Loading...
ERMUSR MISC MEMO 08-12-2008Ji Elk River -~ Municipal Utilities 13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 Elk River, MN 55330-0430 August 7, 2008 To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Jerry Takle Jerry Gumphrey John Dietz From: Bryan Adams Subject: Miscellaneous Issues Phone: 763.441.2020 Fax: 763.441.8099 Enclosed is the packet for the Tuesday, August 12, 2008 commission meeting at 4:00 p.m. Electric usages are up 6.6% above last year due to the data centers while water usages are down 8.6 % from last year. Enclosed is the following information for your review: APPA publication titled Electric Utility Basics. The first three chapters deal with more of the technical aspects of our industry which you may or may not be interested in. The last three chapters deal with finance and restructuring issues which you should review. 2. July 25, 2008 issue of The Kiplinger Letter addressing climate change and energy. 3. Article on Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles from "Climate Wire". ' r etter e ~ ~n e Obama and McCain both support a new law: A cap and trade scheme...limiting emissions of greenhouse gases and providing tradable credits for companies that cut even deeper. The two men differ, though, on the degree of emissions reductions needed and on whether industries hard-pressed by competition from overseas should get a pass or at least extra help. A Democratic Congress makes an OK certain by 2010. Odds are regs will kick in within six ~. Costs will start climbing, before then, as firms make investment decisions based on what's coming. Hit first and hardest: Coal producers and users. Coal burning power plants will be retired early, and utilities will shift wherever possible to natural gas, nuclear and renewable fuels. Even development of technology to capture and sequester C02 won't save power plant coal consumption from a 60%-90% drop over two decades. Electric bills will climb for everyone...most steeply for factories in the East and Midwest, served mainly by coal burning plants. More modest jumps in the West, with its host of natural gas and hydroelectric plants, and for those served by riuclear. Also socked especially hard: Metals manufacturers. Global competition leaves them little room to pass on higher prices, and their energy needs are great. Plants that recycle scrap...using less energy and producing fewer emissions than primary producers and integrated steel mills...will have an increased edge. Integrated oil companies will be pressed to boost production efficiencies. A wallop too for aviation...even if U.S. climate legislation lets it slide... because the European Union will include aircraft in its emissions trading scheme. Any U.S. carriers that land at or take off from EU airports will be roped in. For chemical makers caps well both bad and good news: Increased costs to cut or offset emissions of a wide variety of greenhouse gases created in production. But also opportunities to gain from other industries' drive for energy efficiency... more demand for photovoltaic cells, more plastics in autos and aircraft and so on. For financial services...a silver lining: A brisk new line of business in trading emissions credits will likely offset any loss from the drag on the economy. The country will lose 5000 gas stations this year, more than twice as many ® as last year and the worst dropout rate since the 2001 recession. As motorists cut back, competition from big chains is driving out independents. Discounts for cash are making a comeback. Wafer-thin profit margins are devoured by fees to credit card firms. Most motorists now buy fuel with plastic. Getting a big_push from industry: Synthetic gasoline and diesel...liquid fuels that are made from biomass but, unlike ethanol and biodiesel, are chemically identical to petroleum-based products. That gives the biomass synfuels a big advantage: They can be shipped, stored and pumped using the same facilities and equipment as the real McCoys. Early leaders include Choren Industries, which is partnering with Royal Dutch Shell on a pilot plant in Germany and is mulling another in the U.S. And Amyris Biotechnologies, which has a pilot facility in the works in Brazil and plans one for the Southeast U.S. Also in the race: Gevo Inc. and LS9. Demand for biomass will soar in coming years...fueled by development of cellulosic ethanol and utilities that burn biomass directly, as well as by synfuels. For many businesses, crop and forestry waste, sawdust, orange peels, whey... waste of all sorts, in fact...will evolve from liabilities that must be disposed of to valuable commodities. Municipalities may even turn trash into income streams. To facilitate market development, the Biomass Commodity Exchanee is gearing up. With help from the Agriculture Dept., the BCEX will debut next year At first, it will look more like Craigslist than the Chicago Board of Trade, though, with members using a Web site to list what they have to sell or want to buy. Adams, Bryan rom: Tanksley, Sarah [sanksley@APPAnet.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:50 AM To: Adams, Bryan Subject: Article on Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Published in ClimateWire July 30, 2008 TO: PHEV Interest Group FROM: Sarah Tanksley/ stanksleyna,appanet.org/ 202-467-2934 SUBJECT: Article on Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Published in ClimateWire Below is an article recently published in ClimateWire which APPA staff thought would be of interest to members of the PHEV Interest Group. The article discusses a deal with major auto manufacturers on creating a plug-in vehicle which would connect to the power grid without creating a strain on supply. The article is below for your convenience. If you have any questions or would like more information please feel free to contact me. "Reprinted from ClimateWire with permission from Environment 8~ Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net. 202/628-6500" `AUTOS: GM, Ford, power companies work out logistics of plug-in cars (07/24/2000 Colin Sullivan, ClimateWire reporter SAN JOSE, Calif. -- Executives from U.S. auto manufacturers and major electric utilities convened here yesterday to announce and discuss a landmark deal meant to address how plug-in vehicles would connect to the power grid without overtaxing energy supplies. General Motors Corp. signed an agreement yesterday with Los Angeles-based Southern California Edison Co. (SCE) and dozens of other utilities to work through the logistics for plug-in electrics (Greenwire, July 22). The idea is to collaborate on how power companies would cope with the potential emergence of hybrid and pure electric cars that are bound to drain the grid during peak demand periods. Edward Kjaer, director of electric transportation at SCE, said utilities should view electric cars as the future of the U.S. market as companies like GM bank their development plans on smaller and more efficient models like the Chevrolet Volt and other plug-ins. Given that shifting marketplace, Kjaer thinks it's essential for utilities to plan now for an industry already adjusting rapidly to renewable energy in acarbon-constrained environment. "How are we going to connect these cars to a changing grid?" he said. "This is not going to be an easy task at all because we're blazing totally new ground." ~! A computer-generated image of the Chevy Volt, apuug-in hybrid that GM hopes to get into showrooms by 2010. Photo courtesy of GM. Kj aer told attendees at a plug-in conference that he expects "the sweet spot" for this new market to emerge in the 2010- 12 time frame. He anticipates an increasing focus on the pure battery-electric car (in addition to hybrids) as consumers tire of high gas prices, assuming oil prices don't bottom out in the years ahead. "There's a whole bunch of vehicles in development," said Kjaer, citing not only GM's plans but new design efforts at Ford Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corp., among others. "It says there's a lot of heat and a lot of light in this space." 'An appliance on wheels' To prepare for the convergence of electricity and cars, SCE wants to start a $3 million residential pilot program under which consumers would experience the garage of the future, which could be powered by solar panels or wind energy and equipped to charge electric vehicles. "What we're trying to do is take all this theory out of the theory and put it into the practical," Kjaer said. The primary obstacles in the real world are changing "the passive relationship with the customer" and developing reliable storage systems, he added. Customers in California, for instance, would need better information about when to charge their cars to avoid draining peak summer supplies when air conditioners go full throttle. Power customers are used to simply turning their lights on and getting a bill 30 days later. But Kjaer believes the future consumer will "have to be much more informed" about real-time energy management to pursue intelligent charging and more efficient control of resources. SCE therefore envisions smart meters and identification numbers for vehicles that would allow drivers to refuel (or repower) their vehicles at remote charging stations. The typical driver in this scenario would register his or her car with the utility to manage and access the energy bank. In other words, SCE views the future car as "an appliance on wheels" that could charge both at home and on the road, with a bill still waiting at the end of the month. 'Millions' of plug-in vehicles? Dan Sperling, a board member at the California Air Resources Board, said it's a mistake to assume all drivers would charge their cars during off-peak times. If electricity is 1 or 2 cents a mile, or even 3 or 4 cents a mile, Sperling said, consumers could use that power "whenever they get a chance." "We talk about peak rates and smart grids and all this, but what we really don't know is how the consumer is going to respond," he said. "It's hard to say." ~~ ._ The Tesla electric roadster, already being sold in California. Photo by Debra Kahn. new batteries, he said. Even so, Sperling, who also directs the Institute of Transportation Studies at University of California, Davis, predicts a bright future for electric utilities, given all the pressure on automakers to produce more-efficient cars. A regulation like California's low-carbon fuel standard, for one, could benefit power companies because the rule has been designed as a performance-based approach meant to prod carmakers toward biofuels and more fuel-efficiency. In Sperling's view, acredit-trading environment under the low-carbon fuel standard would (in theory) push carmakers toward developing and selling more electric cars. This, combined with the state's stalled greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and a mandate for more zero-emissions models, could mean a boom for electrics, especially if the federal government funds research and development into "If we do all this, I think we'll see millions of plug-in vehicles on the road in the near future," Sperling said. Sperling also supports establishing a price floor for gasoline at $4.00 a gallon, but he admitted the concept might not fly politically. Battery capacity and supply remain problematic i~lancy Gioia, director of the hybrid vehicle program at Ford, said this is all well and good from a utility standpoint as power companies position themselves to potentially replace gasoline distributors. But from the auto manufacturing perspective, engineers are still coping with a fundamental concern: storage. Gioia has overseen development of the Ford Escape Hybrid and other more efficient models -- including hybrid versions of the Ford Fusion and the Mercury Milan -- and she believes in plug-in cars. Yet she also sees a technical problem yet to be resolved in terms of battery development. "The biggest challenge remains the battery," she said. Electric-battery technology, she points out, is still unproven and has limited range. Add to this concerns over the spiraling cost of steel, copper, aluminum and lithium carbonate, plus the likely dominance of battery manufacturing by China and Japan, and you've got some steep market challenges for U.S. companies. Echoing this concern was Jonathan Lauckner, vice president of global program management at GM. Lauckner said U.S. corporations will have to decide whether they view battery manufacturing and R&D as priorities to bring down the cost of components at home. Otherwise, Japan and China will rule this side of the market. "All of the battery capacity is located in Asia," he said. "It's not cheap shipping batteries all the way from Asia. There's a very sizable logistics cost." ,ord's Gioia also views the component market as a major issue and appeared to signal support for the emergence of U.S. suppliers. "Without domestic or regional supply around the world, it just becomes another issue of ... potential instability," she said.