Loading...
5.2. SR 07-21-2008REQUEST FOR ACTION To Item Number Ci Council 5.2. Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by Communi Develo ment ul 21, 2008 Chris Leeseber ,Park Planner-Planner Item Description Reviewed by Request by Christina Simon for Variance to Lot Frontage erem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er Requirements, Case No. V 08-07 - Public Hearing Reviewed by Action Requested Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request, as illustrated on drawings dated 4-28-08, for the following reasons: 1. Literal enforcement will not cause undue hardship as the property already has a viable use (a duplex) on it without a variance. 2. There is no hardship nor special conditions and circumstances. The conditions of the site existed prior to the applicant purchasing the property. The current conditions, lot size and setbacks, meet the zoning requirements. 3. The applicant was aware of the conditions of the site prior to purchasing the property; which is a duplex on a single parcel of land. 4. The property owner is not being deprived of any rights. The property already has a viable use (a duplex) on it without a variance. Board of Adjustment Discussion The Board of Adjustment, on July 8, 2008, unanimously denied the request based on staff recommendations for denial. They agreed that the lot line could be adjusted in a manner which would not require a variance (Exhibit "A") and access for the driveway could be covered by means of an easement. Public Comment No one spoke at the Board of Adjustment public hearing. Attachments • Staff report to Planning Commission dated July 8, 2008 ACtlon Motion by Second by Vote Follow Up S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\Variance\V 08-07 Simon\V 08-07_CC.doc REQUEST FOR ACTION To Item Number Board of Adjustments Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by Board of Adjustments ul 8, 2008 Chris Leeseber ,Park Planner-Planner Item Description Reviewed by Request by Christina Simon for Variance to Lot Frontage erem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er Requirements, Public Hearing -Case No. V OS-07 Reviewed by Action Requested Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustments denies the request, as illustrated on drawings dated 4-28-08, for the following reasons: 1. Literal. enforcement will not cause undue hardship as the property already has a viable use (a duplex) on it without a variance. 2. There is no hardship nor special conditions and circumstances. The conditions. of the site existed prior to the applicant purchasing the property. The current conditions, lot size and setbacks, meet the zoning requirements. 3. The applicant was aware of the conditions of the site prior to purchasing the property; which is a duplex on a single parcel of land. 4. The property owner is not being deprived of any rights. The property already has a viable use (a duplex) on it without a variance. Background/Discussion The applicant has purchased the subject property with the intent of subdividing the property and selling each unit as a single family residence. To subdivide the property in the manner desired, a variance is required as the. east lot would be 10-feet smaller than allowed by the R2a zoning district There are two neighboring lots have been subdivided in the past (1983 & 1984) but it is unclear what the regulations. were at that time fox subdividing properties. Additionally, should the variance be approved, a Conditional Use Permit will be necessary for the zero lot line. Attachments • Location Map Applicant's Narrative, Site Plan, Plat Exhibit & Surrounding Properties Information 2006 Aerial Exhibit "A" Case File: V 08-07 Page 2 General Information Christina Simon Applicant Christina Sitnon 60 Day Rule The application has been deemed complete as of May $, 2008. The City must take action by June 28, 2008 Requested Action Lot Frontage Variance Location and Size Approximately .67-acres on the south side of 192°d Avenue near the Lowell Street alignment. Location Existing Use Land Use Plan Designation Current Zoning Subject Property Duplex UR -Urban Residential R2a-Two Family Residential North Single Family UR R1c-Single Family South Apartments UR R4-Multi Family East Duplex UR RZa West Duplex UR R2a Overview The applicant purchased the subject property, which is approximately.67-acres in size, with an existing duplex with the intent to subdivide the property. The require lot width fox the R2a zoning is 80-feet and the applicant is proposing a 70-foot width, which would require a 10-foot variance. The property can be subdivided without a variance but the property line would not be in a logical location and easements (utility/ access) would be required. See Exhibit "A" According to the applicant's narrative, both units have their own private seweY systems but share one well. Should the variance be approved, in order to be subdivided (which would be separate. applications, a Lot Split Subdivision and a Conditional Use Permit for a Zero Lot Line Development) the applicant would have to provide plans that show a professionally designed septic system, including the size and locations of primary and secondary systems on each lot. The applicant stated they would install a second well prior to the sale/split. Although these septic and well issues have an effect on the ultimate lot split, they technically do not affect the variance review. These issues will be reviewed at the platting process. S:APLANNINCr MAIN\Case Files\Variance\V 08-07 Simon\V OS-07_BA-2.doc Case File: V 08-07 Page 3 AQplicable Regulations Variance Criteria 7. Literal en orcement o~the ordinance will cause undue hardship. Christina Simon Literal enforcement will not cause undue hardship as the property already has a viable use (a duplex) on it without a variance. The property can be subdivided without a variance. 2. The hardship is caused b~ special conditions and circumstances avhich are peculiar to the ~ro~erty and the structure involved and. which are not characteristic of or applicable to. other lands or structure in the same area. There is no hardship nor special conditions and circumstances. The conditions of the site existedprior to the applicant purchasing the property. The current conditions, lot size and setbacks, meet the zoning requirements. 3. The special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the petitioner's oavn action or inaction. The applicant was aware of the conditions of the site prior to purchasing the property; which is a duplex on a single parcel of land. 4. The literal a~lication o~ the provi rion ~- o~ this ordinance avould deprive the petitioner o~rights enioyed by other properties in the same district under the terms o~this ordinance. The property owner is not being deprived of any rights. The property already has a viable use (a duplex) on it without a variance. 5. The variance will not be in,~uriouc to or adversel~a~fect the health sae or aa~e~are of the residents of the city or the neighborhood where the property i r located and will be in kee~iing avith spirit and intent of the ordinance. A variance would not be injurious. Action Motion by Sccond by Vote Follow Up S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\Variance\V 08-07 Simon\V 08-07_BA-2.doc ~' _ o 'i 9 ~ ~ h F~ 'E ~ i ~ ~_ ~ ~~ `~ c~ ~ ~ 194ih , ~ ~~ _ `~ F ~ D z ~ c~ ~~ / ~ i ~ I I ~~ I ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ CIR ~ j ~~~'~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ R}~ ~ T , 1" r _ _ ~ - -~~~~ D ~ - ~~ ~ ~I ~ ~ f i ` - G LF~N RD 1 R~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ KILL ~,~~~ ~ -- ,~_.-~-,~, ~~~ ,~ ~ ;-~ ~ _'/ L ~}~ ~ g0 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~C'~r~~~ ~ ~~ ~ J~3ry~ A~E~~ ~ ~, o ~ ~> ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ / ~/ ~ ~ ~ L ++++~~ ++ ~ ~ (193rd ~ • ~ - _ - . ~. ~ ~~ .V A ,, ~Q.++~+ ~~ _ ~ -, ' ~ ~ ~ RIDGEWOOD _~ s + +~t~+ ~ ~ / PARK ~~ ~ 1 ,A _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ T v ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ' C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ A ' ~ " SALK ~ - d A E ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' MIDDLE SCHOOL -~h ~ , i ~- - i ' ~ i ~ Cr ~ 1 - R'~ SITE - i -~ ~,, ~, ~ ~ E -~ - -- ~ - ` ~1 - - r~_ j;i ~s~ t ~a ~ ~/ ~ ELK i w K - A~ R -~ ~ ~ WW ~ ~ ~ p ~ TE ~~9, s ~ -- ~' H~i ~~~ _ ~ ~„ ;~ c ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ _- -- -~ _ ~ Y ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ICE ARENA ~ L ~ ~_ ~~ ~ ~ ~ F- ~n ~ ii _ ~ o ~ ~ LINCOLN PARKER VANDENBERGE ELK RIVER ~ ELEMENTARY ELEMENT~IRY w MIDDLE SCHOOL L I HIGH SCHOOL Q ~ SCHOOL SCHO L ~ SCTIOOL ST ___ -J `_ -- .._ _T-._ - -- , .- ~ ~~ ~ A ~ -- _ -- -- ~ l i no ~~ ~ I ~ ~T --- i z ~ ~ - - o -- ? ~ ~ - - ~ ~ JQ 1 > - - - ~ J Q . , ~ j _ 0 ~ - ~ - c Private Drives Location Map ct of N y El -~-1 '~" Case Number: V 08-07 CHRISTINA SIMON River 11938 / 11948 192ND Ave NW -Elk River, MN 55330 (Request for Variance of Frontage for 11938 192nd Ave NV~ Answers to all 5 requirements of a variance questions: 1. This property was purchased with the intent to rent out both units for a short time. and then subdivide and re-sell each unit as a single family /twin home dwelling. Currently both units are rented, but rents are behind and causing me to move up my plans to subdivide and re-sell this property. If a variance is not permitted, and rents continue as is, this property could face foreclosure as I could not re-coupe what is owed on this property should I try to re-sell this property as a duplex in today's market. The value is in having this property subdivided into 2 single family dwellings, not in its' current duplex state. If a variance, thus subdivide is permitted, I can re-sell both properties independently and avoid yet another foreclosure in the city. 2. Special Conditions and Circumstances do apply in this district to support my request for a variance of frontage, thus a subdivide: ~. `Single Family Setbacks' require 80' of frontage and 10,000 sq ft per lot (Town Homes require 20' of frontage and 5,500 sq ft per lot) Our property is a duplex, but with a subdivide would be considered a twin home. o Should we subdivide, the east lot (11938) would measure approximately 70x142.94x70x142.94 = 10,005.$ sq ft which meets square footage requirements, but would need variance for 70' versus required 80' frontage requirements if going by single family requirements o -The west lot (11948) would then measure approximately 100.62x142.94x160x175.06 =19,180 square feet which meets both square footage and frontage requirements for single family residences. • Facts regarding other properties in this same district (on this same street and same plat) that support my request for a variance of frontage: o Property Owners tend to take better care of their personal residences; if we are to subdivide this property, it would be sold as 2 separate twin homes and most likely purchased by a home owner not an investor looking for a rental property. This helps values in the area. I would assume this also helps the city with property tax income. o Lot 20 Block 2 =non homestead and not subdivided o Lot 21 Block 2 (subject Property =non homestead) o .Lot 22 Block 2 (11922 192nd Ave NW) =Homestead and Subdivided ^ Lot Sq Ft = 11,761 per tax records ^ Dimensions approximately 75x 142x91 x 142 per lot drawing dimensions in property 11912 192nd Ave's file at the City • 75' of frontage does not meet single family frontage requirements but it was allowed to be subdivided o Lot 22 Block 2 (11912 192nd Ave NV~ =Homestead and Subdivided ^ Lot Sq Ft = 12,196 per tax records ^ Dimensions 95.6x142.94x78.81x142 per lot drawing in this file at the city ~~~`~1~ ~.__ -~k'-~ ~ ^ This is the only property in this neighborhood that meets the City's frontage and lot square footage requirements for a subdivide. o Lot 23 Block 2 =Homestead in 2007 but recently sold, remodeled and rented out. Assuming 2008 taxes will reflect a non homestead (rentals) o Lot 24 Block 2 of the original Ridgewood East Plat has been allowed to be subdivided into 4 parcels (A-D), all of which are now homestead properties. There are currently 2 sets of twin homes on these 4 parcels, and 2 of the 4 are well /septic properties (see below) and do not meet frontage or lot square footage requirements. The other set of twin homes may or may not be well septic, but they too do not meet city guidelines. o Lot 24 Block 2 (11868192°d Ave NV~ =Homestead and Subdivided ^ Lot Sq Ft = 8,276 per tax records ^ Dimensions 53x142x64x142 per lot drawing in this file at the City (this property was allowed to be subdivided with 53' of road frontage, less than 10,000 sq feet on the lot and it too is a well and septic property o Lot 24 Block 2 (11866192° Ave NV~ =Homestead and Subdivided ^ Lot Sq Ft = 4,356 per tam records ^ Dimensions 32.02 g 142.09 (this property was allowed to be subdivided with only 32' of frontage, less than 10,000 sq feet on the lot, and it too is well and septic.) j~~ ~~ ;-z„s, • There are several properties on this same street (and in this same plat) that are currently subdivided that do not meet city guidelines for a single family split. o My property at 11948 / 11938 192°a Ave NW in Elk River meets the square footage requirements for both lots should a subdivide be allowed. o The only variance that needs to be given is for frontage requirements on the property at 11938192"d Ave NW. After the property is split, this lot would have approximately 70' of frontage versus the 80' of frontage required by the city on a single family lot split. o Currently both units have their own private sewer systems but share one well. The property to the east, 11938 192°d Ave NW would then need to have its' own private well installed prior to the sale /split. • All properties that have been allowed to be subdivided are currently homesteaded properties and those that are still one PID are investment /rental properties. It will only help the neighborhood values to allow for a subdivide and sell each unit as a homesteaded property. 3. No special conditions or circumstances are due to my own actions or inactions. 4. Other properties in this same district have been allowed to be subdivided and do not meet the city's frontage and lot square footage requirements. By allowing this property to also be subdivided, you are only helping to increase property values in this neighborhood, not putting any home owners at risk in the least bit. 5. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of any of the residents of the City or the neighborhood. ~~ I 71938 / y1948192ND AVENUE NW, ELK RIPER -e• LOT 2'f, @LOCit 2, RIDGEWOOD EAST N 1" 40' .~ ~~~ 5~ ~~c 892ND Aim ~y S2.b2 ~~,~ac~Z ~ qo ~~ ~ ~ 7c~ ~~ Accommodat plat drawing r I95.i)6 ~~~ . FILE COPY 14234 a~~ti~ ~ ~'~ _ LswinQ sn..aarvd+r~i++u~d ~ enact on •,A~wi imp.aan d m• pm>,.. rlonalpurya w t G» ooaW~Y ~ h~ for -~-'+!4~ wTD~saa or.H.• 230 0~~' u ~]o x ~~Z.~~ x '7~ ~ 1~z.9~- /ar nn5. ~ f~ ~L l~r~~(rz ~ 1'~2:`~`~ ~ ~GcL~ !`1S~Lcc: ~-~ ~~ ~~ r „ 3 ~-~1 (~ ~.Z' 1 STnRY I8 FRE 20 TW SHED ~ ~ ~$~Q~ ~~ p ~ ` $$ ~"~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~t ,, _~ ~~ W °o 3 0 oc r m W ~oa i Y ~ ~. ~ q i ~O ~ 4 y iN * y~ 1;~ L ,~ a. ,~ ~~ ~~. rTTY OF ELK RIVrR P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • (763) 441-4900 r _ocation of job ~ (~ ~Q ~ 4Z ~-v ~~ ', 9wner 1~''1 ~Y' ~ V~ 1 r'iP~L\ Address .icensed Designer ~~ ~? ~~r~ License # cg ~ l - + +1Cr- License # ~ Ct~-/ .icensed Installer ' ~ ~ ~ - >ignature Date ~- aG - y'~ (Show location of house, tank, drainfield, property line and well) N W ® P. + 5 a~ ..~ , p2,~ ~~h ~~ ~4 ~~ vSh t ~ ~ _^_~ / .~ ~! E-^1 F~ ~.L. .~ c~s~ n~ sr n i w'~a.~ C .~' ~ . ~~ mss, ~}~ ~_._ n~1• 1 ~ /~fi'" a ~ ~jpp~i~l+y} P~i~' ~( '~~ ~~~ "7 ~C rr2 ~~r~~ fi~~ ,!. • C~•G~ '~? C/ .~'L`5L . s~~~. ~ 1 r •s? !/ _/ ~ ~ ~ IE""•~ ~ad5i ~~~~~ ~`~ r~/hZ f h~~ #~sn ~'~~~ ~~~y )mac r `~~ L,o sue, ~ .` ~ ~~r~Q r~ 7 73L1j ii;~(f{i /Cr ,r NOTE: On ALL replacements and additions, tanks must be exposed for baffle inspection. COMMENTS: New Work ^ Outside Lift ~ Replacement ~ Ejector ^ Addition ^ Gravity ^ Mound System D Tank Size I'Zcc~ C` Tank Size ~~ ~~ S uare Foota e of Drainfield Area ~ Z De th of Rock Under Pie ~~ De th of Rock Over Pie ~ ~ `t Graveless De th of Dirt Cover ~'' ~~~ Number of Bedrooms THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT BY A LICENSED INSTALLER (ASBUILT) (1) CITY COPY, (2) OWNER COPY, (3) LICENSED INSTALLER COPY DATE B ~" ~C"' INSPECTOR COMMENTS MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Update Date 2003/10/10 Unique No. 00127221 WELL AND BORING RECORD EMry Date 1988/04/17 County Name Sherburne Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed Township Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection ft 1 ~ ft 1877/10/27 ~ ~ ~y 28 ADDDDA 190 Well Name BAUFIELD, MARY Drilling Method Non-specified Rotary Drilling Fluid Well Hydrofractured? ^ Yes ^ No Contact's Name BAUFIELD, MARY ft From ft. to 11948192ND NW AV Use Domestic Casing Drive Shce? ^ Yes ^ N Hole Diameter Casing Diameter WeigM(IbstR) GEOLOGICAL MATERIAL COLOR HARDNESS FROM TO 4 in. to 185 ft SAND BROW 0 50 CLAY BLUE ~ 150 WATER SAND BROW 150 190 Screen Y I Open Hole From ft. to ft• Make JOHNSON Type L piameter Slot Length Set Fitting 2 ft. to ft Date 1977/10/27 Static Water Level 70 ft. from Land surface PUMPING LEVEL (below land surface) 80 ft. after 3 hrs. pumping 30 9•P•m- Well Head Completion Pigess adapter mfr Model ^ 12 in. above grade Casing Protection ^ At-grade(Ernironmental Wells and Borings ONLY) No Grouting Infomration Wefl grouted? ©Y~ Material From To lft.l AmountlVds/ba4s1 Y Nearest Known Source of Contamination ~ ft, direction. WeN disinfected upon completion? ©Yes ^ No pub ^ Not Installed Date Installed Y Mfr name AERMOTOR Model Np 0.75 Volts Drop Pipe Length 72 ft. Capacity 9•P•m Type S No Any not in use and not sealed well(s) on Property'? ^ Yes Was a variance granted from the MDH for this Well? ^ Yes ^ No USGS Quad: Elk River Elevation: 965 Well CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION Lic. Or Reg. No. 27 Aquifer: QBAA AR Id: License Business Name ~~ r~~ Report Copy Name of Driller 70:2638757 MRY-9-2006 08:16 FROM:MERWIN & ASSOCIRTES 7638560901 + T-4Z0 P 001/003 F-P4g yAY-Od-2006 16:12 Flt0il4-CALL CENrR • - 2/29/02 yVaterj4Yastawater1Sf5913 C©mp(iance Inspection Forn1 for Exisfiins rotnnesota Poltutiart ,~ Individual SewageTreatmenC SysCems CcntrotAgeney CvmDJouot) olUUe /orm RdIUJs the minlmeJ teCuJremeMs olMGn~lwlSws ~eo} ol~nca~egvUemarnts ~ortbedrOm eddlgo~~ Pteaso refs & ~~~~~ Date ofln~pection, `=~-•,~-~.,,.-~ ReasonforlnspectJan; ~~--~---- ~~• ~• . >' Telephone ( ).;~~rfL. ==c~~ Property owner{sj •~=~- ~ ~~ ~ )ephon4 ~ ~~ Person requestlng lnspaet}o~i _ City /'rJ~ep- XJp Code G SitaAddress ~ Township '• ' Pire No.~ Parcel No. ~ County Legal Desalptton y £ ~r LoalRegulaWryA ti~nrrN C ~~]L ..~ '.7 sterrtin Shvreland Area: yes system !n Wefiht3ad. Dato systehi toastruded ;~ j •-+---- ~ ocat Permtt # pf arty) ~. Protection Area: yey~}srysttsm serving a MA}i Ilcensed faelilty: ya~~ ~. - SYseertrs bulit prior to Apr11 1, 1996 and not located in ` Shoreland pr Wellhead P~gteetlpn Area or 5ervinq a Food, ,~,..r, (,s~'~•;j •~verage or Lodging EstabUshFnpnt s•tlie'sX,Qetiianiinintrientthr•eafito'a~611ch ate__tkcr •.Dtschefgaol'sett^sgxtoq?49rgJpdsurfaea7 YES ;• Dlscharlraectstwtgge tt;dratntite or surface water~l YES ;,5ewa9a.-4.~!PNtt~~~1pA9? .••, •. - YES 0 4Sltuathm wltq the potcntla! to, )mmedlately and • adversely Intgad or thnss!en p•.rbltt: htwFth or TFS~ safaty9 1" fY1M.1 Y t~~g~3@,pi,~attlnaT(a yes aRsrvarls a fellliigsYstem) = L'eu~U!~~~~fcro`v~r~tt~(,separabop betweSn "• . •Sjrstem,bptrovl•p~tiJt4?a!$-ao!! ortxdr•oeKl r ~ Yr:s O• - A ~a4~P.yf~~olftl9~WJ; orlQach}rlg pit? Y~ r~ ~ }ie•Ilalsn }n;•I1,~hfx •Ii0• • Is, the svsfem non•ctimoliant? - !a the syatom rogutatad tmdor a mon#toring plt+n or opeaatnng pertntti P!•no, po ro pegs 2) YES ..tr~a~ • !•las the fegUhttd monlloAng taken pface~ YES NO (rl na ~Q al'tt~~'99n~rpM, nn81 1. Ynil`~>'l•11111:1!ZNTrT./~ ri ltr~+r +t°•r` • Doha tge,lnollgarLngJndfctsie thaE4he system meets perfatmantevxpopialions? YES NO (n no> the •ratrm p'non~omptytny) stems located in Shoretaftd or Wefthead P Ansas or Serv-ng a Food, eeveragtt or Lod Estabtlshmsnt, or systems Buttt after ~, ~ ;o ~ t an trnrnt entthreat ovblichEafth or safely? •(a yes answe~ts a>7 n'PHSsYsrernl • Alst:hatDe of sewage L'o the ground sutfacat YEr ~9,~ - plscharga of sewage to oralntlle or surrbte waters? Yom' ~~ - Sewaya barkup IrKo tirteittng? YE.S 1G0 • 5lfuatlon with the potentla} to tmmeetatety and • adversely impact or threaten pubtlc health or satety7 Ytwc :t4O Ys the ~~~eM faF}Ina? (d }'ESBl1SriBt(S•d ldl/1119'SySlplt7~ - Lt:ss•Oran T}f REE feet of vetUcal separatlon tielwtan system bottom and saturated sotl or be4rpCk'! •YES lQt:% -Aaeepage pit; cesspool, dryweR, orleaching pti ~` :~•• ~sthasYSter+t nan-eo_moffant? - la the system regulated under a monltartng~ ~~ • • operating perm!!? {Jl no, go to page 2) •• Jf yes, • yes the required monitoring taken place? YFS ~ NO (If no, the system Js rioncorn~lyJny) • Ooes thm monitofing #ndicate that the system mea~ ~ peAormance expectaubna7 , (lrAV; Uro sysrern !s non•e+vmptying) ~..,,- ~. Page i oftis`• - wq=~i^rlsrsq.9l 1 ~ .. 1 U: Gbaa i .~ . ~ T-420 P.OOi/003 F-749 MaYN~1Y 04~-26008 0 6:12 FRfIL CENTER SSOCIRTES 7638S609ei ~'Yl_._,.~~. /'~~ __ _ _ Fire No./ P reel Nv. _ - - - • PKOperty Ownef(s),,,..t .!~+,~ ~ _ .nom w _ ./ ~ /i~• ~/i i,wr-. ~~tem Gom onenGs (Please destt/be 9're sys~~pa~nenGS end attach ~~ sketch show/n9 ~~+~~/~ ~r-,~ _ r .-i.._ !~~ u1FS~ rnernnna y`@rg USed !o Ma1kE ~' '~ ~e l~..rl~ns for the comnIlance insneo*_'tonT (Note: NC sCdli~~ rna loppwing lulls rmt eXhaas+7Ve, Gt In se0uandal pldelnorinaYcaras wh~dt cwnb/naCOnr maynK>9:rSdry lt7 make a detdm/naCc W~tartl9ht fink(s) ~""Probad tank bottom r~~Otuarved lOrr nquld laud q [yramined consC. nxords p Examined empr/ (PumpEd) tank Q Robed oucstdg tank for"~adC soA- a -t~sdry+wcuum-Check G Outer tiydraulla Runc!(ontng t6~Searched for surtata Outset d PerfOnnYd hydraulkteR Searched for Kcping In Yard ^ Checked for bade up to home O Exces~ve Pig ~ sot! systemlD-twxes meotvnar testimony O F~tamtned for staging to tank p "Blade son' a0ove soli system q Outer llettJcai Separatlort Distance Cpnduete0 loll bOnngs ~ ~~Jryyy~~~ Depth tC Ilmitlny layer. ~ p it Depth to system bottom q ~rrrirted records o •Wtl umitlrtg•tayer VeriBcatfon• , o . ether - lotus '' •" • - ecic ofle) Q felting (uo prgieEr groundwater) O an 8asetl on the eomp.Qance rriterla, ttte_system status ist i-ant manitortn Issue) ~omptiant (none of the ~ Imminent tllteat tti'pubilc health or safety (riPHS), O non ( 9 previous carlditlons). TTseretore, this:docutnent is a: rtificate of Gampliance D Notice of Noncomp!!anee Is this systt:m an EPA Glass V Injecl:ion Weii4 O ~ ~ ~ertiRcatlon I heretry cettlty as a state or Minnesota llcettsed Inspector and/or pPStgner I or Quan~fed Employee inspector and/or QuaIItled t3nploy~ Designer i tltat I conducted an InvsstigaHon that accuratey detamtned me Comp9artce Scotus Of this system and That my ratonded observations are acwrate as of this 6a ~~N c mat se of ate system, !^~adroMuat~ nor ancsa orr tt,ture water ~ ° due to unknovm tandlCons dtNlnQ system (~ Inspector's name (pearl ~A h ~'G ~ ~}• i `e.~~ ~ Phon (3 - ~' 0 ~ ~ ~9p Ilceltse and/or tl'on_~N_umber ~ ~! ~Ke_'~~A,ddtess yh~~~tp~~0 ~y/3' a 3 t'.mptoyed by ~~s W 4 b... <• 9pppraSS "~ n ! FG a /~o /~ h ~~~ ~ .~ ~ ~~~, ill y-~ Ssgnaturc -'~ ~• -,~(gcrade.Reau_tre!ments rdmrvedltwnMb~n~sren~s3lIS.S3J •Rn l7PN8muat ba Opgrsdait~ ai/a use atsuad wRYh6i tent rnon4'rs ofrees/pr o,,/d7ls nodcr of wldr/n a ShOltt/Pe/1ad h' repakeo6rloeiar oroaaance /lrhe sysnsm faAls m proNda saAfdenrg~ndwaterArnteroty~ th~rr the s}~stenr mustbe upgraded ieplaced. orRr use dluanOhruGd w/Cdn Ohe Gme m~rkrd byrv/e ardre loca/orWi+anc+a If an system ~ notlkt+bapas a-~+e~'y+ /aw,.ans/.MeaSk+isrA-±o•+ie~raratar~n•ao!/s~gataraabrti obdr Dhesysmvrtneednot6e t~graOrC~r1, iepn/~G(, /ep~ w'~use dlsarrdnued m~9'rny/oC~! ora9'nanGe' teat LsmotssOkt 7Trls apes natappv/ym systavcs /n shor land arm wee/~aed P!R(I and; gtCjare asrd/n ciorrnt+ctlon wRh /o~ad, L,ttwrayey and k~cl9ay etstrhAislunents as o'rllnad 1~ /ast: Suaae.~ed ,Attachments g ed soil b+eaane+ft area, ;} S.It6,ip4gth coyJd.also lndude: wen, wen setbacit to system, dwelOng or otlter bulidin s, tank(;),resew • SUffate ira[erand sali•ttodng•locatlons. Irtdude asdwtk OrewtnB !r awdsbie. z) ° stn bonng•toga; showing each horizon. Inelcace the texture, Color, redo:dmorPhtc features depth co t~edrock standfa9 water and whetlur dla material to Rtl. 3) A nstof any and a0 requirements of the Local orginance that are dtftetenc from the slate ~quirements referred to on~tis (orm. 9} A homeawrler survey of system performance. signed by tha,~sameorrrier as bein~facnat. h - • . S) Mnpltoring data as appropliaae. - ~,;r. , • Page 2 of'2 I'M'll'7-CCICJO CJO. 11 fRI.N'1. 1'IGRWlIV d I"IJJUI.l!'IIGJ IGJUJUYJ JC.11 .U WJ...I tMY-114-r:t106 14:13 FROM-CALL CENTER + 1 T-420 t'. U031uu3 IF-f4B • - t~tta Stcciclt; •. r. .,~ ..p..,j., :~ .;,..,~, s. ;~..}...;..{...j.::.. ;.1.:....s..... 1, •; .I..i.~..;.: j .,...~..;.. .~..s. .y. ? .; '~' + gyp'... ~. .. .~-rl. .~3. ~.._, 1,,..,c .~. - .j.. .? .i. • .~. .tei~ ...i...~. .;...s .:•:.Al~yl.'~r• ~..~...~.,. f.. ... ICU P~ IY ' 'f .s 1• .f. ..%. IY~t I'liualartiey{`ypsteestlseok 1Ydl,eef{xun¢k, + d1Tdllttnvrv7f{prettatrllslllniut;twlk(Z)7pI11teg1algil~ysiaen, {eu{red soft uaeuuan e{ey euttala {Irelr~ ptupotcT Ihue{ wn ftiYUys, outl tan 1Cd Iltlp9 (IQUrc !1U'C hu{eAeJ Ly Iho u11ReyJ. InCNtlOt4ta ut{11G{gu{ pqd ~yp{vXl{imtadlslaucet Ilum Uxed {elbta{co pululs Such M illeou,nJ ~uOJhl~a. 1'kuo al{ucd si- Infllli;laRlUaf, IIUIMC{tplllt'llWli, t;vtllllYOlt/7OlQYllllnl{IIICOIpIItlip(ty1.~tJpf1'lUPI'WilllltpllL'P, If9lrnlln6la Sutl DtlrGtg9 (1fK IvJ, Lul:uw aucic Lwb,t{ uu tlta !tlaJ! aGuyt, tudtc!{to vrt t!!o t!{lllt ufUro cutmm! t11r au!! tcxturc, sU'ul:ttLC, cnlu!-, (lUjllll U[ Ottt!]! tltll0l'CtIt5UN typo, oYla41l4tl trC 1[tUttlittg+ Lctlruck 8111! stWttliuy wt Nso i,td({,roto if tlla ntntcrlol Is [i!!. Ultl! Dtt l~ !l!(!~ !J1(f~ ~tlt U W1i f~ ~Ry ''~• . ~ /ay ~ _, . liEtUIIUt1Bl~[j~ ~U1`!L1liG, BLS119~1~{~, tilUll )Ytl'fGll h9 L-ll't71 '+ ~ -~-.-_:... MQYL'LINES 1 IthtlliLU U3tt~U't717sf+tUNSt:I.l,1:02.flnllt~ur~rv, nrnv~ F~ ^~ ,• ••~'•`~°'1° w OOnyiluoJ tp 41 (II1: tl{a plx,v~ sys,mn lu{u rue,p[tawalr7bull{I nut h{ cpmplh~eeal ~ ~~ ~~Y '"S{PJU4Ntl0~dsill{!{Uo9kJos_ ~ ~_ "-^ Rll t191 ~ I75.+~ EXHIBIT "A" so' ~o~ -_ -...._ -- Lot Line wlo Variance ~o Proposed Lot Line 2198 ~Q GwItAGE Gt-RAGE ? I93~8 14294