Loading...
7.1. SR 07-20-2009REQUEST FOR ACTION To Item Number Ci Council 7.1. Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by Public Works ul 20, 2009 Te Maurer, Public Works Director Item Description Reviewed by Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Area Street Improvement -Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing Reviewed by Action Requested The City Council is requested to conduct a public hearing/assessment hearing for the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Area Street Improvement Project. After the hearings are closed, the Council is requested to consider adoption of the attached three resolutions: The first, Ordering the Improvement (requires 4/5 vote of the Council); the second, Adopting the Assessment Roll; and the third, Accepting the Bid and Authorizing Execution of the Contract. Background/Discussion After an informational hearing was held on Apri122, 2009 with the affected property owners, the City Council authorized preparation of plans and specs and bidding the project on July 7, 2009, anticipating this evening's public hearing/assessment hearing. There were a total of seven bids received. Following is a list of bidders and their total bids. The complete bid tabulation is attached. Compan Name Bid Amount Rum River Contractin $238,156.60 North Valle ,Inc. $244,561.90 Northwest As halt $258,510.25 Hardrives, Inc. $266,821.90 W.B. Miller, Inc. $280,731.36 G.M.H. As halt Co oration $281,597.20 Knife River Inco orated ~ $303,175.08 The feasibility for the project estimated the construction cost for street, storm sewer improvements and some minor watermain improvements at $411,000. The low bid received from Rum River Contracting is approximately 40 percent under the feasibility estimate. At the close of the public hearing/assessment hearing and the passage of the resolution ordering the improvement and the resolution adopting the assessment roll, we will be prepared to recommend the award of the contract to Rum River Contracting as the lowest responsible bidder. At Monday evening's meeting, the public hearing/assessment hearing for the project is scheduled, I will be prepared with a presentation that will briefly discuss the project, go through a cost analysis, and discuss the assessment. Allowing a small percentage for contingency above the bid Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Improvement Page 2 July 2Q 2009 of Rum River Contracting, since it is a per unit contract, I will be prepared to recommend that the City Council reduce the assessment rate per unit from $4,500 to $3,750. One of the issues that the City Council should be prepared to address is whether or not the residential properties at the corners of Main Street with Norfolk, Morton, and Lowell Avenues should be included in the assessment of this project. Currently, they are all included in the assessment roll and have been noticed of this hearing and the proposed assessment to their property. As a way of background, Main Street was reconstructed in 1988 and all of these properties were assessed for that street reconstruction at that time. In the 2003 and 2005 street reconstruction projects there were also properties similar to these affected at the corners of Main Street and streets within those projects. Those properties were eliminated from the assessment roll of the 2003 and 2005 projects because they had previously paid an assessment in 1988 for the Main Street reconstruction. Somewhat different than these residential properties are the First National Bank and Dare Funeral Home properties. They are proposed to be assessed two units each for the work on King Avenue. As you are aware, Main Street in front of these properties was overlaid last year and no assessment was levied. At the time of this memo, staff has not received any written objection to the proposed assessment. The only contact we have received is the email all Council members received from Don and Kitty Schumacher, who are unable to attend the meeting. A copy of that email is attached for your reference. At the close of the public hearing/assessment hearing, it would be appropriate for the City Council to consider adoption of the resolutions. The first resolution orders the improvement and requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council; the second resolution adopts the assessment roll. This can be adopted with any changes the city deems appropriate based on input at the public hearing. This would include reducing the assessment rate from $4,500 per unit to $3,750 per unit. The final resolution awards the contract to Rum River Contracting in the amount of $238,156.60. Financial Impact Based on the recommended reduction in the assessment rate from $4,500 per unit to $3,750 per unit, the city's contribution to this project will be approximately 1 /3 the cost with approximately 2/3 of the cost being assessed to the affected properties. The city has budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program for this street reconstruction with the city's share coming from Street Reserves. There will be a small contribution from the Elk River Municipal Utilities for minor adjustments to the water system in the area that they have requested. Attachments • Bid tabulation • Resolution Ordering the Improvement • Resolution Adopting the Assessment Roll • Resolution Accepting the Bid and Authorizing Execution of the Contract • Assessment Roll • E-mail from the Schumachers • Letters from residents received after this memo was submitted Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Improvement July zo, zoos Page 3 Action Motion by Second by Vote Follow Up 13 ~ ~. ~ i L. I - -- I " ~ ~N i e ~. I l I i t - i~ - I G ~ 8 E ~ ~ 4 8 ~'B ~ ffi R € € ~ I .~ $ ~"~ k ~ I ~ ( i ~ ~ ~ £ C I , { !.~ ~8 8 ~ ; I R - % F ~ £ r. I i o .. I, I 1 R s 5 .f E I 1 - I ~° c ~ 4~ d Q C q T I ~ -~ I~ G 1 ~ 5 3~ R`, g E F i EE ~ ~ I~ i~ Y~ m E ~ ' - E r ~ n 4 e ~ b ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ z `~ @# A j I~ ~ I~ ~ ~ 1~ 4 ~ rt 1$ m ~ I V € ~ ~ li Is ~ I~ s ~ ' ~ 9 ~ c _ IP Ig G '® ~ ~ ~ I iZ Q w E 1 b c ~ I J, a ' p ~ .Z _ (~ I~ ~ " mI 16 ~~iz 17 I " 28 F ' I"I e~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ C e 1 € ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-I ~I~e ~ g i" l ~ ~ , I CIA :~. a I G i; I z 5 ~ a - I~ IP o ~ i -, IP ,g l`= ~ ~ i 'a r ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ I i la l9 14 :~ ~I ~ ~ m 6',"I Ifi cr x - a.. I r r o `' I~ ~ I - s ~ I: I~ aI 1> ~ O c I i m ,~ m {~ '~ x i r r l l~ ~ 7 ~ I ~ I I~ E ~ l~ ~ ~ i ~ Ii ~ ~ c ~ ~ I li I. n ~ ~ i ~ ! i ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ I3 ~ . 1 ~ I I I ~ 1 F i ~ I~ i _ . . : i I I li I I ~ m t i I I ii i I { I 1 i I I I X 1 1 1 I I i I I I II ~ I i I I . ' I i 1 i ~ F I - I e ~ I - - w ,. .. ~ ., ~ le _ _ 'I~ -. I. C € n € 8 ~ u r ~ € g 8 M € _ - - -o ~ S 8 € ~ - a ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ _ _£ ~ e 8 € 2 - I € R 6 € e € $ € e % $ $ € 8 ~ € .. % ,. $ 8 .. ~ $ Y € ,. € € € 8 .. .. € $ $ $ $ € % € % r $ € ~ ~ Y S E R £ _ < 8 8 C 8 C e 8 e - - _ C. r M - r I -_ ~ - s -_ _ - Y E € = 8 € € € € 8 5 8 °0 80 ~' 8 $ S ~ v E 8 ~ k' e e € L S w u 6 N e $ € % € % € S `e 8 $ % $ % r .. _- a c .. € _ - s ° .. s $ e Y .. e= m ~ e ~" _ as s a .. a r E ~ f ~ ~ x .. ~ - s ~ e - s ` ~ ~ u• a - s e ~ ~ € a ~ s _ _ - - b' E ~ - - _ ~~ i _ 8 $ a _ _ _ 6 - - C - s % - _ _ - - ~ k - M $ x 8 % ~ e _ - - - B ~ ~ _ s 5 e _ € $ 8 8 € k - ~ $ $ € € ~ 8 $ k 8 £ „ 8 _ _ _ € % € % % $ $ % S $ $ % % % % € @ % % € $ % % ~ € $ € E h - _ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ % % % _ % € % % $ $ % % % $ € € % R € € % € $ € % 5 ~ € f d 4& Y $ S 4 i 5 Y mob' e ~ Y 9- m _ P ~°. - : 8 8 ~ x Y e Ef Y L E B r. yz A ~ mZ .m+0 m3~ RESOLUTION 09- A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF NORFOLK, MORTON, LOWELL, KING AVENUES AREA STREET IMPROVEMENT OF 2009 WHEREAS a public hearing relating to the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Area Street Improvement was held before the Elk River City Council after ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given; and WHEREAS the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility Report and those matter presented at the public hearing by those person desiring to be heard on the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Elk River, Minnesota: 1. The Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Area Street Improvement is hereby ordered as recommended in the Feasibility Report dated May 11, 2009. Passed and adopted this 20~ day of July, 2009. Stephanie A. Klinzing, Mayor ATTEST: Tina Allard, City Clerk C:\Documents and Settings\jjohnson\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK49\Order Improvement.doc RESOLUTION 09 - A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT IN THE MATTER OF THE NORFOLK, MORTON, LOWELL, KING AVENUES STREET IMPROVEMENT OF 2009 WHEREAS pursuant to a Ciry Council Resolution 09-26, passed at the May 18, 2009 meeting, competitive bids were solicited and received for the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Street Improvement; and WHEREAS the City Council has considered the amount of the bids and the responsibility of the bidders and determined that Rum River Contracting Company is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ciry Council of the City of Elk River, Minnesota: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City, such contract with Rum River Contracting Company, as is approved by the Ciry Attorney, for the completion of the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Street Improvement according to the approved plans and specifications designated by City Council Resolution. 2. The Ciry Administrator is authorized and directed to forthwith return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids upon execution of the contract specified above. Passed and adopted this 20~ day of July, 2009. Stephanie A. Klinzing, Mayor ATTEST: Tina Allard, Ciry Clerk C:\Documents and Settings\jjohnson\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK49\Accept Bid.doc RESOLUTION 09 - A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE MATTER OF THE NORFOLK, MORTON, LOWELL, KING AVENUES STREET IMPROVEMENT OF 2009 WHEREAS upon due notice properly made as required by law, the Elk River Ciry Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Street Improvement and has determined the amount to be assessed against each individual property as the Council deems just; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ciry Council of the Ciry of Elk River, Minnesota: 1. The final assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby accepted and adopted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands therein named. Each such tract of land in the assessment roll is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in an amount not less than the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, including both principal and interest, amortized in such amount annually as is required to pay the principal with interest at 5% over a period of 7 - 10 years. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification to the County Auditor of the assessment or the first installment thereof, pay to the City Treasurer the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment; except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days after the adoption of this Resolution. Prepayment may also be made after the certification of the assessment or first installment thereof by paying to the Ciry Treasurer/County Auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with interest. In the case of a payment made before November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the year in which payment is made. If payment is made after November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The Ciry Administrator shall transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the attached assessment roll to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed and adopted this 20th day of July, 2009. ATTEST: Tina Allard City Clerk Stephanie A. Klinzing, Mayor C:\Documents and Settings\jjohnson\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK49\Adopt Assess Roll.doc N +l Of0 p1^l OINP 1JNNOb01 V W UlA fJN+S f001 V $'i W S: Yd8+81~OND V ONI UiA W N~ObO V CIyP W N+ObO V 0y A W N+O VV- N1SV N`Vj_vVVV V VNry yrV yr VNVN V VV V N`S IYS'IYS~ Tys•N`SV I~xj'N1S IYS' NysQ {~ N10 1JA1 yyp~ ~ Ra Q A ~ VV ~ ~ L ± ± ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ j S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q N ~ ~ N Q ~ Q R ~ R ~ N N N N~ Q.Q ~ N~ N N N _ _ ~ ~~__ V~ Z omolgi~o~:='oS oo~$'~'b'$`do$o$'b'$Wiooo~~ooyk~o$`~'~Yn&$°~~~~~~~~VmyPWNO aSa'aSa+aaaaaa5aaS5aaSa555+aaa+a+a SaaSaSaa55aaSaSaaaaaaanaSSaaaaaa+a~ DDDDDD DD DDDS ~DDDDDx2x 2Sx 222x222xxx2<GDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDV ~~ccc.-cccrr-2zz- pppccccccccccccccccccccccc l~r~mmooo~ooo ~oomr~~n~n~n ~^~~ ~~~~~~^~^~~~cssooooo0000000000000000005 A D D D a a { as ~ ~ ~ D A D D D ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ -1 a --p1 ypyp a ~ a =i a ~ ~ ~ =1 ~ a =~ a ~ ~ ~ a «5<A'p p.~D.p,pmm< y<Sz22222222Z2Z~~222~~mmAALD~.IIAAS1.lOlAApOT DSDLLAAA yy N~ y y. f/!. ~~ Z~~ b1 ~~~~~~~~~~~ y y~~~ y N y y y y y y y y y y W y y y y y y y y y y y y 2ZZ Z'2Z NNNNNNNNNNNN+++++-~ 2z2222222ZZ2Z2222222z2Z rrTT11~~1~~r9ooo0000 0$$0~00000000ooooyl~~~~~g 00000000000000000000000 y~ D y A P A ~ W W W O D D O O O P P P A P P P P W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m m m m Z Z N N Z Z Z P W N+~~ N N N A++ N+ W N 0 A W++++ b V A P+ b 0> y W N+N y+++++++++ N N N N N N+ +++ r b ~1 0 J N N O Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ti + + + + ..• 0 y N + + ~ ~ N N N N + + + + + ~ + + + + + + + + 0 V 0 m W Q~ O (~TOD D 1- Dy mD 3 m3pOm0 41m y'~yy 29 D yTT-1~ mZ~ yOCm D D_DD xL-DN ~_D gyQ1 2pC22D~~C2C2 Q~~ m D z~~ 8 D frily ml- O iD pmm302nm70CT2"'C DD3sm m_.yn c~ m00~ 0~~222r2-i <r 2~ (7<n~D myZ { 2 y ~ V 3 (V] x:~ ~ O N ~ i D (Z/1 ~c 2 m D m lC" N A ((TT 2~ 3 p VI D D~ m p D y~~ n~ In N~~ Q'22 ~ T x m D A!/~ r Z ~:m.. 3- cp-D ~_~7cF pDSp~cp{x!"410 O~~?pm'~aN~v?m7~ApOZm oy 57~rp- cDicoazFA~r yO vmi~zxrm ODAxm_~'O 2 20DZZF20;DD2~C-SDpm~S D1-O~ym2-~ATD i$xZ30~~D~22~z~ D~ mZrD,DT,T.:Z 1_•000- 2220mr_D~m30~2 ~Lm<D_ZOD47~3D 0~ ~~~{{' m ~O~pmmD=O?~ym.~..{{Op O ~2mm~=:rmrm.2 mm.Srmm/rrrZTm3jm02D<r330=mz1fi11Dyc•Z~~2<C10~OSr-pOrZlaflyZ~lmj1~TS1'<mU O 3 y T z.D r N a.2 D N~ N m r ~ p z r W~ p N y D r 9 z~ D a O p p r m D ` p~~ a Z D 0~= p~ D m D O O O fpC/oImZOO~ Z-. Z:op20D NO 020~pO Dm In p0 D-nl~z~2 ZO~m ymD A ~`OOr V 2 z D P~~ V P D D Om << mDp y ~< S$` D a yDO <3 Z G 3a ~ OOD A C ~_ z ~ ~ ~~ xQ~ ~ {x yn ~ ~ m z m ~ o y xD{ m35 ~ z =1 R D D O m -i ~ 3 ~ m c - m m D z m y z m r ~ C y D D O 3 ~ 111 r N T c Ummi y D m yl N V++ b ~ N+ N N N b N N 3333~~~w8~C~~~3°~,~a~s~V~~~~~~ae ~es5bq~~a ~N N ~~$ +~ N OOOO Q.Q~r~zz (j3Dp+3rzyz zZZZZ2z 33m33+21,1 .y rr rpr~rzzz zzz33333~3 DDDD DgO~f- D D3pgON030000000300D00 rmD m0 gmg00~33p-Oppppp=~ y-~y..{~~Z Dmm~Z~y~D D+D~DDDDDDDDDDYL DD~mr2~~moD O DDD DZ ~m~fID7DDDDDDZ~ OOOO ~'"~.V 1T1--r DO ~7~T TZTTTT~~11111121-1 -i ~/21T1--7[ mm Zxm TTT yT71pp111-~ {-{ipm 222`2 ppp p{O ~~DpO~SZDZOOr ~OyOOOO000yZ21~~yyn1122yD5 r~1;pp C1011CZ Or Or Or az5~1-2~22~Oy mmmlllZ Smz Z~Z Dm2m~Dp~~D~~DDD~{'D<11'D<11X1DG'1D {277pCC~D<O~Dyy~mmmT~mmmDDDDDi r~i ^~1^ o it<<< zz<l~ir5it~r~~4 2 °°°°. ~j. zg.~a F nzzm mmml~i r6`1<ilm z z ~o co n ~f z (~ ~ ~~ m~ ~ ~ ~133Tm~ f~ f ~3mz m 2 m1"~1" F ~ O vv ~ v 2 z g f ~ { ~ 2x x f {-:( .< rm-~rm-rm-~.~x x~xx-~x xxzxz~cxxxxxxxxScxxx~ic x icx Sc x 7rc 7rcosczxpxxxxxx ~C scxxxxxx~sc~ z~cxx DDDD3 ADDDD3D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIDDDDDDDDmDDDDDA~DDDDDDDDDDDWD~ D~2-~ ~D< <z- «- Z2--<2 <Z 7 zz 2 r~i r~i r~i r~i z zmr~1 mr~1~zm 1~mmr~i ~mm15r ~~~r~i mmt~i ~mm a'~~~mm1~1 ~~ rd~~3~~r5i ~~~m~~~r~~~~~rSi N D DDDyyDDDD DyD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD"DDDDDDDD~DDDZDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D Z22Z~{Z22Z Z{Z Z2ZZZ2Z222Z2Z222Z2D22Z2Z2Z2T2Z2$2222222222222232 A ~ ~ ~ y0 A P P +J fON OI P W W W iNptm O m m m ~.! m ~1 xx x Yi 7rc v DD D m D j T .11'A. .lml !Z0 D OFn` O W 2Z 2 D Z Z O ~ ~ ~ x x ~ D zD ~ 1<II T A D D 3 3 ~~Z$! uyZ O ~p ry O rp 1,1 N N (p mOD 010 J m~1NN++ID I~INN+ N N + NNyN1 pN-~ O(J 1p~1p~~p1N N1+1(p~1pp N1N~1Npo~1,~1W O~y11 N1p1+Npb-~ 1J 010N 1J ~ p1Jy V+O kt ~ W Ay~~ V ~. ~41 W P O b1VJ W 41~ V+O~O P 00N0101N00NfJ W++A 00N00 0 0 0 0 _ 1100 ~ 3 3~ i0 + 3 r z z OZ y 2 z z 2 2 Z Z V 3 3 3 3' 3 3 r r r r r r r r 2 z z z z z 3 3 3 3 3 3a DDDD D 0-. - DD D~0g0003000000~3 00003 DD~~~ggggg000~~PP0000000> -1 -1 -1-I - Z D Z2 'n -1 D DDDD D~1DDDDD D DDDDD 22 a AAA mmDDDDDDDZ pp 0000 W O ,yyyDiAZ~000~0000000y ZZZZy ~~~~~oCc0C00Cr0000D p~r~-O=ZZ==Z~Zt <DDG GDGS Z D 22<GD aD~7rC 7rC 7rC 7rC x~xxxx{ D DDD 22DD Dy1-i~-iF~~ ~pZ2 xDD DDD D Z mr1111im ~ m ~~ m m r C v D D D~ D D D D D D D 3 <<~~ ~`L mmm~r~-19-1T-~D~D~rf ~ D «<<~< f z r'«< ~<~~~« r~i mm ~ ~zz ~ tno ttnnm m ~ff~ z f~~z~zzz m zziz Z2 f~~f~~~f mz`Lf 2222222 ~ ~ f~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ f~~~~f~ mmmm m m m mmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm xxxic x x x x~cxxxx7rcicx~cxxxic xxicxx xx~cxxicxxx~cxxicicicxxxxxicxxx DDDD D D D DDDDADDDDD_D 2DDD 22DDDD- DDDZzD ZD D_D_D_DDZDz DDDZzD ZDz 2D2 DD ZD _D DDD 15i mmr~l m m m ~m~r~i ~ml~i m1511~i mmmm lllmmm~ ~~mr17 r17~~~mmrl7mmmr~rl~llimm~l~i mmm DDDD D A D DDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 2 3 3 ~77y~Jl~~11111117{y1yJ~~~~1111(5y5~~~y~1 ({}}yy~~00~~!!11 1((~(~.~~~.(++~~ 2 11{y{y~000~~~}} (((yyZ00~~~~1 ((yy(~~~~~~ (10y~J~~111111 {(5yy5JJ0~~~111 1~$~'J.~~~~J.~~111 111y1y1~~~~~1 ~~~`y~yJJJJ~+~+''111 2 (($(JJ.~~.~~++111 1yy~1~10~~~~111 11y~1~~~~1l11 111y1yI0~~~~1117(5(0~~0~0~ ({yy{0J~~~~111 (((Sy5y.J~J0.~(~~~ ({5}~}r0~~r~:: 1(]]yy00~~~~~ 1{yy0~p~ (75~(~pJ~~J11 1{5~{~y1r~~00~~1117(y(J~~O0}}117(5(yy}(.~~ppj~~~ 117y1yJ0pf~~~111~~0y1y1}~~~~111170y1yJpp~~11 ((((151Jr00ryy~~11`(~y~J1JJ1{jj111117yyy1y~~~~~ ~11 {(y~~y~p~+~11 ~1}00~}p~~~11 (((515Jl~~0~!j~11 ~~70y01~~~~1111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >K C DOOOOQOOO00NN0++~+~~~++++++_._.++~+~~~+_. _.~+++.. ~_.r+~..~~+++~++~~+.. NMNN $888888$$$8888$$$$8$8$$$$$8$8$8$8$8$$$$8$8$$$$8$$88$8$$$$$ W W W W 80 80 V8 {pP~ {pP~ (App 1pAJ~ (pA~1 1Ap1~0 1p1A~0 1Ap0 {pA~ {pA~1 ~pPJ1 {PJp1 {pA~ (pA~ 1pA0 {pP~ 1pA~ {pP~1 ~O~pp01 ~p~A01 1Ap1p00 1p1A~~11 1p1pA~~1 ~p~A11 ~~A1pp111 1Pp1p00 (p{P~0 1p1A~0 1p1PJ~11 1p1AJ~~1 (p{P~~11 ~{AppO~1 ({Ppp~~1 {p{A~11 1Pp1p~0 {pA{p~0 1Ap1p0~ ~{P1pp01 {p{P~01 Amp1pp 1p1P~0 1Ap1p~0 1p1A~~1 1A1p1p111 {~Appp11 {pA{p~111 ~p1PJ~11 1p1AJ0~ Ul N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oa O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O From: Don Schumacher [mailto:dschumacher@charter.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 12:04 PM To: sklinzing; Zerwas, Nick; jgumphrey; Westgaard, Matt; pmotin Cc: Johnson, Lori; Maurer, Terry Subject: Norfolk Ave., et.al. Street Improvement To All, My wife Kitty and I have lived for over 30 years at 212 Norfolk Ave. which is in the proposed Street Improvement which is scheduled for a hearing on July 20`h. Unfortunately we will both be out of town at that time. However, we do want to be on record as being very much in favor of the project for at least the following reasons. 1. The work clearly needs to be done. 2. Some level of infrastructure maintenance should be done every year regardless of the economy. 3. This is likely an opportune time to obtain a favorable bid(s) for the work because of the economy. We urge you to approve the project and thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Don and Kitty Schumacher ss July 2oc~ Sub: 2009 Street Rehab Project From: Neil Fi. & Maria D. Anderson 27 Morton Ave. NW Elk River, MN 55330 To: Efk River City Council RECEIVED JUL 1 ~ X009 As property owners involved in this proposed assessment project we are very much in favor of having the project completed this year. If the final bid comes in Less than anticipated the savings should be passed onto the property owners by decreasing the assessment. If the city council chooses to delay the project against the wishes of the property owners it would be appropriate to guarantee the $4500 cost. My wife and !will not be able to attend the meeting, hence this letter. L~~~ Neil H. Ande n Maria D. Anderson R~GElVED ~UL 1 ~ 16 July 2009 Sub: 2009 Street Rehab Project From: Mrs. Rodney Anderson (tax payer} 1011 Manor Place Elk River, MN To: Elk River City Council As property owner involved in this proposed assessment project we I am very much in favor of having the project completed this year. If the Tina! bid comes in less than anticipated the savings should be passed onto the property owners by decreasing the assessment. If the city council chooses to delay the project against the wishes of the property owners it would be appropriate to guarantee the $4500 cost. I will not be able to attend the meeting, hence this letter. Mrs. Rodney Anderson