Loading...
6.1. ERMUSR 10-13-2009Elk River Municipal Utilities 13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 Elk River, MN 55330-0430 October 6, 2009 To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission John Dietz Jerry Gumphrey Daryl Thompson From: Troy Adams Subject: Staff Updates -Director of Operations Phone: 763.441.2020 Fax: 763.441.8099 Year to date, electric usage is up 1.02%. Comparing a rolling year block to a previous year block, electric usage is up 3.98%. As an associate member of Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (CMMPA), ERMU was invited to attend the 2009 CMMPA Member Summit in September. I went to represent ERMU. There were a number of pertinent presentations and it was worth my time to attend this event. The Minnesota Department of Commerce gave a presentation on the Conservation Improvement Program (CIP) changes for 2010. The impending carbon regulation and potential impact to utilities was presented. Also, CMMPA updated the members on CapX transmission projects and Big Stone II. ERMU is participating in the Brooking CapX project with Minnesota Municipal Transmission Group and CMMPA. Attached is the meeting agenda. Also attached is a recent CapX newsletter. It has been well publicized that Otter Tail Power withdrew from the Big Stone II power plant project early in September. The other primary Big Stone II participants include CMMPA, Heartland Consumers Power District, Missouri River Energy Services, and Montana-Dakota Utilities. The remaining four primary participants are currently in discussion with a new participant. If the legalities and financials work for the new participant, the Big Stone II project will continue. I will provide more information as this process transpires. Attached is the official press release from Big Stone II. This last month I met with individuals from both Xcel Energy and Heartland Consumers Power District regarding ERMU's future power contract needs. Both were very interested in further exploring the option of providing ERMU with a power contract. Also, enclosed for your reading is the current issue of the MMUA Resource. Re ionall~/Ieetin ~ ~ ~~ Thursday, September 24, 2009 • DINNER •'• Introductions - Bob Schulte, CMMPA CEO • Agency Overview • Industry Trends • Minnesota Conservation Improvement Program - Jeff Haase, Minnesota Department of Commerce • Carbon Regulation Overview - Bob Jagusch, Minnesota Municipal Utilities Assoc. •'• Energy Conservation - Lori Frisk-Thompson, CMMPA Member Relations •'• Renewables - Steve Thompson, CMMPA Director of Operations • Nebraska City 2 - Steve Thompson, CMMPA Director of Operations • Big Stone II Project - Bob Schulte, CMMPA CEO • BREAK • Intermediate and Long-Range Planning - Steve Thompson, CMMPA Director of Operations •'• Transmission - Steve Thompson, CMMPA Director of Operations •'• Financial Trends -Larry Blaine, CMMPA Chief Financial Officer • Agency Agreement - Bob Schulte, CMMPA CEO • Q&A • Closing A Minnesota Route Permit application was filed October 1 for the Fargo-St. Cloutl 345-kV project. Bemidji-Grand Rapids 230-kV • The Office of Energy Security (OES) continues work on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and expects it to be issued in early November. Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is collecting federal agenry comments for incorpora- tioninto the EIS. RUS' scoping document, however, must be issued prior to issuance of the EIS. • Judge Eric Lipman is the administrative law judge assigned to the contested case hearing by the OES. Apre-hearing conference is scheduled for October 2. Brookings County-Hampton 345-kV • The project team is reviewing direct testimony, which is due October 13. Anticipated witnesses are Craig Poorker, Kevin Lennon and Dr. Peter Valberg. Intervenors' direct testimony and OES comments are due November 9. • Ten OES-sponsored public meetings on the draft EIS are scheduled for November 12-19 in locations along the proposed routes. • Seventeen public or evidentiary hearings will take place November 30 to December 11 in locations along the proposed routes and December 15-18 in St. Paul. Public comments will be accepted until January 15, 2010. • The project team is working with OES and Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MN PUC) staff to notify landowners on proposed route options by mail with dates and locations of upcoming meetings and hearings. Fargo-St.Cloud-Monticello 345-kV • Monticello-St. Cloud project: - The administrative law judge's first pre-hearing confer- ence was September 25; a schedule has been determined. - Comments are being prepared on the project task force's proposed routes. A discussion with the OES on what options could potentially be removed from the scope will follow. - Direct testimony is due January 2010, with contested case public hearings in early February. A June 2010 MN PUC decision is anticipated. Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse 345-kV • The project team met with staff from the MN PUC, Minnesota Department of Commerce and OES, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW), and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and RUS on August 31. • MN PUC and PSCW chairs have directly discussed the project. An interstate coordination strategy was developed with a focus on Alma as the preferred river crossing. A phased approach to state filings will be used, which will allow the Minnesota Route Permit scoping process to conclude before a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) application is submitted to the PSCW. • RUS representatives met separately with the project team and state and federal agencies regarding the EIS. • The project team met with PSCW staff September 28 to review anticipated Wisconsin routes. continued _SEPTEM6ER 2009 CURRENT • Work continues on the Minnesota Route Permit application with a December 2009 target submission date. The CPCN will be filed with the PSCW in summer 2010. Regulatory • Applicants submitted a compliance filing to the MN PUC September 9, as ordered in the August 10 final written order in the 345-kV Certificate of Need (CN) proceeding. It contained the following: - A projected estimate of capacity enabled by the Brookings County-Hampton line when in service. - Expectations ofrenewable energy generation needs by Brookings County-Hampton owners at the line's expected in-service. - the engagement of the utilities working with stakehold- ers to find a solution to the Brookings County-Hampton cost allocation issue. • The regulatory team is reviewing appeals of the MN PUC decision, which were filed September 10 by two intervenors - NoCapX and Citizens Energy Task Force - in the CN proceedings. • Options for a cost allocation proposal to the Group 5 genera- tors and regulators are being developed and evaluated as a means to drive toward stakeholder resolution. legislative • CapX2020 presented at the September 8 Legislative Energy Commission hearing in St. Paul, focusing on transmission planning and polity and Brookings County-Hampton project cost allocation. Agreements Team • Basic forms of the templates for the project participation, construction management, and operation and maintenance agreements are expected to be complete by the end of October. • The transmission capacity exchange agreement is complete, subject to discussions with MISO and FERC (expected during fourth quarter). Project management office • Bemidji-Grand Rapids project detailed engineering propos- als were received September 2. The initial evaluation matrix was populated and issued to the project team for review. • The four management committees e-voted to hire Peter Halls from Faegre & Benson for the joint sourcing construction counsel; they also approved the contract template agreements. • Early RFP development activities continue for right-of--way services, aerial mapping and 345-kV detailed engineering. Project communications • Landowner notification -landowner and local government letter, direct mail newsletter and newspaper ads -were prepared for the Fargo-St. Cloud project Route Permit application filing. • Talking points for the distributed generation phase II study results were developed. • September media coverage: 13. For archived issues of the CapX Current, see "communications" on SharePoint. Delivering electricity you can rely on ~, ~, Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency • Dairyland Power Cooperative • Great Rives Energy • Minnesota Power Minnkota Power Cooperative • Missouri River Energy Services • Otter Tai! Power Company • Rochester Public Utilities Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency • WPPI Energy • Xcel Energy ~~ .~~ BIG ST N~ ~~w r~. x. iv Tx.~~~ii x.~..~. For Immediate Release .~, TT BIG STONE 1 [. Contact: Dan Sharp Manager, Big Stone II Communications (701) 390-3442 cell e-mail: dan.sharp@mduresources.com Big Stone II announces participant changes Otter Tail Power Company withdraws; Project pursues new participants (Fargo, ND -September 11, 2009)-The participating utilities announced today the withdrawal of Otter Tail Power Company from the Big Stone II Project, a planned 500-to-600-megawatt coal-fired power plant located near Milbank, South Dakota, and its associated transmission. The remaining participants emphasized that Big Stone II will go forward if sufficient participants can be found to join the project. Tom Heller, CEO of Missouri River Energy Services, which has the project's largest share, stated that Big Stone II is still the least-cost, environmentally sound baseload power plant for the remaining project participants. "Big Stone II is a fully permitted project that will provide participants' customers with least- cost generation for decades. It will improve the emissions profile of the existing Big Stone Plant, and the transmission facilities will be sized to serve the region's burgeoning wind energy development," he said. While Heller conveyed the project's regret that Otter Tail had to withdraw, he said other potential new participants have expressed interest in joining the project and exploratory discussions are underway. The current Big Stone II Project participants are Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Heartland Consumers Power District, Missouri River Energy Services and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. ########## Elk River --~ Municipal Utilities 13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 Elk River, MN 55330-0430 October 9, 2009 TO: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission John Dietz Jerry Gumphrey Daryl Thompson FROM: Theresa Slominski SUBJECT: Staff Update -Office Phone: 763.441.2020 Fax: 763.441.8099 We had 263 customers signup to participate in our ACH payment program as a result of the $10.00 credit incentive. The $2,630.00 was included in September's billing. This month is the last month of shut offs as the Cold Weather Rule goes into effect October 15`h and continues through April 15`t'. As we are shutting people off, we are coordinating the water shut offs as well to avoid pipes freezing and bursting over the winter months. In some cases we may have to leave the electricity on if the water valve cannot be located/operated. Our health insurance premium renewal is 4.5% this year, the minimum increase available in the pool we belong to of city, county, and government groups through BCBS. I have attached the renewal information which shows our current employee participation breakdown and the related premiums, as well as a benefit description sheet. ~ o 0 C ~ l6 t ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ o O ~ ~ w ~ O J ~ ~ rn y O ~ ~ O O n 0 ~ f~ d tt m E ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ O O C O C O .~ M ...+ m b4 FPr fA 69 ~ ~3 ~ ~ c ~ ~. d O c0 m O O o V ~ L ~_ O l1~ M ~.. y O O O O O M (O O C y ~ ~ O O O h~ O d !9 O ~ ~ 6q 3 ~ ~ O ~ O V ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s bs r» .~..~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn~ c ~ v _ ._ ~ ~ ~ °o ~ L In ~ ~, y O M M O N y 64 U ~~// I L ~ 'w' ` ~ = ' O ~ ~ . _ V L ~ r ~ U o w ~ ~ Rf 3 U V ~ ~ - ~ ` O ~ C ti ' ~ ~ a > ' n V ~ U_ d d O c ••~I W F ~ ~ 0 _ y y O L U _ F• +' ~ fn w J = ~ d J S Ll. ~ U U ~° m O NEl~ .. C N J ~~,, . ~ ~ U m cn U ~_ ~ io 3 y C U Z m m ~ a v O N a> (!~ t= t= c= . u ~ c ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ O w U Q ~ y m c v > r 0 ~ Z w c c ~ N y X v 3 ~ o Z ~ ~ y ~ ° o ; .~ ~ C G1 ~ ~ m -~ d ~ ~ E °' >_ : ~ ~ E = ~ . ~ ~ 3 W C - - a i = ~ ~ O :° m LL y ~ ~ ~ I-~ ~ ~ d a i y Y ~ a ' ~ t ~ f~ c n c c > ~I e a a W o a cVn ~¢ v _ °- ~ v ~ N d' O M N N 3 c N ~' v M of rn °o N Comprehensive major medical with copay plan Please note: Benefits are subiect to reaulatorvaooroval Pia~fi~ghUgF~tJ~ ~ ~ " - ~ ~''- Extended/out of network - - Calendar-year deductible None 2200/person - $6001famity Out of-pocket maximum 61,100/person - ES,000tfamily $2,500lperson A separate out of pocket maximum of 5750 per person or 51,500 per family applies to prescr(ption drags. Ufetime maximum $5 million for seMces from all providers Physician services • Offke a urgent care visits for illness tx injury 100% after S25 copay 60% after deductible • Retail health dink 100% 60% after deductible • Behavioral health care (marital heahfl, wbstance t00% after S25 copay* 60% after deductible abuse, eating disorders and autism) Chiropractic manipulation 100% after $25 copay` 60% after deductible; no benefits for services from out-of-network providers • In-0fflce wrgery/allergy-related services 80% 60% after deductible Preventive care • Weq-child services and Immunizations 100% 60% after deductible • Prenatal care 100% 60% after deductible « Routine physicals and eye exams 100% 60°/a after deductible • Cancer screenings 100% 60% after deductible Lab services 100%; 80% for inpatient services 60% after deductible X-ray and diagnostic imaging 100%; 80% for inpatient services 60% after deductible In- and outpatient hospital services • Faality services (includes behavioral health care) 80%* 60% after deductible • Professional services (includes behavioral heahh care) 80%* 60% after deductible Emergency care • Outpatient fadlity services 100% after 375 copay 100% after S75 copay • Outpatient profes~onal services 80% g0% Ambulance services 80% gp°~ Medical supplies 80% 60% after deductible Therapy services - • Chiropractic therapy 80%* 60% after deductible; no benefits forservices from out-of-network providers • Occupational and physical therapy 80% 60% after deductible*' • Speech therapy 80% 60% after deductible"" Prescription drugs • Retail (31-day supply) S5 generid535 formulary brand S5 generidS35 formulary brand S85 non-formulary brand S85 non-formulary brand; member pays the pharmacy and files a claim. In addition to copays, member will be responsible for amounts in excess of allowed amount. • 90dayRx (90-day wpply) 610 generid$70 formulary brand 5170 non-formulary brand If a generic drug is available and member chooses abrand-name drug, member pays the difference between the brand-name price and the generic price, plus any coinsurance. In some cases, this can amount to the full cost of the brand-name drug. Health support Online Health Assessment and Coaching Modules • Heahh Guides and Nurse Guides • Dedicated Nurse Support • inducted with your plan Fitness Program • Employee Assistance • 24-Hour Nurse Advice Llne • Heahhy Start Prenatal Support • Stap-Smoking Support How wst sharing is calculated Copays are flat fees you p at the time you receive a servke. Coinsurance is the percentage of charges you pay for a servke. It's based on the allowed amount. Deductible Is the ortion of the allow d amount ou t All d i h p e y mus pay. owe amount s t e negotiated amount that network providers have agreed to accept as fuU payment at the time our dai i N d y m s processe . onpartkipating providers have not agreed to accept our atlowed amount as payment in full. Your cost sharing may be much greater when you use a nonpartcipating provider. Y-sit bluecrossmn.com far more information about nonparticipating prover payment. ' For highest level of coverage, use Select network providers for chlrapractlc and behavioral health services. Far aB other seMces, use the Blue t7oss network. BlueCross BlueShield ~ ~ • ~ of Minnesota • e xne~dnbe~c~,mwnuranf,o~.°~ (Plan number 113) F5986R27 (4/09) "" Physkal, occupatlanal and speech therapy servkes are limited to a 5500 Btaxlmum per calendar year ThisisoNyanoutGne~planbenefits.The<onUadandcertificateindudecompletedetailsofwnatBandisn'tcovered.servicesnotmvered inckrdeeyeglasses,hearingaids,itemspdmarByusedforaran-medkalpurpose,over-the-couMerdngslnutrttkmalsupplernents,servkes that are cosmetk, experimental, not medic~ly necessary, or covered ty vrorkers' compensation «no-ra<rt crab tnwrance. Preexisting condhammaynott~ecoveredforaNmftedperiodofYrne.ThistkratareducedtypriorcoMkxpusrnverageanddoesnRapplytopregnanry, newborns, adopted chtdren or handicapped dependents. We feature a large network of heahh care providers. Each provider a an independentcontractorand is notouragent. Nonparticipating providers do not have contractsvrith Bkce Cross and Blue ShieM of Minnesota. Benefits are effective July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. y~;,. ~ ~;. m ~ 9•.:,; Rising health care casts. Greater need for wellness and prevention. Maintaining employee satisfaction.lVaw is the time far practtcai soh.~tions. Blue Crass and Blue Shield of Minnesota is the state's anIy health plan that con~bines 7b years of experience with a focus on tl7e healthy future of businesses Iike yours. ~,. Health plan solutions 5~ How this plan option works Members can see any participating health care provider they choose for most covered services. The best benefits apply when members see providers in our statewide Blue Cross (Awarem) network. This network includes doctors, specialists, primary care clinics and hospitals. Network providers handle all of the claims paperwork. Save by using network providers By using the large Blue Cross network of health care providers, members avoid paying higher out-of-pocket expenses. That's because network providers agree to accept the "allowed amount" stated in their contracts as full payment for covered services. Members are covered throughout the United States with the BlueCardm program, and even beyond with B1ueCard Worldwide®. Unmatched support for your health • Health Guides and Nurse Guides with one call to customer service • Dedicated Nurse Support for an extended illness or accident • Healthy Start® Prenatal Support for when you re expecting • 24-Hour Nurse Advice Line for health concerns anytime • Fitness Program that encourages members to exercise regularly • Plus, Online Wellness Center, Health Assessment, Online Coaching Modules, Stop-Smoking Support and Employee Assistance Program Elk River ,~,_, Municipal Utilities Memorandum To: Elk River Utilities Commission Jahn Dietz Jerry C~wnl>h~' X3'11 Prepared By: David Berg Check By: Terry Maurer Date: 10/7/2009 Subject: Hydrant Recall Efforts We were informed of a Waterous Hydrant part recall in September. Hydrants manufactured from 1999 to 2004 have recalled parts because of the grease within the equipment. ERMU has an estimated 400 hydrants in the water system, which is about 40% of our hydrant inventory. We have been in contact with Waterous and they are sending us new parts for 50 hydrants at this time and more as we need them. Three hydrant part exchanges an hour is the likely time consumption for labor. We will be refunded $40.00 per hydrant. If this does not meet our needs of time & effort, Waterous has offered a contractor option. The contractor would complete the labor and we would not receive the $40.00 refund. Elk River ,..,.., Municipal Utilities Memorandum To: Elk River Utilities Commission Jatu- Dietz Jerry Gim~tuey Daryl T11Q~1 Prepared By: David Berg Check By: Terry Maurer Date: 10/7/2009 Subject: SMART Irrigation Rebate Update Our new SMART Irrigation Rebate program has received nine applications thus far. We have created a strong interest in water conservation and those that have applied are telling others of the rebate. With the nine applications we have in, approximately $3000.00 of our $6000.00 for our 2010 budget will be accounted for. It appears that we are on track with the estimated number of applications we have taken in. The turn out so far shows promise for effective water conservation for our community. Elk River M Municip al Utilitie s Memorandum To: Elk River Utilities Commission Jdu~ Dietz Prepared By: David Berg Check By: Terry Maurer Date: 10/7/2009 Subject: 4`~ Grade Water Awareness & Poster Contest - 2010 The Minnesota Rural Water Association (MRWA) sent documents to our offices asking us to contact 4`h grade teachers for classroom water conservation education implementation. A114`~ grade teachers in Elk River (Lincoln, Parker, Meadowvale & Twin Lakes) were sent an email containing four (4) water lesson plans. The lesson plans provided do meet the Minnesota Science Curriculum Standards, which will aide teachers with integration of the lesson plans. Along with the lesson plans, the 2010 MRWA 4~' Grade Water Poster Contest guidelines were sent. The youth have a chance to win a $100.00 Savings bond and other prizes. Elk River ---~ Municipal Utilities 13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 Elk River, MN 55330-0430 October 7, 2009 TO: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission John Dietz Jerry Gumphrey Daryl Thompson FROM: Mark Fuchs SUBJECT: Staff Update -Electric Department The following is a summary of projects and/or updates over the past several weeks: Phone: 763.441.2020 Fax: 763.441.8099 1. Connexus took a feeder out of our Waco substation and we had to de-energize the bus work for them so they could install their meter. 2. We had new service requests for one new house, two new street lights on Dayton River Road, and one 8-plex townhouse. 3. Placed and made up the new 3-phase service for Goodwill store. They currently have a temporary service. 4. Eleven new street lights have been installed on the new part of 193`d and we've completed the work required to be done for the project. 5. Continued working on Simonet Drive rebuild. 6. Continued working on Xenia and Tipton Avenue rebuilds. 7. Continued working at Area 23 tap rebuilds. 8. We are in the process of changing out some of our rusted 3-phase junction boxes. 9. The City has The Great River Trail paved and are in the process of installing a split rail fence in some parts. We have about 5000 feet of single phase primary that is in some of the area where the fence is being installed but it should be deep enough. Electric Department Report to ERMU Commission Page 2 10. Grand Marais had high winds go through their town on September 27`h. MMUA contacted us and asked if we could send two crews to offer mutual aid. After talking to their Line Superintendent we decided to start by sending up one crew. After our guys and their Line Superintendent evaluated the situation in person, and saw the need, we sent up the second crew. ElkRiver ---1 Municip al Utilitie s 13069 Orono Parkway . P.O. Box 430 Phone: 763.441.2020 Elk River, MN 55330-0430 Fax: 763.441.8099 October 7, 2009 TO: Elk River Utilities Commission John Dietz Jerry Gumphrey Daryl Thompson FROM: Wade Lovelette SUBJ: Staff Update -Technical Services Department The following is a summary of projects and/or updates over the past several weeks: 1. The Locating Department had a total of 275 locate tickets for the month of September. Some of them are meets which require several trips back to the same area as needed to mark utilities. 2. The Metering Department continues with weekly and monthly substation checks, changing out meters to the radio read meters, and doing the monthly power bill. They also worked with the Line Department to repair the switched capacitor banks that are out on the system so that they will automatically operate when they are supposed to. 3. The Security Systems Department had a total of 99 phone contacts, 25 personal visits, 26 systems quoted, 19 sales made, 19 installs completed and 25 service calls for the month of July. Another great month - it looks like the advertising is paying off! 4. Map books continue to be updated daily as crews add or change items in them. 5. Power Plant staff has performed the monthly run of the generators and everything looked good. Steve Ziemer will be working on a written lock-out tag-out procedure on every piece of equipment within the power plant. This is required by OSHA. ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES EDUCATION/ SEMINAR REPORT DATE ~i- l/-~'c~ EMPLOYEE NAME ~ ~~ ,~L!'; ;`rs'''.;~~+.% TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR -5~:~~-~.~--~~... ~'',~~ ~~,~ :-~-..~'~~ . ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR C~~ y"~~,r ~ ~ ~s~ ~•-..~ c, , `~ ~ DATES ATTENDED C'~ - % ~~' ~`1 / r~ _~'c?' c~ J LOCATION ii`i c:_~.c'': Ld a-,.._ ~~.•, c:. ~-. ~ S WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND •t~ ~ ~<< ~-t P~ ~.~, ,.~,;i ~.;~ ~ f-..~, WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING . ;i .,~ ,~ i.7 C•. Y"--L< ..: F`~. 5 ~...J r: `~'.' ~ L L~-~t~-: .,etc ~-t c:~ r vi ~-l '` t ~ C - 1 f WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO ~`z':j .. ~ i 'S~NATURE ~'1`~-~''~'" ELK FtIi7ER YyiI1PiICIPAI., L1TIIaITIES EDLJCP,TION/ SEMINAR F2EP®RT DATE ~i _! S .,, ~ ~ _- GI .~ f ~ ~ (,1r/ EMPLOYEE NAME ~ C t?~ L l~ ~'r'e'g~,~-... TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR- ~:'bwla~t'~ f•vt:G, ~~~C~ ~°rvn~'~ C. 4vu r t-- ORGANIZATION SPONSOR/ING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR l~~l~~ DATES ATTENDED ~- ( 15--- ~ 6 -° % '? -. / ~ ~ ~ ~ LOCATION ~t~,r',r-5"~`i WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND-- ~ ~'_ ~-~. wyt 1Z'o•rs ~ ~, `~ / , ! t ~ ~~', G~~il"- ~r' ~ P~ ~1i , //~ f.2y-~a {~c ~ ~~ ~Y'! ~/ ~Yc' a ~cc s'~f~ ~- ~i4-+o~rC4t~ --~~ i{'% ` yt G2 ~ ~ "I ~f'.~ ~ 1/e e s -F~ ~yC`,ti ~t (.as, ~ e ~--% `~`~ ~, C vs7~"o ray e-s.-'~ ~ I- ~; WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING-. ~- ~~~-~'~- ~~~~'~yvP.. .,~- g I '! t ~t- s~Y1 C ~ ~ ~tti ~~ CAL r~ Y7' ~ i't ~ ~ ~ °1 ~~L ~ C ~~ U"~ 5 C'Gcar1 ~°' y r1 G{ ~ ~; C 1 Gr ~'Z~ ~~'t,C+C ,~,~i.<-~. r ~/! c~ .7 -^1 t'~+'r ~~. w'r~(. e' d~ G. cjC~~' ~ 9 5" " //G C ~ ~' yrLF'~ T '~ e~, t'ZG~ J'2-~C, y.CJ_ t y j [ ~/ ~//~ _,~/'C'G~~<-~"S` ~SO'"C~ L~ / /~ ~' C'o ~~E'1 Gl Z'.~``G~+.s"Cae's2.. /~( ~f~ e'7'.~ rrY7 WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO SIGNATURE ELK RIVER ~SIJPIICIPAI, IJTIIaITIES EDUCATI®N/ SEMIYdAR REP®RT DATE ~/<5 ~®~ •- 9~g~~,g EMPLOYEE N TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR ®~~ ~i~rs>' z-:~°~`" .~„~,... ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR '~~'~°'~-~ DATES ATTENDED 9r~~°~ - ~ r~;~~~ LOCATION ~'~e~S~~~ ~ ~ WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND- ~~°~/~~~' /L+!<i!'•-.r~ /~a~4rir:,~ WHAT I]NfFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING .~ ~- ~ ~~Y ®... YL- . i ~ ~~, ~~. ~~ ~L /fin ~ //~- 1 -'3~- ~~~ • i~r -r r y~y ..~.~. h~`"~~ 7'~ /i~'~ ~l +~~ ~ ~" G-yrrtd~"7~ J$,.. , l~ ~1 ~ S, ~/~LS~ ~~L~ ~.~lr% s~js~ //ry L,urrsy~r~ ~~n,-r T f~~"c' f~ !7~ f3lz~ L"v~.~ Y.r ~ ~'"'~ ~ u ~T f- cr•.-rte. •~ ~' ~'s~ ~ dZ~r fi !lh ~ 0'~,c_/~r'" cf~Pt°S i~vr- ~,6'~.wY~c WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO ELK Rii/ER PRUAIICIPAY., UTILITIES EDUCP,TIOtd/ SEMIYdAR REP®RT ~ ~:. DATE ~ - Z I ~' EMPLOYEE NAME ~i"~ti~~ L~^~ TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR .L,~ iti~1~r41}-`~~an~ ORGANIZATION SPONS/SORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR l~.l~.u..~ DATES ATTENDED °i/j~ -^- G~--~b> LOCATION i~~ C!~(~~'~th ~ ~ ~ 1u WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND ~~ l~~~:~r~ t1n,J~~e.. ~,~1tiuAt- 1,v« 6il< WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING T6'y~:v ~1tn ~ ~T t,t~i~` ~4~(ct,~S .~ ~Ue'Y~ i ,~ iiV1C~ ~1 ~1f?e.y ~z {~ icy ~~t.F.,~'}1C7~~ a'1 _ > ~ ~~vti~ '~(~~ ~ ~~ 1 l ~kS ~' C r' ( r1 ~ tiyt~'- {~c ou,~~i7 r' r/~-i.S ~'~ ~t~~y'~ c yZ ~' `~-'}-t .' z~ ~; ,~ ,'~''rv ~L1r`~. f7 Ll,'~~'l.li~ ~•;~ ; ~ .~ ~.) Lri 1~ ~ci iT"~ ~ [/ `~ 1 ~/Y1 , WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO ,~ ~ ~~') tip ~ SIGNATURE EI,IC RI~1Elt MiIIdICIP~II., [YT IaITIES EDiJC~ITI®N/ SEMINAR REP®R'T DATE I ~ Z ~ " EMPLOYEE NAME~~~~ Z ~t.~--- ~e / TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMZNAR_I'~y ~/v~i 1. L 4 ~~ ~e~~.,1.,/~ ~~,,~„ poh ~~ ~ ~ ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATI SEMINAR ~~~_ DATES ATTENDED ~'1 ' Z 7 _ / 9 - L ~ LOCATION DC n/~ o wl~ woL W ~~ S f o,n Sr ~n WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND tit/~ ~,_~S~G~ ~,, -~~ WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDI ~ I ` ~r~ ~ 1r~ S ~d~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~f ~Iav ~~' ~ ,o r, N N WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO ly- -FO ~/-1 e~ L: vt /-'~ a ~ m~ ~- ~'~~.~/ /J `c~ eS ~~ ~i/I ~j./vH9X /~ SIGNATURE ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES EDUCATION/ SEMINAR REPORT ------------------------------------------------------- DATE ~~~ J ~ EMPLOYEE NAME - ~y "1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~'~~^c"~Li ~}Zi TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR ~L~~r ~~~~`~-~ ~`'~t`C~~~~ i y~ ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR ~J'~/I/'?o~ ~~+/'-~G•~125 y%' DATES ATTENDED _ `Jt~V~ 1 ~+(~ ~~ ~ I` (~ LOCATION ~~ (, UvY1/~~l~~iTl~ ~/111~ WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND -- f ,n J ~ ...~-~~fi L~'e fi1~(~~ ~ ~1~/1~ ~1 ~~/l. ~~?~a- ML~/L-G ~.i~-, u 1 ~G`+iy~ bl ~~1N - I V ~~ 6 I ~,~ ~j~' 10~, ~ G~/~.S ~,~1 -l~l~v( ~ ~{,~t ~ ~ ~ii L~ t/~ ~ ~ ~:~i~( G~( (.~ WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING ~ U n~ 2~ ~ ~ .~ , . ~ -- U 2 ~v C~1 j ~, o~~ (S~~ ~'~~ ;r~vr~ WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO ~! ~w a~~j~a~~ l;S ~vGt~ ~.-~~~-~ V~ C L-~ c~f~ ~ ~ ~j ~ ~ , L~r~~~, r C~r~t ~'~Y~!%7''-~, J ~~ 1 ~}'L ~l •'~'- G~L.Lorw~ Vy? ~ ~r f Vt; l"- ~. U.~~Ylii.~s~ . _ SIGNATURE ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES EDUCATION/ SEMINAR REPORT ------------------------------------------------------- DATE _ ! ~/~/o~ EMPLOYEE NAME_ ~~ ~~ ~`~-~" ~''~'- TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR /°/9~C ~C3=~~~4c:~ ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR -~~~ C~~ /~'~i~-G/~iy.~.~ DATES ATTENDED ~/r6 - 9ir~i~y LOCATION ~~~o''"-~/.•~~ ~y~ ,/~ /// WHY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND ~~~~~'~ Co~~~~ce h h ~s'c.~ry ~ Y~~ih ~' c3~,. ~cf' 1~ J ~ p ~..r~ 6:~ri „~ So 7~ 7~~.-a ~ J.rJI~YJrj' `'~L~-, vs-~2 L c:Z 4 ~''L Ci f~j2s- lic..S ~'K~ ~ f 7'~/~ S O ~L~sc~.e 1'c''e ex c~-~ C. `iu-~r~ ~J" S ~c ~ eSS-e S~ ~- ~ ~s 7~ ~~C ~i~.S. WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING ~.2C~,r.,e~ .-~/s.itic ©%~ hew ~ecc7'`'i.«-e.l O~ bJ~~i, S~ I~ ~'ln~~t f-e_ ~ "i~~-~`+GL ~/J~ 1~-G'~,f .f-~~r ~ C~. ,~jp,:~ 7~ qL C ° `gip ~,~ 7~~Q- ~ 1,~,~('re~r C v-ec~i ~ c ~-aCs oti~i:•,,t ~c c. vc,y, f ~LG[erS '1C~f-- c~,c-7~o~~s a~o~ O~~e~- / // ~ 1~/~S cz b le ~O CC7~H/z, Lc h i c'c~ ~ O Wit-- O 7C`Fi~~ S Y' ~ u.zt'7~S- Jco :~-- p `'°q .--~c.~-., /~ "~ .o ~--o ~ e~+~ns eh. ~1" ~ 7`- p ~r~g~--vc ~n ~z~e. ~ S WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO i~~S -- v(o t~h ~ a q ~~-. •~, f !n ~ 7~i vz h2C' °`/ ~"~cx l~c..GL.C~ O J~v'eL, 7LU ~- hew 7C~- T~c.~e~,(- ~e,~. S /~ocr..{~ i.,-i ~ f'~7~. SIGNATURE ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES EDUCATION/ SEMINAR REPORT ------------------------------------------------------- DATE ~ ~b-1~0~ EMPLOYEE NAME J r l ~a ~.. TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMI v ~/ ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR r~Z3~~'M0.~c`c~ ~ DATES ATTENDED ~'- ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~, ~'/ ~~ LOCATION ~~ C~orvt ~w~ ~ ~ Y~/~ n W,,HIIY DID EMPLOYEE CHOOSE TO ATTEND ~~ tea s p vt.~ p #- ~-1 ~ v... cal o y e e s C ~ o ~ ~-. -~ I/'~o rrzS.e:~~- ~ IZM u WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDI ~"-1-ll ~ -~~--e ~~ w~d~-deg -~- ~-~- po~e~rr~~c.~r ~;~, es C.o+~--p.,_~-ems ~-o~crc~ H.. ~e~ ~rcx~~rar+~s and ~o„J _~ t,~Se f ' r... CkS we 1 I Gi5 rC'a-rrt ~ ,may c~o,,._~- <S L`~~.•~ ~"ograw~S W~ Cwrr~nT~7 ~c,~-~..'P cth~ !.-Sr rig f'~~,L, ((~~rr''~~ O ~ l f( v , L _t~v.gv'e ~i't-~C.~ ~v,~y 1v2;~.~ pf'o rcx-n2S a..~~., ta.bl~e •~ J"~D~".e p~ M-2T~la~s e, l 1 ~p 2C~ v v. ; n c~ -~rv.w. c'i'~"~.er u~ t ~ 7', 8 S ~ GL h i C s c.7^ o < Cwt.. _~ ~D~ f'`-e.`~ t.~S-e CPY~-cun Pi~Oc~r(~M ~~~~pnS WAS INFORMATION CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO ~(,e6 ~e we0'e a~).~ ~ :S11~rv ~vrtl. ~w~ ~e~J` n(~ ~ ~rd~5~~ b~lL ~- boo1L w~f'~, c~id~~s •~ ~;-~sw ~,~~ 1~Y- GNATU ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES EDUCATION/ SEMINAR REPORT ------------------------------------------------------- DATE / EMPLOYEE NAME ~ Z~/''D ~/) ~n~. TITLE OF EDUCATION/SEMINAR O /~ ~ /l'CL/f ~[ T ORGANIZATION SPONSORING EDUCATION/ SEMINAR lT /^~1/IC DATES ATTENDED ~/J~ ~/n ~ ~F/. ~DD / LOCATION WHY DID EMPLOYEE CH WHAT INFORMATION WAS LEARNED BY ATTENDING JIVLYAI Vitt' r ~ „ ~ .. . s_• . writ 11VP VKMH'1'lUN CONVEYED TO SUPERVISOR AND CO-WORKERS AND TO WHO