Loading...
04-29-2009 CCM BOAME~T~N ~F THI+ ~LI~ RAVER BARD ~~ APPEAL~N~ EU~rLI~ATI~N HEL~~TTHEHERBI~RN~ LJNTY~VI;RNMENTENTER VI~EDNEDI~Y, APRIL ~~~ ~1~0~ II~Iembers Present: Mayor ~lin~it~g, Councie~.bexs leas, Gumphrey, Moon, and lestgaard Members Absent: done taf£ P.resent~ City Clerk Tina Allard and ~~ecuti~re 5ecretary~Deputy City Clerk Jessica Il~llex Also Present: Sherburne County Assessor Gerald I~rit~eck, Chief Deputy John Cullen, Residential Appraisers Greg Olson, Theresa Quinn, and hell.y Murshel, Agricultural pecia~.st Jeanne ~endexson, and Commercial~~ndustrial Appraiser lilliam Riley ~. Call Meeting To Order 1'u~rsuan.t to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the ilk River Board of Appeal and Equalisation ~cras called to order at X30 p~~ by ~Iayo~.• l~lin~ing. ~. Board ofA~~eal and E~uali~ation Gerald lit~eck, herbuxne County .Assessor, indicated that the purpose of the Board of Appeal and ~quali~ation is to consxde~r and preview 200 estin~atea~ market values and property classifications. lnforation was presented on the assessment procedures and statistics for the City of Elk River ~OO9 assessments. The Board of Appeal and Equalisation heard appeals as outlined below 1. ~ca~t Waters, Paxce~ Xa~e~ti~cation Nuxnber'~5~~i90-410 l1~Ir. Maters stated that his house ~s assessed at $3~~,Gao and leis neighbor has an identical house assessed at ~3~0, ~~0. He requested that hzs assessed value be reduced to 3~~,2~0. Mr. Olson i~~dicated that the neighborr caned for a reassessment and the quality grade was lowered. IV~r. Olson Hated there is a significant difference in. valuad.ons fox basex~aetlt ~.nishes listed. 1V~O~ED ~Y CON'CYLMEMBER ~JI~PHREY ANA ~CO~D~~ B~' ~OU~~~I~EII~BER ERAS FOR THE APPR~~ER TO REASSESS PA~REL 75~~9D-010 ANA TO REPORT BACK AT THE RECOI~TVEI~IE MI~ETINO. 141OTYON' ~ARRrED ~-0, ~. F1Qyd I~~sc, Parcel Identification N~rnbers 75-~'~0-00~1~, 755-733,~~.15, ~5~ "~~3-0115 hoard ~f ~~pea~ ar~d Equa[t~ation ,~nutes April 29, 209 Y'age 2 Kruse stated that he believes leis proper~r is over valued as the site has no serer and no access ~e added that the it~r's sip rr~ont~a ma~~atorium does not allow h to seU. the property. r, Kruse requested that the value an these three parcels be reduced as rr~uch as passible. i~a~ar l~lin~i~ng noted that the morata~'iurr~ does not prohibit the sale of the prop~.i~ but rather development of the property at this t~.~xe. ll~r. sullen indicated he was going to review the property but did not get to it. He stated he would be can-~fortabXe lowering the value to I~iS or ~ per squat,~e foot. IDLED BY D~NILME~IBE~ ~J1VIP~iI~E~ AND SEDNDED BY' CDUN~ILME~E~. EI~'A~ T~ AD~D~T TIE LAND ~ALDE DN I'.EL 7S-'~4~-000 TD $2~~,'~~4, Nl~TIDN ~AR~YED 5-4, MOVED ~~ CDU~ZL1E7i1~$ER iVIDTIN AND SE~DNDED BY ~ODNZLIE~E~ ~UMPH~EV TD AD,~DST TAE SAND VAL~J~ D~ TkIE oT~~r~ aNE Ac~E I~A~cELS ~~~~~~-o~~~ AND ~~-~~~~1~a T~ ~a,~~~ ~E~ LAT. MOTION ~AIt~ZED 5-~' ~. Dan 5~nith~ I'arceX Identj.t~tcatian Number 75~57'7~0~45 ~Perl~ns} ixaith e~pla~ned that he owns three I~erl~ins and 11e believes the one in Ells River mad be valued high, ~e indicated that the three buildings are very similar in cor~structian and that the building quality on the Elk Diver location is ~.sted as very goad while the othear t<vo are listed as average. He also expressed concern with tl~e land being valued lxigh~ Mx. l~il.ey stated 11e would like to reassess the building and land value o~ this parcel. LOVED BV ~OIJNILMEIVIBER ~11~T'~REV AND E~DNDED BY CO~TN~ILI4~E~E~ ~E~.'A.~ ~OI~ TIDE AI'PI~AIER TO R.EAE~ TI-IE ~U~ILDING AT I'A.CEL 75-577-0145 AND DEPORT BAS AT THE I~.E~ONVENE MEETIIII~, iVIOTION IJA~II.IED 5-4. 11~0~'ED ~~ ~OUNCZI~1Vi~l~E ~TJMI~1-IRE AND ~CDNDED ~Y OUNILMEII~BER ~ERV~A TD REAES TAE LAND AT PARCEL 75-577 a1~~ ~ REPORT ~A~ AT TAE ~EC~N~ENE 11~IEETIN0.IVIOTION cA~.~.~~D ~~~. 4, Corey'4illlam.s, ~~~eeX Ide~.ti~cation Nutnber'~5~735~~054 Mr. Iilliams presented an appraisal and asked that h.i,s value be seduced to that amount of Ms. uinn noted that the entire develaptnent has received a reducd.an the last twa gears. GIs. Quinn reviewed comparable sales and recommended no ci~ange~ I~O~ED BY C~UNILiVIEBER.IVIOTIN FIR N~ C~AN~E TD PAR.EL "~~~ 735~14~~. Iv~otion died for lacy of a second MOOED ~~ ~a~N~rLE~~E~ ~~~~E~ AND sEoNDED ~~ ~DUN'CILI~ENI~E~ SERA TO AD,~UST TkIE B~JILDIN AND LAND VALUE OP I'ARCE~ 75-7~5-1054 TO ~~5,504~ 1VI~TION CARRIED 4-1. ouncilmember 1Viotin apposed Board of Appeal at~d Equa~iot~ ll~inutes t'ag~ ~ April ~9, X009 ~, Connie I1laras-~irt~~ Parcel Identi~tcatian Number 75~14G-1141 11~s, Mara-~lirt~ requested that her property value be reduced ~~ more than half` due tv the wet conditions and ~ac~ of accessF 11rTr, ~~son indicated that NIs~ 114aro-irt~ lost her agricultural classification ar~d it is now a moral vacant lot. ~e stated the bre~.l~down of the sand value was based an ~ 5 aces ~raste and 15.E acres pasture. Ike explained that the land was reviewed again tada~ and he would recommend a land breal~down o£ ~ ages waste and 3,$~ acres pasture. 111D~ED ~'~ CO~JNC~LMEI~BER E~TAA~D AND sE~(~NDED B~ CD[]NCYLII~CE141BE~ ~UMPk~IREY TD CANE TAE CLArF7CATIDN ~N PARCEL ~~-BUG-~~~1 TD BASTE LAND ITS A TAB VALUE CAF $4,454, CDTI~N CA.RI~IED 5~~, G. Pen. ~xa.t~~e, Parcel Iderrtificatian Number '~-411-4534 7rat~ke stated that nlan~ taxpayer's proper~r values were reduced b~ 8-~°l~ and his onl~r dropped by .aa~°la, Iie requested that l~s atso be reduced Si9~l~. N1r, Olson indicated that ~ 1at~l~e's entire neighborhood was reassessed this ~rear~ He explained that ~vltile other property values degreased there were multiple items not included ~n the fast assessment that caused the increase ~ ~. lrat~l~e's property including a Fireplace, bricl~, air conditioner, and a large amount of increase was due to a porch ~`aur can~parables were reviewed for which the average was ~~44,~00. I14~VED BY COUNCIL~IENIBER ~ERA.S AND SECONDED B~ C~UNCILI~IEII~BE~ ~UPPIP.E'~ TO ADJUST TIDE BUILDYN~ ~TA.LUE DP PARCEL 75M411-4530 TO ~11G,~40, ~TIDN CARRIED 5~0. '7, Brian attd Cathy Carroll, Parcel fde~tYFrcation, Number 75-G8-425 114x. Carr~li indicated that he paid 113,~0~ to purchase a Foreclosed borne and is behag taxed at ~275,0~0. Mr. Carroll explained the house sustained a large amount of damage and was uninhabitable at the time of purchase. lie stated all the sh.eetxack and insulation had been r~tnoved and reviewed a police report autli~ing the dainage~ Mi.•~ Carrell re~riewed cQnaparables on yew homes ~ his development thaC have sold for under ~~O,~aa, He requested a break an taxes f or a ~ra~ ~li~t1~ ~e Cat7 ~'epalf t~7~ }.1~f17~, Ison indicated he has veri~'ied the date t1~e house was damaged is within the tinaeframe being considered at this time, Iie stated that he would ~reconztnend the house be considered G5°l~ cvn~plete. ~~ED BV C~UNCXL'iENxBEB. EI~'A.S AND SECONDED BY CDUNCIL1~iElVlBER UP~RE~ T'D ADJUST TF~E BUYLDIN~ VALUE DB PARCEL "15-CGS-445 T`D $90300, ~TIDN CARRIED 5~0, S, Chris Sisl~, Parcel Xdenti£ication Number 75-'147-4745 N1r. Sisl~ indicated that this house eras recently appraised for ~~,oaa and purchased ~'or ~~53,00~. Ile requested that his tax value be reduced closer to the appraised value, Baaxd ~f Appeal aid ~qu~li~atioiY ~ir~~at~s Ap~i129, ~~09 Pale ~ It eras noted that fills property ~s Hat currently recorded in fix. ~~sk's name; therefore, his cancexns cannot be addressed at this ~m.e. appraisal staff' reeatnended that ~Ir. disk verify tl~e tide has been recorded and cone back with his appeal at the June I ~ Caunty ~aard meeting, NXOVED B~' ~O~JNC~LNIENI~ER SERA AND SEI~ON~~D BY COUNILMEMB~. N~OTIN TO N~AE NO CHANGE TO THE VALUE OF PARC~~'I5~7D7,~7~5 BECA~US~ TIDE PROPEL' IS NOT ~~GISTERED ZN MR. II~'S NAME, NIOTION CAR~Y~D 5~~. M~.•a Sisk's a~vnershi~ was electronically ~~eri~ed using the Sherhur~n.e ~~oun~ Landha~rk system. IVIO~ED ~'~ COLINCILNIEII~~ER ~ERV~A '~ EGO~DED BY COLINCILIVIFNI~ER MOTIN TO R.ECZND HIS PR~ZOUS MOTION B~CA.US~ MR, SISI~' ONF~SHIP OF PA~RCEI~ 75-7~7~0'705 ~A.S BEEN ~RIFID. NCOTION CARRIED ~-0. NIr. Olson explained that NTr, S~sk's appraisal is dated larch 2~a9 and is past the January 2 deadline to be considered this year, He Hated that an overall redu~ctian has been made in that development. ~at~.pa~~isans v~ere reviewed averaging $4a2,~~a. NIO'ED ~~ COUI~CILMENII3ER ~R'LA.S AND EGON'DED BY CO~JNCILiVIE14~IBER G11~PHRE~TO AD~I~T THE E5'TIMATED N~A.R~ET ~AL[JE OF PARCEL ~5^'7~7-0'05 TO 374,10~'ITH THE RED~JCTION CONxING FRONT THE BIJIIJDXNG.II~O'TION CARRIED 5-0. 9, Eric Gunderson, I~a~rcel Identificatian Number 75-G73~~4I0 NIx. Gunderson purchased the laotne cast ~uly and lead to replace all the appliances and flooring because the house had not been urinteri~ed properly. Mr. alson indicated he was not aware the hams eras datx~aged, M0~'ED P~ COL~NCILNIEMBER ETCAARD AND ECONI~ED ~~' CO~NCI~NIEN~BER IVIOTIN ~ORTPI~ AP~'RAIER TO REAES5 I'ARCE~ 75~G73-0410 AND REPORT BACK AT THE R~CON~VENE MEETINO. N~OT~ON CARRIED ~-0, 10, RaXpb Nla~.a~ing, Parcel Ider~til~cation ~i~mber 75,401-050 Mr, sullen subrn~itt~d a letter f'rona fix, ll~anni.ng asking far the value o~n parcel 75~4~I~~450 to be reduced. MOOED B~' COI~N'Cr~NIENIPER II~OTIN AND EON~D~D BY COUNCIIaNIE1VIBER ETGAARD TO NIAI~E NO CHANGE'TO THE ~'AI~UE OF PARCEL 75 401-a450. IVIVTrQN CARRIED 5 0, ~~, Sharon Nliller, Parcel Ide~tiiication ~Ium.hex 75~1<~4~3401 Coun~ils~'iember Latin disclosed that l~fs.lVliller is a client o~ his through a guardianship, Board ~£,~ppea~ and E~uali~ation Minutes Apri129, 2~~~ page 5 1VIs, Haller stated her estimated market value increased from ~~91,700 to 773,00 from last year, She estimated that she has nine tillable acres and the rest is wetland, She noted that a portion of her land is used by her neighba.r to pasture his caws, Ms. Henderson Indicated that the entire parcel is grandfathered ~ as g~•een acres She explained that in ~0~8 the land breakdown was 9 tillable acres, ~~a acres pasture, .75 acres road, 60.75 acres waste, ar~d two sites. She explained that for X009 the breal~dQwn is X3,5 acres tillable, 11,75 a.c~•es pasture, ~7 acres waste, ,7 acres road, and t~vo sites. the noted that Ms. Miller did not return the agricultural veri~.cation form that was given to her so she had to estunate the land breakdown I1~s, ~Ienderson stated she gill need a copy of the rental agreement between Ms. Miller and her neighbor for the pasturing of the cows. MovED ~~ ~U~v~rI~MEM~~RE~T~AARD ~ Eo~DED ~~ CDU~CILMEMBER. ~ERwA FAR THE A~~RAIS~R To REAES THE I1AI~D FIR PARCEL, 75-124-3401 AN'D REI'~RT BAIL AT THE RE~~N'~E~E MEETING. Z1flI~TIDN CARRIED 5-4, 1~. Gt~vi~n Rul~ke,1'arceX Xdentx~icatxan l~Iumber 75-'795-001 auld like his estimated market ~ralue reduced as the asking price of similar units is ~1~~,000. Ms, Quinn indicated that there is a Minitnuna Assessment Agreement far the Bluffs that does not allow the value to be lowered through 2010. ll~f GATED BY '''C``ISSC~UN'`III ~Ifff''IJ`ME'MBER EST''-'l11 AARI~ A~'D ~S~~I~~]'~~/I'~~ 1~~ (~ V U~ V~~M.k.fM~..,~fR ~S.~i J..~fRwA T V MAKi..1 V ~Hl s~ 1 4~ L T V I~~1JJ~ ! J-~ J~- 0~01 DUE T THE 11~INIMUM ASESSl1~iEN'T AGREEME~'T X~ 1'.GE THRI~UCH 2OT0~ MGTIG~ CARRIED 5-0, 13, Ryari Fulin, Parcel Identi~icatiot~ Number "75-"795-0415 M~. ~'ulin expressed the same concerns as Mr, Rukke above. He stated that he leases an additional parking stall and questioned ~rhy that is reflected on his propezty value, Ms. Quinn explained the cancan areas are split amongst the units. 1VI~VED BY C~U~JGILMEMBER wESTGAARD AI~1D SEEGNDED BY CDUNCII~MEMBER ~~R4~AS TG MAKE NG CHANGE TO I~ARCEI~ 75-795- 0415 DUE TG THE M~~'YMUM A5ESSMENT AGREEMENT ~l•1 ~'~.AC~ THR~UG~H ~01~, MGT~G~1 GARR~ED 5-~~ 14. A1oxs I~a~ndels, I'~rcel Identification ~'urnber 75714-210 Mr. l~andels requested that his estiix~ated market value be reduced because a foreclosed house near hiurn sold far much laver. Ms. Quinn indicated that a ~r~as appraisal was conducted in that area due to lack of sales. Board of Appeal and ~c~uation ~rli~~utes A~r~l ~9, 2~~9 Page ~ 11~D~ED BY C~UNCILh~ENIBER D~'I A1~D E~I~DED BY' C~UNCILII~EBER ~ER'.A T~ 11~AE ~~ CHA'~E TD PARCEL 75y'714~ O~I.~, 'TIN CARRZEI~ 5~0. ~.5, B11~ ar~d ~haro~n ~andin, Parcel Ide~.tificatia~ Number 75-714~O~~D I1~Is. andin stated t~iat they have an e~tremel~r rnadest home and are be~a,g assessed too much the added drat she is being assessed for three decl~s urhich a~:e really dog steps. IVCs. uinn stated ~.~at one of e deck i n~orc of a platfarrn and could be removed, the Hated this would reduce the value by ~~60, 1VID~ED BY Di~NCILl1~ENIBER ZERA. Ai~1I~ SECONDED B~ Co~rrC~~~~~ER ~~1~PxREY o ADJUST ~~E ETIMA~`ED 1~ART~ET ~'AL~UL D~ PARCEL'75~~I,~~~22~ TO $237,50 w~TH'T~E AI~JUS'TIV~EN~` Co~I~r ~Ra TAE ~r~rl~~~~ ~AL~E. ~~xxo~ ~A~R~ED ~^o. 1~. I'et~ ~rrnc~~, Parcel Xdentiftaatro~ 7Vunabex 75-G9~~1~.~ ~rroci~ rndtcated he has two appraisals far d1e property; one in Nove~n.ber Z~0$ for 365,~~0 and one 1~pri124 for 337,~~~, He would like the esti?nated n-~arl~et ~ralue for dlis property reduced to be consistent ~ui~i the appraisals. . ~Isan reviewed sales history and comparables fair the home. DEED BY CDI~N'CIL~IE~VIBER NIDTZ~I ATE SECO'DED BY CDUNCILI~EBER ~ERwA TD A.E ~D C~AGE'~0 PARCEL 75-~99~ O~.IO, DTI01~ CARRIED ~-D, 1"~, l~enr~is Booth, Parcel Identil"icatlon N'umbe~ 75-1124404 1VIr. Booth indicated that his green acres has been removed and he would la`~~e it reinstated. NIr, Z~rit~eh explained tl~at adding or removing green. acres is not urithha the Board's jurisdictian~ ~e noted that in order to obtain green acres the property trust be classified as agricultural which die boazd can decide. qualifications far green acres ureze discussed. It was also discussed that changes rna~r be nude ~.t the Legislative level, Xt was noted that the session is scheduled to be o~rer at the e~.d of Nay so it may be best to wait and see what changes axe trade. r. Booth urns infor`rned by appearing tonight lie has reseed his right to appeal to the Caunt~r Board on June ~~, 1VIDVED BY CDI~NCILENIBER ~ERwA~ ANI] SEC4~'DED BY C~U~ICIL14~iE11~l~ER wE~'GAARD T~ SAE I~~ CI~AN~E ~'~ PARCEL 75~ 11~~44Q4,114D~'IDN CARRIED ~~0, 18, ~ea~tan Yoder, Parcel Idenfii~catior- ~1'unabex 75-~3W~~~~ Mr~ Yoder stated he has an appraisal dated larch 10, 00~ for 155,~~0 and he would life his estimated tnar~et value adjusted to match. The comparables in fir, Yoder's appraisal were reviewed. ~~ard of Appeal and Equalization Minutes April ~9, 2~~~ Page 7 ~I~~ED B~ CGUNCILMEMEE~ GUII~PHRE~ AND SECONDED E~ CGUNCILiVCEMBEI~ ~~RV~A T~ MADE NG CHANGE TG PAI~~EL ~'S^~23- ~~~G. MOTIGN ~AR~IED a~~~, ~9, Thomas weisha~la, Parcel Identification Nunabe~r 7~F1~~^~~0~ ~Ir, Teishalla indicated that at a bare miriit~um he would Like his estirxzated marl~et value reduced to at feast ~5~,OaQ. Ike added that his neighbor's property is in poor condition which beings his value down. Mr. ~lsan explained that be hacked 541 off ofMr, weishalla's house and 1a~lo off of the land due to t~~e condition of his neighbor's harr~e and property ~orrlparables were reviewed. ll~a~or I~in~ing informed IVIr~ weishalla that the city has Bade enforcement of~~er to address issues such as the apes fir, weishalla is experiencing with his neighbor. 14rIG~ED BY C~UNC~LEBE~ IDT~N AND SECDS~'DED ~~' ot~~vcz~E~E~ G~MP~~E~T~ ADJUST Tr~E LAND vAL~ o~ PARCEL'15-1z~~44a5 TD 59,~4~~ AND TD ADJUST TAE VALUE ~~ TAE BUILDING TG $2~5,G0~. l~0'TIGN CARRIED 5~~, 2a. Gary Aucn, Parcel Identi#~catYnn N~~ber'~5-~~.G-~73 Mr. Auer indicated that his house is listed for ~I99,OD anal he is having trouble sell~r~g it due to the large number of foreclosures ~ the area, IVfs. uinn reviewed coparables in the areas MG~ED BY CGUNCYLI1~IElVIBLR ~ERwAS AND SEG~NIJED ~Y C~UNCILMEII~~E~ wETGAARD T~ ADJ~T TAE ET~II~ATED MA~.ET ~A~UE ~~ PARCEL 75-SIG-~~36 TG ~.~y0~~ ITI~ THE ADJUTIViNT II~ADE T~ TF3E BU~~D~NG.II~GT~DN CARRIED -Q, ~~. ~'o Gllgenbach, Parcel IdentiBca~~ion Nurnher'~5-5~~-4'~3~ r. Cilgenbach stated that Mr. Aucn, has alt~.ost the identical house He requested that his estimated market value be reduced as Drell. MG~ED B~ GDUNCIL~EI~IBER ESTGAARD AND SECONDED B~ OUNILNIEIVIBEIt ERA TO ADJUST TAE BUILDING V'ALU'E ~P PARCEL 75~5I~~~734 ~Y 5°l0, GTIGN CARRIED ~-~, Z~, Dwight and Jame I~ir~exde, Parcei Identification Number 75-~I~~~i.OI 11~r, I~itkeide requested his property n~air~tain a green acres classification. ~e explained that he receives income ~`rom boarding one horse, Mir. I~irl~eide questioned same of the green acres definitions, ll~rr. Iirkeide was informed that it would be best to appeal at the bounty Board bevel once the Legislature has mare clearly defined the green acre rules. OWED B~ COUNCILEBER MOTIN AND SEC0IDED ~' COUNCILNIEIVIBER ~ERwAS TO 1~'A~E NO CHANGE TO PARCEL 75-~I~- I3~~rd of Appeal and ~quatian Minutes Apii~ ~9, 209 X101 BDT ~D~ TkIE LASI~'~~A'~~DN T~ ~~~N ~.~I~~JLTX.JRAL~ NIC]~'I~N AR~~~l3 5~0, Z3. Jiro Sletten, Parcel Ide~t~ficati~n Number "15M4~G,43~~ outacilme~-nber Mahn disclosed that letters is ~ client far tai purposes. fir. Slette~a presented an app~aisa~ ~rorn Dece~x~~e~ for 1G5,~0~~ Iie explai~,ed th~.t the ~p~~aisal lists the basement as canc~ete but it should be woad winch ~auld lowex e appraisal i£ e~rrected. Ike noted that the building qualit~r of his ho~~.e is low, Page 8 Mx, bison reviewed corriparables. ~ Fe n.ated t~~at a 3°l~ depreciation on the ~e~e has a-1~ead~ been taken, MD~ED ~Y ~T~NI1~~11'I~11~~~~ M~T~~I ~.NT) E~ND~D ~~' ~~UNf~ILM~M~~~ ~~~wA~ FDR TI~~ APP~AI~'I~D ~~AE5 PAR~I1 '15-45~-~4~ AND R~POIT'~ ~~.G ~~ T R~DN~~NE i1~I~~'~IN, NiDTI~N Mayor I~lin~ing called a Feces s at 8: ~ ~ ~.m, The meeting ~ecanven.ed at 8:15 p.m. 24, Rabe~fi ~o~f~na~a, Parcel Identification Nurnbexs '~~^1~1-2~~~ and 7~~1~~~~4~4 III, ~-1o~~m.an expressed concerns about the increase in his tapes and requested his estimated rna~ket values be seduced, Ms. Quinn indicated ~laat sloe conapieted a xeassessment of the home ar~d the basement ~inisl~ was added to the assessment, ~UIs,l~enderson. explained the breakdown a~ the land classifications. I~D~~I] B~ f;~`UNI~rLM~MB~R ~MP~~~ ,ALIT] EDND~I~ B I~DUN~Y~IV~~M~~~. ~~~.'.~'~'~ ~~ N~ I~I~AN~~'T~ PA.~C~~ 7~-~~1- 2~~~ .~NT~ 75-1~1-~~00~ I~IDTIC~N ~AT~~YED 5~~. ~~~ Scott ~chm~tt, Parcel Identification Nunnber "~~~~9~-D~1~ , Schmitt stated he believes he is being over assessed £o~ his pool ar~d requested fiat his estimated market value be seduced, Mr. Olson xeviewed compazables. DAD BY CDUN~IIJME~~~~. ~~~w.~S ,AND ~ON'D~D ~Y CDUNC~~lVI~11~IBER M~TIN ~'~ ADJI~T'T~I~ ~S~`rM~.~'ED 11~A~i.~~' ~u''~~'''''~ ~o ~~~'''''',o~a oN P~~, ~~W~'~~-~~~~ w~x~ T~~ ~u~n~~N~ ~il ~~ ~~.iJ ~ V J.~~~~1~+F tiJ ~~~1 1 ~I~~ ~~ V ~ 2G~ David Les~a~, Parcel Identification Number 75~G~5~~I.05 ~vlr. Lesna~ sndicated that he was going to refinance ~ ~`ebruary but the appraisal came back at anl~r ~~~5,0~0~ He requested that his estimated market value be seduced, Board of ~4ppeal and ~quali~atio~~ Il~inutes Page 9 April 29, 200 iVir~ Olson reviewed con~parables. He stated that the value already re~.ects an S°lo depreciation, n~~~E~ ~~ courr~IL~I~~~R ~~JIHIPHR.Y ~.NI~ ~~~oN~a~ ~~ co~NrL~I~n~~~>~~R~ T~~~T THE I~~P~E~~~Tr~N ~R~~ ~°~~ TIC ~,~°IO ~~R THE HI~L~SE ~N~ ARC ~N PARCEL 75 G05~D~~5.11~OTIDN CARRYED 5~~, ~'~. Carla Bar~i~a, Parcel Ide~.tx~ication Nurnber'~5-70?RD~35 IVIs. Br~~~a explained that she purchased a foreclosed home in larch for ~1 S,a00 and it appraised at ~~5,~~0, the requested that her estnnated market ~ralue be reduced, NIr. Olson reviewed cornparahles, l~a~r~~ ~~ COUNC~LII~IBER ~r~TrN ~N~ ~~oN~~~ ~~ C~UNC~Ll1~BER ~~TI~AARD ADJ~JT TC~ THE ETZI~ATED MARKET VALUE T~ X330,040 IAN PARCEL 75~7~7-~~~5 ~~TH THE AI~~UTENT 11~E ON' THE BU~LD~N', M~T~~N CARRIED ~-~. ~8. Ethan Ander~un, Parcel Ide~atxf~cat~o~ Number 75~7~1~~135 . Anderso~x indicated that he purchased iris ~iotne in Mardi 2aa~ for I91,0~0. Ike added that houses in the area are listed for under ~150,0~~. NIr, Olson reviewed com.parables. I~D~ED BY CDUNCIL~iEI~ER ~ER.~~ ~] SECONI~E~ B~ ED~JNCILEII~BER ~Ul1~IPHREY TO AI~JUT THE ESTIMATED A.RET VALUE T~ ~D5,0~~ ~N PARCEL 75,7zI~IlI3~ KITH THE AD,jL~ST~NT ADS ~N'THE ~UILDIN. ~IDTI~N CARRIED 5-~. Z9. Steve iYler, Parcel Yder~~ificatxo~n Nunlbe~ 7-747~U905 NIr. Olson indicated that he completed a reassessment at the request of Mr. ll.er. e explained that the former owner refused to allow access to the property sc it was placed a arl~itrar~. NIr, ~.er requested that his assess~x~ent he ~~educed based on the reassessment, ~f OWED B~ COUNCILl4~E1VIBER GU11rIPHRE~ .AND E~C~1~I1.]ED B~ C~UNCILMEN~~ER ESTI~AARD T~ A.DJST THE LAND VALUE T~ $84,800 .ANA THE I~LJZLDING VALUE T~ ~-C9,9~~ FOR PARCEL 75-747-4945 AS SUI~ESTEI~ THE CDUNT~ A.SS~SOR, Ni~TY~N ~ARR~ED 5~ai 30. A.rderl at~d ~4xin Ra~y~n.o~d, Parcel Identif~cafiQ~ Number 75-41~~~.~45 ll~r. Olson presented a handout reviewi~ the aho~re parcel. MOVED BY COUNC~LMEMBER GUMPHREYAND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD TO APPROVE THE ADJUSTMENT OF Bard a~ Appeal a^d ~q~ali~at~ot~ 1Vlin~te~ April ~9, ~~~9 Page ~ 0 '~kIE LAND V~ALU~ ~~~ PAR~L ~]5 ~I3-~4~5 TO i ~,~04 A.~ ~J~ST~.+D B~' 'T~ I~OC~NTY A~~~,1~I~TZ~N ~RRIE~ 5-~. 31. Tiao~as and Lori ~a~ner, Parcel Identification N'~ber ~5~I~9~3~~D . Olson presented a handout reviev~ring tl~e above parcel, 114~~~~ ~~ ~UN~IL114~~BER ~T`II~ AND ~EONDE~ ~~ I~OUNCILII4~I~~R~~'~A.AI~.I~ To APPR~~ TI~~ A~~~T~I~NT o~ TI~~ LAND ~ALU~ PIER PARI~EL 75 ~4~J~320~'T~ $42,340 ~S ~GET~D B~' THE ~OI~NT ASS~~OR. N.~O~`I~N CARI~IEI~ 5-4. 32, Paul and K~istina Nelsat~, ~'arcel Iden~ficatxo~ Nuber'~5R~~7-445 Olson presented a handout ~evie~ring the above parcel, ~V~~ BY ~C]~NIL1~~~1rIBER ~~I~A ANI~ ~~ONI~~I] BY ~IJN~ILII4~MBEI~ NIOTIN TO ~PPR.OVE T~I~ .A.DJI~~T'NI~''NT''1~F T'~~ LAND VALUE ~~ ~ PAR~L 75~1I'~~40I5 TO X92,400 i ~ U V ~.+--.fSTi...D ~~ TAE ~~~NT~ ~ss~~I~.1VI~'TION' cA~~I~~ 5-0. 33, re~o~ Barrett and Dawn ~aoks, Parcel rdenl;~.~icatian umber ~5-~3041I00 NIz~ Olson presented a handout revieu~ng the above parcel. IVIOVE~ B~ ~~]C~NI~ILII~EBER 114~TIN A.N~ EI~ONDEI] B~Y G~UN~IL~IEII~IBE~ SERA ~'~ APP~VE'TI~~ A.I~~I~STMENT ~~ T LAND ~~LUE ~F PARCEL 75~134~~.~00 TO X75,144 A5 SUE~'TED ~~ THE ~f]UNT~.A~SES~O~. MI~TIO~I MARRIED 5~0. 34. en.neth and Juanita Locl~wood, Parcel Iderrti£ication Nt~tnber 75^134~4~I~ 1, Olson presented a handout ~evieng the above parcel. IVr~VEI~ B~ ~L~NILl1~E1~IBEIt ~E~A AND E~NDEI~ ~Y G~UNI~IL~EMBEI~ ~T~AA~ T~ AP~~a~ TIE A~~~sTn~~NT o~ TIDE LAND AL~JE ~~ PAR~EL'15-~34-4110 T~ ~G~,04~ ,~ UG~~TED ~~ T~~ ~o~rNT~ A~~. ~IOTI~N CARItI~D 5~a; 35~ at~hew I-~odgtr~an, Pax~el Ide~tificatiar, ~Iu~nber'~5~~.30-433 Mr~ Olson presented a handout revle~v~g the above parcel, M~~~I~ BY ~C~C~NCILNiENI~R NI~TrN ANI] S~ND~I~ ~Y ~~~NC~L~I~~r~~~ ~T~AAI~ ~ro APPR~~~ Tx~ ~uT''~N'T o~ 1 ~ LAND ~V J..f ~1 ~~J..tL ~'Y.!-AI~~I''J"" ~~ T~ ~~J}~~~ 1.~ ~LJ Vi.~TL~ ~~ TI-I ~~ {1NT~ F~il~~Rl ~• ~TI~N 111L~A~~ r1~4. 3C, shad Epson, Parcel Identi~catio~n Nun~be~ 75~GG8-035 1V~, Olson presented ~ handout reviewing the above parce~+ Board o~Appeal and F~ua~i~atiot~ Minutes April ~~, Z0~9 Page 1 ~ I~CD~ED ~~' C~I~JN'CILN~ENIBER ~ERA.S AND SECONDED BY CDUNCILNIE11flBER wESTCA.AR~ TC APPROVE THE ADJCJSTiVIEN'T DE THE BU'ILDINO ~ALU`E ~~` PARCEL "~S~GC~-0~~~ T~ ~35,1~4 ~ SUCCESTED BY THE CDUNT~' ASSESSOR. CT`ION CARRIED 5-0, 3'~. Rabin Stenman aid Michael ~~icl~, Parcel Iderxti~c~tian Nun~1~e~ 75-~~1- a~~~ l~r, ~l~on presented a fetter that was received regarding the above parcel. ~IO~ED B~ CCUNCILI~IEI~BER ~ESTCAARD AND SECONDED B~ CDUNCILMEII~BER I1~OT~N TD AIDE NO CHANCE ~O PARCEL 75-~~~ 4~~5. OT~ON CARRIED 5~0, 3~. Huultori 01s~~ Parni~y LLLP, Parcel Identil~icatian N~rnber'75-~~5~~1~D ll~s. I~len.derson presented a hat~do~t revievring the above parcel. 1VIO~ED ~~ COUN'CZLE~IBER CUIV~PHRE AND SECONDED BY COUNCILIV~EN~BER ~ERV~A TO APPROVE THE ADJUTIVIENT ~P THE L' AND VALUE CF PARCEL 75-0~5~1~.~0 TD ~58,5~0 AS SU~CESTED B~ THE COUI1iT`~' ASSESSDR.I~IO'TION' CARRIED 5-~~ ~~. Pete Ro~ilf, Parcel ~dentlfiCa~l~fl N~nahers '~5~43~~0~~.0 a~.d "~5-43~~0120 .~ letter franc . Rol~lf eras distributed, 14~0~'ED BY CDUNCIL~IEI4~BER OUMPHRE~' AND SECONDED BY COUNCILI~IEMBER MDTIN FOR THE APPRAISER TD REASSESS PARCELS '15-4~~1~II~ AND ~-43-01~~ AND REPORT BACK AT THE RECONV'EN'E IVIEET~NC. IVIDTION CARR.~ED 5-0. ~~. 4~ayne J~hnso~ -'Trustee, Parcel Iden~ificatlot~ Nunabe~r 75~G~9~OIQ~ A letter fra~x~ . John,san was distributed. COVED BY COUN'CILI~EIV~BER UIV~PHREY AND SECONDED BV COUNCILMEI4~BER ES'TG~AARD TO 11IAE ~1O CHANGE'TD PARCEL 7~- C'?9-OI4~.11~OTION CARRIED 5~a. 41. Eli River Tawuhouses} Parcel Idenfificatlon ~lurnbers 75~4~U-~~.~.~, 75-44Q~ 1I0, "75~44U,~~31~, 75-4~~-DI40, a~d'~5~4~~-1511 11rIr. ~tl.ey ~re~entcd a letter received from LL Tax consulting on behalf of E diver T`awnhauses at~d the above parcels, r, Riled itxdica~ed that he wih review the incatx~e infornaatian an these parcels once it is xeceived. IVIOED BY COUNC~LIVIEMBER ~ER'AS AND SECONDED BY caUNC~Ln~EBER ~UPHRE~ To n~A.I~ N~ .1c~~/NEJ~ T~l/~Pf~~~L ~~- ~~Y ~~~V"~' ~~-~~V~YiY~~ ~~ L~~ ~~` ~~-~ ^ V-V ~~Y~ 3.~..h l~ ^ ~ ~ ^ V-~~~Y~ IYf~lf Ti ~+N ~I~ R~~'Tl ~~V~ / hoard ~f Appeal and Equali~at~ota Mutes Page 12 Apzil ~~, 209 4~. Li~vor,ia Properties, Ia~C, P~rcex Ide~~ifioat~a~ N~rrib~~ 75-75~0~~5 A letter ~ro~n Livonia i'~rop~~ties, LAC vas d~str~buted. M~~'ED B~ ~~U~II111~E11~BER ~UI'HRE~ AST) E~~ED B~ ~~I~N~IL1~F11~~~ SERA. T~ ~.E NIA CH~.E T~ ~~RCFJ~ 75-735 0~.~5,11~IOTI~~I CARRIED 5~~. 43, ~eraidlrie aid Joseph Barsody - Tr~stee~, P~~cel Yde~.~i~icatio~n ~u~mber 75- ~ handout revie~rin the above parcel vas distributed, M~ED ~~ COU~'~~~i4~IENiBE~. ~ER~ A~l'D EC~DEI~ B~' CD~NCII114~~FER GU11~~'HREY TD ~.PPRD~E THE ADJ~~TNIENT DF THE ~~ ~ALU~~ ~F'~I'ARCEI~ ~5 534~01~.0 TD ~5,40~ A. IJ~~~TEI3 B~ THE ~j~~~T ,R ~~~EIJV lam, IDTIO~ C.A~RIED 5-0# 44. R ~ C, I~~C, Parcel Identification N~uber 75~4~~~4D~3 ~ handout revie~n~ the above parcel way distributed+ D~EI~ BAY C~UNCTLN~CEBER 4~E~TG~AAI~D A.~1D SE~N'DET) B'~ DI~~'GII~ENIB~~. NIDTI~ T~} ~.PPRD THE AI~J[~T~ENT ~F TIME ~I~ILDING ~VA.LUE ~F PARCEL 75~4~~-D~43 Ta 5~3,~4~ A U~~TED ~~ THE I~DUNTY A5~SDR, iVIDTI~~ CARIII~D SRD. 45, Geraid Sne~t, I'a~cel Iden~x~catiot~ Nu~be~ 75-101~44I.0 ~s, u.inn presented a handout rev~ei~g the above parcel. MD~EI] BY CDUI~CIL~IEB~R ~IJMPHR~~ .c~ND SE~DDED B~' ~~IJ~iCII~~BER i1~OTrN TD ~PPRO~E TIDE A~JL~TI~IEI~T ~F THE BTJII~I~Y~1~ VALUE ~F P~RCEI~ 75-~4~-~4~~0 TO ~ab,~0~ A SC~G~~E~TEI) BY THE C~UItiI'T~Y AES~~R, DTION ~A~RIEI] 5~4. 4G. C & P Properties, I1I.~P, Parcel Tde~atificatian ~Vurnbex'~5~13~-430 Ms, u~nn p~'esented a handout reviewing the above parcel. 11~DVED ~~ ~OUNILMEMBER SERA. ANI~ SE~~~DEII F~ ~~U~C~rIaE~BER 'IJ11~PkIREY TO A.PPR~ THE AD~'`U~STII~E~T 1OF THE I~AI) ~''A.~UE DF P~RC~I~ 75^I3G~43~~ TD ~~~,'~~~ 1iV UE~TJ..~~] BY THil ~~ 4J~T 1 ~~~~..,1~~J~4 '~TA~A \ ~Ji+~`~~Al~ V ~~ 4~. Michael ~~d Joyce ~olem~n, Pa~ce1 Ide~tffication Nu.her'I5~~1~-~~05 Ms. ~uinn presented a handout reviewing the above pa~~cel, MOVED BY CDUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO APPROVE THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE Board o~ Appeal and Equalisation Minutes April ~9, 2~~~ 1'ag~ 13 ~U~LDYNI~ VALUE D~ PARCET~'~5=1-~~DS T~ ~1~,000 A UETED ~~ THE CDUNTYASSE~~R. M~TI~N CARRIED S~D. 48. '~'lil~xa and ~Ielet~ ~irards Parcel Identrf~ca~on Number 753-3400 NIs, ~.nn presented ~ handout revie~in~ the above parcel, NI~VED BY C~UNC7LIVI~IBER EST~AARD AND EDNDED BY CDUNCIL144E114BER ~IDTIN' TO APPROVE THE AD,~UTNIENT DF THE LAND VALUE OF PARCEL 1 ~ I23y~400 T''~ $13,00 A~ L1I~~~TLD ~~ TIE ~V~NT~ l~~J.JL ~. 1-iVT~~N ~~J.J~ ~/ ~• 4~. Oreo~r Prae~1} Parcel Identification Number ~5~4~8-4~OG NIs, uinn presented a handout revie~vi.ng the above parce~+ COVED ~~ COUNCILII~EBER ERAS AND SECONDED B~ COUNCILMEI44~ER ~T''! ~.~ 'T~ ~~~~~ T~~ ~~T~~NT''a~ THE BUILD~NO VALVE 01 I'LL 75~4~S~O,~OG TO ~19,9~U A ~,.--.fTED BY THE COUNTY' ASSESSOR. ~I~IOTION CARRIED 5~0. 50. Annette aid Robert Olson, Parcel Identr`ficatxo~ Nurr~~er 75-~4~8-030 71~Is, r~~nn presented a handout revie~ring tie above parcel MOVED ~Y CoUNCrL~IEn~~ER n~oTrN AND SECONDED ~~ CCUNCILII~EMBE~.'ESTOAARD TQ APPROVE THE ADJUS'T1~ENT ~P TS ill ~~~~~J.N~ ~~ll ~ V ~ ~~~~ ~~~~idV-~~Jre~ T~ ~~V V ~~~~ ~ i} ~~~TL~ BY THE C[~U1~TY ASSESSOR. MOTION CARItYED 5~0. 5~. Raymond Sr~tla and Term Ellgren, Parcel Identx~cation Nuna~er 7~~4~5~ 0350 111s, uinn presented a ~iandout reviewing e above paxce~. 11~OVED BY COUNCILI~IEI~IBER ERA AND SECONDED ~~ COUNCII~IVIEIVIBER v~E~TOAARD TO APPROVE'THE ADJUSTNIEN'T o~ THE ~UILDINO VA~,UE OP PARCEL 75~48~D350 TO $~1~800 A.S SIJOGETED BV THE COUNTY ASES0R~ O'TION CARRIED 5'0. 5~. Rich Dellwo, Parcel Ide~trfieation Nurr-ber 75-430M~155 ids, uinn presented a handout reviewing the above parcel, 1VrOVED BY COUN'CILEI44BER NIO'TIN AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEIVIBER v~E~TAARD TO APPROVE TIDE A~~~~T~ENT o~'~'"1 THE BUILDING VALUE QF PARCEL 75 4U~0155 TO $70,400 AS SUOOESTED BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR, iVIDTION CAR.RrED 5~0, ~3. Gregor and Lori Goodsell, Parcel Identi~catXO~ Number 7~~44G-D~I6 ~. uit~n presented a handout review~n~ the above parcel. Board of Appeal and Egaalt~ation ~Cinute~ April ~~, 2~~9 Pale ~ 4 IViD~ED BY CDUNCILII~EMBER MDTIN AND ECDIIIDED BY' C~~NC~~EE~ EST~AARD T~ API~RO~'E THE AD~~T~IE~T a~ THE BLJILDIN VALUE ~~' PARCEL 75-~~G^~Z~. T`D 3y5~~ A ~U~ETED ~~' TIE CDUNT~ AEOR,I~DTIDN CARRIED 5-~- 54. Timothy and Lisa Gagner, Parcel Identificatia~a Number 75-~~6-~~IB I1~s~ Quinn preser~tcd ~. l~a~~dout revie~zng~ fhe above parcel, l1~IC~~ED B~ COLJNCILEER ~ER'A AND ECDND.ED B~ CD~UN'CIL11~ElVIBER UMPHREY TD APPRD~'E THE AD~IJTIVIENT ~~ THE BUILDING VALUE ~~ PARCEL 75~4~G-o~I8 TQ ~9~,~4~~ AS ~UI~ESTED B~ THE COUNTYAEDR. DTI~N CARRIED S~U. 55~ Dau~las ~~een grad ~ent~e~l Ho1n1, Parcel Identification Nutn~er'75-533-D11Q ~, Quinn presented a handout ievieu~in~ ~c above parcel. 11~D~'ED B~ CDUNCILMEII~BER ~DTZN AND ECDNDED B~ CI~UNIL1ViE14~BER'ESTI~AARD TD APPRD~E THE ADJU~T~IENT DB THE BUILDING VALUE ~ PARCEL'~5-~33WOII~'T $IZ~,~aO A~ UGETED ~~ THE CDUN'T~' A5EDR.IVI~TIDN CARRIED 5~0, 5G. Debra ~ean Klan, Parcel Identi€ica~ion Number'~5~555w01G5 s. ~~uinn presented a ~~andout .revievcring the aba~re parcel, NIDVED BY CDUNCILEPER L~II~PHRE~ AND SECONDED ~~' CDUNCILMEMBER ETGAARD TO APPRD~E THE AD~U~T`a1~ENT ~~ THE BUILDI~I'G ~'ALI3E OF PARCEL "~5-555~~~5 TD I~~~G~~ A UETED B~ THE CDUNT~ A~~EDR, MOTION CARRIED 5-0. ~7. Darin and Krishna Thum, Parcel Ide~.ti~icatiota Number 75~~G4~04~5 ~s. ~uint~ presented a handout ~eview~.~ tk~e above parcel, 11~0~'ED B~` COC~NCILI~ENI~ER 4~1E~TAARD AND SECONDED ~~ COUNCILEI~BER CIJMPHRE'~ TO APPRD~E THE ADf USTNIENT DP THE BUILDING VALUE OF PARCEL'7-G~-~~~~ TD $~0~,~04 A SU~ETED BY THE CDUN'T~' ASSESSOR. MOTION CARRIED 5~~~ 58. Jeff and Su~anaae Zurek, Parcel Identificatio~a N~naber'~~-GAS-o~~~ IVIs. uin.~ presented a handout reviev~i~, tae above parcel, ~iCI~ED B~ CDUNCIL11~E11~BER 1~OTIN AND SECONDED BY COI~'NCILiVIEMBER ESTOAARD TD APPROVE THE AD~IJSTNIENT OF THE BUILDINGVALUE DF PARCEI~'~5~G75-O~~o TO 2~5,4~4 ~ SUG~OESTED B~ THE C~~JNTY A.SSESS~R. ~~TI~N CARRIED 5-4. Boaxd of Appeal and E~ua,li~ation Minutes Apri129, ~~~~ 3. Recess Page ~ ~ OWED BY COUNCILII~~~lBER NiOTIN' AND EONDD B~' cO~N~rLn~~MB~~ ~sx.~AARD ~ro ~TABLIS~i A ItECONV~NE DAx~ FOR T~I~ BOARD ~~" AP~~AL AND ~UALI~ATYON MEET~~NO FOR MAC 11, 2009, A.'~ ~~30 I~,M. AT G~~Y BALL, Mayor I.~~i~g recess ed the meeting at ~ ~ ~~0 ~.tn~ NT~nutes ~re'~ared b : ~e ica N~ller. {. ..~ ~~~ ,~ .~ ~ r. .._ Tina A~ard, pity ~~erk ~, ~-~, tepk~s. ~ I.n~ii~g, Mayo ..