% 11.01 % 0.55% 12.82% 9.93% ORTONVlllE 0% 0% 558.953 290.849 324,294 0 324,294 72.23% 6.99% 1.51% 12.89% 6.37% OSAKIS 0% 0% 246,189 88,938 122.743 0 122,743 68.39% ,9.85% 2.44% 11.53% 7.79% OSLO 0% 0.41012% 74.992 26.952 57.975 0 57.975 56.62% 6.72% 2.84% 30.34% 3.48% OS SED 0% 0% 60.806 133.912 528.299 96.118 432.181 52.22% 19.15% 0.00% 26.50% 2.13% OSTRANDER 0% 0% 20.510 14.824 60.800 0 60.800 63.94% 8.69% 6.31% 19.32% 1.73% OTSEGO 0% 0.05406% 50.941 146.391 458,837 0 458.837 70.52% 5.72% 19.38% 1.86% 2.52% OTTERTAll 0% 0.00550% 512 16,124 48.011 0 48.011 43.83% 2.37% 7.16% 9.89% 36.75% OWATONNA 0% 0% 2,765,743 1,170.650 2.268.878 0 2.268,878 71.06% 7.81% 0.40% 19.74% 1.00% PALISADE 0% 0% 3.624 4,250 6,030 0 6.030 70.92% 5.91% 3.25% 13.84% 6.09% PARK RAPIDS 0% 0% 442.810 75.402 280,312 0 280,312 46.19% 15.30% 0.91% 31.14% 6.45% PARKERS PRAIRIE 0% 0% 109.070 45.986 81,591 0 81,591 69.77% 12.78% 1.44% 9.68% 6.32% PAYNESVllLE 0% 0.03689% 236.943 140.498 490.571 0 490,571 65.62% 8.78% 0.54% 20.78% 4.28% I e I mm_......oooomoomoooommo_moo..mooo. T AX BASE OAT Aoo_omo.o____....__....o_moo.o.m_lo______o_...oo. NET TAX CAPACITY TAX RA TES __moo_',,~ol 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate PEASE 180 44.166 0 0 0 44,166 0 81.6% 10.1% 64.1% 0.2% 156.0% PELICAN RAPIDS 1,896 672,640 0 69,879 0 602,761 0 39.8% 36.0% 55.6% 6.2% 137.6% PEMBERTON 236 46,587 0 0 0 46,587 0 38.7% 74.2% 53.9% 0.2% 167.0% PENNOCK 486 97,289 0 0 0 97,289 0 41.6% 28.4% 61.3% 0.2% 131.6% PEQUOT LAKES 876 502.980 0 4.224 0 498,756 0 31.8% 32.7% 51.5% 0.1% 116.2% PERHAM 2,174 1.194.726 0 123.176 0 1,071,550 0 39.8% 27.4% 67.6% 2.9% 137.6% PERLEY 129 29.570 0 0 0 29,570 0 40.5% 29.4% 59.5% 3.5% 132.9% PETERSON 253 47.328 0 0 0 47,328 0 47.4% 41.7% 51.0% 0.0% 140.0% PIERZ 1,035 289.791 0 15,657 0 274,134 0 59.0% 22.3% 61.8% 0.4% 143.4% PILLAGER 312 67,242 0 0 0 67,242 0 40.1% 124.8% 59.7% 0.2% 224.6% PINE CITY 2,753 1.442,720 0 108,356 0 1.334,364 0 51.2% 20.5% 57.3% 0.2% 129.2% PINE ISLAND 2,179 851.512 0 109,642 0 741,870 0 22.1% 69.8% 60.8% 0.6% 153.3% PINE RIVER 865 317,122 0 0 0 317,122 0 40.1% 27.4% 57.1% 0.2% 124.7% PINE SPRINGS 435 389,841 0 0 7,376 382,465 32,042 30.7% 7.4% 69.4% 7.7% 115.2% PIPESTONE 4,559 1.308.860 0 151,497 0 1.157.363 0 57.7% 33.9% 49.2% 0.2% 141.0% PLAINVIEW 2,827 1.010.551 0 88.511 0 922,040 0 56.2% 47.5% 70.0% 0.7% 174.4% PLATO 338 116,134 0 12,570 0 103,564 0 41.8% 45.9% 48.4% 0.7% 136.8% PLEASANT LAKE 126 56.308 0 0 0 56.308 0 39.7% 18.7% 56.5% 0.5% 115.4% PLUMMER 275 82,093 0 0 0 82,093 0 44.1% 77.6% 47.2% 1.3% 170.2% PLYMOUTH 55,137 68,048.541 0 3,844,131 12.375.252 51,829.158 4,452,858 37.8% 16.0% 62.6% 5.8% 122.3% PORTER 207 34.209 0 0 0 34.209 0 49.1% 54.5% 53.4% 1.4% 158.4% PRESTON 1,532 350,930 0 2,355 0 348,575 0 39.0% 68.4% 59.8% 0.0% 167.2% PRINCETON 3,810 1.883.583 0 210,892 0 1.672,691 0 62.1% 40.5% 58.6% 0.1% 161.4% PRINSBURG 499 147.831 0 0 0 147,831 0 41.7% 25.2% 53.9% 0.2% 121.0% PRIOR LAKE 12.072 6.732,031 0 26,413 334,252 6.371,366 1,233,971 48.4% 36.3% 58.1% 6.8% 149.6% PROCTOR 3,010 815.032 0 18,171 0 796,861 0 65.0% 37.9% 51.3% 1.0% 155.3% QUAMBA 124 17.592 0 0 0 17,592 0 72.6% 15.2% 64.0% 0.3% 152.1% RACINE 305 85.121 0 0 0 85,121 0 51.0% 30.4% 68.4% 0.7% 150.5% RAMSEY 14,081 .6.875,432 0 912.231 714,312 5,248,889 1.762,052 32.7% 18.7% 58.1% 1.1% 110.6% RANDALL 579 109,985 0 0 0 109,985 0 54.9% 25.3% 56.0% 0.4% 136.6% RANDOLPH 333 99.213 0 0 6,467 92,746 62,661 27.5% 10.8% 56.5% 1.8% 96.5% RANIER 199 71.715 0 0 0 71.715 0 44.7% 10.7% 70.4% 0.2% 126.0% RAYMOND 660 143,784 0 0 0 143.784 0 39.8% 29.6% 53.6% 0.2% 123.2% REO LAKE FALLS 1.484 245.715 0 8,246 0 237,469 0 41.5% 72.4% 49.6% 1.2% 164.7% RED WING 15,561 31.361.688 0 901,604 0 30.460,084 0 22.6% 27.7% 54.3% 0.3% 104.9% REDWOOD FALLS 4,893 2,164.952 0 211,486 0 1,953,466 0 34.6% 42.6% 69.0% 0.2% 146.5% REGAL 49 14,418 0 0 0 14,418 0 42.2% 14.1% 65.9% 1.0% 123.3% REMER 335 79,493 0 0 0 79,493 0 40.6% 52.7% 57.8% 0.2% 151.3% RENVILLE 1,317 315.563 0 8,444 0 307,119 0 26.7% 94.2% 52.2% 0.3% 173.3% e REVERE 110 25,147 0 0 0 25.147 0 30.6% 25.8% 50.8% 0.2% 107.5% RICE 652 445,333 0 71,415 0 373.918 0 45.4% 34.2% 65.6% 0.0% 145.3% RICHFIELD 35,538 20,217,683 0 2,260,038 1,163.376 16,794,269 4,533,234 37.8% 25.6% 67.0% 6.7% 137.2% RICHMOND 1,016 310,390 0 0 0 310,390 0 39.3% 23.7% 60.9% 0.5% 124.4% RICHVILLE 123 12.209 0 0 0 12,209 0 40.5% 62.0% 67.6% 2.9% 173.0% RIVERTON 124 94,100 0 0 0 94,100 0 31.8% 36.1% 60.0% 2.5% 130.4% ROB81NSDALE 14,410 7.243.489 0 1.244.767 373.040 5,625,682 1,914,820 37.8% 22.1% 65.2% 5.9% 131.0% ROCHESTER 76,060 54,918,573 0 2,923.961 0 51.994,612 0 3B.2% 24.2% 66.5% 0.0% 128.9% ROCK CREEK 1,086 322.387 3,047 0 0 319,340 0 51.2% 17.9% 60,8% 0.2% 130.2% ROCKFORD 2.832 819.652 0 35,020 44,845 739.787 114,138 33.1% 42.7% 64.7% 0.7% 141.2% ROCKVILLE 601 183.586 0 0 0 183,586 0 39.7% 28.4% 61.3% 0.5% 129.9% ROGERS 759 1.555,203 0 224,067 430,542 900.594 57,303 37.8% 23.9% 63.1% 2.5% 127.4% ROLLlNGSTONE 731 190,567 0 0 0 190.567 0 41.0% 43.6% 51.5% 1.3% 137.3% RONNEBY 58 B.664 141 0 0 8.523 0 45.4% 18.4% 58.6% 0.0% 122.3% ROOSEVELT 185 29,408 0 0 0 29.408 0 33,1% 3.8% 55.1% 0.2% 92.1% ROSCOE 140 22.987 0 0 0 22,987 0 39.5% 28.6% 65.7% 0.5% 134.3% ROSE CREEK 370 69.944 0 0 0 69,944 0 46.1% 6.5% 55.9% 0.7% 109.2% ROSEAU 2,558 1.109,521 0 0 0 1.109,521 0 31.4% 49.0% 67.6% 2.6% 150.6% ROSEMOUNT 10,478 9.110.508 0 454,114 1.375,139 7.281,255 1,032.099 27.5% 32.3% 60.3% 5.0% 125.1% ROSEVILLE 33,487 43,011.726 0 4,836,223 8,187,756 29.987.747 3,117.186 44.5% 17.4% 72.1% 5.1% 139.1% ROTHSAY 438 94.453 0 0 0 94.453 0 42.4% 44.5% 52.1% 0.0% 139.0% ROUND LAKE 469 165.388 0 0 0 165.388 0 30.5% 35.4% 69.2% 0.2% 135.3% ROYALTON 806 220,719 0 11,842 0 208,877 0 58.8% 49.4% 53.5% 0.4% 162.1% RUSH CITY 1,516 702.888 0 134,533 0 568,355 0 53.4% 43.7% 73.7% 0.2% 171.0% RUSHFORD CITY 1,599 584.480 0 122,444 0 462,036 0 42.8% 46.8% 46.8% 0.0% 136.4% RUSHFORD VILLAGE 604 214,911 0 0 0 214,911 0 43.4% 43.7% 46.3% O~O% 133.3% RUSHMORE 380 62,174 0 0 0 62,174 0 31.1% 70.9% 55.0% 1.5% 158.5% RUSSELL 391 60.290 0 0 0 60,290 0 34.3% 83.6% 49.0% 0.2% 167.1% RUTHTON 334 79,878 0 0 0 79,878 0 59.0% 17.4% 62.9% 0.2% 139.5% RUTLEDGE 147 34.122 0 0 0 34,122 0 51.2% 20.9% 66.4% 0.2% 138.7% SABIN 508 91,993 0 0 0 91,993 0 45.1% 31.9% 55.0% 1.5% 133.4% SACRED HEART 595 119.564 0 0 0 119,564 0 24.7% 81.0% 48.1% 0.2% 154,0% SANBORN 455 128,549 0 0 0 128,549 0 34.6% 42.4% 73.3% 0.2% 150.5% SANDSTONE 2.092 343,752 0 0 0 343,752 0 51.1% 57.4% 68.3% 6.0% 182.7% SARGEANT 78 31,567 0 0 0 31,567 0 51.0% 27.1% 51.9% 0.7% 130.7% SARTELL 6,095 3.543.510 0 152,793 0 3,390.717 0 42.2% 17.2% 63.2% 0.1% 122.7% SAUK CENTRE 3,693 1,176,831 0 87,414 0 1.089,417 0 39.3% 52.7% 71.0% 0.5% 163.5% SAUK RAPIDS 8,835 3,723,910 0 921,057 0 2,802,853 0 45.4% 22.4% 65.5% 1.5% 134.8% SAVAGE 12,889 7,985.736 0 945,174 817,869 6.222.693 1,267,214 48.5% 30.2% 71.9% 5.7% 156.3% SCANLON 880 296,568 0 0 0 296,568 0 58.1% 20.8% 54.5% 0.2% 133.6% SEAFORTH 88 20.774 0 0 0 20.774 0 33.9% 22.2% 51.7% 0.2% 108.1% SEBEKA 647 130,296 0 0 0 130,296 0 71.2% 42.2% 47.2% 0.1% 160.8% SEDAN 62 9.890 0 0 0 9,890 0 46.5% 21.5% 68.7% 4.1% 140.8% SHAFER 391 119,096 0 0 0 119.096 0 53.5% 77.6% 56.8% 0.2% 188.1% - SHAKOPEE 12.732 13,356.769 0 1,919,058 2.109,835 9.327.876 1,119,692 48.5% 26.7% 66.2% 5.3% 146.7% SHELLY 214 38.398 0 0 0 38,398 0 39.9% 51.8% 78.0% 3.5% 173.2% SHER8URN 1.091 224,088 0 0 0 224,088 0 23.2% 95.1% 46.1% 0.2% 164.6% SHEVLIN 155 33.710 0 0 0 33.710 0 65.9% 14.7% 63.7% 0.4% 144.7% '.....MV TAX RA TES....- f.um...m_.________.u__m.AlD AND lEVY OAT A_u___m__m.um_m__m____ '._m__.u_______mm__ T AX BASE COMPOSITION-..----......----.....-I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV CityMV School MV lGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City levy levy levy Homestead Industrial Classes PEASE 0% 0% 5,987 1.336 4,448 0 4.448 67.69% 7.34% 0.91% 20.53% 3.54% PELICAN RAPIDS 0% 0% 209,582 59.000 216.902 0 216,902 58.00% 13.76% 1.44% 19.80% 7.00% PEMBERTON 0% 0.00318% 11,354 13.954 34.546 0 34,546 72.41% 4.32% 1.78% 19.20% 2.29% PENNOCK 0% 0% 53,692 26.160 27.623 0 27,623 73.25% 8.23% 7.58% 6.96% 3.98% PEQUOT lAKES 0% 0% 76,692 38.435 162.978 0 162,978 46.13% 14.59% 0.32% 27.69% 11.27% PERHAM 0% 0% 222.955 77.664 293.156 0 293,156 47.10% 12.06% 0.66% 32.34% 7.84% PERLEY 0% 0% 9,479 2.372 8,700 0 8,700 51.62% 7.17% 4.84% 11.42% 24.95% PETERSON 0% 0% 17,687 9.664 19,739 0 19,739 78.15% 8.31% 3.90% 6.52% 3.13% PIERZ 0% 0% 74,109 30,535 61.011 0 61.011 74.23% 8.83% 1.60% 14.02% 1.32% PillAGER 0% 0% 18.136 25.595 83.885 0 83.885 63.36% 11.22% 0.73% 10.14% 14.55% PINE CITY 0% 0% 340,823 115,464 273.451 0 273,451 52.79% 13.41% 0.45% 27.83% 5.51% PINE ISLAND 0% 0% 177,794 219,859 517,528 0 517.528 68.73% 8.24% 3.05% 16.87% 3.11% PINE RIVER 0% 0% 134,410 41,847 86.821 0 86,821 51.43% 8.71% 0.06% 34.13% 5.67% PINE SPRINGS 0% 0% 0 2,662 30,005 1,728 28,277 94.75% 2.52% 0.00% 0.02% 2.71% PIPESTONE 0% 0% 781,098 217.336 392.404 0 392.404 66.34% 9.43% 1.07% 17.52% 5.63% PlAINVIEW 0% 0% 333,551 134.092 437,877 0 437,877 73.89% 6.47% 1.32% 15.94% 2.39% PLATO 0% 0% 29.200 43.608 47.542 0 47,542 79.36% 2.98% 2.48% 12.37% 2.81% PLEASANT lAKE 0% 0% 54 3,485 10,515 0 10,515 83.74% 5.80% 0.00% 3.79% 6.67% PLUMMER 0% 0.22100% 47.023 23,589 63,679 0 63.679 38.29% 9.56% 18.09% 6.19% 27.88% PLYMOUTH 0% 0% 0 1.861.057 9,109,247 791.188 8,318,059 67.42% 8.18% 0.61% 22.46% 1.32% PORTER 0% 0.04626% 34.357 6,240 18,644 0 18,644 42.40% 7.47% 34.67% 11.10% 4.36% PRESTON 0% 0% 278.561 125.463 238.404 0 238,404 72.21% 8.44% 3.57% 14.83% 0.95% PRINCETON 0% 0% 355.639 183,935 678.191 0 678.191 58.39% 10.47% 0.06% 29.51% 1.56% PRINS8URG 0% 0% 78.157 35.986 37,290 0 37,290 72.81% 3.65% 6.12% 15.85% 1.57% PRIOR lAKE 0.02596% 0.06352% 27.231 839,206 2,683,535 371.276 2.312.259 82.79% 7.28% 2.09% 4.53% 3.31% PROCTOR 0% 0.05591 % 397.121 206,275 302,396 0 302,396 81.05% 7.22% 0.09% 7.98% 3.66% QUAMBA 0% 0% 1.941 1,322 2.678 0 2,678 64.15% 5.95% 18.18% 7.27% 4.46% RACINE 0% 0.02335% 13.764 11,086 25.914 0 25,914 83.53% 2.25% 4.57% 8.15% 1.50% RAMSEY 0% 0.00777% 294,485 515,245 1,272,039 291.335 980,704 81.45% 4.35% 2.60% 9.03% 2.57% RANDAll 0% 0% 46,491 20,832 27,857 0 27,857 67.22% 9.02% 6.82% 14.32% 2.62% RANDOLPH 0% 0.13329% 8.009 9,~19 17,515 7.495 10,020 70.38% 9.53% 8.79% 8.57% 2.74% RANIER 0% 0% 16.429 2.301 7,699 0 7,699 67.36% 10.50% 0.00% 3.87% 18.27% RAYMOND 0% 0% 100.583 40,234 42,597 0 42,597 74.55% 11.61 % 1.46% 5.63% 6.74% RED lAKE FAlCS 0% 0% 329,273 142.166 171.932 0 171,932 69.69% 7.31% 2.34% 11. 75 % 8.92% RED WING 0% 0% 37.862 1,199,916 8,443.391 0 8,443,391 31.26% 4.70% 0.88% 10.41% 52.75% REDWOOD FAllS 0% 0% 911,379 347,235 832,977 0 832.977 68.49% 8.56% 0.21% 22.06% 0.68% REGAL 0% 0% 403 1,472 2.028 0 2,028 59.07% 5.34% 16.01% 9.63% 9.95% REMER 0% 0% 45,394 14,463 41,872 0 41.872 57.98% 16.48% 2.69% 17.78% 5.07% RENVlllE 0% 0% 252.271 123.284 289,153 0 289,153 69.14% 7.50% 3.00% 17.15% 3.21% REVERE 0% 0% 20,392 6,518 6,490 0 6.490 30.02% 6.88% 28.88% 25.04% 9.19% RICE '0% 0% 14.793 24,177 128,063 0 128,063 45.13% 4.40% 8.62% 36.95% 4.89% RICHFIELD 0% 0% 3,169,487 1.859,900 5,433,824 1.131.132 4.302,692 75.30% 11.95% 0.00% 11.97% 0.77% RICHMOND 0% 0.04177% 98,131 65,958 73,618 0 73,618 76.38% 8.71% 0.19% 11.90% 2.82% RICHVlllE 0% 0% 2,475 2,033 7,574 0 7,574 45.11% 9.91% 38.62% 2.19% 4.17% RIVERTON 0% 0% 9.959 4,717 33,992 0 33,992 42.48% 6.33% 1.50% 0.60% 49.09% ROBBINSDAlE 0.04741 % 0% 1.517.058 902,352 1,665,308 419.444 1.245,864 77.17% 12.12% 0.00% 9.19% 1.52% ROCHESTER 0% 0.00002% 5.679.332 4,435.619 12,582,072 0 12.582,072 64.26% 10.36% 0.27% 24.15% 0.96% ROCK CREEK 0% 0% 18,653 34,357 57.315 0 57,315 27.59% 3.91% 55.40% 2.63% 10.47% ROCKFORD 0% 0% 278.329 117,424 357,582 41,974 315,608 65.01% 15.01% 0.58% 12.17% 7.23% ROCKVlllE 0% 0.04177% 27,794 21,914 52,133 0 52,133 70.07% 17.55% 1.05% 8.85% 2.48% ROGERS 0% 0.05252% 138 21,335 229,579 14.220 215.359 32.62% 6.85% 4.83% 53.74% 1.96% ROlLlNGSTONE 0% 0% 50,322 47,128 83,081 0 83,081 85.60% 6:43% 1.12% 5.30% 1.55% RONNEBY 0% 0% 824 1,340 1,566 0 1.566 57.22% 19.66% 13.62% 1.66% 7.85% ROOSEVELT 0% 0.06546% 3,263 726 1,106 0 1.106 79.18% 3.50% 7.30% 5.16% 4.86% ROSCOE 0% 0.03692% 4,631 4,848 6.579 0 6,579 67.77% 4.25% 11.15% 10.70% 6.13% ROSE CREEK 0% 0% 54,474 22,594 4.565 0 4,565 81.23% 1.99% 3.16% 10.45% 3.17% ROSEAU 0% 0.04142% 238,186 141,073 544,076 0 544.076 59.02% 8.26% 0.35% 28.02% 4.34% ROSEMOUNT 0% 0.02769% 380,794 555,804 2.665.983 314,358 2,351.625 62.56% 7.23% 4.22% 20.11% 5.87% ROSEVlllE 0% 0% 30,426 1,773.502 5,751,502 533,927 5.217,575 55.87% 8.92% 0.05% 33.35% 1.82% ROTH SAY 0% 0% 51.998 21,965 42.002 0 42,002 64.24% 7.43% 10.48% 9.75% 8.10% ROUND lAKE 0% 0% 29,513 26,373 58,620 0 58,620 55.22% 9.37% 6.81% 28.47% 0.12% ROYAL TON 0% 0% 47.226 30,722 103.098 0 103,098 65.68% 12.55% 2.15% 14.06% 5.56% RUSH CITY 0% 0% 189.192 73,918 248.451 0 248.451 55.99% 13.32% 1.29% 25.72% 3.68% RUSHFORD CITY 0% 0% 178.784 104,619 216.219 0 216,219 62.82% 12.12% 0.84% 21.90% 2.32% RUSHFORD VillAGE 0% 0% 27.882 41,185 93,813 0 93,813 36.00% 3.03% 53.85% 5.05% 2.08% RUSHMORE 0% 0% 45.702 18,025 44,085 0 44.085 77.42% 6.96% 0.14% 14.95% 0.52% RUSSEll 0% 0% 83,030 27,874 50,400 0 50,400 75.93% 8.46% 3.17% 7.79% 4.64% RUTHTON 0% 0% 45,725 12,777 13,937 0 13.937 51.80% 4.48% 4.36% 8.78% 30.58% RUTLEDGE 0% 0% 935 2,555 7,145 0 7.145 61.36% 5.40% 9.86% 3.71% 19.67% SABIN 0% 0% 25,298 42,612 29,369 0 29,369 84.93% 3.09% 1.34% 3.50% 7.15% SACRED HEART 0% 0% 146.671 37,872 96,867 0 96.867 57.41% 11.39% 8.21% 16.20% 6.78% SANBORN 0% 0% 63,682 29,526 54,471 0 54,471 46.51% 5.35% 15.92% 27.56% 4.66% SANDSTONE 0% 0% 250.555 40,049 197,296 0 197,296 51.77% 16.95% 2.62% 17.84% 10.82% SARGEANT 0% 0% 3.734 2.440 8,560 0 8.560 34.58% 0.90% 32.45% 31.49% 0.58% SARTEll 0% 0% 221,155 286,302 582,931 0 582.931 59.17% 13.63% 0.20% 23.16% 3.84% SAUK CENTRE 0% 0% 723,246 160,133 573,763 0 573,763 69.64% 8.62% 0.48% 19.71% 1.55% SAUK RAPIDS 0% 0% 963,970 355,299 627.407 0 627,407 65.93% 16.42% 0.03% 15.50% 2.12% SAVAGE 0% 0.01495% 54,658 524,534 2.255.445 375,819 1.B79,626 79.71% .4.81% 1.70% 11.81% 1.96% SCANLON 0% 0% 202,715 60.196 61.615 0 61,615 81.66% 2.85% 0.00% 6.51% 8.98% SEAFORTH 0% 0% 13,222 3.894 4.621 0 4,621 36.72% 3.53% 40.15% 17.25% 2.36% SEBEKA 0% 0.04450% 155,996 36.594 55.001 0 55,001 60.14% 11.68% 4.98% 14.33% 8.86% SEDAN 0% 0% 1,235 670 2,130 0 2,130 56.44% 6.82% 16.34% 9.34% 11.06% SHAFER 0% 0% 14.057 14,004 92.416 0 92,416 59.36% 10.61% 3.66% 20.61% 5.77% SHAKO PEE 0% 0% 158,842 449,839 2.805,882 317,057 2.488.825 51.55% 6.83% 4.40% 32.80% 4.43% SHEllY 0% 0% 42,583 9.519 19.881 0 19,881 67.00% 6.28% 4.31% 10.89% 11.52% SHERBURN 0% 0% 217,465 117.612 213,184 0 213,lB4 73.60% 10.01% 1.09% 11.65% 3.65% SHEVLIN 0% 0% 7.297 2,444 4.956 0 4.956 51.38% 5.44% 9.15% 23.71% 10.32% 1....m.m.........m.m.___hm___m.._m.m.T AX BASE DA T A..m.m..m.m...__.__._____.__.__.m I m......._____ NET TAX CAPACITY TAX RATES ....--m.--..J e 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate SHOREVIEW 25.730 IB.726.712 0 557.676 1.658,996 16.510.040 2.514,308 44.5% 18.8% 66.0% 5.1% 134.4% SHOREWOOD 6,430 7.396,104 0 317 205,973 7.189,814 375,309 37.8% 20.0% '77.0% 5.8% 140.6% SILVER 8AY 1.898 494.504 0 1.310 0 493.194 0 73.9% 65.2% 49.9% 3.0% 191.9% SILVER LAKE 765 190.494 0 0 0 190,494 0 43.3% 32.2% 55.8% 0.2% 131.4% SKYLINE 342 154.621 0 0 0 154,621 0 39.6% 8.B% 55.1% 0.2% 103.7% SLA YTON 2.156 576.271 0 10.628 0 565.643 0 33.9% 30.6% 46.9% 0.2% 111.5% SLEEPY EYE 3.708 998.538 0 45.720 0 952.818 0 35.7% 23.9% 47.8% 0.2% 107.6% S081ESKI 197 39.915 0 0 0 39,915 0 59.0% 10.8% 60.5% 0.4% 130.8% SOLWAY 71 18.504 0 0 0 18,504 0 60.7% 28.4% 59.6% 0.4% 149.1% SOUTH HAVEN 190 47.305 0 0 0 47.305 0 32.0% 17.2% 63.1% 0.9% 113.1% SOUTH ST PAUL 20.235 9,710.316 0 1.419.309 3,733 8,287.274 2,856,701 25.8% 28.5% 57.7% 6.0% 118.0% SPICER 1.097 745,340 0 75.030 0 670.310 0 40.7% 34.5% 69.9% 0.2% 145.4% SPRING GROVE 1,237 281,236 0 0 0 281.236 0 46.6% 49.5% 59.2% 0.0% 155.4% SPRING HILL 76 14.512 0 0 0 14,512 0 39.7% 35.8% 67.7% 0.5% 143.7% SPRING LAKE PARK 6.523 3.840,515 0 1,462 629.660 3.209.393 960,908 32.9% 22.6% 54.9% 5.2% 115.5% SPRING PARK 1.757 1.540.599 0 188.293 155,581 1.196.725 220.352 37.8% 25.8% 67.8% 6.2% 137.6% SPRING VALLEY 2.455 614.698 0 18.659 0 596.039 0 38.3% 56.9% 51.5% 0.0% 146.6% SPRINGFIELD 2.188 570.757 0 45.722 0 525.035 0 35.0% 64.7% 58.3% 0.2% 158.3% SQUAW LAKE 136 23,364 0 0 0 23.364 0 46.8% 17.8% 56.1% 0.1% 120.9% ST ANTHONY (HENNEPIN) 8.019 5.838,514 0 624,383 617.285 4.696.846 874.190 40.2% 26.2% 66.5% 6.0% 138.8% ST ANTHONY (STEARNS) 80 13.650 0 0 0 13.650 0 39.6% 27.2% 52.7% 2.0% 121.6% ST BONIFACIUS 1,195 589,815 0 0 75,850 513,965 176.392 37.8% 37.2% 83.5% 2.9% 161.3% ST CHARLES 2,844 896.502 0 59,731 0 836.771 0 38.4% 36.8% 52.9% 0.9% 129.1% ST CLAIR 636 140.494 0 362 0 140,132 0 39.8% 26.4% 72.4% 0.2% 138.8% ST CLOUD 49.416 30.859.270 0 2,777,133 0 28.082.137 0 37.4% 31.0% 56.5% 2.1% 127.0% ST FRANCIS 2.727 1.058.925 0 0 116,838 942,087 458.639 32.7% 31.8% 61.5% 1.1% 127.1% ST HILAIRE 295 67.371 0 0 0 67.371 0 58.8% 25.1% 70.6% 1.5% 156.0% ST JAMES 4,361 1.274.509 0 171.562 0 1,102.947 0 50.0% 29.2% 52.5% 0.2% 132.0% ST JOSEPH 3.987 825.087 0 0 0 825,087 0 39.6% 19.9% 56.4% 0.4% 116.3% ST LEO 111 15.857 0 0 0 15.857 0 51.2% 17.4% 56.0% 1.4% 126.0% ST LOUIS PARK 43.764 41.824,782 0 2.179.946 5.085,068 34.559,768 4,377,403 37.8% 20.2% 69.0% 6.1% 133.2% ST MARTIN 282 65,069 0 0 0 65.069 0 39.7% 21.9% 52.7% 0.5% 114.8% ST MARYS POINT 343 292,601 0 0 2,314 290,287 26,465 30.7% 16.6% 64.1% 2.0% 113.4% ST MICHAEL 2.822 1,129.506 0 56,781 0 1.072,725 0 32.0% 26.9% 55.4% 0.0% 114.2% ST PAUL 272.243 161.236.889 0 12,788,901 16.544,989 131,902.999 40,905,294 40.7% 38.8% 62.1% 6.2% 147.8% ST PAUL PARK 5.091 2.177,728 0 262,414 291.794 1.623.520 807,046 30.7% 20.3% 72.1% 5.0% 128.0% ST PETER 9.801 2.262.157 0 124,383 0 2.137,774 0 50.0% 32.2% 65.9% 0.2% 148.3% ST ROSA 74 17.046 0 0 0 17.046 0 39.6% 17.0% 67.7% 0.5% 124.8% ST STEPHEN 652 191,623 0 0 0 191,623 0 39.4% 21.9% 62.7% 0.2% 124.2% ST VINCENT 109 12.006 0 0 0 12.006 0 26.3% 27.1% 65.4% 1.3% 120.1% e STACY 1,144 334,436 0 0 0 334.436 0 53.5% 15.2% 53.4% 0.2% 122.3% STAPLES 2.897 593.957 0 13.685 0 580.272 0 67.1% 66.8% 55.4% 0.1% 189.4% STARBUCK 1.148 332.847 0 43.587 0 2B9.260 0 46.3% 55.5% 68.5% 5.8% 176.1% STEEN 178 21,966 0 0 0 21.966 0 34.3% 36.4% 69.2% 0.2% 140.1% STEPHEN 698 197,420 0 0 0 197.420 0 23.8% 46.1% 57.7% 0.2% 127.9% STEWART 566 139.500 0 0 0 139.500 0 36.9% 55.8% 56.2% 1.0% 149.9% STEWARTVILLE 4.651 1.367.887 0 111.449 0 1.256.438 0 38.2% 23.8% 68.2% 0.0% 130.3% STILLWATER 15.001 10.030.421 0 940.335 1.413.213 7.676,873 1,699.170 28.2% 29.6% 64.1% 5.5% 127.4% STOCKTON 557 107.188 0 0 0 107,188 0 41.5% 51.3% 52.1% 1.3% 146.2% STOROEN 275 62.232 0 0 0 62.232 0 41.7% 156.4% 48.8% 0.2% 246.0% STRANOaUIST 92 13.735 0 0 0 13,735 0 24.0% 19.3% 67.2% 0.2% 110.7% STRATHCONA 39 6.150 0 0 0 6.150 0 31.4% 31.3% 55.3% 1.7% 119.6% STURGEON LAKE 245 68.014 0 0 0 68,014 0 51.2% 38.5% 66.4% 0.2% 156.3% SUNBURG 114 19.815 0 0 0 19,815 0 41.8% 79.5% 78.5% 0.2% 200.1% SUNFISH LAKE 442 1.032,743 0 0 0 1,032,743 0 27.5% 18.1% 64.6% 4.7% 115.0% SWANVILLE 321 99,228 0 0 0 99,228 0 59.0% 13.2% 54.4% 0.4% 127.0% TACONITE 318 77.247 0 0 0 77.247 0 28.3% 87.4% 43.2% 0.1% 159.1% TAMARACK 51 19.426 0 0 0 19.426 0 57.2% 20.0% 60.6% 0.2% 138.1% TAOPI 81 10,042 0 0 0 10.042 0 51.0% 15.0% 61.0% 0.7% 127.6% TAUNTON 175 38.055 0 0 0 38.055 0 39.5% 46.0% 52.0% 1.2% 138.6% TAYLORS FALLS 745 375.462 0 0 0 375.462 0 52.5% 40.4% 56.9% 0.2% 150.1% TENNEY 3 4.517 0 0 0 4.517 0 44.8% 12.7% 62.9% 0.1% 120.5% TENSTRIKE 181 55.354 0 0 0 65,354 0 60.7% 12.1% 67.2% 0.4% 140.4% THIEF RIVER FALLS 8.008 2,193.907 0 0 0 2,193.907 0 60.1% 41.5% 72.1% 1.6% 175.3% THOMSON 132 99,476 0 0 0 99.476 0 52.8%. 49.0% 43.5% 0.2% 145.4% TINT AH 69 14.823 0 0 0 14,823 0 47.8% 41.2% 62.5% 0.7% 152.2% TONKA 8AY 1,466 2.327.643 0 0 37.145 2,290,498 66.269 37.8% 15.9% 77.3% 5.4% 136.4% TOWER 492 134.527 0 0 0 134.527 0 58.0% 66.1% 34.1% 1.0% 159.2% TRACY 2.056 507.619 0 0 0 507,619 0 34.6% 50.3% 46.0% 0.2% 131.1% TRAIL 61 24.525 0 0 0 24.525 0 46.1% 23.4% 48.8% 4.0% 122.2% TRIMONT 740 194.441 0 10.246 0 184.195 0 27.3% 65.8% 52.7% 0.2% 146.0% TROMMALO 87 21.200 0 0 0 21.200 0 31.8% 45.7% 59.9% 2.5% 139.9% TROSKY 121 20.114 0 0 0 20.114 0 64.3% 18.8% 54.9% 0.2% 138.2% TRUMAN 1.288 314.518 0 17.852 0 296.666 0 24.5% 33.6% 56.3% 0.2% 114.6% TURTLE RIVER 62 23.756 0 0 0 23,756 0 60.7% 3.3% 59.6% 0.4% 124.0% TWIN LAKES 146 54.436 0 0 0 54,436 0 39.2% 6.5% 50.3% 0.0% 96.0% TWIN VALLEY 831 134,684 0 0 0 134.684 0 36.2% 40.4% 64.2% 3.1% 143.9% TWO HAR80RS 3.630 923,187 0 1.839 0 921.348 0 74.6% 41.5% 50.2% 0.5% 166.8% TYLER 1,257 258.692 0 0 0 258.692 0 52.0% 46.0% 69.4% 0.3% 167.7% ULEN 555 81.225 0 0 0 81.225 0 45.9% 39.9% 69.7% 3.0% 158.5% UNDERWOOD 279 72.336 0 0 0 72.336 0 39.7% 34.9% 53.6% 0.0% 128.2% UPSALA 371 132.533 0 4.918 0 127,615 0 59.0% 19.2% 52.3% 0.4% 130.8% UR8ANK 70 16.024 0 0 0 16,024 0 40.6% 11.7% 53.7% 0.0% 106.0% e UTICA 216 76,212 0 0 0 76.212 0 41.4% 17.7% 53.6% 0.9% 113.7% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 11,638 9.891,499 0 1,402,157 1,644.864 6.844,478 1,190,885 44.7% 14.9% 71.0% 4.8% 135.4% VERGAS 284 79.364 0 0 0 79.364 0 40.5% 21.0% 57.6% 0.0% 119.2% VERMILLION 510 182.043 0 0 11.254 170.789 79.393 27.5% 37.7% 60.4% 1.8% 127.3% Im--MV TAX RA TES----- I h____m___m_m__mm----AID AND LEVY OAT Amm______________.m___mm I___m_m_______mm--- T AX BASE CDMPDSITION----m-------.---I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV CityMV School MV LGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes SHOREVIEW 0% 0% 0 1.000.062 3,588,195 481,991 3.106,204 84.78% 4.65% 0.02% 9.08% 1.47% SHOREWOOD 0% 0% 0 425,265 1,518,833 80,106 1.438.727 89.76% 5.92% 0.05% 2.47% 1.79% SILVER BAY 0% 0.06420% 272,586 108,584 321,424 0 321,424 74.25% 7.19% 0.10% 5.27% 13.19% SILVER LAKE 0% 0% 123,260 76.~ 44 61,259 0 61.259 78.97% 10.02% 0.04% 8.55% 2.42% SKYLINE 0% 0.04770% 3,639 15,377 13.564 0 13,564 98.01% 1.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.42% SLAYTON 0% 0% 503,326 159.352 173,040 0 173,040 69.39% 13.73% 0.59% 16.16% 0.13% SLEEPY EYE 0% 0% 754,993 163,492 227.514 0 227,514 76.23% 8.50% 0.33% 14.13% 0.81% SOBIESKI 0% 0% 2.166 3.513 4,323 0 4,323 52.04% 3.71% 38.38% 2.74% 3.12% SOLWAY 0% 0% 3,429 2,252 5,248 0 5,248 58.03% 5.35% 15.28% 12.40% 8.94% SOUTH HAVEN 0% 0.04962% 22,440 4.874 8,126 0 8,126 66.70% 10.35% 8.58% 7.99% 6.38% SOUTH ST PAUL 0% 0.00121% 2,405.296 1,168,624 3,139,007 773,398 2,365,609 75.18% 9.97% 0.00% 12.56% 2.29% SPICER 0% 0% 87.024 77,337 231.487 0 231,487 59.30% 13.25% 0.44% 12.78% 14.23% SPRING GROVE 0% 0.02540% 266,436 82,785 139.296 0 139.296 76.16% 6.44% 3.13% 12.58% 1.69% SPRING HILL 0% 0% 2,411 3,857 5.195 0 5.195 58.47% 0.11% 37.23% 1.96% 2.23% SPRING LAKE PARK 0% 0% 215,996 189,583 929.349 204,974 724.375 69.66% 8.39% 0.00% 20.07% 1.88% SPRING PARK 0% 0% 4.100 95.623 366,036 56,754 309.282 38.15% 41.34% 0.00% 18.77% 1.74% SPRING VALLEY 0% 0% 488,126 217,906 339,198 0 339,198 73.76% 10.36% 1.94% 12.27% 1.67% SPRINGFIELD 0% 0% 351.080 198.390 339,514 0 339,514 76.56% 6.16% 0.55% 15.67% 1.06% SQUAW LAKE 0% 0% 3.061 1,444 4.155 0 4,155 48.84% 4.23% 0.86% 14.39% 31.68% ST ANTHONY (HENNEPIN) 0% 0% 132,899 338,277 1,438,408 209,714 1,228,694 70.87% 14.34% 0.00% 13.00% 1. 79% ST ANTHONY (STEARNS) 0% 0% 675 1,612 3.712 0 3.712 51.69% 7.10% 32.80% 6.07% 2.34% ST BONIFACIUS 0% 0% 8..924 47,503 253,354 62,267 191.087 73.70% 8.48% 2.18% 14.38% 1.26% ST CHARLES 0% 0% 297.674 153,036 307,957 0 307,957 72.35% 14.40% 1.37% 10.57% 1.32% ST CLAIR 0% 0% 61,641 27,092 37,000 0 37,000 86.64% 4.63% 1.77% 5.11% 1.85% ST CLOUD 0% 0% 5.745,638 2.921.679 8,717,558 0 8,717.558 48.24% 17.18% 0.06% 31.73% 2.79% ST FRANCIS 0% 0.05161% 30,317 98,772 445.960 146,141 299,819 57.79% 12.05% 15.45% 10.85% 3.86% ST HILAIRE 0% 0% 19,974 23.781 16,915 0 16,915 51.23% 11.16% 3.58% 13.16% 20.87% ST JAMES 0% 0% 745,453 153,905 322,381 0 322,381 66.75% 7.34% 0.53% 24.34% 1.04% ST JOSEPH 0% 0% 377 ,689 64,948 164,341 0 164.341 67.80% 13.25% 0.52% 15.33% 3.11% ST LEO 0% 0.04626% 8.485 3,049 2,766 0 2,766 65.17% 12:55% 14.37% 5.46% 2.44% ST LOUIS PARK 0% 0.??oo7% i .876. 733 2,877,975 7,886,933 907,934 6.978,999 61.91 % 13.76% 0.00% 22.95% 1.37% ST MARTIN 0% 0% 15,100 7,385 14.264 0 14,264 69.99% 5.61% 8.21% 14.10% 2.09% ST MARYS POINT 0% 0% 0 3,460 51.544 3,439 48.105 84.88% 4.36% 0.00% 0.00% 10.76% ST MICHAEL 0% 0.04942% 120,895 107,103 288.875 0 288,875 78.84% 9.11% 1.61% 8.84% 1.60% ST PAUL 0% 0% 41,120,521 19,961,964 66.742.328 15.554,625 51,187,703 61.33% 14.35% 0.02% 18.92% 5.38% ST PAUL PARK 0% 0% 439,585 207,568 467,613 138,482 329,131 78.76% 4.88% 0.00% 13.43% 2.93% ST PETER 0% 0% 1.104,326 448,068 688,192 0 688,192 75.84% 10.10% 0.08% 12.73% 1.25% ST ROSA 0% 0% 2.930 2.145 2.891 0 2,891 67.18% 1.53% 21.13% 5.97% 4.19% ST STEPHEN 0% 0.00007% 18,684 41,046 41,908 0 41,908 78.80% 2.25% 12.60% 5.43% 0.93% ST VINCENT 0% 0% 7.468 2,568 3,249 0 3.249 52.93% 4.39% 37.92% 0.20% 4.56% STACY 0% 0.05189% 39,480 19,697 50,901 0 50.901 56.33% 9.55% 1.00% 20.93% 12.18% STAPLES 0% 0.05363% 645,315 149,054 387,442 0 387,442 63.80% 12.61% 0.64% 19.46% 3.50% STAR8UCK 0% 0% 186,319 44,i81 160.502 0 160.502 64.21% 13.52% 0.28% 18.28% 3.70% STEEN 0% 0% 9,153 4,938 7.986 0 7.986 66.11% 3.57% 24.00% 4.76% 1.56% STEPHEN 0% 0% 85,206 21.644 91,001 0 91,001 72.76% 7.08% 1.36% 8.21% 10.58% STEWART 0% 0.02338% 145.196 62.586 77.797 0 77,797 64.85% 7.67% 7.44% 16.63% 3.41% STEWARTVllLE 0% 0,02333% 547,146 153,950 299,649 0 299,649 81.13% 7.09% 0.09% 9.22% 2.48% STillWATER 0% 0% 778,969 994,493 2.769,528 496,947 2.272,581 73.88% 8.24% 0.01% 16.26% 1.61% STOCKTON . 0% 0% 13,869 14,984 54,947 0 54,947 75.09% 7.02% 6.32% 7.74% 3.83% STORDEN 0% 0% 61,213 30.502 96,678 0 96,678 59.05% 5.70% 2.55% 30.24% 2.47% "r'''.' STRANDQUIST 0% 0% 10,202 633 2,647 0 2.647 48.31% 10.38% 6.10% 10.43% 24.79% STRATHCONA 0% 0.13619% 2,296 478 1,922 0 1.922 55.63% 8.07% 11.08% 13.49% 11.73% STURGEON LAKE 0% 0% 4,068 7.178 26,212 0 26.212 57.36% 7.56% 6.17% 12.34% 16.58% SUN BURG 0% 0% 12,919 3,402 15,749 0 15,749 56.06% 10.14% 10.86% 18.87% 4.07% SUNFISH LAKE 0% 0% 0 45,275 187,402 0 187,402 87.84% 10.19% 0.92% 0.00% 1.05% SWANVILLE 0% 0.11106% 53,787 5,479 13,131 0 13,131 58.96% 9.24% 1.54% 27.31% 2.95% TACONITE 0% 0.05877% 115,159 32,256 67,550 0 67,550 48.68% 3.550.. 2.73% 13.96% 31.07% TAMARACK 0% 0% 5.036 2,002 3,884 0 3.884 42.12% 3.44% 23.00% 14.46% 16.97% TAOPI 0% 0% 992 1,995 1.505 0 1,505 51.21% 1.99% 41.64% 0.97% 4.20% TAUNTON 0% 0% 6,247 2,430 17.500 0 17,500 54.15% 3.88% 17.48% 18.67% 5.81% TAYLORS FALLS 0% 0% 77.134 86,143 151,859 0 151.859 66.43% 11.42% 5.93% 7.73% 8.48% TENNEY 0% 0% 1,727 155 572 0 572 5.32% 7.76% 0.00% 7.26% 79.66% TENSTRIKE 0% 0% 1,477 1,310 6.690 0 6.690 58.41 % 1.75% 13.12% 6.30% 20.42% THIEF RIVER FALLS 0% 0% 1,144.258 523,240 910.317 0 910.317 65.97% 10.20% 0.07% 20.47% 3.29% THOMSON 0% 0.06507% 16.168 3.747 48.749 0 48,749 40.44% 0.89% 1.72% 0.48% 56.48% TINT AH 0% 0% 8,607 2.889 6.111 0 6.111 37.88% 3.61% 34.73% 6.77% 17.01% TONKA 8A Y 0% 0% 0 77.609 374,253 10,797 363,456 84.86% 9.70% 0.00% 2.76% 2.68% TOWER 0% 0% 116,286 38,214 88,885 0 88,885 51.16% 16.04% 2.09% 16.97% 13.74% TRACY 0% 0% 519,524 171.709 255,146 0 255,146 72.54% 4.94% 1.16% 16.68% 4.68% TRAIL 0% 0% 3,744 271 5,729 0 5,729 23.15% 4.34% 13.01% 6.76% 52.74% TRIMONT 0% 0% 149.317 72,081 121,153 0 121,153 63.69% 11.97% 3.98% 16.04% 4.33% TROMMALD 0% 0% 8.568 2,310 9,690 0 9,690 55.34% 9.89% 19.60% 2.96% 12.20% TROSKY 0% 0% 1.278 1,303 3,781 0 3,781 43.85% 1.78% 45.42% 5.03% 3.92% TRUMAN 0% 0% 230,078 89,453 99,730 0 99,730 61.28% 14.49% 6.38% 16.98% 0.86% TURTLE RIVER 0% 0% 27 212 788 0 788 54.53% 11.46% 10.65% 8.28% 15.07% TWIN LAKES 0% 0.04059% 36,624 10.428 5,303 0 5,303 49.59% 3.65% 6.53% 8.75% 31.47% TWIN VALLEY 0% 0% 139,309 60,172 54,427 0 54,427 68.34% 8.96% 0.96% 18.72% 3.02% TWO HARBORS 0% 0.06420% 895,866 262.721 382,506 0 382.506 74.56% 9.66% 0.00% 12.74% 3.05% TYLER 0% 0% 169,420 72,941 119.000 0 119,000 73.64% 7.21% 2.67% 13.92% 2.56% ULEN 0% 00.. 85,170 38,090 32,420 0 32,420 61.58% 11.19% 7.70% 10.54% 8.98% UNDERWOOD 0% 0% 56.582 9,993 25.247 0 25.247 59.03% 12.29% 0.97% 15.36% 12.35% UPSALA 0% 0.03211 % 53,771 10,788 24,450 0 24,450 54.24% 10.03% 17.73% 13.44% 4.56% URBANK 0% 0% 1.615 1.874 1,869 0 1,869 54.78% 4.25% 21.20% 14.95% 4.83% UTICA 0% 0% 21,702 8.237 13.500 0 13,500 55.70% 5.03% 18.11% 17.28% 3.88% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 0% 0% 905 377.731 1.197.851 180,485 1.017,366 72.90% 5.63% 0.31% 19.04% 2.12% VERGAS 0% 0% 7,302 5,163 16.658 0 16,658 53.50% 14.29% 8.49% 13,56% 10.17% VERMILLION 0% 0% 2.178 27,307 76,686 12,357 64,329 83.20% 5.01% 4.05% 6.74% 1.00% e 1...-----.---.....---.........---------......-.---.--- T AX BASE DA T A.......---..---------.....---......------. 1___,,,,_,,,,.,, NET TAX CAPACITY TAX RATES ..______.....-1 1993 Total Tax Powerline Captured Fiscal Disp Taxable Fiscal Disp Average Average Average Average Average Population Capacity Tax TIF Tax Contrib Tax Tax Distrib Tax County City School Special Total Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate VERNDALE 558 150,536 0 0 0 150,536 0 78.7% 36.9% 97.4% 0.2% 213.3% VERNON CENTER 333 82.126 0 39 0 B2,087 0 35.1% 69.5% 59.1% 0.2% 163.9% VESTA 339 53,453 0 0 0 53.453 0 30.3% 43.6% 47.4% 0.2% 121.5% VICTORIA 2,833 2.559.542 0 11,107 88,335 2,454,100 202.636 44.5% 32.0% 68.5% 2.1% 147.0% VIKING 95 9.813 0 0 0 9,813 0 23.0% 20.8% 49.6% 2.8% 96.3% VILLARD 243 56,438 0 0 0 56,438 0 45.8% 44.9% 67.7% 4.0% 162.4% VINING 80 15,752 0 0 0 15,752 0 40.5% 47.8% 75.0% 0.0% 163.3% VIRGINIA 9,283 3,346.122 0 428,777 0 2,917,345 0 56.9% 38.8% 29.7% 1.0% 126.4% WA8ASHA 2.452 965.839 0 40.973 0 924.866 0 55.9% 46.4% 57.1% 0.7% 160.1% WA8ASSO 701 192,623 0 10.249 0 182,374 0 34.5% 40.6% 53.2% 0.2% 128.5% WACONIA 3.920 2,759,868 0 437,340 331.580 1,990,948 395,102 44.4% 38.3% 83.4'lf> 1.4% 167.5% WADENA 4.251 1,315,395 0 37,305 0 1,278,090 0 76.3% 24.9% 64.8% 0.5% 166.5% WAHKON 196 114.297 0 0 0 114.297 0 81.6% 15.1% 73.3% 0.2% 170.1 % WAITE PARK 5,463 4,119.911 0 839.553 0 3,280,358 0 39.7% 33.4% 56.5% 2.0% 131.6% WALDORF 243 57,592 0 2,029 0 55,563 .0 48.2% 28.1% 51.1% 0.2% 127.7% WALKER 977 645.218 0 75,618 0 569.600 0 39.5% 40.9% 53.5% 0.2% 134.2% WALNUT GROVE 624 150,225 0 0 0 150,225 0 31.9% 36.7% 52.4% 0.2% 121.2% WALTERS 82 9,196 0 0 0 9.196 0 23.8% 47.3% 43.1% 0.2% 114.5% WALTHAM 171 29,248 0 0 0 29,248 0 39.9% 37.8% 40.9% 0.6% 119.2% WANAMINGO 872 305,910 0 O. 0 305,910 0 24.1% 41.7% 49.0% 0.6% 115.5% WANOA 102 23,949 0 0 0 23,949 0 30.7% 44.8% 49.8% 0.2% 125.5% WAR8A 138 54.355 0 0 0 54,355 0 46.8% 18.1% 56.1% 0.2% 121.1 % WARREN 1.797 354.567 0 0 0 354,567 0 23.8% 35.8% 65.6% 2.8% 128.0% WARROAD 1,711 1.398,486 0 46.455 0 1,352.031 0 31.6% 29.6% 55.1% 0.2% 116.4% WASECA 8,144 3,324.679 0 49.593 0 3,275,086 0 49.9% 26.7% 62.8% 0.2% 139.6% WATERTOWN 2.495 791,685 0 71,243 60.693 659.749 450.218 44.5% 21.2% 67.3% 1.4% 134.4% WATERVILLE 1.789 459,279 0 0 0 459,279 0 43.0% 70.4% 48.3% 0.2% 161.9% WATKINS 857 191,747 0 21,007 0 170,740 0 41.8% 61.9% 62.6% 1.3% 167.6% WATSON 204 34,448 0 0 0 34,448 0 31.6% 111.8% 51.5% 0.4% 195.3% WAUBUN 388 81,247 0 10,169 0 71,078 0 94.0% 56.1% 52.4% 2.7% 205.1% WAVERLY 604 299.765 0 0 0 299.765 0 31.6% 51.6% 41.9% 0.0% 125.1% WAYZATA 3.830 8,680,573 0 740,412 1,120,608 6,819.553 179,452 37.8% 20.3% 60.5% 6.9% 125.5% WELCOME 783 221,851 0 44,087 .0 177,764 0 27.3% 62.3% 52.7% 0.2% 142.5% WelLS 2.449 656,769 0 61,444 0 595,325 0 31.9% 35.2% 55.7% 0.2% 123.1% WENDelL 155 43,330 0 0 0 43.330 0 45.5% 52.2% 62.2% 0.7% 160.6% WEST CONCORD 890 172.344 0 0 0 172.344 0 34.2% 71.3% 56.5% 0.0% 162.0% WEST ST PAUL 19,304 14,029.867 0 284.233 1,822.962 11,922.672 2,373.677 27.5% 22.0% 64.6% 5.5% 119.6% . WEST UNION 82 16,418 0 0 0 16.418 0 73.3% 18.3% 69.8% 0.4% 161.8% WEST8ROOK 849 160.341 0 0 0 160,341 0 43.5% 36.0% 59.2% 0.2% 138.9% WESTPORT 43 6,644 0 0 0 6,644 0 46.4% 15.0% 68.7% 4.3% 134.4% WHALAN 87 14,640 0 0 0 14,640 0 47.3% 66.8% 62.5% 0.0% 176.6% WHEATON 1.601 '384.761 0 0 0 384.761 0 39.7% 67.2% 50.6% 0.7% 158.2% WHITE BEAR LAKE 24,979 14.431.717 0 1,495,027 1,549,407 11.387.283 3,319.604 44.6% 16.7% 71.9% 5.5% 138.6% WILDER 76 16.872 0 0 0 16,872 0 39.9% 23.2% 67.7% 1.3% 132.1% . WILLERNIE 587 242,158 0 0 24,000 218.158 98,639 30.7% 28.6% 69.7% 5.4% 134.3% WILLIAMS 215 46,057 0 0 0 46,057 0 58.9% 44.4% 62.2% 0.4% 165.9% WILLMAR 18,322 8,414,085 0 361,960 0 8.052.125 0 41.3% 23.5% 62.0% 0.8% 127.5% WILLOW RIVER 291 87.610 0 0 0 87,610 0 51.2% 14.1% 66.4% 6.0% 137.7% WILMONT 351 68,533 0 0 0 68,533 0 31.0% 38.1% 54.9% 1.5% 125.6% WILTON 176 60,818 0 0 0 60,818 0 60.8% 6.6% 59.6% 0.4% 127.4% WINDOM 4,348 1.188,896 0 73,839 0 1,115,057 0 41.5% 46.3% 63.7% 0.2% 151.7% WINGER 163 51,582 0 0 0 51,582 0 40.7% 24.6% 59.9% 4.3% 129.5% WINNE8AGO 1,562 364,903 0 3,172 0 361,731 0 26.8% 58.9% 50.5% 0.2% 136.4% WINONA 25,680 10.800.803 0 645.614 0 10,155,189 0 38.3% 32.6% 51.4% 1.3% 123.5% WINSTED 1,639 690.280 0 22,060 0 668,220 0 46.4% 32.7% 48.8% 0.2% 128.2% WINTHROP 1,305 299,420 0 8.723 0 290,697 0 51.0% 54.9% 40.9% 0.2% 147.1% WINTON 160 23,754 0 0 0 23,754 0 69.0% 48.9% 43.9% 1.1% 162.8% WOLF LAKE 32 9,832 0 0 0 9.832 0 57.9% 4.0% 63.4% 0.0% 125.3% WOLVERTON 151 41,777 0 0 0 41,777 0 44.5% 40.9% 50.1% 0.9% 136.3% WOOD LAKE 409 80,192 0 0 0 80,192 0 48.8% 35.8% 48.0% 0.5% 133.1% WODD8URY 26,900 21,536,206 0 1.211.423 2.122.784 18.201,999 2.115,597 31.1% 22.5% 70.4% 5.9% 129.9% WOODLAND 484 1.672.440 0 0 2,015 1.670,425 9,952 37.8% 8.0% 77.3% 5.4% 128.5% WOODSTOCK 152 22,527 0 0 0 22,527 0 56.1% 53.5% 46.7% '0.2% 156.4% WORTHINGTON 10,183 4,890,406 0 452,006 0 4,438.400 0 29.9% 32.1% 53.4% 1.3% 116.6% WRENSHALL 313 139.793 0 0 0 139,793 0 62.6% 13.4% 58.6% 0.2% 134.8% WRIGHT 143 27,386 0 0 0 27.386 0 64.6% 56.7% 72.3% 0.2% 193.8% WYKOFF 493 89.182 0 890 0 88,292 0 40.9% 42.3% 57.4% 0.0% 140.5% WYOMING 2,416 1,335.223 0 57,548 0 1,277,675 0 53.5% 27.3% 56.2% 0.2% 137.2% YOUNG AMERICA 1.427 572,770 0 93,798 54.647 424,325 221,992 44.5% 36.1% 73.9% 1.4% 155.8% ZEMPLE 64 66,433 0 0 0 66,433 0 46.8% 12.6% 40.9% 0.2% 100.5% ZIMMERMAN 1,638 606,665 0 50,914 0 555,751 0 21.4% 49.9% 62,3% 0.0% 133.6% ZUM8RO FALLS 242 45,124 0 0 0 45.124 0 58.5% 27.8% 56.4% 0.7% 143.4% ZUM8ROTA 2,372 1,122.870 0 128.831 0 994.039 0 22.3% 32.5% 54.4% 0.6% 109.8% CITY TOTALS 3.575.266 64.988 274,295,729 268,583,563 26.4% 4.2% 2,552,796.233 198.898.560 2.079.536.956 37.6O,i, 62.6% 130.7% e I mnMV TAX RA TES.m. I mm.m...n_..nn.._mmAID AND LEVY OAT Am____nmnnm___m_.__.m I m..n..mnm____...._T AX BASE CDMPOSITION-~---m-n--n-'-""-I Average Average 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV Percent MV City MV School MV LGA City Certified FD Dist City Net Residential Apartments Farm Commercial Other Tax Rate Tax Rate HACA City Levy Levy Levy Homestead Industrial Classes VERNDALE 0% 0% 5B,630 14.520 55,601 0 55,601 57.23% 8.98% 3.05% 8.39% 22.36% VERNON CENTER 0% 0% 33,635 29,685 57,085 0 57,085 68.30% 4.48% 8.07% 15.39% 3.76% VESTA 0% 0% 56,090 22,789 23.295 0 23,295 68.05% 4.95% 4.58% 19.85% 2.56% VICTORIA 0% 0% 0 185,281 848.711 63.845 784,866 84.83% 6.06% 3.30% 3.60% 2.19% VIKING 0% 0% 20,763 2.986 2,044 0 2.044 64.44% 3.14% 18.53% 2.88% 11.01% VILLARD 0% 0% 30.675 14.686 25,314 0 25,314 59.55% 6.49% 6.17% 19.04% 8.75% VINING 0% 0.04166% 8.387 1,634 7,522 0 7.522 45.42% 10.47% 28.76% 9.43% 5.92% VIRGINIA 0% 0.05978% 3,084,528 1,005,274 1,131.023 0 1,131.023 65.60% 8.33% 0.21% 23.66% 2.19% WABASHA 0% 0% 399,355 167,560 429.184 0 429,184 67.35% 7.61% 4.22% 15.46% 5.36% WABASSO 0% 0% 133,882 28,538 73.995 0 73,995 64.30% 11.73% 3.24% 19.17% 1.56% WACONIA 0% 0% 257,546 217,704 904.679 142.653 762.026 66.76% 11.88% 0.50% 19.20% 1.67% WADENA 0% 0% 535.359 155,564 318.638 0 318.638 62.09% 11.28% 0.34% 23.30% 2.99% WAHKON 0% 0% 16.847 6.583 17.202 0 17,202 46.02% 4.95% 1.66% 2.26% 45.11% WAITE PARK 0% 0% 322,430 337,591 1.096,722 0 1,096,722 31.86% 27.99% 0.16% 37.21% 2.78% WALDORF 0% 0.00320% 50,262 19,607 15,590 0 15.590 68.04% 6.40% 5.74% 17.59% 2.23% WALKER 0% 0% 178,258 87,262 233,222 0 233,222 47.47% 10.57% 0.14% 30.70% 11.12% WALNUT GROVE 0% 0% 123,370 39,309 55.125 0 55,125 64.76% 12.58% 4.31% 14.76% 3.58% WALTERS 0% 0% 22.925 6.784 4.349 0 4.349 61.67% 4.95% 13.92% 12.75% 6.71% WALTHAM 0% 0% 19.277 12.760 11,050 0 11.050 63.81% 0.77% 16.87% 14.46% 4.08% WANAMINGO 0% 0% 112,393 63,517 127.565 0 127.565 71.19% 8.03% 2.34% 16.10% 2.33% WANDA 0% 0% 9.041 4,731 10.726 0 10.726 51.45% 2.68% 9.19% 33.76% 2.93% WARBA 0% 0% 7,878 3,030 9,820 0 9.820 52.95% 3.13% 8.50% 4.33% 31.10% WARREN 0% 0% 224,831 47,902 126.857 0 126.857 75.74% 7.69% 0.68% 14.15% 1.74% WARROAD 0% 0.06544% 81,209 39.452 399,944 0 399.944 37.36% 13.02% 0.18% 44.73% 4.71% WASECA 0% 0% 1,366,201 333,587 873,383 0 873,383 67.02% 10.58% 0.16% 20.34% 1.90% WATERTOWN 0% 0% 169.292 62,100 226,431 86.366 140.065 75.21% 12.08% 0.15% 8.78% 3.79% WATERVILLE 0% 0% 312.887 109,229 323,245 0 323.245 73.37% 8.80% 1.03% 5.02% 11.79% WATKINS 0% 0% 80.018 70.588 105,700 0 105.700 65.25% 13.91% 0.22% 15.83% 4.78% WATSON 0% 0% 35.621 16.967 38.498 0 38,498 60.40% 12.37% 0.23% 22.96% 4.04% WAUBUN 0% 0% 29.909 20,135 39.865 0 39.865 60.75% 8.02% 5.12% 16.02% 10.09% WAVERLY 0% 0.08752% 81,285 49,794 154,662 0 154.662 61.88% 8.64% 1.91% 9.27% 18.29% WAYZATA 0% 0% 0 282,443 1.416,717 35.349 1.381,368 61.59% 13.67% 0.00% 20.67% 4.06% WELCOME 0% 0% 127.929 44,502 110,727 0 110,727 60.77% 7.48% 3.65% 24.20% 3.90% WELLS 0% 0% 581.717 88,128 209,822 0 209.822 73.86% 6.38% 0.11% 17.75% 1.90% WENDELL 0% 0% 36.581 8,662 22,611 0 22.611 47.42% 2.73% 18.24% 14.83% 16.78% WEST CONCORD 0% 0% 110.639 54.792 122.866 0 122.866 81.37% 5.65% 4.59% 6.51% 1.88% WEST ST PAUL 0% 0% 1,089.827 987,245 3.145.567 519.957 2.625.610 64.00% 16.14% 0.07% 18.74% 1.04% WEST UNION 0% 0% 1.526 1,497 3.003 0 3,003 68.13% 4.05% 9.53% 2.52% 15.77% WESTBROOK 0% 0% 185,682 57.159 57.728 0 57,728 63.54% 12.01 % 5.76% '18.65% 0.04% WESTPORT 0% 0% 1,847 354 996 0 996 50.76% 11.89% 20.27% 7.33% 9.74% WHALAN 0% 0% 6.916 3.566 9,778 0 9.778 64.08% 13.68% 16.40% 3.70% 2.15% WHEATON 0% 0% 329.668 153,043 25B.660 0 258.660 72.29% 8.70% 1.13% 13.24% 4.65% WHITE BEAR LAKE 0% 0% 770,232 856,698 2,456,448 554.997 1.901,451 75.18% 10.85% 0.13% 12.57% 1.28% WILDER 0% 0% 9,305 2,933 3.920 0 3,920 38.13% 1.98% 40.40% 16.85% 2.64% WILLERNIE 0% 0% 38.166 30,025 85.270 22.914 62,356 75.44% 9.20% 0.00% 14.20% 1.16% WILLIAMS 0% 0% 22,478 7.684 20.453 0 20.453 57.25% 10.83% 9.51% 14.14% 8.27% WILLMAR 0% 0% 2,211.426 679,902 1,891.365 0 1.891,365 61.73% 11.96% 0.61% 23.90% 1.80% WILLOW RIVER 0% 0% 24.910 3.636 12.364 0 12,364 66.23% 8.21% 2.28% 13.07% 10.21% WILMONT 0% 0% 36.777 16.777 26,125 0 26.125 71.21% 6.97% 4.73% 15.23% 1.86% WILTON 0% 0% 57 96 4.029 0 4.029 70.57% 3.42% 5.47% 5.17% 15.36% WINDOM 0% 0% 665.347 356.359 515,842 0 515.842 68.29% 10.75% 0.37% 19.07% 1.53% .,....." WINGER 0% 0% 31,973 20,647 12,691 0 12,691 43.10% 14.45% 2.30% 22.73% 17.42% WINNEBAGO 0% 0% 297.668 114,106 212,915 0 212,915 58.66% 10.50% 6.62% 19.11% 5.10% WINONA 0% 0% 4.624.005 1,487,597 3,308.154 0 3.308.154 63.04% 11.22% 0.04% 23.32% 2.38% WINS TED 0% 0% 269.604 107,533 21"8.809 0 218.809 73.21% 8.65% 0.01% 16.37% 1.75% WINTHROP 0% 0% 275.021 112.773 159.658 0 159,658 77.83% 5.38% 2.07% 13.42% 1.30% WINTON 0% 0% 24,088 4,677 11.608 0 11,608 78.46% 14.58% 0.00% 2.18% 4.78% WOLF LAKE 0% 0% 520 206 395 0 395 67.64% 12.0B% 6.69% 8.88% 4.71% WOLVERTON 0% 0% 18,727 6.412 17 ,088 0 17,088 49.30% 6.80% 6.23% 7.43% 30.24% WOOD LAKE 0% 0% 82.565 29,190 28,745 0 28.745 56.80% 5.45% 8.82% 25.13% 3.79% WOODBURY 0% 0% 0 1,324,911 4,553,959 463.186 4.090.773 75.57% 8.82% 3.68% 10.17% 1.75% WOODLAND 0% 0% 0 32.522 133,962 846 133,116 88.43% 7.76% 0.00% 0.00% 3.81% WOODSTOCK 0% 0% 24,670 4,972 12,049 0 12,049 54.62% 2.56% 22.23% 17.15% 3.43% WORTHINGTON 0% 0% l,829,lB9 722.846 1,423,332 0 1.423,332 63.17% 11.81% 0.46% 23.16% 1.39% WRENSHALL 0% 0.05422% 64,492 7,498 18,764 0 18,764 49.42% 2.60% 4.12% 28.82% 15.04% WRIGHT 0% 0% 695 6.725 15,525 0 15,525 54.75% 4.47% 19.27% 12.99% 8.51% WYKOFF 0% 0% 93,055 28,464 37,317 0 37,317 70.58% 6.42% 6.36% 13.99% 2.65% WYOMING 0% 0.06441% 116,265 98.562 349,023 0 349.023 77.16% 6.41% 0.56% 14.13% 1.73% YOUNG AMERICA 0% 0% 81.074 B6.584 231.901 78.613 153,288 81.39% 6.05% 0.49% 9.56% 2.52% ZEMPLE 0% 0% 1.207 1,628 8.371 0 8,371 24.16% 2.26% 3.70% 0.00% 69.88% ZIMMERMAN 0% 0.05252% 63,791 117,639 277.153 0 277,153 69.95% 8.25% 1.74% 12.21% 7.85% ZUMBRO FALLS 0% 0.01572% 8,697 23,758 12.551 0 12.551 76.23% 4.52% 5.05% 12.78% 1.42% ZUMBROT A 0% 0% 368,778 181,123 323,056 0 323,056 71.40% 7.23% 0.97% 16.68% 3.73% CITY TOTALS 0.02234% 329,934.104 619,264.676 547.969.472 10.33% 20.15% 0.03817% 195,589.640 71.295.204 63.98% 0.91% 4.64% Star Tribune/Monday/November 21/1994' .38 to worst-case property tax proJections 280 281 282 270 ~;: 273",,93.000 ,L 283 ,,~~93,OOO : .;' ;;.;. :.'. .9t~~~]~~:L,;~~iO~0 . WashiftgtOnCo;' ....) . . Cottage ~rov!" ,. 833! .~83,300 I ~1 .279 I $85.200 I $1,311 I 2.3%! 2.6"~ .. forestLaKe...:.831f:83,900.l.:1;J42 ,',.,84,5Ou, ,1,162 'O.7J"~ l,7.l::.;' ..Fo,rest.L. T~~.::831 :104,600,):S11 )07,400..:1,688, }.7",11.7..,,;, . Hugo...;,.. .::.:",."",i624 ,:~99,BOO,lj,1,6JO.^ ,,1ll?,900 .:1,924;. ~6.h 19,!i:.tJ: Lake Elmo 834 133,700 2,397 140,400 2,628 5.0 9.6. f;" . . Mat1tomediT::~ :~~14,100': K:r;9ir~t19..206 2;123, :4:S1!;J.6~r; Oakdale 622 78,800 1,053 79,600 1,093 1.0 3.8 " :-;''91~: :3 1,605.3 :2,569:3 ,;',i_.:", ,_ y}. :.rst. A~th~~~" ~ \..51. Paul .;.~. 5horeview C:i_0.iV' -:;""', 'n:;.",-; $2.22 4J . 8. nX...118.20%........:... r2,328 ; 8:(.[: 18.~~s: 2,146 8.9 19.5 :. .:! ,903 8.9'~' 19.'112 1,840 7.2 j17.0 .. 1,730 7.2: 17.7. , County Bssessois and lllJdI\Q!s;: Star Tribune GraphlcIJane Friedniann,' : Research assistance: Joe Kimball . Reactions mixed to South S1. Paul alone bears good, bad news: Some get l.1 % hike, others 20.7% By Anthony Lonetree Staff Writer Tax notices are arriving in the Twin Cjties area, bringing anger, relief and confusion - all in South St. Paul alllne. If its elected officials approve pro- poSed city, county and school levies next month, South St. Paul would find itself on both ends of a "good news. bad news" tax scale, according to Star Tribune projections. The owner of an average-valued home in the South St. Paul School District would pay 20.7 percent more in taxes. Neighbors in the city who live in the Inver Grove Heights dis- trict would see only a 1.1 percent increase. A reason for the disparity: The South St. :Paul district is proposing an 18 percent levy hike, while the Inver Grove Heights school board is weigh- ing a 7 percent increase. The Dakota.. County community is not alone in its potential for double- digit increases. The Star Tribune has found such notices to be plentiful in five of seven metro area counties. The newspaper calculated the worst- case tax bills for owners of average- valued homes in 73 metro area com- munities. The numbers reflect prop- erty-value increases. and also include multiple calculations for cities such as South St. Paul whose boundaries include more than one school district. While that community's odd tax situ- ation can be attributed largely to gov- ernment spending, homeowners in other cities can point to increasing property values as the main culprit behind their double-digit hikes. relies on the value of one's property as one of the two major components of the property-tax bill. Citizens who began receiving their truth-in-taxation notices about a week ago will find that they have limited options to challenge those valuations now. The numbers were set by county assessors earlier this year. But the truth-in-taxation statement lists public hearing sites where prop- erty owners can fight city, county and school spending plans. Often the lev- ies are trimmed before final votes are taken in December. Here are some of the larger. levy increases being proposed by local ju- risdictions: Cities/townships: Forest Lake T own- ship, 41.75 percent; Andover, 24.3; Lino Lakes, 22.1; Rosemoun!, 20.9; Chanhassen, 17.2; Woodbury, 14.9; Savage, 13.8; Brooklyn Park, 12.9; Hugo, 12.4; White Bear Township, 12.3; Mahtomedi, 12.0; Brooklyn Center, 11.6; Golden Valley, 11.3, and Hastings, 11.0. Schools (with district number): Brooklyn Center (286), 28.6 percent; Anoka-Isanti (15), 25.7; Chaska (112), 22.45; Hopkins (270), 18.7; South St. Paul (6) and White Bear Lake (624), 18.1; Eden Prairie (272), 18.0; Prior Lake (719), 17.9; Shako- pee (720), 17.7; Anoka-Hennepin (11), 15.7; Farmington (192), 15.!, and Rosemount (196), 10.7. I\JI"'~^lI.''''''''' I r'""rY'\__ :__ I""!: ~ o ~ e B :~ o 0..> ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ '.\J to..> i~ J ~ \ e - r.r;, 0..> S o ~. 0..> ,E ~ I H ~ ~ o ~ C) . ~=: ClI::S 8~ ~.... C).... "'ClI ClI_ ~.E C)._ .J::<Il ~cU ::S... OC) .J:: 1:10 1:10"0 ::Ss:: 8Cl1 .J:: ~ ...s:: ....0 O<ll cn.i: C)ClI e_.o.. ::::8 (.)0 s::c:.> '~ C) E--:3 .?? ~.5 l;; ~ ~ ~ 8 5l ~_ ... ::S:::::S...== II en ,,g><~ ... ~~0~C) ... ",00 '" g g 8 o~or.i g ..0 .J::l:1Og~.J:: ClI o,5~.....0~ ~ 0>' ~"'o OCllCllS::--::Z:: c::i p. s:: .- ~~ ~ oC)oggo~a.i ::,..o_&t:lN c:.> ~:= ...vrC\1 c: "'..0 &t:l . ClI ClI::s -ClI:::.J:: ...8><", c:.> ::s ClI ClI .... s:: 0....... OEt- ..ooC)~""o:g co I .c: --0 -- =e-.:3::;:: ~ ~ C) 'ClI'-N~C) oEts::p......ocos:: ::z:: C) '(ij . C) o>~o :3 ~ti5;3 =. A < C") .-4 Z o o UJ => Z ~ o c:.> en w ~ to- ,5 g =' g g .?;>g ;g II 5l 0~.8 o~ o~ l;; o~ g ... ::s gCllgg~g c:.>,5 ~ ;;5 ~ .,.. ~ ~ ::10 C) o ..0 ClICl1Cl1 >.8 ::::> ClI >< ClI.... p..... or.i 0 ~. ClI.... 0 _ 0 co ~.J:: o 'O.....,ao~==s...~~,"o ..... ClI .... C) ~ C) 0 ft, _ C) cc.-- 1i) C) C 5:&t:l Et.-::::,E ClI c>~"'O>oc"OClI c boCllOOo> boS::> ....J:: ..... C) ... 0 ;: 0_C)1ls::.J::.3c:.>.?;> ...- <1> := = E-t -- ~ ~ c ..... :E.J::~ CS::ClI._ClI ~ c: -cUcu..cas:= >< ~ &t:l ClI ~ 1:10:3 ":" t:: 8 ~ C 0> .J:: 0> ClI s:: C).- t- ClI~"''''''rilC)'-c:.>en N ~ ~ccS:s!....>. o~ ril.5 C).-.- 8 "0 C) s:: N. C)-C)C) C)"OClI -&t:lc",oenenoenS::..!<: C)co.....::so::s::so::s~ c:.> :3 ~ ,g~,g ,g ~,g 'a ClI....ClI"'>. ... ClI' C)c:! w... s:: S..oS "O....><1i) ~ s:: .... >. 0 ~ p.C'..... 0.... :=: .... - 0 Lt) CIJ CU .- -g 1i) >. s,~ p. :=: ~ ~ 1: .~ ct:: ..-4 >a :.0.... CI:l ~ ..t~C)C)ct:: ><C)..... o c.a..c._ -- CIJ.- Q) I ClI 0'" .J:: ~s::~p. C C) s,.J:: 5l E-< ... _ - &t:l -- ..= ===:::s ('0-- :::s . ~"'.SEt,g~ >.ClI"Ooo:t' c:=: 00 tp....5lc:: 0'- >. "0 0 8 C) ....;.0 = 8 ~ ClI ~ o. g.en g..g P.ClI0'" ....s::.... Q) .J:: P.O s:: p.._ P. '" 8 c:.> C) 8..... ~ Q) ,- o ::s '" 0 - .... Q) '" >'.J:: en S g c:.> ClI Q) .:::::s:;:: c:.> ,5 .J::.... c p. E--,g @:a ~~o~o~ 'ot:~ o ..... 0 >.:=: c >'o::s ~ ...... ...... <::> .- <1) c--- t: 0 0 co >. o~ .....0 ~ C) 0 c::i M ClI';';O>< ><E-- Seno ....O>~ ~$~~~ 8 ~~~ ex: UJ l- ii: 3: LL LL <( I- en Z :r: (.) o a: < ::J: (.) a: III 'C.O; C'C - ~ :::::s :2..a cnQ) .c +J ClI en. ~C) ..... .a;J QJ' ,_.J:: >...... ClI::S p.,.Q . 0 ~ "'cc >..J:: C) c.... C)6....-"01:100::s >_::s==ccSe. - 0 ~ ClI'- .~ g ClI >._ 1illl.... >. s:: ==..:"0 ... ~ 2cc,.Q ClI C"O s::: -'.J::XQ)Or::::s ~~~2>'~;;::... c >. >. -' 0 .", :Oot::~Q)~g. >.ClI Q)s:::...........C) m..oC)p. ::sC)~ 8c:.> 8 Q)O.J:: o..:=: 0....0 >. ~ .S\,.JNDAY, NOVEMBER 20,1994 SAINT P~UL PIONEER TAXES/Minnesota Legislature's . j, I , I :1 : ! ,.' 'f' CONTINUED FROM 1 A bill on a $60,000 house? If you guessed that because of efforts to _ :ease the plight of low-income peo- -ple the tax bill on that house :would go down from 1985 to 1995, you're wrong again. The property tax bill on a $60,000 house 10 St. ~Paul was $629 in 1985. Next year 'it will be $908, or up 44.3 perce~~. Those surprising bits of trIvIa ,,:are the result of often unseen 'changes in the property ~ax sys- 'tern created by the LegIslature. qOver the past 10 years. the cha~g- 'es have given a sometimes umn- tended tax break to owners of . higher-valued homes while shifting :more tax burden to lower-valued homes. "The recent changes in the tax 'system affect all homes in, the state, so that property tax bills would rise faster for lower valued homes, compared to hig~er value ,residences, as long as theIr market yalue stayed the same or grew at , {he same rate. I I J .4 , Home values keep rising " 'So why has there been so much ,complaining, especially from 'p~o- pIe living in some of the pncIer .'neighborhoods . in St. Papl, about .' property tax 10creases 10 recent years? i ',-" Well, like all good bar bets, ';\ ,-there's a bit of a trick to this one. ! : : First even though the tax bill i I ori'a high-valued house in St. Paul : i 'is now lower compared with the 1,1' '. bin on a similarly valued house 10 : :years ago, the bills have increased n 'Ii) the past couple of years. !I -'~'Second, a house worth $100,000 ,('".,' :; ~r $200,000 in 1985 is likely to. be "worth a lot more now. So tax bIlls t.,'l ': on': any given ho~se have. been ~ pushed up through 10creases In as- p . 'sessedvaluation, despite tax! I c:b'reaks given to high-valued i ':homes. . r ~~:'. Taxes went up' for expenSIve ,'homes in St. Paul because they are worth more, But taxes went up for modest homes at least partly be- ~cause the legislative changes, made them pay more. ., For example, if a house wo~th ',~!OO,OOO in St. Paul in 1985 In- "creased in value 3 percent every 'ye~r it would be worth about $n4:000 by 1995 and its tax bill "would be 47 percent larger. A $60,000 house would haye nearly the same rate of tax 10- "''-=-crease even if its value stayed the :";:;ame. If its value increased 3 per- :;.-cent a year, it would be wo~th ;:i,aDout $80,000 by 1995, when Its ! ;~,!a:x bill be 115 per,cen~ la~ger.,+ :r.....'... "q" , I " ~ ; :Constant revisions "'" , :''''::The Legislature has done much '::':tweaking, tinkering and revamp- ::'Jiig over the years. ~~r: In 1990, for example, the state 'l""changed the system for distribut- 1:iiig homestead credit aid because :=legislators thought the previous :'::-'s}'stem encouraged local govern- 'ftnent spending. The change, how- ;~j,yer, also had the effect of lower- :i'oing taxes on higher-value homes. ' r:;'Other changes to the property ,;;:tax system in 1992 and 1993 gave ....more tax relief on homes worth more than $115,000, and resulted in a shift of more of the tax bur- den to lower-value homes. The legislators made that change because they thought own- ers of high-valued homes were I paying a disproportionate share of Ii. property taxes. Still another change means that homeowners, especially owners of lower-valued homes, will pay a greater share of newly approved referendum tax increases than they have before. That change was made to discourage homeowners from voting for tax increases in the knowledge that businesses or owners of expensive homes would bear a disproportionate share of the burden.. "Clearly there have been deci- sions made that upper-value homes are paying too much rela- tive to lower-value homes," said, Steve Hinze, legislative analyst in the state House Research Depart- ment. Owners of expensive homes still pay more money in taxes relative to their home values than owners of modest homes. But the legisla- 'tive changes have closed that dis- parity in the past 10 years. ' The owner of a $200,000 home now pays'about six times as much in property taxes as the owner of a $60,000 home in the same taxing district, even though the $200,000 home is worth about three times as much. But in 1985, the owner, of a $200,000 home in St. Paul paid " about nine times as much in prop- erty taxes as the owner of a $60,000 home in the city. The owner of a $100,000 home paid three times the taxes of the owner of a $60,000 home in St. Paul in 1985. Now the owner of a $100,000 home pays about twice the tax bill as the owner of a \60,000 home. :hanges criticized Some critics" such as Wayne .1 J!j. ~ ~ r:n. ~ 5 s ~ ~ s ~ .~ 0). ~ I. ~ .~ ~ ~ .~ ~ CI) CI) UJ ~ c.. ~ UJ UJ Z o ~ ..J ;:J <' . ~ ... r:n. <: ,,~ CI) \J,J E ,~ .5t ~ ~ o a3 ~ ~ 2 ~~oc~ :<UJ ..c Q)...... -_ .::: rd .- ..... ~ Cll.....~ ...... <I.l Q) _ tl.O-S:: ""':8 s:: Q) "0 S::Q)Q)Cll'-<I.l Cll s::'- "'" > <I.l..... = So.=: Cll'6O Q) ~ ,g <I.l!(l tl.Oo t:j-;;j ..... >< =..c: 0._ Q) Q) 0~""'::t:Q)= tl.O~:>, "'" :5 c; J:: s:: ~ ~ ~~. :>, ::- Q)~Cll05~Clllil S 0 -:5 CIS <I.l ~ ="0 <I.l s:: . tl.O ~ 0'- 0 ~..!a "'" tl.O"'..... "",..c: 0 CIS.:,g..... g ~-;U.E Q) ~ "O.~ 0.. a,) r;j ~,g Q)~ Q) ~'6O~ : .E""'s:5Q)"O :>, CIS..... 0 ...:l "'" .o>oC,).E .E ~6Q) .0 I~ o_..c: s::..... s:: <I.l ~ CIS..... 0 .- Q) "'Cf.l ::::.!:<: "0 ..... Cll CIS "0 0 .: ~ 0'8 ~ g S <I.lCl""'o.otl.O Q) .E~>< s:: .E gf ~ < ~ ~.- ~ :a ,=: ~ CIS,g ~ "","0 Q) <I.l ,- ~8Q)~~0- := CJ > o..-_..c 0 S CIS:::: >< tl.O ~..c: ._ .= CIS S ~ IIl~~E-tQ)~ '-" ~ ~ C'tS ~ o..~ o~Q)o~g.E <I.l<l.l <I.l<l.lo. Q)"",Q)-Q)Q) <I.lui SQ)s::a..c:Q)Q)Q) 0:5 o,_E-t S S rg ..c:oE:2; 000 <I.lC,)..c: ..#f:U~.. ~ ....... ..~... e' L ,.::; (U.u b.-.... .~. C1J . . ;::l..:s:r CV'ClJ..; ; .:;::.S"' . , t~~ oo.....c::. .' ~ ~- ~ cr:sl J,..;, ~ ~.'" <-- ~ ,_ '" "'" 0 tl.O C,) CIS 0...... :>, 0 ....Q.l .......s.... o.tl.O<I.l~ ~o. :;'f~~ ::::(1) ] o.~..!!! ..!!!:5 an~~~ ~.E ~ -= go~ :>'"0 E 8.:a ~ ~ CIS 0 ><.EQ) ~~ . ~ CIS "'" .- 1 :B~ .e. CO :: "C I "'" Q) <I.l ui "'" <I.l .....Q)..c:Q)Q) C,)'- Q).!:<:IIl><S .....:>, ~:il~~o ~:g 'O.E '60$,5 S ~gf~Qj"6' I ......;;; CIS S >:;g .0 S ..!.. 0 Q) s:: S::=<I.lO~Cll ;;;;::;...;~""'~,g ._,g ~ ,5 Q) ~ Q) :8 ~ .be; :5 ..... tI) _ ~ -_ ..c: CO "'0 tI):::: ~ "",Q)ClSS::CIS'O .....IIl=ClSs::.....Z :glil>,g1;;o. s::= Cll..c: ECIS CIS ~..c:"O"'" ."'" ,- Qj"~ S~:5 "'" g~s::""'~.~ ~S~~~ ~ SClSCIS~S~ =811l~o.IIl"'" o~.cfgj~IIl os:::>,<I.l Q)"", ..c: CIS tl.O..... 0..... ..c: .-..... >< 0 S Q) ._ ~^rx.. s:: ..c: = CIS III 0 ~ :>, s::..c: i: Q) g .~ gr..... ..c: 0 s:: Cll ._ s:: S o_..c: "O.IIl ~ - :g;E ~ ~.gt: on......Q) ClJ"O Q) ~oCll8""'CIS ~ga:5.o~~ "0 go <I.l tl.O{5 gr - III CIS III :>,_..c: ~.b~s::"O ._SQ):::CIS<I.l __ ClJ __ ~::; Q) -> ~ en..o..c C'tS :::-- Q) 'Q)~""''''''CIS=<I.l~ .fl~E-toS::!>~ ",o.OlllS::.E::> - ~'" =0 ::::.8,g d.> >. I cr...... " s::CIS~Q)Q)""'''''' Q)>:>'ClJ .: ~ 6;, ~ 5 8. 8. :5 :::: ~ S C :2;Q)Q) 0"",0 Q).....O jg C,)"'" 0.Q)"'" .....- C,) .....:::: S ..c:o. .Cll 0.:; s:: Q) o III CIS Q) tl.O tl.O s:: ~..c: 0.0 '0' > "'" = Q) 1;; ,: :a'- 0...... Q) ~ CIS o ""0 :>, s:: Q) 0 0. <I.l-"O ..c: .....><Cll<l.lClSCIS~ClJQ):>,Q)"O :>, C,)ClSS Q):>,,,,o.Q)..c:<I.l'-::C E E-t >< S Cll 8 "'" 6;,':::: 5 S CIS :a "'" ~ ~ _ 0.,: ~ Cll :il..c::>, .g Q) ~ C'tS ~ == ~.~ CfJ e: Q) C ~ > ..c: :>,'_ ~._ ""'..... > CIS 0. __ U') ~ tI') Q) s-. ""C -- E en :;~~lil~~:5~Q)~~ Q) C,) N tl.Oo."'" Q).......c: 0.- Q)"O tl.O Q)::::s::otl.Os::o.....><~O'Q) s:: ><._ CIS "'" ~ ~ <I.l Q) >< 0. CIS Q)U..c:o. 0~Q) ",Q)~ ii . C,) Q)Q)Cll><><~s::..c:<1i ~ ~ Q) ~ 5 S J:: ~ ~ S::'- o..~ U ~..c: ,_ ~ 0 Q) .. CIS 'tl.O 0 0 E-t -+-Jcn~..c(,)~ ..cc~Q) C,)._ CIS 0. e ", ""';-w?ilf~::-:-:' , .: "'::;'~~,,'k~.r:; , , ,r: 2! E/kHiv~f;~~~.~:!'lews I Wednesday, November 30,1994 ~"",,'..__ ~"~.' -.<-.........:.1 - Property taxes are UP' on,~ . homes that were revalued by Don Heinzman flat and thus waS not revalued. Editor Ty Bischoff, Sherburne County The good news is the property assessor, said state law requires tax rate is down in School Dis- the property values to be raised. triet 728. Don't blame the assessor, he Thebadnewsisthatjustabout says. School boards, city coun- every residential property owner cils and town boards decide how in the school district got an in- much money should be spent. crease. If the city, school and county What gives? had decided to spend less, taxes All residential property in would have gone down. Sherburne County was revalued . Anyone who wants to complain \ by the Sherburne County about their tax bill and how the \ Assessor's Office by 7 to 15 per- money is being spent can pro- l cent. . test at the Truth in Taxation l '. Wright County Assessor Doug , hearings scheduled this and I Gruber said values in the school next month. ; district from his county also are There is a catch 22 iri the news' I up by a similar 7 to. 15 per cent. ' that the amount of the property ! Real estate is a hot' commodity tax levy is down. It's downbe-, ~,; .. d :;;;?~r:tr;~I13;~Y~ ~~ ..~. :~th:~tar,.~~.,'.~,~,..'~~:~+ ?~ ~ecOinIh1!rCIalandmdo.stria1 "":>;~"~'" . . , r 'real estate inarke~ however, is Taxes, continued ~J~.~ge 13 .....-~...~;i../....'l:> -,-' -....... In Brief Continued frOJDpage 1 Hearing on city's taxes is Monday The Truth in Taxation hearing for the city of Elk , River will be Monday at 7 p.m. in the Elk River City Hall. It Will be continued Dee, 12 at City Hall at 8 p.m. taxa's'" .' ,;.,:...;'~{) . . .j~~';.L ., . ,,- . !~ ~i ;; ContbJ:ued from page 2.::.::::.j ',n'T" . ".\ 'i}t~' \ r iriA~t ~.Jisf.>'prov;d'~~:"~;:;::r":~:';{$~ ::~~~2~~~~ ru~': l:o=e:~~~7.':~~/:i~ ~.Sherburne CountyAuditoreent. '. .. percent. . ..' ...;.,t,t:f/fi""'~),i:,~"f i^ ~mo!la Doebler shows reduc- :' In part of Big Lake Township . In Zimmerman, the"amountof!)0~;/ i.. tio~s mresidential homestead in the Elk River school district, . ' ,taxes for an $80,000 home would :~:' Ii prop.ertyt~es i,n most areas of the owner of an $80,000 home drop $73,or6percent.,~:..".,<~.",~,,,' ~ . t~~~~I~~t~~~trt?~~~~G~~t~:~Br~l~~Ptt~1f~l~;~6~fu~:f~A I For example, m Elk RIver, the cent: ers of. commerCIal and mdus- . \ o.vvn~r.. of an, $80,000 home-', In Livonia Township, an trial properties.: t ~f'':~'~,;-'..-1:.'>.';: .~ .:'f ~~'.;:~ .~.. ' 1,' ~ ~ .' 'j e "I. The Current o Printed on recycled paper he City of Elk River Newsletter Vol. 5, No.6-December 1994 Council adopts preliminary 1995 tax levy and general fund budget On September 12, 1994, the Elk River City Council adopted the Preliminary 1995 Tax Levy and General Fund Budget. The resolution adopted by the council calls for a maximum net tax levy of $2,223,347 and a maximum general fund budget of$3,807,700. The council by law cannot increase these amounts but it may decrease both the levy and the general fund budget prior to final adoption in December. In fact, the council has already decreased the general fund budget to $3,787,250. The follow- ing two charts show where the 1995 general fund revenues will come from and how they are proposed to be spent in 1995. 1995 PROJECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUES licenses & Permits 5% Fines 2% Intergovernmental ~.W""" "T Transfers from Other Funds 7% Charges for Service Other Revenues 4% 10% 1995 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES Parks & Recreation Contingency 8% 5% Streets/Public Works 16% Building Insp ./Planning 10% Public Safety 43% NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES The Elk River City Council will hold a public hearing on its budget and on the amount of property taxes it is proposing to collect to pay for the costs of services the city will provide in 1995. A TrEND THE PUBLIC HEARING 7\11 Elk River re'sidents are invited to attend the public hearing of the City Council to express their opinions on the budget and on the proposed amount of property taxes on: Monday, December 5, at 7:00 p.m. Elk River Ci Hall, 13065 Orono Parkwa , Elk River As you can see, 47 percent of the general fund revenues come from property taxes. Property taxes are also collected to fund the library, pay debt on capital equipment and other bond issues, and, new this year, to pay for surface (storm) water management debt and expenses. The city of Elk River receives approximately 20 percent of the property tax paid by Elk River property owners. The remainder goes to School District 728, Sherburne County, the Elk River Economic Development Authority, and the Elk River Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The following pie chart shows the actual distribution for taxes payable in 1994. These percentages have remained very consistent over the past several years. 1994 PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION Sherburne County 19% HRA & EDA 1% City of Elk River 20% School District 728 60% When you get your Notice of Proposed Property Tax for 1995 statement, keep in mind that the city's percentage increase stated for your property will apply to only the 20 percent of your total property tax bill that will be paid to the city. Also please remember that increases in your property value as determined by the county assessor will affect your percentage increase. If you live in the urban service district and your property value did not increase, your statement will show a 9.5 percent increase. If you live in the rural service district and your property value did not increase, your state- ment will show a 15.5 percent increase. The City Council will hold a public hearing on December 5 to discuss and take public comment on the levy and budget. The meeting will be held at the Elk River City Hall, 13065 Orono Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. The final 1995 Property Tax Levy and General Fund budget will be adopted at a subse- quent council meeting. The public is invited to attend the public hearing. 2 Steering cODlDlittee looks at property tax . Robert Minton, eering Committee Chairman The biggest share of property taxes, we are often told, is paid by business and industry. Individual homes, so the story goes, do not carry their own weight, be- cause the cost of services from the city and schools far exceeds the amount they pay in taxes. The balance is made up by business. Well, we wanted some proof of this conventional wisdom on the Compre- hensive Plan Steering Committee, and city staff member Steve Ach found a study that amply demonstrates the ben- efits that business pays to homeowners. The study also has the advantage of being more or less local, from the city of Lakeville The study took the commercial and industrial zones of that city, and some- how computed the cost of all tax-paid services to those properties. What they found was thatfullyone-thirdofall taxes collected by the city were in excess of the Mt of services. .. When taxes paid to the school district were brought into the equation, the dif- ference between taxes paid and taxes used became rather astounding. That is because businesses as such do not send children to schools, but they do pay a lot of property taxes to school districts. For both city and school services, businesses paid about five times more taxes than the cost of the services they used. In other words, when businesses pay property taxes, about one-fifth of those taxes pay for the services they use, and 8lSS;~'<Si.."S.:OS;. ;t.o" :@! ~..*>> four-fifths are used to subsidize homeowners. Even more surprising to me, on a per acre basis, commercially zoned property excesses in Lakeville were almost twice as much as those from industrial zones. So commercial properties not only subsi- dize homeowner property taxes, but they also do it very efficiently in tenns ofland use. When the application for Elk Park Center was under consideration by the Planning Commission, several residents expressed the concern that the develop- mentwould increase their property taxes. Quite the opposite appears to be em- phatically troe, and if you are concerned about property taxes, this information should not be taken lightly. The implications for updating the comprehensive plan are clear. In future development, there has to be a healthy balance between the residential, indus- trial, and commercial zones. This is im- portant not only for property taxes, but also for jobs in the local area. Moreover, the industrial and commercial zones have to be preserved well in advance, because once they become residential, it would be extremely difficult politically to change them. These are some of the issues we will be considering at future meetings of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Commit- tee. The meetings are announced in the Star News, and at those meetings, the future of your community will be consid- ered. We hope you will join us in our discussions. Storm water fee dropped . In July, 1994, the Elk River City Council discussed the possibility of cre- ating a surface water management fee that would be charged against all prop- erty owners in order to help finance stonn water improvement projects. It was in- tended that this fee would be included with the garbage, electric, water, and sewer bills that are sent out by the Mu- nicipal Utilities. After receiving a sig- nificant amount of public input from area citizens and property owners, the City Council has decided not to imple- ment this proposed surface water man- agement fee. In deciding not to charge reside.nts and property owners a monthly stonn water management fee on their utility bills, the council looked at alternative financing approaches. In order to meet the city's debt requirement for stonn water ~provement projects, the City Council has decided to consider a city- wide tax levy for debt and ongoing ex- penses that are necessary to manage the city's stonn water runoff. RECYCLING CALENDAR DECEMBER 123 4 ~~~~i~~iii:l~t~~~:~ili:I:~I~ii~~:~~~I:~ 1 0 111213 14 15 16 17 181:I[il~~[::;~:::.. Iii 24 252627 28 29 30 31 JANUARY 1 j~~~~~I~~~;1~:~I:~:~~;11:~::i:~;~11~:I~:: 7 8....~..J9..J..t.Jg...1.~ 14 15::i~II:~~ii:::~ill::~~il::::li121 222324 25 26 27 28 ..............~...................... ................... 29:a0131@:I ................... - Shaded areas represent recycling weeks SOURCE OF FUNDS 1992 1993 1994 1995 ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED GENERAL PROPERTY TAX $1,161,536 $1,340,216 $1 A96,850 $1,791,100 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES 831, 11 7 878,882 924,850 902,550 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 278A62 394,652 403,100 386,300 FINES & FORFEITS 103,618 77,555 97,350 80,000 LICENSES & PERMITS 144,652 205,783 158,250 197,950 OTHER REVENUES 97,909 125,946 101,700 106,700 TRANSFERS 226,250 201,920 212,650 267,650 TOTAL $2,843,544 $3,224,954 $3,394,750 $3,732,250 GENERAL PROPERTY TAX Ad V alorem Tax $1,791,100 $1,791,100 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES Local Government Aid HACA Police Relief Gravel Tax Landfill Surcharge Urban Street Maintenance Police Training Reimbursement 247,100 494,950 83,500 34,000 1 0,000 28,000 5,000 902,550 CHARGES FOR SERVICES GENERAL GOVERNMENT Administrative Project Fees Plan Check Fees Planning & Zoning Fees Sewer Inspection Fees Miscellaneous Sales Assessment Searches .......................................... 60,000 77,000 12,800 1,500 1,300 6,500 .......................................... .......................................... PUBLIC SAFETY School Liaison Police Contract Police Contribution (NSP & Landfill) Impound Fees Fire Calls & Contracts ........................................... 50,000 14,000 39,500 900 58,000 .......................................... .......................................... .......................................... PUBLIC WORKS Street Services .......................................... 2,000 4 . RECREATION Recreation Fees Softball League Fees FINES & FORFEITS Court Fines LICENSES & PERMITS PERMITS Building Permits Building Permit Surcharge Plumbing & Heating Permits Contractor License Surcharge LICENSES Dog Cigarette Liquor Amusement Gas Fitters Garbage Haulers Mineral Extraction Apartment Licenses Other Business OTHER REVENUE Interest Contribution-Municipal Utilities Contribution-Guardian Angels Refunds & Reimbursements TRANSFERS Liquor Landfill Equipment Reserve-Elections Equipment Reserve Street Reserve Secondary DARE Sewer Economic Development Authority Housing & Redevelopment Authority Fund Balance Reserved for Cash Flow TOTAL .......................................... .......................................... .......................................... 5 . 51 ,400 11 .400 80,000 131,300 450 24,500 2,200 800 300 24,000 2,300 750 250 9,000 o 2,100 30,000 72,000 3,700 1,000 153,450 1,200 o 30,500 25,000 50,000 6,000 1,000 500 Q , . 386,300 80,000 197,950 e 106,700 267,650 $3,732,250 . APPROPRIATIONS SUMMARY 1992 1993 1994 1995 Actual Actual Adopted Proposed MA YOR & COUNCIL 50,093 50,093 62,850 63,250 ADMINISTRA TION & FINANCE 281,781 337,077 395,100 416,100 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 60,461 0 38,900 34,350 ELECTIONS 18,339 0 12,700 7,500 LEGAL 33,672 36,218 35,000 40,000 ENGINEERING 28,074 28,827 28,000 30,000 BUILDING & ZONING 231,389 239,112 198,900 242,500 PLANNING 226 0 109,700 127,300 PLANNING COMMISSION 1 ,464 7,763 4,950 6,450 DA T A PROCESSING 13,523 16,174 22,550 21,650 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 53,990 59,969 78,600 94,200 POLICE 1,054,329 1,159,866 1,260,200 1,318,600 POLICE RESERVE 7,102 0 17,200 25,000 FIRE 197,772 201,806 230,050 242,500 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 11,711 17,672 10,750 7,450 STREETS 412,490 0 410,000 430,550 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT. 64,109 73,982 61,950 66,100 SNOW REMOVAL 38,207 54,039 80,800 90,150 STREET LIGHTING 1,015 894 1,500 1,500 SHADE TREE 8,502 0 9,350 9,550 PARKS 82,924 100,405 91,900 88,800 RECREA TION 111,530 0 132,250 152,650 SR. CITIZEN PROGRAMS 25,052 0 31,550 32,600 CONTINGENCY 14,934 1 3, 1 00 70,000 183,500 TOTAL 2.802.689 $2.396.997 $3.394.750 $3,732.250 IV. RESOLUTION 94 - A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER . A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1995 WHEREAS, the Elk River City Council has reviewed the City's anticipated expenditures for all funds in 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Elk River City Council has considered projected revenues for all funds in 1995; and, WHEREAS, revenues from sources other than property taxes are not sufficient to meet anticipated expenditures of all funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Elk River that the proposed General Fund Budget in the amount of $3,732,250 is hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Elk River that the following amounts be levied as property taxes payable in 1995. General Fund Library Dam Loan 1977 G.O. Refunding Surface Water Management City Special Assessments 1989 Fire Equipment 1991 Certificate of Indebtedness 1992 Certificate of Indebtedness 1993 Certificate of Indebtedness 1994 Certificate of Indebtedness 1995 Certificate of Indebtedness TOTAL Gross Levy $2,286,082 50,600 32,572 29,300 210,000 38,331 69,747 18,822 23,437 24,853 25,000 29,000 $2,837,744 HACA Reduction $494,957 10,955 7,052 6,344 45,467 8,299 15,101 4,075 5,074 5,381 5,413 6,279 $614,397 Net Levy $1,791,125 39,645 25,520 22,956 164,533 30,032 54,646 14,747 18,363 19,472 19,587 22,721 $2,223,347 . Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Elk River this _ day of December, 1994. Henry A. Duitsman, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra A. Thackeray, City Clerk 77. .